RESUMO
International scientific experts in food, nutrition, dietetics, endocrinology, physical activity, paediatrics, nursing, toxicology and public health met in Lisbon on 2â»4 July 2017 to develop a Consensus on the use of low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) as substitutes for sugars and other caloric sweeteners. LNCS are food additives that are broadly used as sugar substitutes to sweeten foods and beverages with the addition of fewer or no calories. They are also used in medicines, health-care products, such as toothpaste, and food supplements. The goal of this Consensus was to provide a useful, evidence-based, point of reference to assist in efforts to reduce free sugars consumption in line with current international public health recommendations. Participating experts in the Lisbon Consensus analysed and evaluated the evidence in relation to the role of LNCS in food safety, their regulation and the nutritional and dietary aspects of their use in foods and beverages. The conclusions of this Consensus were: (1) LNCS are some of the most extensively evaluated dietary constituents, and their safety has been reviewed and confirmed by regulatory bodies globally including the World Health Organisation, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Authority; (2) Consumer education, which is based on the most robust scientific evidence and regulatory processes, on the use of products containing LNCS should be strengthened in a comprehensive and objective way; (3) The use of LNCS in weight reduction programmes that involve replacing caloric sweeteners with LNCS in the context of structured diet plans may favour sustainable weight reduction. Furthermore, their use in diabetes management programmes may contribute to a better glycaemic control in patients, albeit with modest results. LNCS also provide dental health benefits when used in place of free sugars; (4) It is proposed that foods and beverages with LNCS could be included in dietary guidelines as alternative options to products sweetened with free sugars; (5) Continued education of health professionals is required, since they are a key source of information on issues related to food and health for both the general population and patients. With this in mind, the publication of position statements and consensus documents in the academic literature are extremely desirable.
Assuntos
Bebidas/normas , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/normas , Inocuidade dos Alimentos , Alimentos/normas , Adoçantes não Calóricos/normas , Adoçantes Calóricos/normas , Valor Nutritivo , Animais , Bebidas/efeitos adversos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Consenso , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Ingestão de Energia , Alimentos/efeitos adversos , Rotulagem de Alimentos/normas , Humanos , Adoçantes não Calóricos/efeitos adversos , Adoçantes Calóricos/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Obesidade/terapia , Recomendações Nutricionais , Medição de Risco , Redução de PesoRESUMO
Resumen Estar bien hidratado se relaciona con un estado adecuado de salud y bienestar; sin embargo ¿qué pasa en los pacientes adultos que tienen algún padecimiento como obesidad, diabetes mellitus tipo 2, hipertensión arterial, cardiopatía isquémica e insuficiencia cardiaca, alteraciones nefrológicas (insuficiencia, poliquistosis y litiasis renal), enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, dislipidemia, hiperuricemia o, bien, en adultos mayores y en el periodo perioperatorio, en donde hay pérdida del estado de salud o una necesidad diferente de hidratación y que requieren consumir bebidas no alcohólicas para tener un buen estado de hidratación sin alterar la evolución natural de estas condiciones? Algunos puntos y recomendaciones son: la carbonatación de las bebidas ofrece el beneficio de aumentar la saciedad y disminuir la ingesta energética, lo que puede contribuir a la pérdida de peso; el agua simple es la mejor fuente de hidratación en los pacientes diabéticos, sin embargo, otras fuentes de hidratación pueden ser el agua mineralizada, el agua mineral, la leche (de preferencia descremada), café y té sin azúcar o con edulcorantes no calóricos o bajos en calorías, así como cualquier bebida que los contenga; en pacientes con litiasis renal se recomienda ingerir 2.5 a 4 L de agua al día; las bebidas para deportistas pueden ser consumidas por pacientes hipertensos, siempre y cuando no excedan la cantidad de sodio recomendada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. En conclusión, la hidratación juega un papel importante en la evolución de las enfermedades mencionadas.
Abstract Being well hydrated is related to an adequate state of health and well-being; however, what happens in those adult patients having some pathological conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, ischemic heart disease and heart failure, kidney diseases (renal failure, polycystic renal disease and renal lithiasis), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, or in the elderly and in the perioperative period, where there is loss of health or a different need for hydration and require the use of non-alcoholic beverages in order to have a good state of hydration without altering the natural evolution of these conditions? Some key points and recommendations are: carbonation of beverages offers the benefit of increasing satiety and decreasing energy intake, which can contribute to weight loss; simple water is the best source of hydration in diabetic patients; however, other sources of hydration may be mineralized water, mineral water, milk (preferably non-fat), coffee and tea without sugar or non-caloric sweeteners or low-calorie, as well as any beverage containing them; in patients with renal lithiasis it is recommended to take 2.5 to 4 L of water per day; sports drinks can be consumed by hypertensive patients as long as they do not exceed the amount of sodium recommended by the World Health Organization. In conclusion, hydration plays an important role in the evolution of the pathologic conditions mentioned above.
RESUMO
A 21 pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal mayor se les trató el dolor postoperatorio con Buprenorfina (Bp) 300 µg cada 12 horas por vía epidural por 72 horas. En todos el dolor fue controlado satisfactoriamente (EVA a las 24,48 y 72 horas de 1.8, 1.3 y 0 respectivamente). Solo en 2 casos hubo que utilizar suplementos intravenosos durante el primer día y ninguno los necesitó a las 48 y 72 horas. No observamos efectos secundarios y la sedacion fue mínima