Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of the effect of adenomyosis on determining the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

Background: Accurate preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) with deep myometrial invasion (DMI) is critical to deciding whether to perform lymphadenectomy. However, the presence of adenomyosis makes distinguishing DMI from superficial myometrial invasion (SMI) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) challenging. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in diagnosing DMI in EC coexisting with adenomyosis (EC-A) compared with EC without coexisting adenomyosis and to evaluate the effect of different adenomyosis subtypes on myometrial invasion (MI) depth in EC. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I EC who underwent preoperative MRI were consecutively included in this 2-center retrospective study. Institution 1 was searched from January 2017 to November 2022 and institution 2 was searched from June 2017 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, patients with EC-A; group B, EC patients without coexisting adenomyosis, matched 1:2 according to age ±5 years and tumor grade. A senior radiologist assessed the MRI adenomyosis classification in group A. Then, 2 radiologists (R1/R2) independently interpreted T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE), and a combination of all images (mpMRI) respectively, and then assessed MI depth. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. The chi-square test was used to compare the accuracy of diagnosing DMI. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the Kappa test. Results: A total of 70 cases in group A and 140 cases in group B were included. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of consensus were 94.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.9-99.7%] vs. 92.1% (95% CI: 87.7-96.6%), 60.0% (95% CI: 17-92.7%) vs. 86.7% (95% CI: 68.4-95.6%), and 96.9% (95% CI: 88.4-95.5%) vs. 93.6% (95% CI: 86.8-97.2%) (group A vs. group B, respectively). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of DMI on each sequence between the groups (Reviewer 1/Reviewer 2): PT2WI=0.14/0.17, PDWI=0.50/0.33, PT1CE=0.90/0.18, PmpMRI=0.50/0.37. The AUC for T2WI, DWI, T1CE, and mpMRI (Reviewer 1/Reviewer 2), respectively, were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.42-0.66)/0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.74)/0.77 (95% CI: 0.65-0.86), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.80)/0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97)/0.89 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95) (group A) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89)/0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89)/0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93)/0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95)/0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) (group B). Interobserver agreement was highest with mpMRI [κ=0.387/0.695 (case/control)]. The consensus results of MRI categorization of adenomyosis revealed no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosing DMI by adenomyosis subtype (Pspatial relationship>0.99, Paffected area=0.52, Paffected pattern=0.58, Paffected size>0.99). Conclusions: The presence of adenomyosis or adenomyosis subtype had no significant effect on the interpretation of the depth of MI. T1CE can increase the contrast between adenomyosis and cancer foci; therefore, the information provided by T1CE should be valued.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessing lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status of endometrial cancer (EC) has guiding significance in lymph node dissection. However, LVSI can only be obtained after surgery. Researchers have tried to extract the information of LVSI using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of preoperative MRI to predict the LVSI status of EC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was conducted by using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles were included according to the criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. A bivariate random effects model was used to obtain pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A subgroup analysis was performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of nine articles (814 patients) were included. The risk of bias was low or unclear for most studies, and the applicability concerns were low or unclear for all studies. The summary AUC values as well as pooled sensitivity and specificity of LVSI status in EC were 0.82, 73%, and 77%, respectively. According to the subgroup analysis, radiomics/non-radiomics features, country/region, sample size, age, MR manufacturer, magnetic field, scores of risk bias, and scores of applicability concern may have caused heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed that MRI has moderate diagnostic efficacy for LVSI status in EC. Large-sample, uniformly designed studies are needed to verify the true value of MRI in assessing LVSI.

Hemodynamics study on the relationship between the sigmoid sinus wall dehiscence and the blood flow pattern of the transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus junction.

Sigmoid sinus wall dehiscence (SSWD) is a common pathophysiology of patients with pulsatile tinnitus (PT). However, the pathological mechanism of SSWD is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the position of the SSWD and blood flow pattern of the transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus (TS-SS) junction. The impact of the blood flow was hypothesized to be the pathological mechanism of SSWD. Twenty patients and two healthy volunteers were analyzed retrospectively, and transient computer fluid dynamics was used to verify this hypothesis. A 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging experiment was performed to validate the numerical simulation. The position of high-velocity blood flow impacting the vessel wall (17/20) was consistent with SSWD. In healthy volunteers, the temporal bone was thin where the blood flow impacted the blood vessel wall. The average wall shear stress (20/20) and pressure (18/20) of the SSWD area (peak) were higher than those of sigmoid sinus wall anomalies (the contact area between the vessel wall and the temporal bone at the TS-SS junction). The average wall pressure percentage differences of 16/20, 11/20, and 4/20 patients were more than 5%, 10%, and 20%, respectively. The average wall shear stress percentage differences of 20/20, 18/20, and 16/20 patients were more than 5%, 10%, and 20%, respectively. In brief, the blood flow of the TS-SS junction impacted the vessel wall and increased wall pressure, which might be an important pathological mechanism of SSWD. This study could serve as a basis for the diagnosis and SSWD resurfacing surgery of patients with PT induced by SSWD.