TROG 14.04: Multicentre Study of Feasibility and Impact on Anxiety of DIBH in Breast Cancer Patients.

AIMS: The aim of TROG 14.04 was to assess the feasibility of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and its impact on radiation dose to the heart in patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Secondary end points pertained to patient anxiety and cost of delivering a DIBH programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised two groups - left-sided breast cancer patients engaging DIBH and right-sided breast cancer patients using free breathing through radiotherapy. The primary end point was the feasibility of DIBH, defined as left-sided breast cancer patients' ability to breath hold for 15 s, decrease in heart dose in DIBH compared with the free breathing treatment plan and reproducibility of radiotherapy delivery using mid-lung distance (MLD) assessed on electronic portal imaging as the surrogate. The time required for treatment delivery, patient-reported outcomes and resource requirement were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Between February and November 2018, 32 left-sided and 30 right-sided breast cancer patients from six radiotherapy centres were enrolled. Two left-sided breast cancer patients did not undergo DIBH (one treated in free breathing as per investigator choice, one withdrawn). The mean heart dose was reduced from 2.8 Gy (free breathing) to 1.5 Gy (DIBH). Set-up reproducibility in the first week of treatment assessed by MLD was 1.88 ± 1.04 mm (average ± 1 standard deviation) for DIBH and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm for free breathing patients. Using a reproducibility cut-off for MLD of 2 mm (1 standard deviation) as per study protocol, DIBH was feasible for 67% of DIBH patients. Radiotherapy delivery using DIBH took about 2 min longer than for free breathing. Anxiety was not significantly different in DIBH patients and decreased over the course of treatment in both groups. CONCLUSION: Although DIBH was shown to require about 2 min longer per treatment slot, it has the potential to reduce heart dose in left-sided breast cancer patients by nearly a half, provided careful assessment of breath hold reproducibility is carried out.

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) results from the AGITG DOCTOR trial: a randomised phase 2 trial of tailored neoadjuvant therapy for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: AGITG DOCTOR was a randomised phase 2 trial of pre-operative cisplatin, 5 fluorouracil (CF) followed by docetaxel (D) with or without radiotherapy (RT) based on poor early response to CF, detected via PET, for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. This study describes PROs over 2 years. METHODS: Participants (N = 116) completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and oesophageal module (QLQ-OES18) before chemotherapy (baseline), before surgery, six and 12 weeks post-surgery and three-monthly until 2 years. We plotted PROs over time and calculated the percentage of participants per treatment group whose post-surgery score was within 10 points (threshold for clinically relevant change) of their baseline score, for each PRO scale. We examined the relationship between Grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) and PROs. This analysis included four groups: CF responders, non-responders randomised to DCF, non-responders randomised to DCF + RT, and "others" who were not randomised. RESULTS: Global QOL was clinically similar between groups from 6 weeks post-surgery. All groups had poorer functional and higher symptom scores during active treatment and shortly after surgery, particularly the DCF and DCF + RT groups. DCF + RT reported a clinically significant difference (-13points) in mean overall health/QOL between baseline and pre-surgery. Similar proportions of patients across groups scored +/- 10 points of baseline scores within 2 years for most PRO domains. Instance of grade 3+ AEs were not related to PROs at baseline or 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: By 2 years, similar proportions of patients scored within 10 points of baseline for most PRO domains, with the exception of pain and insomnia for the DCF + RT group. Non-responders randomised to DCF or DCF + RT experienced additional short-term burden compared to CF responders, reflecting the longer duration of neoadjuvant treatment and additional toxicity. This should be weighed against clinical benefits reported in AGITG DOCTOR. This data will inform communication of the trajectory of treatment options for early CF non-responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12609000665235 . Registered 31 July 2009.

A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women's self-reported health-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: Given the high survival rate of cervical cancer patients, understanding women's health-related quality of life (HRQL) during and after treatment is of major clinical importance. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize all available evidence about the effects of each contemporary treatment modality for cervical cancer on all dimensions of women's HRQL, including symptoms, functioning, and global HRQL. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases from January 2000 to September 2019, cross-referenced and searched by author name for studies of patients treated for cervical cancer that reported patient-reported outcomes (PROs) before treatment and with at least one post-treatment measurement. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and quality criteria and extracted findings. Studies were categorized by treatment to determine specific treatment effects on PROs. Results were narratively summarized. RESULTS: We found twenty-nine papers reporting 23 studies. After treatments with curative intent for early or locally advanced disease, lymphedema, diarrhea, menopausal symptoms, tight and shorter vagina, pain during intercourse, and sexual worries remained long-term problems; however, sexual activity improved over time. HRQL and psychological distress were impacted during treatment with also worsening of global HRQL but improved 3-6 months after treatment. In patients with metastatic or recurrent disease, pain improved during palliative treatment or remained stable, with no differences in global HRQL found over time. CONCLUSION: Whereas most symptoms worsen during treatment and improve in the first 3 months after completing treatment, symptoms like lymphedema, menopausal symptoms, and sexual worries develop gradually and persist after curative treatment. These findings can be used to inform clinical practice and facilitate communication and shared decision-making. More research is needed in very early cervical cancer and the impact of fertility sparing therapy on PROs.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in ovarian cancer clinical trials-lost opportunities and lessons learned.

Despite increased recognition of the value of including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as important end points in phase III clinical trials, there has been a lack of pre-specified PRO hypotheses and shortcomings with the analyses and interpretation of PROs in many ovarian cancer trials. This paper discusses and provides examples of the so-called lost opportunities in ovarian cancer trials. These include: (i) no clear pre-specified PRO hypotheses; (ii) PRO end points not included; (iii) insensitive PRO end point selection; (iv) collection of poor-quality PRO data not suitable for analysis; (v) differences in PROs between treatment arms ignored; and (vi) poor reporting quality. We can learn from the past and with relatively little additional effort, improve the collection and interpretation of PRO data in future ovarian cancer trials. The importance of doing so is underpinned by recent initiatives to improve the standard and usefulness of PRO data in clinical trials. These include the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for PROs to support labelling claims, the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO MCBS), the International Society for Quality-of-Life Research PRO reporting guidance and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Clinical Trials (CONSORT)-PRO-extension statement which includes a checklist of recommended items to include in PRO sections of trial protocols. Promoting the importance of hypothesis-driven PROs in ovarian cancer clinical trials will lead to improvements in the design of these trials and the interpretation of their results.