Change in Postoperative Storage Symptoms and De Novo Urge Incontinence After Thulium:YAG Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Objectives: To assess the change of storage symptoms (SS) and their impact on quality of life in men undergoing thulium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: BPH patients requiring surgery were prospectively evaluated (April 2019-October 2020). Inclusion criteria: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥8, maximum urinary flow rate ≤15 mL/s, and urinary retention. Exclusion criteria: previous urethral/prostatic surgery, pelvic irradiation, bladder/prostate cancer, neurogenic bladder, concomitant transurethral surgery, and active urinary tract infection. IPSS, International Continence Society-Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) and International Continence Society-Overactive Bladder Quality of Life (ICIQ-OABq) scores were gathered before surgery and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: In total, 117 men were included. Mean age was 68.0 ± 7.7 years. Mean prostate volume was 86.6 ± 34 cc. Mean IPSS subscore was 8.7 ± 3.1 and 11.7 ± 4.7 for storage and voiding symptoms, respectively. Mean ICIQ-OAB was 29.1 ± 16.8. Mean ICIQ-OABq was 80.3 ± 30.6. Voiding IPSS decreased 72.8% at 1 month, whereas the reduction of storage IPSS was 38.0%. ICIQ-OAB decreased 49.6% at 1 month. ICIQ-OABq showed a 30.0% reduction. One year after surgery, the reduction of voiding IPSS was 94.8%, ICIQ-OAB 85.5%, storage IPSS 76.7%, and ICIQ-OABq 60.5%. Urge incontinence was present in 26.5% of men at 1 month, 15.4% at 3 months, and 4.3% at 6 months. Four (3.4%) patients complained of urge incontinence 12 months after surgery. Conclusion: Both storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms significantly decreased after ThuLEP, but storage symptoms showed less reduction with a significant impact on patients' quality of life, particularly during the first 3 months.

Mild acute biliary pancreatitis: the timing of cholecystectomy should not exceed index admission.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to treat mild biliary acute pancreatitis (MBAP) during index admission is recommended. However, the optimal surgical timing is controversial, considering that patients are actually often discharged from hospital and readmitted for elective cholecystectomy. Moreover, previous studies showed an uneven patients' stratification for pancreatitis severity. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients homogenously categorizedfor MBAP according to the newest pancreatitis classifications, undergoing cholecystectomy with different timing. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing cholecystectomy from 2008 to 2015 for MBAP, according to the 2012 Revision of the Atlanta Classification and the Determinant-Based Classification of Acute Pancreatitis, and stratified them in two groups: index cholecystectomy (IC) and interval-delayed cholecystectomy (IDC, after at least 4 weeks). RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were analyzed. IC was performed in 40 patients (38.8%) while IDC in 63 patients (61.2%). The two groups were similar in comorbidities and pancreatitis severity at admission. There were no differences for conversion rate, operation length, total length of hospitalization and overall complication rates. However, IDC patients had a 33.3% rate of re-hospitalization for recurrent biliary-pancreatic events while waiting for the elective procedure and showed a higher rate of acute cholecystitis at histological diagnosis than IC (11.1% vs. 0%, P=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients affected by MBAP, homogenously assessed following the new acute pancreatitis severity scores, the performance of cholecystectomy during the index admission is the best treatment option in order to avoid further undesired hospitalizations for recurrent biliary/pancreatic events while waiting for surgery.