RESUMO
International recommendations encourage liberal administration of oxygen to patients having surgery under general anaesthesia, ostensibly to reduce surgical site infection. However, the optimal oxygen regimen to minimise postoperative complications and enhance recovery from surgery remains uncertain. The hospital operating theatre randomised oxygen (HOT-ROX) trial is a multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial designed to assess the effect of a restricted, standard care, or liberal peri-operative oxygen therapy regimen on days alive and at home after surgery in adults undergoing prolonged non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. Here, we report the findings of the internal vanguard feasibility phase of the trial undertaken in four large metropolitan hospitals in Australia and New Zealand that included the first 210 patients of a planned overall 2640 trial sample, with eight pre-specified endpoints evaluating protocol implementation and safety. We screened a total of 956 participants between 1 September 2019 and 26 January 2021, with data from 210 participants included in the analysis. Median (IQR [range]) time-weighted average intra-operative Fi O2 was 0.30 (0.26-0.35 [0.20-0.59]) and 0.47 (0.44-0.51 [0.37-0.68]) for restricted and standard care, respectively (mean difference (95%CI) 0.17 (0.14-0.20), p < 0.001). Median time-weighted average intra-operative Fi O2 was 0.83 (0.80-0.85 [0.70-0.91]) for liberal oxygen therapy (mean difference (95%CI) compared with standard care 0.36 (0.33-0.39), p < 0.001). All feasibility endpoints were met. There were no significant patient adverse events. These data support the feasibility of proceeding with the HOT-ROX trial without major protocol modifications.
Assuntos
Oxigenoterapia , Oxigênio , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Oxigenoterapia/métodos , Austrália , Nova ZelândiaRESUMO
The Difficult Airway Society recommends that all patients should be pre-oxygenated before the induction of general anaesthesia, but this may not always be easy or comfortable and anaesthesia may often be induced without full pre-oxygenation. We tested the hypothesis that high-flow nasal oxygen cannulae would be easier and more comfortable than facemasks for pre-oxygenation. We randomly allocated 199 patients undergoing elective surgery aged ≥ 10 years to pre-oxygenation using either high-flow nasal oxygen or facemask. Ease and comfort were assessed by anaesthetists and patients on 10-cm visual analogue scale and six-point smiley face scale, respectively. Secondary endpoints included end-tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway and time to secure an airway. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in ratings of -0.76 (-1.25 to -0.27) cm for ease of use (p = 0.003) and -0.45 (-0.75 to -0.13) points for comfort (p = 0.006), both favoured high-flow nasal oxygen. A mean difference (95%CI) between groups in end-tidal oxygen fraction of 3.89% (2.41-5.37%) after securing a definitive airway also favoured high-flow nasal oxygen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients with hypoxaemia (Sp O2 < 90%) or severe hypoxaemia (Sp O2 < 85%) lasting ≥ 1 min or ≥ 2 min; in the proportion of patients with an end-tidal oxygen fraction < 87% in the first 5 min after tracheal intubation (52.2% vs. 58.9% in facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.31); or in time taken to secure an airway (11.6 vs. 12.2 min in facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen groups, respectively; p = 0.65). In conclusion, we found pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen to be easier for anaesthetists and more comfortable for patients than pre-oxygenation with a facemask, with no clinically relevant differences in end-tidal oxygen fraction after securing a definitive airway or time to secure an airway. The differences in ease and comfort were modest.
Assuntos
Máscaras , Oxigênio , Humanos , Cânula , Administração Intranasal , Hipóxia , OxigenoterapiaRESUMO
We implemented the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist at Auckland City Hospital from November 2007. We hypothesised that the checklist would reduce postoperative mortality and increase days alive and out of hospital, both measured to 90 postoperative days. We compared outcomes for cohorts who had surgery during 18-month periods before vs. after checklist implementation. We also analysed outcomes during 9 years that included these periods (July 2004-December 2013). We analysed 9475 patients in the 18-month period before the checklist and 10,589 afterwards. We analysed 57,577 patients who had surgery from 2004 to 2013. Mean number of days alive and out of hospital (95%CI) in the cohort after checklist implementation was 1.0 (0.4-1.6) days longer than in the cohort preceding implementation, p < 0.001. Ninety-day mortality was 395/9475 (4%) and 362/10,589 (3%) in the cohorts before and after checklist implementation, multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) 0.93 (0.80-1.09), p = 0.4. The cohort changes in these outcomes were indistinguishable from longer-term trends in mortality and days alive and out of hospital observed during 9 years, as determined by Bayesian changepoint analysis. Postoperative mortality to 90 days was 228/5686 (4.0%) for Maori and 2047/51,921 (3.9%) for non-Maori, multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99), p = 0.04. Maori spent on average (95%CI) 1.1 (0.5-1.7) fewer days alive and out of hospital than non-Maori, p < 0.001. In conclusion, our patients experienced improving postoperative outcomes from 2004 to 2013, including the periods before and after implementation of the surgical checklist. Maori patients had worse outcomes than non-Maori.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/tendências , Auditoria Médica/tendências , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Lista de Checagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many multivariable models to calculate mortality risk after surgery are limited by insufficient sample size at development or by application to cohorts distinct from derivation populations. The aims of this study were to validate the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) for a New Zealand population and to develop an extended NZRISK model to calculate 1-month, 1-year and 2-year mortality after non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: Data from the New Zealand National Minimum Data Set for patients having surgery between January 2013 and December 2014 were used to validate SORT. A random 75 per cent split of the data was used to develop the NZRISK model, which was validated in the other 25 per cent of the data set. RESULTS: External validation of SORT in the 360 140 patients who underwent surgery in the study period showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) value of 0·906) but poor calibration (McFadden's pseudo-R2 0·137, calibration slope 5·32), indicating it was invalid in this national surgical population. Internal validation of the NZRISK model, which incorporates sex and ethnicity in addition to the variables used in SORT for 1-month, 1-year and 2-year outcomes, demonstrated excellent discrimination with AUROC values of 0·921, 0·904 and 0·895 respectively, and excellent calibration (McFadden's pseudo-R2 0·275, 0·308 and 0·312 respectively). Calibration slopes were 1·12, 1·02 and 1·02 respectively. CONCLUSION: The SORT performed poorly in this national population. However, inclusion of sex and ethnicity in the NZRISK model improved performance. Calculation of mortality risk beyond 30 days after surgery adds to the utility of this tool for shared decision-making.
ANTECEDENTES: Muchos modelos multivariados de estimación del riesgo de mortalidad después de la cirugía están limitados por haberse desarrollado a partir de tamaños muestrales insuficientes o por haberse aplicados a cohortes distintas de las poblaciones de derivación. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron validar el Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) para una población de Nueva Zelanda y desarrollar un modelo NZRISK extendido para calcular la mortalidad al mes y a los 1 y 2 años de una cirugía no cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Para validar el SORT se utilizó el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de Nueva Zelanda para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía entre enero de 2013 y diciembre de 2014. Se realizó una división aleatoria del 75% de los datos para desarrollar el modelo NZRISK que, posteriormente, se validó en el otro 25% del conjunto de datos. RESULTADOS: La validación externa de SORT en 360.140 pacientes intervenidos en el periodo analizado mostró una buena discriminación (área bajo las curvas de característica operativa del receptor (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUROC) 0,906)) pero con una mala calibración (pseudo-R2 de McFaddens 0,137 y pendiente de calibración 5,32), lo que indicaba que SORT no era válido para esta población quirúrgica nacional. La validación interna del modelo NZRISK, que incorpora el género y la etnia además de las variables utilizadas en el SORT, para los resultados al mes y a los 1 y 2 años demostró una excelente capacidad de discriminación con una AUROC de 0,921, 0,904, 0,895 respectivamente y una calibración excelente, con una pseudo-R2 de McFaddens de 0,275, 0,308 y 0,312 respectivamente. Las pendientes de calibración fueron de 1,12, 1,02 y 1,02, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: El SORT no fue útil en esta población nacional. Sin embargo, la inclusión del género y la etnia en el modelo NZRISK mejoró sus resultados. El cálculo del riesgo de mortalidad más allá de 30 días después de la cirugía añade utilidad a esta herramienta para la toma de decisiones compartida.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Etomidate is frequently selected over propofol for induction of anaesthesia because of a putatively favourable haemodynamic profile, but data confirming this perception are limited. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomised to induction of anaesthesia with propofol or etomidate. Phase I (n=75) was conducted as open-label, whereas Phase II (n=75) was double blind. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and boluses of vasopressor administered after induction were recorded. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve below baseline MAP (MAP-time integral) during the 10 min after induction. Secondary endpoints were the use of vasopressors over the same period, and the effect of blinding on the aforementioned endpoints. Groups were compared using regression models with phase and anaesthetist as factors. RESULTS: The mean difference between etomidate and propofol in the MAP-time integral below baseline was 2244 mm Hg s (95% confidence interval, 581-3906; P=0.009), representing a 34% greater reduction with propofol. Overall, vasopressors were used in 10/75 patients in the etomidate group vs 21/75 in the propofol group (P=0.38), and in 20/74 patients during the blinded phase vs 11/76 during the open-label phase (P=0.31). The interaction between randomisation and phase (open-labelled or blinded) was not significant for either primary (P=0.73) or secondary endpoints (P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol caused a 34% greater reduction in MAP-time integral from baseline after induction of anaesthesia than etomidate, despite more frequent use of vasopressors with propofol, confirming the superior haemodynamic profile of etomidate in this context. The proportion of patients receiving vasopressors increased slightly, albeit not significantly, in both groups in the blinded phase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12614000717651.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Etomidato , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Propofol , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Arterial , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
We conducted an online survey to assess the career experiences of wrong side blocks, the practice of Stop-Before-You-Block, the recently described method of Mock-Before-You-Block and attitudes to these. Respondents were 208 anaesthetists across nine hospitals (173 consultants or Staff and Associate Specialist doctors'), representing 3623 years of collective anaesthetic practice. There had been a total of 62 wrong side blocks (by 51 anaesthetists and one current trainee). Predisposing factors for this were commonly ascribed to distractions (35 (69%), for example due to rushing or teaching), patient positioning (9 (18%)) or miscommunication (6 (12%)). Two (4%) respondents felt they had performed Stop-Before-You-Block too early; 62 (41%) of all respondents stated they performed Stop-Before-You-Block as early as preparing the skin or on arrival of the patient in the anaesthetic room, and not any later. Twenty (10%) respondents admitted to not performing Stop-Before-You-Block at all or only occasionally (including 5 (2%) who had performed a wrong side block). Mock-Before-You-Block was easily understood (by 169 out of 197 (86%)) and 14 out of 61 (23%) respondents felt it would have prevented the wrong side error in their case. However, free-text comments indicated that many anaesthetists were reluctant to use a method that interrupted their performance of the block. We conclude that considerable work is needed to achieve full compliance with Stop-Before-You-Block at the correct time.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Bloqueio Nervoso/normas , Abreviaturas como Assunto , Competência Clínica , Inglaterra , Humanos , Auditoria Médica/métodos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is commonly used to decrease the risk of awareness during anaesthesia. We aimed to determine the relationship between blood alcohol concentration and brain function (as measured by BIS) in healthy adults. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 21 anaesthetic registrars self-regulated alcohol consumption over a 3-h period. Expired alcohol concentration (breathalyser) and BIS measurements were performed hourly for 4 h. A venous blood alcohol sample was taken at the conclusion of the study period. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were the correlation between blood alcohol and brain function as measured by BIS and the change in BIS from baseline (∆BIS) at 4 h. The median number of standard drinks consumed was 9.1 (IQR 7.7-12.3), range 5.4-17. At 4 h, there was a moderate inverse correlation between BIS and blood alcohol (r = -0.49, P = 0.029) and between ∆BIS and blood alcohol (r = -0.46, P =0.043). CONCLUSION: In healthy young adults, we found a moderate correlation between venous blood alcohol concentration and BIS. This suggests that acute alcohol consumption can decrease BIS. This information may be relevant when providing anaesthesia to intoxicated patients who require urgent or time-critical surgery, although certain limitations of this study should be kept in mind.
Assuntos
Intoxicação Alcoólica/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Monitores de Consciência/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletroencefalografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Intoxicação Alcoólica/sangue , Concentração Alcoólica no Sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The reported benefits of using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) are likely to depend on compliance with its correct use. Compliance with SSC administration in centres that have introduced the checklist under a research protocol may differ from centres where the SSC is introduced independently. OBJECTIVE: To compare compliance with SSC administration at an original WHO pilot study centre (Hospital 1) with that at a similar neighbouring hospital (Hospital 2) that independently integrated the SSC with pre-existing practice. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study. One hundred operations were observed at each hospital. We recorded: compliance with administration of SSC domains (Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out) and individual domain items; timing of domain administration; and operating room team engagement during administration. RESULTS: Domain compliance at Hospital 1 and Hospital 2, respectively, was: 96% and 31% (p<0.0005) for Sign In; 99% and 48% (p<0.0005) for Time Out and 22% and 9% (p=0.008) for Sign Out. Engagement of two or more teams during Sign In and Time Out occurred more frequently at Hospital 2 than at Hospital 1. DISCUSSION: Compliance with administration of SSC domains was lower at Hospital 2 which introduced the SSC outside the context of a strict study protocol. This finding mandates caution in extrapolation of benefits identified in SSC studies to non-study hospitals. Staff engagement was better at Hospital 2 where checklist administration leadership is strategically shared among anaesthetic, surgical and nursing team members as compared with exclusive nursing leadership at Hospital 1. STUDY REGISTRY NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Ref: ACTRN12612000135819, http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=362007.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Competência Clínica , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Estudos Prospectivos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
Asthma is related to school absenteeism and underperformance in elementary students. This pilot study assessed whether school nurse case management (CM) in children identified with asthma impacts academic performance and school absenteeism in one school. A validated questionnaire was used to identify children at risk for asthma and CM was provided to link these students to medical care and assure asthma action plans at school. In the 40 children with confirmed diagnosis who received CM, academic performance on standardized testing postintervention was similar to the 76 children who were low risk for asthma. Average days absent due to illness in the CM group were reduced from 5.8 to 3.7 days in the postintervention school year. School nurse screening, CM, and collaboration with a medical provider resulted in early identification, referral, and subsequent treatment of students at risk for asthma and may have contributed to reduced illness absences.
Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/enfermagem , Administração de Caso , Avaliação Educacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Serviços de Enfermagem Escolar/métodos , Asma/terapia , California , Criança , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The legal and ethical requirements related to an anaesthetist's communication with patients in preparing them for anaesthesia, assisting them in making appropriate decisions and obtaining consent in a formal sense are complex. Doing these things well takes time, skill and sensitivity. The primary focus should be to adequately prepare patients for surgery and to ensure that they are sufficiently well informed to make the choices that best meet their own needs. This is just an affirmation of the importance of patient-centred care.
Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos/efeitos adversos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Anestesia/ética , Anestesiologia/ética , Anestesiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Austrália , Comunicação , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen is often used with a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug for acute pain. Hitherto, these drugs have had to be given separately, typically at different time intervals. Maxigesic tablets combine acetaminophen and ibuprofen in clinically appropriate doses to simplify administration and dosage regimen. We compared this combination with each of the constituent drugs for the relief of pain after extraction of third molar teeth. METHODS: Adults (more than 16 yr) having one or more wisdom teeth removed under general or local anaesthesia were instructed to take two tablets before operation, then two tablets every 6 h for up to 48 h of: (i) a combination of acetaminophen 500 mg and ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet (Maxigesic); (ii) acetaminophen 500 mg per tablet alone; or (iii) ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet alone. The primary outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) of the 100 mm visual analogue scale pain measurements taken for up to 48 h after surgery, divided by time, at rest and on activity. Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The mean (sem) time-corrected AUC on rest and activity, respectively, were: combination group 22.3 (3.2) and 28.4 (3.4); acetaminophen group 33.0 (3.1) and 40.4 (3.3); and ibuprofen group 34.8 (3.2) and 40.2 (3.4); P<0.01 for each of the four comparisons of combination vs constituent drug. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between acetaminophen and ibuprofen administered together. CONCLUSIONS: Maxigesic tablets provide superior pain relief after oral surgery to acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Extração Dentária/efeitos adversos , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Acetaminofen/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/sangue , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Ibuprofeno/sangue , Masculino , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/sangue , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Pulse oximetry is mandatory during anaesthesia in many countries, a standard endorsed by the World Health Organization 'Safe Surgery Saves Lives' initiative. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists and GE Healthcare collaborated in a quality improvement project over a 15-month period to investigate pulse oximetry in four pilot sites in Uganda, Vietnam, India and the Philippines, using 84 donated pulse oximeters. A substantial gap in oximeter provision was demonstrated at the start of the project. Formal training was essential for oximeter-naïve practitioners. After introduction of oximeters, logbook data were collected from over 8000 anaesthetics, and responses to desaturation were judged appropriate. Anaesthesia providers believed pulse oximeters were essential for patient safety and defined characteristics of the ideal oximeter for their setting. Robust systems for supply and maintenance of low-cost oximeters are required for sustained uptake of pulse oximetry in low- and middle-income countries.
Assuntos
Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Oximetria/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Anestesia Geral/normas , Anestesiologia/educação , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Criança , Países em Desenvolvimento , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Lactente , Cooperação Internacional , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Monitorização Intraoperatória/normas , Oximetria/instrumentação , Oximetria/normas , Projetos Piloto , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Trained assistance for the anaesthetist appears likely to improve safety in anaesthesia. However, there are few objective data to support this assumption, and the requirement for a trained assistant is not universally enforced. We applied a simulation-based model developed in previous work to test the hypothesis that the presence of a trained assistant reduces error in anaesthesia. Ten randomly selected anaesthetists, five trained anaesthetic technicians and five theatre nurses without training in anaesthesia participated in two simulated emergencies, with anaesthetists working alternately with a technician or a nurse. The mean (SD) error rate per scenario was 4.75 (2.9). There were significantly fewer errors in the technician group than the nurse group (33 vs 62, p = 0.01) and this difference remained significant when errors were weighted for severity. This provides objective evidence supporting the requirement for trained assistance to the anaesthetist, and furthermore, demonstrates that a simulation-based model can provide rigorous evidence on safety interventions in anaesthesia.
Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologia/educação , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Assistentes Médicos/educação , Anestesia/normas , Simulação por Computador , Emergências , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Simulação de Paciente , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/normasRESUMO
SUMMARY: It is notoriously difficult to obtain evidence from clinical randomised controlled trials for safety innovations in healthcare. We have developed a research design using simulation for the evaluation of safety initiatives in anaesthesia. We used a standard and a modified scenario in a human-patient simulator, involving a potentially life-threatening problem requiring prompt attention--either a cardiac arrest or a failure in oxygen supply. The modified scenarios involved distractions such as loud music, a demanding and uncooperative surgeon, telephone calls and frequent questions from a medical student. Twenty anaesthetics were administered by 10 anaesthetists. A mean (SD) of 11.3 (2.8) errors per anaesthetic were identified in the oxygen failure scenarios, compared with 8.0 (3.4) in the cardiac arrest scenarios (ANOVA: p = 0.04). The difference between the combined standard scenarios and the combined modified scenarios was not significant. The mean rate of errors overall was 9.7 per simulation, with a pooled SD of 4.46, so in future studies 21 subjects would provide 80% statistical power to show a reduction in error rate of 30% from baseline with pAssuntos
Anestesia/normas
, Simulação por Computador
, Gestão da Segurança/métodos
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Anestesia/efeitos adversos
, Anestesiologia/instrumentação
, Competência Clínica
, Falha de Equipamento
, Feminino
, Parada Cardíaca/terapia
, Humanos
, Masculino
, Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle
, Nova Zelândia
, Oxigenoterapia/instrumentação
, Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos
, Projetos de Pesquisa
RESUMO
The World Health Organization has been involved in a wide range of global healthcare initiatives for many years. Recently an initiative 'Safe Surgery Saves Lives' has been launched to improve the safety of surgery throughout the world. Safe anaesthesia is a key component to achieving this aim.
Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , Países em Desenvolvimento , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normasRESUMO
In a prospective, observational trial, we investigated the influence of time of day on the duration of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) elicited by rocuronium. Forty-nine patients scheduled for surgery between 08:00 and 02:00 were enrolled after giving written informed consent. Time to neuromuscular recovery was measured following three doses: (1) a fat-free-mass (FFM) related induction dose (0.6 mg x kg(-1): n = 47); (2) a maintenance dose (20% of the induction dose: n = 42); and (3) a standard 10-mg dose (n = 35). The extent of NMB was dependent on the time of administration (p = 0.038 General Linear Model Analysis). The maximum effect of 50 min (95% CI 41-59 min) was elicited between 08:00 and 11:00 and the minimum duration of 29 min (95% CI 23-35 min) between 14:00 and 17:00 (p = 0.005). A similar pattern was observed for the maintenance dose. The duration of action of rocuronium is influenced by time of day and this effect is of potential clinical significance and practical relevance to research.
Assuntos
Androstanóis/farmacologia , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiologia , Junção Neuromuscular/efeitos dos fármacos , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Androstanóis/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Neuromuscular , Junção Neuromuscular/fisiologia , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Rocurônio , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
We surveyed contemporary Australasian cardiac surgical and anaesthetic practice, focusing on antiplatelet and antifibrinolytic therapies and blood transfusion practices. The cohort included 499 sequential adult cardiac surgical patients in 12 Australasian teaching hospitals. A total of 282 (57%) patients received red cell or component transfusion. The median (IQR) red cell transfusion threshold haemogloblin levels were 66 (61-73) g/l intraoperatively and 79 (74-85) g/l postoperatively. Many (40%) patients had aspirin within five days of surgery but this was not associated with blood loss or transfusion; 15% had clopidogrel within seven days of surgery. In all, 30 patients (6%) required surgical re-exploration for bleeding. Factors associated with transfusion and excessive bleeding include pre-existing renal impairment, preoperative clopidogrel therapy, and complex or emergency surgery. Despite frequent (67%) use of antifibrinolytic therapy, there was a marked variability in red cell transfusion rates between centres (range 17 to 79%, P < 0.001). This suggests opportunities for improvement in implementation of guidelines and effective blood-sparing interventions. Many patients presenting for surgery receive antiplatelet and/or antifibrinolytic therapy, yet the subsequent benefits and risks remain unclear.