Efficacy of one-time application of low-level laser therapy in the management of complications after third molar surgery: A retrospective practice-based study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a retrospective practice-based clinical study, the effects of additional laser therapy on side effects following the removal of all four impacted third molars. The secondary objective was, based on those results, to rationalize a protocol for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in terms of irradiation settings. METHODS: 96 subjects requiring simultaneous surgical removal of the four third molars were treated from 2017 to 2019. For each subject, one side was randomly assigned to laser treatment, the other receiving the placebo. LLLT was performed by applying an infrared diode laser of 810 nm. In the LLLT irradiated side of the mouth, three groups were randomly assigned to a specific protocol of irradiation. Controllable settings include power, energy density and also scanning technique. The main outcome was pain, registered on a visual analog scale (VAS) performed by the patients. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference for one of the tested protocols. Self-reported annoyance and pain scores were lower for the side submitted to a 30-second laser radiation at a power of 0.3 W with the slow scanning technique (P< 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present treatment approach, using a one-time low-level laser therapy intra-oral application, showed a beneficial effect of LLLT reducing pain after third molar surgery, which should be confirmed through further study.

CO2 and diode laser for excisional biopsies of oral mucosal lesions. A pilot study evaluating clinical and histopathological parameters.

PURPOSE: The present pilot study evaluates the histopathological characteristics and suitability of CO2 and diode lasers for performing excisional biopsies in the buccal mucosa with special emphasis on the extent of the thermal damage zone created. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 patients agreed to undergo surgical removal of their fibrous hyperplasias with a laser. These patients were randomly assigned to one diode or two CO2 laser groups. The CO2 laser was used in a continuous wave mode (cw) with a power of 5 W (Watts), and in a pulsed char-free mode (cf). Power settings for the diode laser were 5.12 W in a pulsed mode. The thermal damage zone of the three lasers and intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed and compared. RESULTS: The collateral thermal damage zone on the borders of the excisional biopsies was significantly smaller with the CO, laser for both settings tested compared to the diode laser regarding values in pm or histopathological index scores. The only intraoperative complication encountered was bleeding, which had to be controlled with electrocauterization. No postoperative complications occurred in any of the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The CO2 laser seems to be appropriate for excisional biopsies of benign oral mucosal lesions. The CO2 laser offers clear advantages in terms of smaller thermal damage zones over the diode laser. More study participants are needed to demonstrate potential differences between the two different CO2 laser settings tested.