CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced liver injury: Clinical phenotypes and role of corticosteroid treatment.

Background & Aims: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the cornerstone of systemic therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. In the various therapeutic studies with CDK4/6 inhibitors, elevations in liver tests were more frequent than in the control groups. The mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced liver toxicity is not well understood; moreover, natural history and appropriate management are poorly described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, collecting cases of CDK4/6 hepatitis from the REFHEPS (Réseau Francophone pour l'étude de l'HEpatotoxicité des Produits de Santé) database. Results: In this study, we report on 22 cases of hepatitis induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, n = 19 and abemaciclib, n = 3). According to the CTCAE classification, all hepatitis cases were grade 3 or 4. Twelve (54.6%) patients had a liver biopsy showing acute centrilobular hepatitis with foci of necrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate. Nine (40.9%) patients were treated with corticosteroids for resolution of hepatitis. In three cases, another CDK4/6 inhibitor could be resumed after resolution of the hepatitis without recurrence. Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced hepatitis is poorly described in the literature but there are several arguments pointing out that these drugs should be included in the DI-ALH (drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis) category. Impact and implications: This study highlights the clinical significance and hepatotoxic risks of CDK4/6 inhibitors, like ribociclib and abemaciclib, in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer treatment. It underscores the necessity for enhanced hepatic monitoring and tailored management strategies, including corticosteroid intervention for unresolved hepatitis post-withdrawal. These findings are crucial for oncologists, hepatologists, and patients, guiding therapeutic decisions and indicating careful liver function monitoring during therapy. The utility of corticosteroids in managing drug-induced hepatitis and the feasibility of resuming CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy post-recovery are notable practical outcomes. Nonetheless, the study's retrospective nature and limited case numbers introduce constraints, underscoring the need for further research to refine our understanding of CDK4/6 inhibitor-associated hepatotoxicity.

Corrigendum: PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy demonstrates favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1326078.].

Cholangitis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Analysis of Pharmacovigilance Data.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are remarkable anticancer therapies that have revolutionized the oncological prognosis of many cancers.1 The considerable efficacy of ICIs is associated with the onset of more- or less-serious, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) affecting several organs, which can concern up to 70% of patients, owing to a loss of self-tolerance during the restoration of antitumor immunity.2 Checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury (CHILI), which may occur in up to 25% of patients, is treated with steroids as first-line treatment, and immunosuppressive drugs as second-line treatment.3 Recently, ICI-induced cholangitis was described as an emerging irAE. Hence, Pi et al4 reviewed all 53 published cases of ICI-induced cholangitis and compared the different types of bile duct involvement. We recently described CHILI according to the biological profile: cholestatic, hepatocellular, or mixed.5 Cholestatic profiles were associated with macroscopic and/or microscopic bile duct damage, and time to resolution was significantly longer. More recently, Onoyama et al6 and Parlati et al7 described a poorer response to steroids in cases of biliary histologic damage or ICI-induced sclerosing cholangitis. The latest European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines include the management of cholangitis, which is succinct and still poorly documented.3 The aim of this study therefore was to analyze the cases of ICI-induced cholangitis reported in the French pharmacovigilance system to describe their clinical characteristics, evolution, and outcome.

Acute liver failure following immune checkpoint inhibitors.

We report the case of a 64-year-old man admitted to intensive care unit for liver failure secondary to immune-mediated hepatitis. This patient suffered from a progressing laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. A treatment was started with immune checkpoint inhibitors combining anti PD-L1 plus novel anti-TIGIT or placebo (ATEZOLIZUMAB plus TIRAGOLUMAB or placebo), as part of a clinical trial. The patient then developed immune-mediated hepatitis, proven by liver biopsy. Despite 14 days of corticosteroids at 2 mg/kg the condition of the patient worsened, with the development of liver failure. The patient was admitted to intensive care unit, treated with plasma exchange, and made a complete recovery from this life-threatening condition. To our knowledge this is the case of a successful use of plasma exchange to treat ATEZOLIZUMAB +/- TIRAGOLUMAB induced liver toxicity. INSIGHTS: Plasma exchange could be a potential lifesaving treatment to severe immune-mediated hepatitis.

Integrating an addiction team into the management of patients transplanted for alcohol-associated liver disease reduces the risk of severe relapse.

Background & Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) is a last resort treatment for patients at high risk of mortality from end-stage liver disease. Over the past years, alcohol-associated liver disease has become the most frequent indication for LT in the world. The outcomes of LT for alcohol-associated liver disease are good, but return to alcohol use is detrimental for medium-term survival because of cancer development, cardiovascular events, and recurrent alcohol-associated cirrhosis. Several strategies have been developed to prevent return to alcohol use during the pre- or post-LT period, but there are no specific recommendations. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate if the integration of an addiction team in a LT unit affected the rate of severe alcohol relapse after LT. The secondary objectives were to assess the effects of addiction follow up on cardiovascular events, cancer, and overall survival. Methods: This study was a retrospective comparison between centres with or without addiction monitoring. Results: The study included 611 patients of which 79.4% were male with a mean age of 55.4 years at the time of LT, 190 were managed by an integrated addiction team. The overall alcohol relapse rate was 28.9% and the rate of severe relapse was 13.0%. Patients with addiction follow-up had significantly less frequent severe alcohol relapse than those in the control group (p = 0.0218). Addiction follow up (odds ratio = 0.19; p = 0.001) and age at LT (odds ratio = 1.23; p = 0.02) remained significantly associated with post-LT cardiovascular events. Conclusions: Our study confirms the benefits of integrating an addiction team to reduce return to alcohol use after LT. Clinical Trials registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04964687). Impact and implications: The main indication for liver transplantation is alcohol-associated cirrhosis. There are currently no specific recommendations on the addiction monitoring of transplant candidates, although severe return to alcohol use after liver transplantation has a negative impact on long-term survival of patients. In this study, we explored the impact of a systematic addiction intervention on the return to alcohol use rates. In our transplantation centre, we demonstrated the interest of an addiction follow up to limit the severe alcohol relapses rate. This information should be further investigated in prospective studies to validate these data.

Combination immune checkpoint therapy carried on despite grade 4 immune-related hepatotoxicity during treatment of metastatic melanoma: Case report and review of literature.

We report the case of a 63-year-old patient with recurrence of acral malignant melanoma after adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment by PEMBROLIZUMAB complicated with immune-related grade II hepatitis. Rechallenge by combination immune checkpoint (NIVOLUMAB + IPILIMUMAB) led to a relapse of the immune-related hepatitis up to a grade 3. Combination ICI therapy was carried on after introduction of corticosteroid therapy. Here, we present the outcomes of this immune-related adverse event (irAE) and a review of literature on the subject.

Clinical pattern of checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury in a multicentre cohort.

Background & Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Liver toxicity occurs in up to 25% of patients treated with ICIs. The aim of our study was to describe the different clinical patterns of ICI-induced hepatitis and to assess their outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury (CHILI) discussed in multidisciplinary meetings between December 2018 and March 2022 in three French centres specialised in ICI toxicity management (Montpellier, Toulouse, Lyon). The hepatitis clinical pattern was analysed by the ratio of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (R value = (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN)) for characterisation as cholestatic (R ≤2), hepatocellular (R ≥5), or mixed (2

PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy demonstrates favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many malignancies in recent years. However, immune-related adverse events (irAE) are a frequent concern in clinical practice. The safety profile of ICI for the treatment of malignancies in patients diagnosed with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease (AILD) remains unclear. Due to this uncertainty, these patients were excluded from ICI clinical trials and ICI are withheld from this patient group. In this retrospective multicenter study, we assessed the safety of ICI in patients with AILD. Methods: We contacted tertiary referral hospitals for the identification of AILD patients under ICI treatment in Europe via the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER). Fourteen centers contributed data on AILD patients with malignancies being treated with ICI, another three centers did not treat these patients with ICI due to fear of irAEs. Results: In this study, 22 AILD patients under ICI treatment could be identified. Among these patients, 12 had primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), five had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), four had autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and one patient had an AIH-PSC variant syndrome. Eleven patients had hepatobiliary cancers and the other 11 patients presented with non-hepatic tumors. The applied ICIs were atezolizumab (n=7), durvalumab (n=5), pembrolizumab (n=4), nivolumab (n=4), spartalizumab (n=1), and in one case combined immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Among eight patients who presented with grade 1 or 2 irAEs, three demonstrated liver irAEs. Cases with grades ≥ 3 irAEs were not reported. No significant changes in liver tests were observed during the first year after the start of ICI. Discussion: This European multicenter study demonstrates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to be safe in patients with AILD. Further studies on the safety of more potent dual immune checkpoint therapy are needed. We conclude that immunotherapy should not categorically be withheld from patients with AILD.

Fibroblast growth factor 19 stimulates water intake.

Fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) is a hormone with pleiotropic metabolic functions, leading to ongoing development of analogues for treatment of metabolic disorders. On the other hand, FGF19 is overexpressed in a sub-group of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and has oncogenic properties. It is therefore crucial to precisely define FGF19 effects, notably in the context of chronic exposure to elevated concentrations of the hormone. Here, we used hydrodynamic gene transfer to generate a transgenic mouse model with long-term FGF19 hepatic overexpression. We describe a novel effect of FGF19, namely the stimulation of water intake. This phenotype, lasting at least over a 6-month period, depends on signaling in the central nervous system and is independent of FGF21, although it mimics some of its features. We further show that HCC patients with high levels of circulating FGF19 have a reduced natremia, indicating dipsogenic features. The present study provides evidence of a new activity of FGF19, which could be clinically relevant in the context of FGF19 overexpressing cancers and in the course of treatment of metabolic disorders by FGF19 analogues.

Patients Treated for HCV Infection and Listed for Liver Transplantation in a French Multicenter Study: What Happens at Five Years?

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been proven safe and effective in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, in the long term, data remain minimal regarding the clinical impact of viral eradication on patients listed for decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to elucidate the clinical outcomes of patients regarding delisting and the evolution of HCC during the long-term follow-up. METHODS: An observational, multicenter, retrospective analysis was carried out on prospectively collected data from HCV-positive patients treated with an interferon-free regimen while awaiting LT in 18 French hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included in the study. The indication for LT was HCC in 104 (58.1%) patients and cirrhosis in 75 (41.9%) patients. The sustained virological response was 84.4% and the treatment was well tolerated. At five years, among 75 patients with cirrhosis treated for HCV, 19 (25.3%) were delisted following improvement after treatment. Predictive factors for delisting highlighted an absence of ascites, MELD score ≤ 15, and Child-Pugh score ≤ 7. No patients with refractory ascites were delisted. Among patients with HCC, 82 (78.9%) were transplanted. The drop-out rate was low (6.7%) and few recurrences of HCC after LT were observed. CONCLUSIONS: DAAs are safe and effective in patients awaiting LT for cirrhosis or HCC. A quarter of patients with cirrhosis can be delisted because of clinical improvement. Predictive factors for delisting, as a result of improvement, may assist prescribers, before initiating HCV infection therapy in the long-term perspective.

Hydrochlorothiazide-induced hepatotoxicity: A rare case of DILI.

Thiazide diuretics are prescribed daily and rarely hepatotoxic. We report the case of 86-year-old woman who was admitted in hospital for jaundice after taking hydrochlorothiazide. All differential diagnoses have been eliminated. The liver biopsy was compatible with drug-induced hepatitis. Clinical and biological manifestations improved after discontinuation of the treatment. The reported case is compared to three other cases in the literature.

Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy: New Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

In the last 5 years, the landscape of oncologic treatment has been deeply modified with the development and use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that exert their antitumoral effect by reverting the exhausted phenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This innovative therapeutic strategy has widely changed the prognosis of some advanced neoplastic diseases such as melanoma and lung cancer, providing durable remission for a significant number of patients. Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), especially ICI-induced hepatitis, may be very severe in some cases, impairing the prognosis of the patient. Guidelines available today on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced hepatitis are mainly based on expert opinions and case series. This lack of large data is explained not only by the low incidence of hepatic adverse events but also by their clinical heterogeneity and variable severity. In this article, we will review the clinical, biological, and histological characteristics of ICI-induced liver injury. We will discuss the current knowledge on their pathological mechanisms and their therapeutic strategy based on immunosuppressive treatment for more severe cases. Regarding severity assessment, we will discuss the gap between the oncologist and the hepatologist's point of view, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management. While initially developed for notably less frequent diseases than neoplastic ones, gene therapy is going to be a revolution for the treatment of diseases not responding to pharmacological therapy. Limited but growing data describe liver injury after the administration of such therapy whose exact physiopathology remains unknown. In this article, we will discuss the available data supporting the role of gene therapies in the onset of drug-induced liver injury and related mechanisms. We will describe the clinical context, the biological and histological features, and the management currently proposed.

Acute liver failure requiring transplantation caused by ulipristal acetate.

Ulipristal has recently been suspected to be hepatotoxic by the European Medicines Agency but the evidence base for hepatotoxicity is sparse. This is a brief formal report of a patient administered ulipristal for 6-8 weeks and who developed acute liver failure leading to liver transplantation. The explanted liver showed extensive hepatocyte necrosis and inflammation compatible with drug-induced liver injury and cirrhosis. The usual causes of acute hepatitis and cirrhosis were eliminated. There were no other potential causative drugs. This case suggests that ulipristal may cause acute hepatitis, with pre-existing cirrhosis probably contributing to the severity of liver injury observed in this case. Ulipristal prescribers must remain vigilant and monitor liver function in their patients.

Chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis.

Some drugs may induce hepatotoxic lesions, such as steatosis or steatohepatitis found in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Among these drugs there are some anti-tumoral molecules, such as methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, tamoxifen and l-asparaginase. The hepatotoxic phenotype developed from treatment with such drugs is known as "CASH" for "Chemotherapy-induced Acute Steatohepatitis". The mechanism of toxicity is essentially based on mitochondrial toxicity. These lesions are chronic and often reversible when the treatment is stopped. Contributing factors related to the patient, the disease or the treatment play a major role in the emergence of CASH. It is important to identify chemotherapies with steatosis or steatohepatitis as risk factors in order to improve control of the metabolic risk factors associated with the patient and to reinforce monitoring during treatment. In the particular context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, a short duration of chemotherapy and a few-weeks delay between chemotherapy and surgery could reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Antiviral (Hepatitis C Virus) Drug-Drug Interaction Leading to Dramatic Underestimation of Liver Function With 99mTc-Mebrofenin Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy.

There is a growing interest in assessment of future remnant liver function with Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy before major hepatectomy to estimate the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure. We illustrate the case of a 42-year-old woman with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer who performed hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Tc-mebrofenin clearance rate of the total liver was considerably low. The patient recently started a treatment for active hepatitis C with a combination of 2 new direct-acting antiviral agents (grazoprevir, elbasvir). Apart from hypoalbuminemia or hyperbilirubinemia, physicians must be aware that drug interactions can interfere with Tc-mebrofenin liver uptake, thereby resulting in a dramatic underestimation of liver function.