Simple Aspiration versus Drainage for Complete Pneumothorax: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Rationale: Management of first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax remains the subject of debate. Objectives: To determine whether first-line simple aspiration is noninferior to first-line chest tube drainage for lung expansion in patients with complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial. Adults aged 18-50 years with complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax (total separation of the lung from the chest wall), recruited at 31 French hospitals from 2009 to 2015, received simple aspiration (n = 200) or chest tube drainage (n = 202) as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was pulmonary expansion 24 hours after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were tolerance of treatment, occurrence of adverse events, and recurrence of pneumothorax within 1 year. Substantial discordance in the numerical inputs used for trial planning and the actual trial rates of the primary outcome resulted in a reevaluation of the trial analysis plan. Measurement and Main Results: Treatment failure occurred in 29% in the aspiration group and 18% in the chest tube drainage group (difference in failure rate, 0.113; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.026-0.200). The aspiration group experienced less pain overall (mean difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -1.89, -0.91), less pain limiting breathing (frequency difference, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.27, -0.09), and less kinking of the device (frequency difference, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09, -0.01). Recurrence of pneumothorax was 20% in this group versus 27% in the drainage group (frequency difference, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.16, +0.02). Conclusions: First-line management of complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax with simple aspiration had a higher failure rate than chest tube drainage but was better tolerated with fewer adverse events. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01008228).

Different phenotypes in dermatomyositis associated with anti-MDA5 antibody: Study of 121 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The predominance of extramuscular manifestations (e.g., skin rash, arthralgia, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) as well as the low frequency of muscle signs in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive (anti-MDA5+) dermatomyositis caused us to question the term myositis-specific antibody for the anti-MDA5 antibody, as well as the homogeneity of the disease. METHODS: To characterize the anti-MDA5+ phenotype, an unsupervised analysis was performed on anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83/121) and compared to a group of patients with myositis without anti-MDA5 antibody (anti-MDA5-; n = 190/201) based on selected variables, collected retrospectively, without any missing data. RESULTS: Within anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83), 3 subgroups were identified. One group (18.1%) corresponded to patients with a rapidly progressive ILD (93.3%; p < 0.0001 across all) and a very high mortality rate. The second subgroup (55.4%) corresponded to patients with pure dermato-rheumatologic symptoms (arthralgia; 82.6%; p < 0.01) and a good prognosis. The third corresponded to patients, mainly male (72.7%; p < 0.0001), with severe skin vasculopathy, frequent signs of myositis (proximal weakness: 68.2%; p < 0.0001), and an intermediate prognosis. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgia/arthritis, and sex permit the cluster appurtenance (83.3% correct estimation). Nevertheless, an unsupervised analysis confirmed that anti-MDA5 antibody delineates an independent group of patients (e.g., dermatomyositis skin rash, skin ulcers, calcinosis, mechanic's hands, ILD, arthralgia/arthritis, and high mortality rate) distinct from anti-MDA5- patients with myositis. CONCLUSION: Anti-MDA5+ patients have a systemic syndrome distinct from other patients with myositis. Three subgroups with different prognosis exist.

Women and COPD: do we need more evidence?

The increasingly female face of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence among women has equalled that of men since 2008, due in part to increased tobacco use among women worldwide and exposure to biomass fuels. This finding is supported by a number of characteristics. There is evidence of susceptibility to smoking and other airborne contaminants, along with epidemiological and phenotypic manifestations. COPD has thus become the leading cause of death in women in the USA. The clinical presentation is characterised by increasingly pronounced dyspnoea with a marked tendency towards anxiety and depression, undernutrition, nonsmall cell lung cancer (especially adenocarcinoma) and osteoporosis. Quality of life is also more significantly impacted. The theories advanced to explain these differences involve the role played by oestrogens, impaired gas exchange in the lungs and smoking habits. While these differences require appropriate therapeutic responses (smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, long-term oxygen therapy), barriers to the treatment of women with COPD include greater under-diagnosis than in men, fewer spirometry tests and medical consultations. Faced with this serious public health problem, we need to update and adapt our knowledge to the epidemiological changes.

[Smoking, smoking cessation and Crohn's disease]. / Tabagisme, sevrage tabagique et maladie de Crohn.

CONTEXT: Smoking whose prevalence is higher in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) worsens its evolution. Ulcerative colitis mostly affect non- or ex-smokers; smoking may improve the course of the disease. OBJECTIVES: Systematic literature review of data on the relationship between smoking, smoking cessation and Crohn'disease. DOCUMENTARY SOURCES: Medline, on the period 1980-2015 with the keywords "Crohn's disease" or "inflammatory bowel disease" and "smoking" or "smoking cessation"; limits "Title/Abstract"; the selected languages were English or French. STUDY SELECTION: Among 1315 articles, 168 abstracts have given rise to a dual reading to select 69 studies (case-control, retrospective, reviews or meta-analysis). Data were extracted using a reading gate. RESULTS: Smoking increases the risk of complications, recurrences and resort of surgery, corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. These deleterious effects are more common in women. Stopping smoking improves the course of the disease and represents an essential component of its management. LIMITS: Heterogeneity of the studies collected according to the type, population characteristics, definition of smoking status and the validation of smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: Smokers suffering from CD must routinely be made aware of the disadvantages of smoking, benefits of abstinence and helped to quit smoking.

Comorbidities of COPD.

By 2020, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will be the third cause of mortality. Extrapulmonary comorbidities influence the prognosis of patients with COPD. Tobacco smoking is a common risk factor for many comorbidities, including coronary heart disease, heart failure and lung cancer. Comorbidities such as pulmonary artery disease and malnutrition are directly caused by COPD, whereas others, such as systemic venous thromboembolism, anxiety, depression, osteoporosis, obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, sleep disturbance and anaemia, have no evident physiopathological relationship with COPD. The common ground between most of these extrapulmonary manifestations is chronic systemic inflammation. All of these diseases potentiate the morbidity of COPD, leading to increased hospitalisations and healthcare costs. They can frequently cause death, independently of respiratory failure. Comorbidities make the management of COPD difficult and need to be evaluated and treated adequately.

[Influence of doctors' smoking habits on minimal advice for smoking cessation. A survey of 369 general practitioners in the department of Vienne, France]. / Influence du tabagisme des médecins sur la pratique du "conseil minimal". Enquête auprès de 369 médecins généralistes de la Vienne.

INTRODUCTION: French doctors' smoking habits may interfere with the effectiveness of smoking prevention measures and particularly when providing minimal advice. OBJECTIVES: To assess the smoking habits of general practitioners in the department of Vienne, France, and to study how they affect minimal advice for smoking cessation. METHOD: 257 general practitioners took part in a phone survey (26.5%) or answered a written questionnaire (73.5%). The questions bore on socio-demographic characteristics, smoking habits and the of minimal advice provided whether partial or whole. Do you smoke? If so, have you ever thought of quitting? RESULTS: The participation rate was 70%. 26% of the participants were current smokers--16 % regular smokers, 10% infrequent smokers, 30% had quit and 44% had never smoke. 44.4% investigated smoking habits as a matter of course, and 41% provided intensive advice for smoking cessation. Doctors who had never smoked gave more advice than those who currently smoked or had quit. DISCUSSION: A comparison with former studies reveals that the number of doctors who smoke has decreased. However, minimal intervention on smoking cessation is put into practice by less than half of the doctors. CONCLUSION: The incidence of smoking among doctors in the Department of Vienne remains too high and minimal intervention on smoking cessation is still insufficient. However, doctors who had never smoked provided minimal advice more often than those who currently smoked or had quit.

Phase I study with dose escalation of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with ifosfamide (GIP) in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (P) are active reference agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ifosfamide (I) has also been approved for NSCLC treatment. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose [maximum tolerated dosage (MTD)], and recommended dose (RD) of a GIP combination in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. In this study, one cycle of chemotherapy combined the following: ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 fixed dose (24-hour intravenous infusion) combined with mesna, day 1; gemcitabine: starting dose 1,000 mg/m2/d, escalating by 250 mg/m2 increments, days 1 and 15; cisplatin: starting dose 80 mg/m2, subsequently 100 mg/m2, day 15; in cohorts of at least 3 patients. Cycles were repeated every 28 days and no hematopoietic growth factors were administered. DLT was evaluated after the first chemotherapy cycle. Thirty-three patients (30 men, 3 women) with stage III (14 patients)/IV (19 patients) NSCLC were treated at eight dose levels, receiving 109 cycles of chemotherapy. Neutropenia was the only DLT reported. Although the MTD was not reached at the highest tested dose level, the RD chosen corresponds to the full doses of the GP3000 doublet standard (G: 3,000 mg/m2; P: 100 mg/m2 per cycle) every 28 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mainly grade I-II. Relative dose intensities of G, I, and P at the RD were 96%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Sixteen of 33 patients with measurable/evaluable disease had an objective response including two complete responses. In conclusion, GIP chemotherapy is safe and appears to be active in patients with NSCLC. The RD is gemcitabine: 1,500 mg/m2 days 1 and 15; ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 day 1; cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 day 15. A confirmatory phase II study is currently under way, before a phase III trial of GIP versus GP.