Impairment for Medication Management in Older Adults: Validity of a Family Report Measure.

Objectives: Medication nonadherence can have significant consequences for the health of older adults. Difficulty managing medications is often a sign of cognitive impairment, and monitoring is an early caregiving task for family members. This study examined a screening tool for independence in medication management.Methods: Reliability and validity of the screening tool were assessed in a sample of 152 female care partners for a relative aged 65+years.Results: The tool showed sound test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and test utility, such that medication assistance was not better predicted by a global rating of cognitive impairment.Conclusions: In context of cognitive impairment, detection of medication mismanagement could be improved in both primary care and specialty health encounters through adoption of this single-item screening tool.Clinical Implications: This single-item report can be used to quickly facilitate discussions of medication management and cognitive impairment screening in office visits. The item also shows promise for efficient measurement of impairment in medication management than typical IADL assessment language.

A randomized crash injury prevention trial of transitioning high-risk elders from driving.

UNLABELLED: Supplemental digital content is available in the text. BACKGROUND: Older adults with medical conditions that impair function are at risk for experiencing a motor vehicle crash. This randomized controlled trial tested an intervention to reduce crash-related risk among older patients. METHODS: A 2-to-1 allocation ratio resulted in comparisons between 26 intervention and 13 attention control (n = 39) group members who were recruited from inpatient and outpatient settings. The intervention consisted of two sessions of facilitated planning in which participants' health, transportation alternatives, attitudes/emotions regarding a change in mobility, and actions to ensure continued safe mobility were discussed. Moreover, all participants received supportive telephone calls during the 6-month intervention period. RESULTS: Results showed that when compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly better subjective health, had fewer high-risk driving behaviors, and drove less distance on excursions from home at follow-up. Yet, simple repeated-measures analyses were not significant. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that facilitated planning may help ease the transition to driving retirement among some high-risk older patients. Larger samples and longer study duration are needed to confirm these effects and to measure direct crash and injury outcomes. A significant proportion of high-risk patients do not plan for driving retirement and remain a crash risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level III.

Identifying amnestic mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), characterized by episodic memory impairment in the absence of clinical dementia, often represents a transitional stage between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is not known if non-expert primary-care physicians (PCPs) can differentiate individuals with no cognitive impairment (NCI), aMCI and mild AD in a primary-care practice setting. This study develops an approach to this question, which is necessary for aMCI to become a treatment target. METHODS: Fourteen experts assessed subjects with memory complaints in terms of their laboratory test results, magnetic resonance imaging findings and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, adapted Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale Delayed Word Recall before designating each subject as having NCI, aMCI or AD. Subjects agreed upon by a consensus committee were assigned to non-expert PCPs who, following brief training, assessed them using the same clinical information and utilizing the same assessment instruments. The chance-corrected inter-rater reliability (expert versus non-expert) measure κ, based on binary outcome (aMCI/not-aMCI), was estimated. RESULTS: The study recruited 119 evaluable subjects (50 aMCI, 27 mild AD and 42 NCI) and demonstrated fair to moderate agreement (κ = 0.423) between experts and non-experts in designation of aMCI. The percent agreement was 72.3%, sensitivity 62.0% and specificity 79.7%. Overall, non-experts under-rated the level of impairment compared with experts. CONCLUSION: This study established the feasibility of making the aMCI designation in the community and identified some likely sources of error. The results suggest that when drugs with clear benefit for aMCI patients are developed, community-based PCPs, with additional, more optimized training, will be able to accurately identify those patients who should receive treatment.

5-HT7 receptors are involved in mediating 5-HT-induced activation of rat primary afferent neurons.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the 5-hydroxytryptamine7 (5-HT7) receptor is expressed by nociceptor-like neurons in the rat PNS and whether 5-HT activates these nociceptors via the 5-HT7 receptor subtype. Using a polyclonal antibody and the method of immunofluorescence staining, we demonstrated that the 5-HT7 receptor appears predominately on "nociceptor-like" neurons of the rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia. Using immunocytochemical methods, we showed that the immunoreactivity of the 5-HT7 receptor antibody complex is localized in the superficial layers of the spinal cord dorsal horn, which corresponds with laminae I, IIouter and IIinner. Furthermore, we demonstrated that noxious stimulation produced by knee injection of 5-HT or a 5-HT7 agonist dose-dependently increases c-Fos production of the rat spinal cord dorsal horn. This effect was significantly inhibited by the preinjection of a 5-HT7 antagonist. We conclude that the 5-HT7 receptor is expressed by rat primary afferent nociceptors which terminate in the superficial layers of the spinal cord dorsal horn and that the 5-HT7 receptor subtype is involved in nociceptor activation by 5-HT.

Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology.

Most patients with advanced cancer develop diverse symptoms that can limit the efficacy of pain treatment and undermine their quality of life. The present study surveys symptom prevalence, etiology and severity in 593 cancer patients treated by a pain service. Non-opioid analgesics, opioids and adjuvants were administered following the WHO-guidelines for cancer pain relief. Other symptoms were systematically treated by appropriate adjuvant drugs. Pain and symptom severity was measured daily by patient self-assessment; the physicians of the pain service assessed symptom etiology and the severity of confusion, coma and gastrointestinal obstruction at each visit. The patients were treated for an average period of 51 days. Efficacy of pain treatment was good in 70%, satisfactory in 16% and inadequate in 14% of patients. The initial treatment caused a significant reduction in the average number of symptoms from four to three. Prevalence and severity of anorexia, impaired activity, confusion, mood changes, insomnia, constipation, dyspepsia, dyspnoea, coughing, dysphagia and urinary symptoms were significantly reduced, those of sedation, other neuropsychiatric symptoms and dry mouth were significantly increased and those of coma, vertigo, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, intestinal obstruction, erythema, pruritus and sweating remained unchanged. The most frequent symptoms were impaired activity (74% of days), mood changes (22%), constipation (23%), nausea (23%) and dry mouth (20%). The highest severity scores were associated with impaired activity, sedation, coma, intestinal obstruction, dysphagia and urinary symptoms. Of all 23 symptoms, only constipation, erythema and dry mouth were assessed as being most frequently caused by the analgesic regimen. In conclusion, the high prevalence and severity of many symptoms in far advanced cancer can be reduced, if pain treatment is combined with systematic symptom control. Nevertheless, general, neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms are experienced during a major part of treatment time and pain relief was inadequate in 14% of patients. Cancer pain management has to be embedded in a frame of palliative care, taking all the possibilities of symptom management into consideration.

Assessment and treatment of neuropathic cancer pain following WHO guidelines.

Neuropathic pain syndromes are one of the major problems of cancer pain treatment. The present study surveys 593 cancer patients treated by a pain service following the WHO guidelines for relief of cancer pain. Of these, 380 presented with nociceptive, 32 with neuropathic and 181 with mixed (nociceptive and neuropathic) pain. In patients with nociceptive, mixed and neuropathic pain, the average duration of evaluated pain treatment was 51, 53 and 38 days, respectively. Non-opioid or opioid analgesics were given to 99%, 96% and 79%, antidepressants to 8%, 25% and 19%, anticonvulsants to 2%, 22% and 38% and corticosteroids to 26%, 35% and 22% of patients, respectively. Systemic analgesia was supported by palliative antineoplastic treatment (48%, 56% and 38% of patients), nerve blocks (3%, 6% and 6%), psychotherapy (3%, 7% and 3%), physiotherapy (6%, 12% and 13%) and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (1%, 6% and 6%). Analgesic treatment resulted in a significant pain relief in all groups of patients, as the mean pain intensity (NRS) decreased from 66 (nociceptive), 65 (mixed) and 70 (neuropathic) on admission to 26, 30 and 28 after 3 days and 18, 17 and 21 at the end of survey. The total outcome of pain treatment was not predicted by the designation to nociceptive, mixed or neuropathic pain. In conclusion, neuropathic cancer pain is not intractable and can be relieved in the majority of patients by treatment following the WHO guidelines.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol enantiomers in comparison with the racemate: a randomised, double-blind study with gynaecological patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

The opioid analgesic tramadol is a racemate and consists of 50% (+)- and 50% (-)-enantiomer. This study investigated analgesic efficacy and safety of both enantiomers after intravenous (i.v.) injection in comparison with the racemate. Ninety-eight patients recovering from major gynaecological surgery under opioid-free halothane anaesthesia were treated in a randomised, double-blind study with (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol or the racemate. Following an individualised i.v. loading dose up to a maximum of 200 mg, patient-controlled analgesia with demand doses of 20 mg was made available for 24 h. The primary criterion was of efficacy was the decrease of pain intensity on a 5-point verbal rating scale from severe or maximum pain to mild or no pain intensity on a 5-point verbal rating scale from severe or maximum pain to mild or no pain within the first hour after the loading dose. The secondary criterion was patient satisfaction with pain relief during the 24-h observation period stated in the final interview. Patients who terminated the study prematurely were evaluated as non-responders. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, tramadol racemate, and (-)-tramadol, 12%, 15%, and 53% of treated patients, respectively, terminated the study prematurely because of inefficacy. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, racemate or (-)-tramadol 67%, 48% and 38%, respectively, were considered responders regarding the primary criterion of efficacy (P = 0.061), and 82%, 76%, or 41% with respect to the secondary criterion (P = 0.001). Assessment of laboratory screening, adverse events, vital signs and blood gas monitoring showed no serious drug-related events. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported non-serious side effects and were most often seen with (+)-tramadol. Taking into account both efficacy and safety aspects, the racemate seems to be superior to either enantiomer alone.