Gyroscope-Assisted CT-Guided Puncture Improves Accuracy and Hit Rate Compared with Free-Hand Puncture: A Phantom Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate gyroscope-assisted CT-guided needle puncture (GAP) compared to free hand puncture (FHP) in a phantom. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A simple, low-cost gyroscope was equipped with a magnetic rail to attach it to common puncture needles. 18 radiologists with different levels of training and experience in CT-guided punctures first punctured three targets in free hand technique in a special biopsy phantom with different difficulty levels of the puncture path (T1: not angulated, needle path 7.3 cm, size 15 mm in diameter, T2: single angulated 41°, needle path 11.3 cm, size 9 mm in diameter, T3: double angulated 38°/26°, needle path 7 cm, size 8 mm in diameter). Without knowing the result of the puncture, a second puncture was performed directly afterwards with the aid of the gyroscope. Punctures were performed in a continuous procedure without intermediate control. The hit rate and the distance between the needle tip and the center of the lesion were evaluated. Additionally, the time needed for the procedure was measured. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 54 insertions (61.1%) hit the target in GAP compared to 20 of 54 (37%) in FHP (p = 0.002). The mean distance of the needle tip to the lesion center was 7.49 ± 5.31 mm in GAP compared to 13.37 ± 10.24 mm in FHP (p < 0.001). Puncture time was not significantly different between GAP (36.72 ± 20.38 s) and FHP (37.83 ± 20.53 s) (p = 0.362). CONCLUSION: Needle guidance with a gyroscope enables an improved hit rate and puncture accuracy in CT-guided punctures without prolonging the puncture time. The needle guidance by gyroscope is inexpensive and easy to establish.

Impact of an online reference system on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether an online reference system (ORS, STATdx Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) impacts finding the histologically confirmed diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions in radiologic imaging. In total, 101 patients with rare tumor entities or lesions and atypical manifestations of common tumors were enrolled retrospectively. Blinded readings were performed by four radiologists with varying levels of experience, who reported on: (a) correct diagnosis (CD), (b) time needed to find the diagnosis, and (c) diagnostic confidence, initially without followed by the assistance of the ORS. The experienced reader (3 years of experience post-residency, CD 49.5%), as well as the advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency (CD 43.6%), and a resident with 5 years of experience (CD 46.5%) made the correct diagnosis more frequently compared to the less experienced reader (CD 25.7%). A significant improvement in making the correct diagnosis was only achieved by the advanced reader, the resident with 5 years of experience (CD with ORS 58.4%; p < 0.001). The advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency improved slightly (CD ORS 47.5%). The experienced reader (CD ORS 50.5%) and the less experienced reader (CD ORS 27.7%) did not improve significantly. The overall subjective confidence increased significantly when ORS was used (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). While the ORS had a positive impact on making the correct diagnosis throughout all readers, it favored radiologists with more clinical experience rather than inexperienced residents. Moreover, the ORS increased the diagnostic confidence of all radiologists significantly. In conclusion, the ORS had no significant impact on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions except for one reader. The greatest benefit is the increase in diagnostic confidence.

Pancreatic cancer in photon-counting CT: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images improve tumor conspicuity.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to identify differences in the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in different monoenergetic or polyenergetic reconstructions and contrast phases in photon-counting CT (PCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Quantitative image analysis was performed with region of interest (ROI) measurements in different monoenergetic levels ranging from 40 up to 70 keV (5-point steps) and polyenergetic series. Tumor-parenchyma attenuation differences and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. A qualitative image analysis was accomplished by 4 radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "not recognizable" up to 5 = "easy recognizable"). Differences between groups were evaluated for statistical significance using the Friedman test and in case of significant differences pair-wise post-hoc testing with Bonferroni correction was applied. RESULTS: Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly different between the different image reconstructions for both arterial- and portal-venous-phase-images (p < 0.001). Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on arterial-phase-images at mono40keV compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono55keV images or higher (p < 0.001). For portal-venous-phase-images tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on mono40keV images compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono50keV images (p = 0.03) or higher (p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for CNR. Tumor conspicuity was rated best on mono40keV images with 4.3 ± 0.9 for arterial-phase-images and 4.3 ± 1.1 for portal-venous-phase-images. In contrast, overall image quality was rated best on polyenergetic-images with 4.8 ± 0.5 for arterial-phase-images and 4.7 ± 0.6 for portal-venous-phase-images. CONCLUSION: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images significantly improve the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in PCCT based on quantitative and qualitative results. On the other hand, readers prefer polyenergetic images for overall image quality.

Photon Counting Computed Tomography in Rectal Cancer: Associations Between Iodine Concentration, Histopathology and Treatment Response: A Pilot Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Common computed tomography (CT) investigation plays a limited role in characterizing and assessing the response of rectal cancer (RC) to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARC). Photon counting computed tomography (PCCT) improves the imaging quality and can provide multiparametric spectral image information including iodine concentration (IC). Our purpose was to analyze associations between IC and histopathology in RC and to evaluate the role of IC in response prediction to NARC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 41 patients were included into the study, 14 women and 27 men, mean age, 65.5 years. PCCT in a portal venous phase of the abdomen was performed. In every case, a polygonal region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn on iodine maps. Normalized IC (NIC) was also calculated. Tumor stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, circumferential resection margin, and tumor markers were analyzed. Tumor regression grade (absence/presence of tumor cells) after NARC was analyzed. NIC values in groups were compared to Mann-Whitney-U tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. RESULTS: ICC was 0.93, 95%CI= (0.88; 0.96). Tumors with lymphovascular invasion showed higher NIC values in comparison to those without (p = 0.04). Tumors with response grade 2-4 showed higher pretreatment NIC values in comparison to lesions with response grade 0-1 (p = 0.01). A NIC value of 0.36 and higher can predict response grade 2-4 (sensitivity, 73.9%; specificity, 91.7%; area under the curve, 0.85). CONCLUSION: NIC values showed an excellent interreader agreement in RC. NIC can predict treatment response to NARC.

Minimizing Contrast Media Dose in CT Pulmonary Angiography with Clinical Photon Counting Using High Pitch Technique.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential to reduce the amount of iodinated contrast media (CM) for computer tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with a novel photon-counting-detector CT (PCCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 105 patients referred for CTPA were retrospectively included in this study. CTPA was performed using bolus tracking and high-pitch dual-source scanning (FLASH mode) on a novel PCCT (Naeotom Alpha, Siemens Healthineers). CM (Accupaque 300, GE Healthcare) dose was lowered stepwise following the introduction of the new CT scanner. Thus, patients could be divided into 3 groups as follows: group 1, n = 29, 35 ml of CM; group 2, n = 62, 45 ml of CM and group 3, n = 14, 60 ml of CM. Four readers independently assessed the image quality (Likert-scale 1-5) and adequate assessment of the segmental pulmonary arteries. Additionally, the pulmonary arterial contrast opacification was measured. RESULTS: The subjective image quality was rated highest in group 1 with 4.6 compared to 4.5 (group 2) and 4.1 (group 3) with a significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.001) and between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.003). In all groups, almost all segmental pulmonary arteries could be assessed adequately without significant differences (18.5 vs. 18.7 vs. 18.4). Mean attenuation in the pulmonary trunk did not differ significantly between groups 321 ± 92 HU versus 345 ± 93 HU versus 347 ± 88 HU (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Significant CM dose reduction is possible without a reduction in image quality. PCCT enables diagnostic CTPA with 35 ml of CM.

Clinical Low-Dose Photon-Counting CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: Radiation Dose Reduction Is Possible without Compromising Image Quality.

Background: This study evaluated the feasibility of reducing the radiation dose in abdominal imaging of urolithiasis with a clinical photon-counting CT (PCCT) by gradually lowering the image quality level (IQL) without compromising the image quality and diagnostic value. Methods: Ninety-eight PCCT examinations using either IQL70 (n = 31), IQL60 (n = 31) or IQL50 (n = 36) were retrospectively included. Parameters for the radiation dose and the quantitative image quality were analyzed. Qualitative image quality, presence of urolithiasis and diagnostic confidence were rated. Results: Lowering the IQL from 70 to 50 led to a significant decrease (22.8%) in the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE, IQL70 4.57 ± 0.84 mGy, IQL50 3.53 ± 0.70 mGy, p < 0.001). Simultaneously, lowering the IQL led to a minimal deterioration of the quantitative quality, e.g., image noise increased from 9.13 ± 1.99 (IQL70) to 9.91 ± 1.77 (IQL50, p = 0.248). Radiologists did not notice major changes in the image quality throughout the IQLs. Detection rates of urolithiasis (91.3-100%) did not differ markedly. Diagnostic confidence was high and not influenced by the IQL. Conclusions: Adjusting the PCCT scan protocol by lowering the IQL can significantly reduce the radiation dose without significant impairment of the image quality. The detection rate and diagnostic confidence are not impaired by using an ultra-low-dose PCCT scan protocol.

Clinical Low Dose Photon Counting CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

The purpose of this study was the evaluation of image quality and radiation dose parameters of the novel photon counting CT (PCCT, Naeotom Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) using low-dose scan protocols for the detection of urolithiasis. Standard CT scans were used as a reference (S40, Somatom Sensation 40, Siemens Healthineers). Sixty-three patients, who underwent CT scans between August and December 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty-one patients were examined with the PCCT and 32 patients were examined with the S40. Radiation dose parameters, as well as quantitative and qualitative image parameters, were analyzed. The presence of urolithiasis, image quality, and diagnostic certainty were rated on a 5-point-scale by 3 blinded readers. Both patient groups (PCCT and S40) did not differ significantly in terms of body mass index. Radiation dose was significantly lower for examinations with the PCCT compared to the S40 (2.4 ± 1.0 mSv vs. 3.4 ± 1.0 mSv; p < 0.001). The SNR was significantly better on images acquired with the PCCT (13.3 ± 3.3 vs. 8.2 ± 1.9; p < 0.001). The image quality of the PCCT was rated significantly better (4.3 ± 0.7 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6; p < 0.001). The detection rate of kidney or ureter calculi was excellent with both CT scanners (PCCT 97.8% and S40 99%, p = 0.611). In high contrast imaging, such as the depiction of stones of the kidney and the ureter, PCCT allows a significant reduction of radiation dose, while maintaining excellent diagnostic confidence and image quality. Given this image quality with our current protocol, further adjustments towards ultra-low-dose CT scans appear feasible.

Low-Dose High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lung: Radiation Dose and Image Quality in the Clinical Routine.

This study aims to investigate the qualitative and quantitative image quality of low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) lung CT scans acquired with the first clinical approved photon counting CT (PCCT) scanner. Furthermore, the radiation dose used by the PCCT is compared to a conventional CT scanner with an energy-integrating detector system (EID-CT). Twenty-nine patients who underwent a LD-HR chest CT scan with dual-source PCCT and had previously undergone a LD-HR chest CT with a standard EID-CT scanner were retrospectively included in this study. Images of the whole lung as well as enlarged image sections displaying a specific finding (lesion) were evaluated in terms of overall image quality, image sharpness and image noise by three senior radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale. The PCCT images were reconstructed with and without a quantum iterative reconstruction algorithm (PCCT QIR+/−). Noise and signal-to-noise (SNR) were measured and the effective radiation dose was calculated. Overall, image quality and image sharpness were rated best in PCCT (QIR+) images. A significant difference was seen particularly in image sections of PCCT (QIR+) images compared to EID-CT images (p < 0.005). Image noise of PCCT (QIR+) images was significantly lower compared to EID-CT images in image sections (p = 0.005). In contrast, noise was lowest on EID-CT images (p < 0.001). The PCCT used significantly less radiation dose compared to the EID-CT (p < 0.001). In conclusion, LD-HR PCCT scans of the lung provide better image quality while using significantly less radiation dose compared to EID-CT scans.