Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
Am J Surg ; 199(1 Suppl): S11-20, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20103080

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current evidence-based guidelines provide recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a variety of surgical patients. DATA SOURCES: A systematic Ovid Medline search (from 1950 to the present) was conducted for relevant articles using the following search terms: "venous thromboembolism," "thrombophlebitis," "thromboembolism," "pulmonary embolism," "heparin," "low-molecular-weight heparin," "postoperative complications," and "anticoagulants." CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacologic and mechanical approaches are available for VTE prophylaxis, including low-dose unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, fondaparinux, intermittent pneumatic compression devices, and graduated compression stockings. Permanent inferior vena cava filters are not recommended for primary VTE prophylaxis, although they do have a role in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with recent VTE who cannot have surgery delayed. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are under investigation for primary VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. New anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa and thrombin will soon be available for the prevention and treatment of VTE in surgical patients.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Contraindicações , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Meias de Compressão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores
3.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 76 Suppl 4: S45-52, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19880836

RESUMO

Most surgical patients who require hospitalization are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should receive VTE prophylaxis, usually including pharmacologic prophylaxis. Nevertheless, rates of appropriate perioperative thromboprophylaxis remain stubbornly low, though an expansion in quality-improvement efforts has led to widespread hospital implementation of prophylaxis strategies in recent years. This article reviews important principles and recent developments in perioperative VTE prophylaxis, with a focus on key recommendations and changes in the 2008 update of the American College Chest Physicians' (ACCP) evidence-based guidelines on antithrombotic therapy.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Trombina/antagonistas & inibidores , Estados Unidos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia
4.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 76 Suppl 4: S119-25, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20064812

RESUMO

Medical malpractice lawsuits are commonly brought against surgeons, anesthesiologists, and internists involved in perioperative care. They can be enormously expensive as well as damaging to a doctor's career. While physicians cannot eliminate the risk of lawsuits, they can help protect themselves by providing competent and compassionate care, practicing good communication with patients (and their families when possible), and documenting patient communications and justifications for any medical decisions that could be challenged.


Assuntos
Medicina Defensiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Perioperatória/legislação & jurisprudência , Idoso , Teste de Esforço/efeitos adversos , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
5.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 83(3): 280-8, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18315993

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate modern surgical outcomes in patients with stable heart failure undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery and to compare the experience of patients with heart failure who have reduced vs preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 557 consecutive patients with heart failure (192 EF less than or equal to 40% and 365 EF greater than 40%) and 10,583 controls who underwent systematic evaluation by hospitalists in a preoperative clinic before having major elective noncardiac surgery between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2006. We examined outcomes in the entire cohort and in propensity-matched case-control groups. RESULTS: Unadjusted 1-month postoperative mortality in patients with both types of heart failure vs controls was 1.3% vs 0.4% (P equals .009), but this difference was not significant in propensity-matched groups (P equals .09). Unadjusted differences in mean hospital length of stay among heart failure patients vs controls (5.7 vs 4.3 days; P less than .001) and 1-month readmission (17.8% vs 8.5%; P less than .001) were also markedly attenuated in propensity-matched groups. Crude 1-year hazard ratios for mortality were 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.0) for both types of heart failure, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.7-2.6) in patients with heart failure who had EF less than or equal to 40%, and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.8) in those who had EF greater than 40% (P less than .01 for all 3 comparisons); however, the differences were not significant in propensity-matched groups (P equals .43). CONCLUSION: Patients with clinically stable heart failure did not have high perioperative mortality rates in association with elective major noncardiac surgery, but they were more likely than patients without heart failure to have longer hospital stays, were more likely to require hospital readmission, and had a substantial long-term mortality rate.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Causas de Morte/tendências , Progressão da Doença , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Ohio/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 22(12): 1762-70, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17891516

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered to be the most common preventable cause of hospital-related death. Hospitalized patients undergoing major Surgery and hospitalized patients with acute medical illness have an increased risk of VTE. Although there is overwhelming evidence for the need and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in patients at risk, only about a third of those who are at risk of VTE receive appropriate prophylaxis. To address the shortfall in VTE prophylaxis, the US Joint Commission and the National Quality Forum (NQF) endorse standardized VTE prophylaxis practices, and are identifying and testing measures to monitor these standards. Hospitals in the USA accredited by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to receive medicare patients will need VTE prophylaxis programs in place to conform to these national consensus standards. This review aims to give background information on initiatives to improve the prevention of VTE and to identify key features of a successful quality improvement strategy for prevention of VTE in the hospital. A literature review shows that the key features of effective quality improvement strategies includes an active strategy, a multifaceted approach, and a continuous iterative process of audit and feedback. Risk assessment models may be helpful for deciding which patients should receive prophylaxis and for matching VTE risk with the appropriate intensity of prophylaxis. This approach should assist in implementing the NQF/Joint Commission-endorsed standards, as well as increase the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidade , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Comissão Para Atividades Profissionais e Hospitalares , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Retroalimentação , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Padrões de Referência , Medição de Risco
7.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 73 Suppl 1: S88-94, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16570556

RESUMO

Hospital strategies to prevent VTE are important to reduce acute morbidity and mortality as well as the long-term consequences caused by venous stasis syndrome. Patients at low risk (eg, those who are ambulatory or undergoing a same-day procedure) or who are at high risk for bleeding (including those with severe renal impairment) are candidates for nonpharmacologic strategies for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Mechanical devices are effective if used appropriately, but compliance is a challenge. Patients who require a hospital stay of more than a day or two should receive a medication-based strategy, preferably using LMWH or fondaparinux. Patients undergoing hip replacement should receive extended prophylaxis with LMWH.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/etiologia
9.
Med Clin North Am ; 86(4): 731-48, 2002 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12365338

RESUMO

The hospitalized surgical patient requires a team approach. Because of increasing patient age and complexity of conditions, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation and medical optimization is often necessary to allow the anesthesiologist and surgeon to deliver the best surgical outcome. Surgical patients at an increased risk for postoperative complications should be followed carefully by a medical consultant throughout the hospital stay. This continuity of perioperative care improves the likelihood that postoperative problems, such as delirium, early myocardial ischemia, or VTE, are quickly identified, and appropriate therapeutic interventions are initiated before more serious adverse events occur. Special surgical populations, such as those patients who need perioperative anticoagulation, further benefit from a surgical team that includes a medical specialist. Expertise and close supervision throughout the perioperative period will give the hospitalized surgical patient the greatest chance for a quick and successful recovery.


Assuntos
Anamnese , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Assistência Perioperatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/normas , Delírio/etiologia , Delírio/prevenção & controle , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Hospitalização , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA