The Postmenopausal Vaginal Microbiome and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.

This review summarizes our current understanding of associations of the postmenopausal vaginal microbiome with genitourinary syndrome of menopause. We review the normal postmenopausal microbiota, examine the association of the microbiome with vulvovaginal symptoms, describe microbial communities associated with physical and laboratory findings, and report the impact of different treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause on microbiota and symptom improvement. Postmenopausal vaginal symptoms have an underlying pathophysiology that has not been fully elucidated. Estrogen treatment may not be sufficient to relieve symptoms of vaginal discomfort in all postmenopausal individuals. In addition, other interventions targeted at changing the microbiota or pH do not consistently improve symptom severity.

Incidence, prevalence, and trends in polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis: a United States population-based study from 2006 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet US incidence estimates do not exist, and prevalence estimates vary widely. OBJECTIVE: A population-based US study estimated the incidence, prevalence, and trends of polycystic ovary syndrome by age, race and ethnicity, and diagnosing provider type. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington from 2006 to 2019 was conducted. All members identified as female, aged 16 to 40 years with at least 3 years of enrollment and at least 1 healthcare encounter during that time, were eligible for inclusion. Individuals were excluded if they had a history of oophorectomy or hysterectomy. Polycystic ovary syndrome cases were identified using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, 256.4 or International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, E28.2). Individuals with a polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis before study entry were excluded from incidence rate estimations. The incidence rates were adjusted by age using direct standardization to the 2010 US census data. Temporal trends in incidence were assessed using weighted linear regression (overall) and Poisson regression (by age, race and ethnicity, and provider type). Prevalent cases were defined as patients with a polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis at any time before the end of 2019. Medical record review of 700 incident cases diagnosed in 2011-2019 was performed to validate incident cases identified by International Classification of Diseases codes using the Rotterdam criteria. RESULTS: Among 177,527 eligible patients who contributed 586,470 person-years, 2491 incident polycystic ovary syndrome cases were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 26.9 years, and the mean body mass index was 31.6 kg/m2. Overall incidence was 42.5 per 10,000 person-years; the rates were similar over time but increased in individuals aged 16 to 20 years from 31.0 to 51.9 per 10,000 person-years (P=.01) and decreased among those aged 26 to 30 years from 82.8 to 45.0 per 10,000 person-years (P=.02). A small decreasing temporal trend in incidence rates was only observed among non-Hispanic White individuals (P=.01). The incidence rates by diagnosing provider type varied little over time. Among the 58,241 patients who contributed person-time in 2019, 3036 (5.2%) had a polycystic ovary syndrome International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code; the prevalence was the highest among the Hawaiian and Pacific Islander group (7.6%) followed by Native American and Hispanic groups. Medical record review classified 60% as definite or probable incident, 14% as possible incident, and 17% as prevalent polycystic ovary syndrome. The overall positive predictive value of polycystic ovary syndrome International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code for identifying definite, probable, or possible incident polycystic ovary syndrome was 76% (95% confidence interval, 72%-79%). CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of nonselected females in the United States, we observed stable rates of incident polycystic ovary syndrome diagnoses over time. The incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome was 4- to 5-fold greater than reported for the United Kingdom. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (5.2%) was almost double before the published US estimates (2.9%) based on the International Classification of Diseases codes. Race and ethnicity and provider type did not seem to have a major impact on temporal rates. Incident diagnoses increased over time in younger and decreased in older age groups, perhaps related to shifting practice patterns with greater awareness among practitioners of the impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on long-term health outcomes and improved prevention efforts. Moreover, increasing obesity rates may be a factor driving the earlier ages at diagnosis.

Changes in concentrations of cervicovaginal immune mediators across the menstrual cycle: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle play a key role in shaping immunity in the cervicovaginal tract. Cervicovaginal fluid contains cytokines, chemokines, immunoglobulins, and other immune mediators. Many studies have shown that the concentrations of these immune mediators change throughout the menstrual cycle, but the studies have often shown inconsistent results. Our understanding of immunological correlates of the menstrual cycle remains limited and could be improved by meta-analysis of the available evidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cervicovaginal immune mediator concentrations throughout the menstrual cycle using individual participant data. Study eligibility included strict definitions of the cycle phase (by progesterone or days since the last menstrual period) and no use of hormonal contraception or intrauterine devices. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using inverse-variance pooling to estimate concentration differences between the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, we performed a new laboratory study, measuring select immune mediators in cervicovaginal lavage samples. RESULTS: We screened 1570 abstracts and identified 71 eligible studies. We analyzed data from 31 studies, encompassing 39,589 concentration measurements of 77 immune mediators made on 2112 samples from 871 participants. Meta-analyses were performed on 53 immune mediators. Antibodies, CC-type chemokines, MMPs, IL-6, IL-16, IL-1RA, G-CSF, GNLY, and ICAM1 were lower in the luteal phase than the follicular phase. Only IL-1α, HBD-2, and HBD-3 were elevated in the luteal phase. There was minimal change between the phases for CXCL8, 9, and 10, interferons, TNF, SLPI, elafin, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and interleukins 1ß, 2, 10, 12, 13, and 17A. The GRADE strength of evidence was moderate to high for all immune mediators listed here. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variability of cervicovaginal immune mediator measurements, our meta-analyses show clear and consistent changes during the menstrual cycle. Many immune mediators were lower in the luteal phase, including chemokines, antibodies, matrix metalloproteinases, and several interleukins. Only interleukin-1α and beta-defensins were higher in the luteal phase. These cyclical differences may have consequences for immunity, susceptibility to infection, and fertility. Our study emphasizes the need to control for the effect of the menstrual cycle on immune mediators in future studies.

Contraceptive Use Among Women in the United States Aged 18-44 Years with Selected Medical Contraindications to Estrogen.

Objective: Medical contraindications to estrogen limit women's contraceptive options. This study assessed the association between selected medical contraindications to estrogen on contraceptive use and examined whether contraindications serve as a barrier to the prevention of unintended pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed women aged 18-44 at risk of unintended pregnancy participating in the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Survey questions queried women regarding contraceptive use and contraindications to estrogen use. We assessed the most recently used contraceptive method and compared the odds of women using each category of contraception (no methods, less effective methods, pill/patch/ring, injection, intrauterine device, implant, permanent contraception) between those with and without potential contraindications to estrogen using multinomial logistic regression models. Results: This study included 32,098 women, of whom 16% had one or more potential contraindications to estrogen. There were significant differences in contraceptive choice by potential contraindication status (p < 0.01). Fifteen percent of women with potential contraindications reported using estrogen-containing methods (pill, patch, or ring) compared with 20% of women with no potential contraindication. Women with potential contraindications to estrogen more frequently used permanent contraception (odds ratio [OR] vs. pill/patch/ring: 1.48 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.88) or no contraceptive method (OR vs. pill/patch/ring: 1.37 95% CI: 1.07-1.75) after adjustment for race, age, marital status, and income. Conclusions: Potential medical contraindications to estrogen are associated with permanent contraception and the use of no contraception. These results portray a complicated relationship but could suggest a lack of access to other contraceptive options.

Reproductive Health Care Utilization by Women Who Inject Drugs and Exchange Sex in the Seattle Area.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding reproductive health needs of women who inject drugs (WWID) and exchange sex. This group is at increased risk of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STI). They also face stigma and other barriers to accessing reproductive health care. Purpose: To evaluate contraceptive usage, pregnancy intention, and uptake of general and reproductive health services among WWID and exchange sex. Methods: This analysis of the 2016 Seattle area National HIV Behavioral Surveillance survey included women aged 18-49 years who exchanged sex for money or drugs and injected drugs in the last year. We evaluated contraceptive utilization, pregnancy intention, and reproductive health care access. Results: Among 144 respondents meeting inclusion criteria, the median age was 39 (IQR 33-45), the median age at first injection was 22 (IQR 17-28), and the most commonly injected drug was heroin (62.0%). A minority (10.3%) desired pregnancy in the next year. Among women wanting to avoid pregnancy, 65.5% had not used any prescription contraception (pill/patch/ring, injection, intrauterine device, or implant) in the last year. In the last year, nearly all (92.4%) respondents had received health care and over half (59.0%) had had an STI test. Of women eligible for the HPV vaccine, 28.6% had received at least one dose. Conclusions: Most WWID and exchange sex want to avoid pregnancy. Despite accessing health care, a minority are using prescribed contraception. Health care tailored to these women's preferences may reduce unmet contraceptive need and improve access to well-woman care and preconception counseling.

Providing reproductive health services for women who inject drugs: a pilot program.

BACKGROUND: Needle syringe programs (NSPs), a proven harm reduction strategy for people who inject drugs, frequently offer limited healthcare services for their clients. Women who inject drugs face multiple barriers to accessing reproductive health care in traditional settings: personal histories of trauma, judgmental treatment from providers, and competing demands on their time. Our aim was to implement patient-centered reproductive healthcare services at a Seattle NSP. METHODS: We interviewed clients and staff of an NSP in Seattle and staff of other community-based organizations serving women who inject drugs, then used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to code transcripts deductively. Based on our qualitative work, we implemented reproductive health care at the NSP program 1 day per week. We evaluated the implementation by surveying staff and clients and auditing charts over a 9-month period. RESULTS: Clients and staff (N = 15 for clients, N = 13 for staff) noted a high unmet need for trauma-informed, accessible reproductive health care. We successfully implemented reproductive health care services including short- and long-acting contraception, sexually transmitted disease testing, and cervical cancer screening. Survey data was limited but demonstrated client satisfaction with services. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating reproductive health care into an NSP's clinical services is feasible and can be a source of low-barrier preventive care for women unable to seek gynecologic care elsewhere.

The effect of testosterone on ovulatory function in transmasculine individuals.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 1.4 million persons in the United States identify as transgender or nonbinary, signifying that their gender identity does not correspond with their assigned sex at birth. Individuals assigned female at birth may seek gender-affirming hormone therapy with testosterone. No studies have directly examined ovulatory function in transmasculine individuals using injectable testosterone. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine the effect of testosterone on ovulatory suppression in transmasculine individuals. Secondary objectives were to determine predictors of ovulation in transmasculine individuals on testosterone, and to assess the effect of testosterone on antimüllerian hormone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study recruited participants from a community clinic that provides gender-affirming hormone therapy. Enrolled individuals were assigned female at birth and were currently using or seeking to initiate masculinizing therapy with injectable testosterone esters (transmasculine individuals). Over a 12-week study period, participants collected daily urine samples for pregnanediol-3-glucoronide testing and completed daily electronic bleeding diaries. We assessed monthly serum mid-dosing interval testosterone, estradiol and sex hormone binding globulin, and antimüllerian hormone values at baseline and study end. Ovulation was defined as pregnanediol-3-glucoronide greater than 5 µg/mL for 3 consecutive days. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who ovulated during the study period. We examined predictors of ovulation such as age, length of time on testosterone, serum testosterone levels, body mass index, and bleeding pattern. RESULTS: From July to November 2018, we enrolled 32 individuals; 20 completed the study (14 continuing testosterone users, 6 new users). Median age was 23 years (range 18-37 years). Bleeding or spotting during the study period was noted by 41% of participants (13/32). Among continuing users, median testosterone therapy duration was 11 months (range 1-60 months). A single ovulation was observed out of a total of 61 combined months of testosterone use; however, several transient rises in pregnanediol-3-glucoronide followed by bleeding episodes were suggestive of 7 dysfunctional ovulatory cycles among 7 individuals. There was no difference in antimüllerian hormone from baseline to 12 weeks between participants initiating testosterone and continuing users of testosterone. We did not have the power to examine our intended predictors given the low numbers of ovulatory events, but found that longer time on testosterone and presence of vaginal bleeding over 12 weeks were associated with transient rises in pregnanediol-3-glucoronide. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that testosterone rapidly induces hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal suppression, resulting in anovulation in a proportion of new users. Importantly, these data also suggest that some long-term testosterone users break through the hormonal suppression and experience an ovulatory event, thereby raising concerns pertaining to the need for contraception in transmasculine individuals engaged in sexual intercourse with sperm-producing partners. Given the small number of overall participants, this work is hypothesis generating. Larger studies are needed to confirm and to clarify these findings.

Obstetrician-gynecologists' screening and management of depression during perimenopause.

OBJECTIVE: Depression in women is more common during perimenopause (the time period around and during menopause) than pre and postmenopause. Obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) play a vital role in the detection and management of depression symptoms in women because for many women ob-gyns are the first and most frequent point of medical contact. This study assessed ob-gyns' screening practices and management of depression in perimenopause. METHODS: A survey regarding depression during perimenopause was sent to 500 practicing ob-gyns who were fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 41.8% (209 of 500 surveys returned). Over a third of respondents (34.1%) reported that they did not regularly screen perimenopausal patients for depression. Higher-quality education about depression, respondent sex, and personal experience with depression were associated with higher rates of screening. While 85.7% of respondents believed that they could recognize depression in perimenopausal women, only about half (55.8%) were confident in their ability to treat these patients. CONCLUSION: Increased education of ob-gyn physicians related to depression during perimenopause may increase the screening and treatment of women during this phase of life.

Effects of Prophylactic Oxytocin on Bleeding Outcomes in Women Undergoing Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether routine use of intravenous oxytocin decreases the frequency of interventions to control excess blood loss during dilation and evacuation (D&E). METHODS: In this multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women undergoing D&E at 18-24 weeks of gestation received 30 units of oxytocin in 500 mL of intravenous fluid or 500 mL of intravenous fluid alone initiated on speculum placement. The primary outcome was the frequency of interventions to control excess bleeding. A sample size of 75 patients per group was needed to detect a 15% decrease in intervention from 20% to 5% with 80% power and two-sided alpha 0.05. Secondary outcomes included measured blood loss, complications, procedure duration, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: From November 2014 to February 2018, we screened 337 women and randomized 160 to receive prophylactic oxytocin (n=82) or placebo (n=78). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The frequency of interventions for bleeding, our primary outcome, was 7.3% in the oxytocin group vs 16.7% in the placebo group, difference of 9.4% (95% CI -21.0% to 1.9%). Interventions primarily included uterine massage and uterotonic administration. Among our secondary outcomes, median measured blood loss was lower in the oxytocin group at 152 (interquartile range 98-235) mL vs 317 (interquartile range 168-464) mL (95% CI 71.6-181.5). Frequency of hemorrhage, defined as blood loss of 500 mL or more and 1,000 mL or more, was lower in the oxytocin group at 3.7% vs 21.8%, difference of 18% (95% CI -29 to -6.9%) and 1.2% vs 10.3%, difference of 9.0% (95% CI -17 to -0.7%), respectively. Procedures were shorter in the oxytocin group at a median of 11.0 (interquartile range 8.0-14.0) vs 13.5 (interquartile range 10.0-19.0) minutes in the placebo group (95% CI 1.0-4.0). We found no differences in the frequency of nonhemorrhage complications, pain scores, or satisfaction scores between groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of oxytocin during D&E at 18-24 weeks of gestation did not decrease the frequency of interventions to control bleeding. However, oxytocin did decrease blood loss and frequency of hemorrhage. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02083809.

The effect of sevoflurane on interventions for blood loss during dilation and evacuation procedures at 18-24 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether the use of sevoflurane during general anesthesia for dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures increases the frequency of interventions to treat excess bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of a standardized general anesthesia protocol with or without inhaled sevoflurane for D&Es between 18 and 24 weeks' gestation was performed. The primary outcome was need for any intervention to treat blood loss. Secondary outcomes included measured blood loss, procedure time, complications, side effects, patient satisfaction and provider ease of procedure. RESULTS: One hundred sixty subjects were randomized. Those in the sevoflurane group were slightly more likely to have interventions for bleeding as compared to those subjects who did not receive sevoflurane (25% versus 16.3%, p=.17) or a measured blood loss above 300 mL (15% versus 7.5%, p=.13); however, these differences could have arisen by chance. Most cases of excess bleeding required only minor interventions, including uterine massage and/or uterotonic agents. Procedure time, complications, side effects, satisfaction and ease of procedure were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of sevoflurane to general anesthesia during a D&E between 18 and 24 weeks' gestation did not increase the risk of intervention for bleeding; however, this study was underpowered to detect clinically important differences. IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, sevoflurane did not significantly increase the risk of intervention for bleeding during D&Es. However, this agent should be used with caution as an anesthetic for surgical abortions.

Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The avoidance of menstruation through continuous or extended (greater than 28 days) administration of combination hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) has gained legitimacy through its use in treating endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, and menstruation-associated symptoms. Avoidance of menstruation through extended or continuous use of CHCs for reasons of personal preference may have additional advantages to women, including improved compliance, greater satisfaction, fewer menstrual symptoms, and less menstruation-related absenteeism from work or school. OBJECTIVES: To determine the differences between continuous or extended-cycle CHCs (pills, patch, ring) in regimens of greater than 28 days of active hormone compared with traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active hormone and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormones and 4 days of placebo). Our hypothesis was that continuous or extended-cycle CHCs have equivalent efficacy and safety but improved bleeding profiles, amenorrhea rates, adherence, continuation, participant satisfaction, and menstrual symptoms compared with standard cyclic CHCs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched computerized databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS) for trials using continuous or extended CHCs (oral contraceptives, contraceptive ring and patch) during the years 1966 to 2013. We also searched the references in review articles and publications identified for inclusion in the protocol. Investigators were contacted regarding additional references. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials in any language comparing continuous or extended-cycle (greater than 28 days of active hormones) versus traditional cyclic administration (21 days of active hormones and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormones and 4 days of placebo) of CHCs for contraception. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Titles and abstracts identified from the literature searches were assessed for potential inclusion. Data were extracted onto data collection forms and then entered into RevMan 5. Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all outcomes for dichotomous outcomes. Weighted mean difference was calculated for continuous outcomes. The trials were critically appraised by examining the following factors: study design, blinding, randomization method, group allocation concealment, exclusions after randomization, loss to follow-up, and early discontinuation. Because the included trials did not have a standard treatment (type of CHC formulation, route of delivery, or time length for continuous dosing), we could not aggregate data into meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Study findings were similar between 28-day and extended or continuous regimens in regard to contraceptive efficacy (i.e., pregnancy rates) and safety profiles. When compliance was reported, no difference between 28-day and extended or continuous cycles was found. Participants reported high satisfaction with both dosing regimens, but this was not an outcome universally studied. Overall discontinuation and discontinuation for bleeding problems were not uniformly higher in either group. The studies that reported menstrual symptoms found that the extended or continuous group fared better in terms of headaches, genital irritation, tiredness, bloating, and menstrual pain. Eleven out of the twelve studies found that bleeding patterns were either equivalent between groups or improved with extended or continuous cycles over time. Endometrial lining assessments by ultrasound and/or endometrial biopsy were done in some participants and were all normal after cyclic or extended CHC use. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The 2014 update yielded four additional trials but unchanged conclusions. Evidence from existing randomized control trials comparing continuous or extended-cycle CHCs (greater than 28 days of active combined hormones) to traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active hormone and 7 days of placebo, or 24 days of active hormone and 4 days of placebo) is of good quality. However, the variations in type of hormones and time length for extended-cycle dosing make a formal meta-analysis impossible. Future studies should choose a previously described type of CHC and dosing regimen. More attention needs to be directed towards participant satisfaction, continuation, and menstruation-associated symptoms.

Blockade of tubal patency following transcervical administration of polidocanol foam: initial studies in rhesus macaques.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of polidocanol foam (PF) as a nonsurgical method of female permanent contraception using a nonhuman primate model. STUDY DESIGN: Four groups of adult female rhesus macaques underwent either transcervical treatment with 5% PF directly into the uterine cavity, treatment with inert (methylcellulose, MF) foam or no treatment followed by removal of the reproductive tract for histologic evaluation. Untreated animals were included in Group 1 (n=3). Group 2 animals (n=4) were treated once with MF. Group 3 (n=7) received a single, and Group 4 (n=5) received multiple monthly treatments with PF; in these 2 groups, baseline tubal patency was assessed either laparoscopically by chromopertubation (CP) or by hysterosalpingography. RESULTS: Group 1 (untreated) and Group 2 (MF) animals had normal tubal histology. In contrast, Group 3 and 4 females treated with PF showed evidence of tubal damage. In Group 4, bilateral tubal blockade was noted on CP after two (n=2) or three (n=3) treatments. Histologic analysis confirmed complete tubal occlusion (loss of epithelium, fibrosis) in three of these animals, and one showed significant tubal damage localized to the intramural segment. Nontarget (cervix, vagina, endometrium, ovary) reproductive tissues were unaffected. While similar tubal changes were observed after a single treatment (Group 3), endometrial hemorrhage was also noted as an acute change. CONCLUSION: PF is a promising candidate agent for nonsurgical permanent female contraception. The histologic features of PF occlusion are confined to the intramural portion of the tube. IMPLICATIONS: This study in rhesus macaques supports further development of transcervical administration of PF as a nonsurgical approach to permanent contraception. A nonsurgical method could reduce risks and costs associated with surgical female sterilization and increase access to permanent contraception.

Comparison of interventions for pain control with tenaculum placement: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Although previous studies have demonstrated that a variety of local anesthetics are effective to decrease pain associated with tenaculum placement, no studies directly compare an injection with a topical anesthetic. The objective of this study was therefore to compare mean pain scores with tenaculum placement after an intracervical lidocaine injection or topical lidocaine gel. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, single-blinded trial of women presenting for office gynecologic procedures that required a tenaculum. Women aged 18 years or older were randomized to receive either a 1% lidocaine intracervical injection or topical application of 2% lidocaine gel to the cervix immediately prior to tenaculum placement. The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement, measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes included pain with the intervention and satisfaction with tenaculum placement. RESULTS: Seventy-four women were enrolled and randomized; 35 subjects in each group met criteria for analysis. The two groups had similar socio-demographic characteristics. Women who received the injection had lower mean pain levels at tenaculum placement [12.3 mm (S.D. 17.4 mm) versus 36.6 mm (S.D. 23.0 mm), p<.001] but higher mean pain levels with study drug application [20.4 mm (S.D. 19.4 mm) versus 5.9 mm (S.D. 8.6 mm), p<.001]. Satisfaction with tenaculum placement was similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Mean pain with tenaculum placement is lower after receiving a lidocaine injection than after receiving a topical lidocaine gel. Satisfaction with tenaculum placement is similar with both interventions.

Pain relief for obstetric and gynecologic ambulatory procedures.

As minor gynecologic procedures move from the operating room to the office, providers need to ensure that patients are comfortable and that procedures are performed safely. Although local anesthesia is commonly used for gynecologic procedures, a multimodal approach may be more effective. If necessary, sedation can be safely provided in an office setting with the correct tools and training. This article reviews evidence-based approaches to pain management for gynecologic procedures in the ambulatory setting.

Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with the estradiol valerate and dienogest oral contraceptive pill.

The new estradiol valerate and dienogest oral contraceptive pill recently received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women without diagnosed uterine conditions.This oral contraceptive formulation combines estradiol valerate, which is metabolically identical to natural estradiol, with the potent new progestin, dienogest. The four-phasic pill is effective for pregnancy prevention and leads to significantly decreased menstrual bleeding among women with heavy periods, and shorter and lighter periods among women with normal periods. Studies indicate that this formulation may be associated with decreased hepatic activation compared to contraceptive pills that contain ethinyl estradiol. However, whether these findings translate to a decreased risk of thrombotic events has not been determined, and the pill carries the same contraindications as all other combined hormonal contraceptives.At least 10-15% of women suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as ≥80 mL of blood loss per cycle. In large clinical trials of women with heavy menstrual bleeding, the estradiol valerate and dienogest pill decreased blood loss volume by a median of 81%.Women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with this contraceptive pill can expect a significant reduction in bleeding after just one cycle of use. This therapy leads to a decrease in bleeding that may be greater than that achieved by different oral contraceptive pills or other medical therapies, including tranexamic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Estradiol valerate and dienogest: a novel four-phasic oral contraceptive pill effective for pregnancy prevention and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Estradiol valerate and dienogest have been combined to create a novel four-phasic oral contraceptive pill effective for both pregnancy prevention and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. This formulation represents the only oral contraceptive pill available in the USA containing an estrogen component that is biologically active as the endogenous estrogen 17ß-estradiol. This medication was developed out of efforts to replace the most common estrogen in contraceptive pills, ethinyl estradiol, which is known to be a potent inducer of hepatic protein synthesis. Estradiol valerate has been available since the 1970s in oral and injectable forms indicated for the treatment of menopausal climacteric symptoms. Dienogest has been used in other oral contraceptive pills for over 10 years. Previous attempts to develop an oral contraceptive pill with natural estradiol or estradiol valerate were unsuccessful due to poor cycle control. A novel dynamic-dosing regimen was devised to improve the bleeding pattern. This medication has been shown in several clinical trials to have good contraceptive efficacy and cycle control. Recent studies have also demonstrated that this medication is effective for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. However, compared with other oral contraceptive pills, this medication is associated with a higher frequency of absent withdrawal bleeding. Furthermore, the dynamic dosing regimen requires relatively complex instructions for users who miss pills.