Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 51(3): 166-72, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18181198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT) is used to identify persons sensitized to beryllium. ATSDR convened an expert panel of physicians and scientists in April 2006 to discuss this test and to consider what BeLPT test results actually establish beryllium sensitization. The three criteria proposed by panel members were (1)one abnormal result, (2)one abnormal and one borderline result, and (3)two abnormal results. METHODS: Complete algorithms were developed for each of the three proposed criteria. Using single-test outcome probabilities developed by Stange et al. [2004. Am J Ind Med 46:453-462], we calculated and compared the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) for each set of criteria. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the three criteria were similar. When the criteria required confirmation of an abnormal result the PPV was higher--whether the requirement was satisfied by a borderline result, or only by another abnormal result. Confirmation also reduced the likelihood of false positives. The differences between the three criteria decreased as the prevalence of sensitization increased. CONCLUSIONS: A single unconfirmed abnormal is usually insufficient to establish sensitization for an apparently healthy person. When the prevalence of beryllium sensitization in a group is high, however, even a single abnormal BeLPT can be a strong predictor.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Beriliose/sangue , Berílio/sangue , Ativação Linfocitária , Beriliose/epidemiologia , Proliferação de Células , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Funções Verossimilhança , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
2.
Environ Health Perspect ; 106(12): 765-7, 1998 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9831535

RESUMO

Chronic beryllium disease (CBD) is typically considered only when occupational exposure to beryllium is a certainty; however, CBD has also occurred in occupational and environmental settings where exposure was unexpected. When the etiology of a case of granulomatous pulmonary disease is not determined, sarcoidosis is the "diagnosis of exclusion." This diagnosis does not communicate much information about the patient's prognosis, the disease's etiology, or even what disease etiologies were specifically excluded. Some cases of CBD have been called sarcoidosis, allowing exposure to continue for the patient and (at times) other individuals. The granulomatous changes of sarcoidosis are thought to result from an abnormal immune response. While the etiologic agents that can initiate this response are largely unknown, the immunopathogenesis of CBD has been well described, and laboratory methods are available in a few centers that can (if used) identify beryllium hypersensitivity. The potential for exposure and disease to be widely separated in time and location makes it important for health-care and environmental health professionals to be aware of these new diagnostic methods.


Assuntos
Beriliose/diagnóstico , Berílio/toxicidade , Beriliose/epidemiologia , Beriliose/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade , Exposição Ocupacional , Medicina do Trabalho , Prognóstico , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA