Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Exposure to Lenalidomide in First Line of Therapy: A Single Center Database Review in Greece.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of lenalidomide (Len) in first-line (1L) therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) has led to a significant proportion of patients becoming Len-refractory following 1L treatment. However, there are limited real-world data on treatment strategies and outcomes of patients who become Len-refractory following 1L therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This real-world retrospective cohort study analyzed Len-refractory and non-Len-refractory patients who received 1L Len and initiated second-line (2L) therapy at a Greek MM center. The Len-exposed cohort (n = 249) included 55.4% Len-refractory patients after 1L. RESULTS: Compared to non-Len-refractory patients, Len-refractory patients more frequently had high-risk cytogenetics and Revised-International Staging System-3 disease stage at diagnosis, and had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) following 1L therapy. Len-refractory versus non-Len-refractory patients more frequently received triplets (59% vs. 40%), anti-CD38 agents (20% vs. 9%) and pomalidomide (22% vs. 13%). The overall response rate was 53% for Len-refractory patients and 64% for non-Len-refractory patients in 2L therapy; median PFS was 10.7 vs. 18.3 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was shorter for Len-refractory patients vs non-Len-refractory patients (23.8 vs. 53.6 months). Len refractoriness was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in Len-exposed patients. CONCLUSION: In this real-world Len-exposed cohort, Len-refractory patients receiving 1L Len experienced poorer survival outcomes than non-Len-refractory patients, highlighting the unmet need in this patient population which has driven the development of novel therapies.

Thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Haemostatic abnormalities and deregulated coagulation are common complications in AL amyloidosis. The relevant risks of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events have not been thoroughly evaluated. To describe clinically significant thrombotic/haemorrhagic events in 450 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis. Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were reported in 6% and arterial embolic events (AEEs) in 5% of patients, respectively, during a 55-month median follow-up. Lower albumin, lower eGFR, higher BM infiltration, soft tissue involvement, IMiD-based therapy and prior thrombosis were associated with VTE risk. Prior thrombosis was the only independent prognostic variable (HR 9.3, p = 0.001). Coronary arterial disease, prior AEE, 24-h proteinuria and higher platelet counts were associated with AEE risk. Significant bleeding events were reported in 9%, and associated mortality was 19%. Liver involvement, higher serum creatinine and higher baseline VWF:Ag levels were linked to bleeding risk. Using competing risk analysis, the cumulative probability of thrombosis/bleeding was higher during the first year following diagnosis, but a stable lower risk for both events remained for the duration of follow-up. In AL amyloidosis patients, the risk of thrombotic/arterial embolic events is significant, but the bleeding risk is also high. A multiparametric assessment is required to initiate anti-thrombotic or anti-platelet therapy appropriately.

Belantamab mafodotin, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Part 1 results of a phase I/II study.

Preclinical and clinical data demonstrate synergy between belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) and immunomodulatory drugs with limited overlapping toxicities. We investigated the safety and efficacy of belamaf with lenalidomide 25mg on days 1-21 every 28 days and dexamethasone 40mg weekly (belamaf-Rd) in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. 36 patients (median age 72.5 years) were randomized to receive belamaf at three different doses (2.5/1.9/1.4 mg/kg) every 8 weeks (q8w). Dosing schedule was extended to every 12 weeks (q12w) to account for ocular toxicity. Most common ≥ Grade (Gr) 3 adverse events were fatigue (n=21, 58.3%), rash (n=6, 16.7%), diarrhea (n=8, 22.2%) and COVID-19 (n=5, 13.9%). Gr 3-4 ocular adverse events (OAEs), comprising of visual acuity decline from baseline and/or keratopathy, were reported in 39/216(18.1%)/ 33/244(13.5%)/ 26/207(12.6%) ophthalmological assessments in cohorts 2.5/1.9/1.4 mg/kg. Importantly, Gr 3-4 keratopathy was identified in 9/216 (4.2%)/ 1/244(0.4%)/ 1/207(0.5%) assessments. Most patients (32/36, 88.9%) were treated in the extended q12w schedule, where dose holds due to OAEs were 40, 33 and 16 in cohorts 2.5/1.9/1.4. Overall, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 83.3% and 52.8%, without significant differences among cohorts. Over a median follow-up of 20.3 months no disease progression was reported; 6 patients discontinued treatment due to infection-related death (n=4 COVID-19, n=2 pneumonia) and 1 patient withdrew consent. Based on toxicity/efficacy balance, the recommended phase 2 dose was 1.9 mg/kg q8w, extended to q12w for toxicity. Belamaf-Rd, with the extended schedule for belamaf, has shown important clinical activity and a significant improvement of OAEs with minimal impact on vision-related functioning in an elderly, non-transplant eligible population.

Efficacy and safety of daratumumab with ixazomib and dexamethasone in lenalidomide-exposed patients after one prior line of therapy: Final results of the phase 2 study DARIA.

The use of lenalidomide in frontline therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) has increased the number of those who become refractory to lenalidomide at second line. In this context, we assessed the efficacy of daratumumab in combination with ixazomib and dexamethasone (Dara-Ixa-dex) in the prospective phase 2 study DARIA. Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) after one prior line with a lenalidomide-based regimen. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included survival outcomes, safety and changes in biomarkers of bone metabolism. Overall, 50 patients were enrolled (median age 69 years, 56% males). 32 (64%) patients were refractory to lenalidomide, and 17 (34%) had undergone autologous transplant. The ORR was 64% (n = 32); whereas 17 (34%) had a very good partial response or better. The median time to first response was 1.0 month. After a median follow-up of 23.4 months, the median PFS and OS were 8.1 and 39.2 months, respectively. Furthermore, significant changes in markers of bone metabolism became evident as early as at 6 months on treatment. Regarding safety, 21 (42%) patients had ≥1 grade 3/4 adverse event (AE); the most common was thrombocytopenia (n = 9, 18%). 14 (28%) patients had ≥1 serious AE (SAE), the most common being acute kidney injury and pneumonia (n = 2, each). Four patients died due to infections. In conclusion, second-line treatment with Dara-Ixa-dex in patients with RRMM pre-treated with a lenalidomide-based regimen resulted in rapid responses along with a favorable effect on bone metabolism.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against COVID-19 for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Study in the Omicron Era.

Background: tixagevimab/cilgavimab, distributed under the name "Evusheld", was the first available pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 other than vaccination. It received an EUA from the FDA after sufficient trial data showed efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and subsequent severe disease. Its potential benefits for high-risk immunocompromised patients generated a lot of interest. Individuals with multiple myeloma fall into this category, as they are characterized by attenuated immune responses and, in some cases, vaccines have limited efficacy. Methods: this single-center, prospective study included consecutive patients with multiple myeloma. All individuals were considered high-risk for COVID-19 due to their underlying disease. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as data regarding COVID-19 infection and antibodies, were collected. Patients were administered two intramuscular 150 mg doses of Evusheld and were monitored during the follow-up period. Results: one hundred and eleven multiple myeloma patients were included in this analysis, with a median age of 64 years (range 58-69) and fifty-three were females (47.7%). Fourteen patients (12.6%) had a prior history of COVID-19 and all patients were vaccinated with either three or four doses of mRNA-based vaccines. An increase was observed in the median neutralizing-antibody levels before and after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration, from 92.6% to 97.3%. The high levels were sustainable, with a median neutralizing-antibody level of 95.4% at 3 months post Evusheld administration. Overall, nine patients (8.1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the follow-up period, at a median of 31 days. There were no SARS-CoV-2- infection-related hospitalizations or deaths. The monoclonal antibody combination was well tolerated, with no infusion-related reactions or major adverse events, and pain at the injection site only was reported by 33 patients (30%). Conclusions: tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) seemed beneficial for patients with multiple myeloma, who presented high neutralizing-antibody levels and a low incidence of COVID-19 during the initial Omicron wave. No new safety concerns emerged. However, novel combinations of monoclonal antibodies against the new circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 are deemed necessary in view of the emergence of immune tolerance.

Impact of daratumumab on stem cell mobilization and collection, engraftment and early post-transplant complications among multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a standard therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study aimed to assess the impact of daratumumab-containing induction on stem cell (SC) mobilization, apheresis and hospitalization. We evaluated 200 newly diagnosed MM patients that were mobilized for SC collection and which received induction with (N = 40) or without daratumumab (N = 160). Dara group patients required more frequent use of plerixafor, larger collection volumes, and had lower SC yield. 87.5% (35/40) of dara group patients achieved the planned yield of ≥ 5 × 10^6 CD34+/kg for at least one transplant compared to 96.2% (154/160) of patients in the non-dara group. Dara group patients had delayed hematopoietic recovery (11 vs 10 days for PMN > 0.5 × 10E9/l), required more transfusions (4 vs 2 plts), prolonged hospitalization (20 vs 18 days), more febrile episodes and prolonged antibiotic administration. Despite daratumumab effect patients finally achieved a successful stem cell collection and proceeded to transplant.

Real World Efficacy and Toxicity of Selinexor: Importance of Patient Characteristics, Dose Intensity and Post Progression Outcomes.

BACKGOUND: Selinexor is an orally available selective inhibitor of exportin-1 that has offered a new treatment option in relapsed or refractory myeloma (RRMM) either in combination with dexamethasone (Sd) or with bortezomib and dexamethasone (SVd). PATIENTS-METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of selinexor combinations in the real world, post progression therapies and their outcomes. The analysis included 44 patients with RRMM treated with Sd (N = 21, 48%) or SVd (N = 23, 52%). RESULTS: On intent-to-treat, response rate (ORR) among all treated patients was 29.5% (13/44, of which CR: 2, VGPR: 3, PR:8); ORR was 35% for SVd and 24% for Sd. Median PFS was 3.0 months for all; 6.9 months for responders (≥PR),2.7 months for Sd and 3.4 months for SVd treated patients. In univariate analysis, serum albumin <3.5 g/dl and LDH >ULN were associated with worse PFS (P = .001 and P = .032, respectively).The OS of the whole cohort exceeded one year while serum albumin <3.5 gr/dl and LDH>ULN were associated with worse OS. After progression to Sd/SVd, 20 patients received further therapy; on ITT, the ORR was 40% (8/20) and the subsequent PFS was 3.4 months. The most common adverse events were fatigue, thrombocytopenia and nausea, while the most recorded grade 3 or 4 side effect was thrombocytopenia; 56% (25/44) of patients required dose reduction, however, this was not associated with inferior PFS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, selinexor-based therapy provides an additional treatment option in the real word setting and with appropriate dosing and toxicity management a subset of patients may have significant benefit.

Outcomes of patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy.

As daratumumab use in AL amyloidosis increases, more patients will either relapse after or become refractory to daratumumab. We present the outcome of 33 patients with AL who failed on daratumumab (due to haematological relapse in 21 [64%] patients and inadequate haematological response in 12 [36%]) and received further treatment. Overall response rate in the post-daratumumab failure treatment was 55% (CR/VGPR: 14 [42%] and PR: 3 [9%] patients). Patients retreated with daratumumab and patients harbouring +1q21 had lower rates of response. Treatment of patients with AL who fail daratumumab therapy is feasible when non-cross-resistant drugs or other targeted therapies are available.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin Monotherapy in Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a promising therapeutic target for multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of monotherapy with the conjugated anti-BCMA monoclonal antibody belantamab mafodotin in triple-class refractory patients with MM in real-world practice. Patients refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor, one immunomodulatory drug, and one anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received belantamab mafodotin at 2.5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Overall, 27 patients with a median age of 65 years (range 41-81) were included. Of these, 52% were male and the median number of prior lines of treatment was 5 (4-10). The overall response rate (partial response or better) was 52%, whereas the disease control rate (stable disease or better) was 70%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95%CI: 0-7), whereas the median PFS among the responders was 12 months (95%CI: 6-18). Regarding the toxicity profile, the most common toxicity was eye toxicity, in 44% of the patients. Keratopathy grade 2-3 was reported in 33.3% of the patients. In conclusion, belantamab mafodotin showed a safety and efficacy profile consistent with the results of the registrational study. Importantly, heavily pretreated patients who responded to treatment derived a substantial survival benefit.

Prognostic impact of translocation t(11;14) and of other cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with AL amyloidosis in the era of contemporary therapies.

OBJECTIVES: Translocation t(11;14) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis with prognostic and therapeutic relevance, which has not been clearly defined in the most recent therapeutic era. METHODS: We assessed its prognostic role in 146 newly-diagnosed patients who received novel agent-based treatment combinations. Event-free survival (EFS), a composite endpoint defined by hematological progression, start of a new treatment-line or death, and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: Half of the patients had at least one FISH abnormality; 40% had t(11;14) which was inversely associated with other cytogenetic abnormalities. At 1, 3, and 6-month landmarks, hematologic response rates were numerically but not statistically higher in the non-t(11;14) group. Patients with t(11;14) were more frequently switched to second-line treatment within 12 months (p = .015). At median follow-up of 31.4 months, t(11;14) was associated with shorter EFS [17.1 (95% CI 3.2-10.6) vs. 27.2 months (95% CI 13.8-40.6), p = .021] and retained its prognostic significance in the multivariate model (HR:1.66, p = .029). The effect on OS was neutral, possibly due to the use of effective salvage therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of targeted therapies for patients with t(11;14) to avoid delays in the achievement of deep hematologic responses.

Use of Oral Antivirals Ritonavir-Nirmatrelvir and Molnupiravir in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Is Associated with Low Rates of Severe COVID-19: A Single-Center, Prospective Study.

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM), SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with a severe clinical course and high mortality rates due to the concomitant disease- and treatment-related immunosuppression. Specific antiviral treatment involves viral replication control with monoclonal antibodies and antivirals, including molnupiravir and the ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir. This prospective study investigated the effect of these two agents on SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and mortality in patients with MM. Patients received either ritonavir-nirmatrelvir or molnupiravir. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), were compared. A total of 139 patients was treated with ritonavir-nirmatrelvir while the remaining 30 patients were treated with molnupiravir. In total, 149 patients (88.2%) had a mild infection, 15 (8.9%) had a moderate infection, and five (3%) had severe COVID-19. No differences in the severity of COVID-19-related outcomes were observed between the two antivirals. Patients with severe disease had lower neutralizing antibody levels before the COVID-19 infection compared to patients with mild disease (p = 0.04). Regarding treatment, it was observed that patients receiving belantamab mafodotin had a higher risk of severe COVID-19 (p < 0.001) in the univariate analysis. In conclusion, ritonavir-nirmatrelvir and molnupiravirmay prevent severe disease in MM patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This prospective study indicated the comparable effects of the two treatment options, providing an insight for further research in preventing severe COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Outcomes for patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis and Mayo stage 3B disease.

Patients with cardiac light chain amyloidosis and Mayo stage 3b disease define a high-risk population with very poor prognosis. Here, we report treatment outcomes of 80 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL and Mayo 3b who received novel regimens. Early mortality (<1 month) rate was 12.5%. On intention-to-treat, overall hematologic response rate was 40%, with complete response (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) in 25% and partial response (PR) in 15%. At 1- and 3- month landmark analysis CR or VGPR/PR rates were 25%/23.5% and 34%/25.5%, respectively. Among patients that were treated with daratumumab-based therapies, 52.6% and 85.7% achieved at least VGPR within one 1 and 3 months, respectively. Three-month cardiac response rate was 11.3% and 6-month was 18.8%. At least hemVGPR at 3 months was associated with cardiac response at 6 months (p = 0.034). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months. At 1-month landmark at least hemPR was associated with better median OS (24.1 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.017) and at 3-month landmark, at least hemVGPR was associated with a median OS of 40.7 versus 17 months for hemPR and 7.4 months for those without hematologic response (p = 0.028). Cardiac response at 3 months was associated with longer median OS (59.7 vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.044). Factors associated with poorer survival were κ-light chain amyloidosis (median OS 2.9 vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.028), peripheral nerve involvement (3.4 vs. 10.45 months, p = 0.024), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (2 vs. 8 months, p = 0.002), baseline LVEF <55% (median OS 3.4 vs. 32 months, p = 0.29) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (2.7 months for NYHA 3B-4 vs. 8 months for NYHA 2-3A, p = 0.02). Twenty-one patients (26.3%) received salvage therapy and ORR was 57.1%. Median OS for patients who received second line therapy was 24 months. In conclusion, patients with Mayo 3b disease benefit from early hematologic response but cardiac response rates remain low.

Pulmonary function tests reveal unrecognised lung dysfunction and have independent prognostic significance in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Lung involvement in AL amyloidosis is not very common, but post-mortem data and retrospective studies suggest it is likely underrecognized. AIM: To perform a comprehensive evaluation of lung function with pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. METHODS: A prospective, non-interventional study of 139 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. RESULTS: PFTs indicated normal breathing physiology in 68% of patients, obstructive in 9% and restrictive in 23%; the latter was associated with worse survival (28.6 vs 76 months for obstructive/normal physiology, p = 0.002) and remained significant after adjustment for Mayo stage and abnormal chest-CT. Forced vital capacity <80% of predicted value, forced expiratory volume <80% of predicted value, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity <70% were independently associated with poorer survival. Respiratory muscle strength (as assessed by maximal expiratory (Pe) and inspiratory (Pi) pressure) was affected in most patients (64% had Pi < 55% and 57% had Pe < 70% of predicted values). Pe% was an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR: 0.984 per 1% unit increase, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary dysfunction, as assessed with PFTs, is common and underrecognized in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis, with significant prognostic and potentially therapeutic implications, independent of the degree of cardiac dysfunction or chest-CT findings.

Second Booster BNT162b2 Restores SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Response in Patients With Multiple Myeloma, Excluding Those Under Anti-BCMA Therapy.

COVID-19 vaccination leads to a less intense humoral response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared with healthy individuals, whereas the SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity fades over time. The purpose of this study was to explore the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in patients with MM after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, focusing on their response before (B4D) and at 1 month after the fourth vaccination (M1P4D). Overall, 201 patients with a median age of 67 years were included, whereas 114 (56.7%) were men. The median NAbs levels B4D were 80.0% (±3.5%) and at M1P4D they increased to a median value of 96.1% (±3.7%). The NAb values at M1P4D were similar to those at 1 month post the third dose and superior to all previous timepoints. At M1P4D, the NAbs levels of all the treatment groups increased, apart from the anti-BCMA group. A significant increase in median NAbs values was observed for those receiving CD38-based treatment (n = 43, from 71.0% B4D to 96.0% at M1P4D) and those who did not receive CD38- or BCMA-targeted therapy (n = 137, from 89.6% B4D to 96.3% at M1P4D). Regarding the patients under BCMA-based therapy (n = 21), there was no remarkable increase in NAbs values following the second booster shot (from 3.0% B4D to 4.0% at M1P4D). In conclusion, booster vaccination with the BNT162b2 results in a substantially improved humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with MM. Anti-BCMA treatment remains an adverse predictive factor for NAbs response; thus, tailored prevention measures should be considered for this patient subgroup.

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Skeletal-Related Events and Abnormal MRI Pattern Have Poor Survival Outcomes: A Prospective Study on 370 Patients.

Contemporary information is sparse on the frequency of skeletal-related events (SREs) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients at a population-based level in the era of novel agents. In this context, we conducted this single-center, prospective, observational study to determine the incidence of SREs among newly diagnosed MMs (NDMM) and to explore the possible correlations with disease characteristics, imaging finding, and patient prognosis. A total of 370 patients with available baseline MRIs were included. Among them, 208 (56%) presented with at least one SRE at diagnosis. Fractures were the most common reported SREs (48%). The incidence of SREs at diagnosis was higher in patients with osteolytic lesions, abnormal MRI pattern, hypercalcemia, and at least 60% bone marrow infiltration by plasma cells. Importantly, the patients with normal MRI pattern, who did not present with SREs at diagnosis, had statistically significant improved median OS in comparison with the patients who had abnormal MRI patterns and/or the presence of SREs at diagnosis (9.3 vs. 6.6 years, p = 0.048). Our data, which represent one of a few systematic reports on the incidence and characteristics of SREs in the era of novel agents, was indicative of a high incidence of SREs at the time of MM diagnosis. Early detection of myeloma bone disease and tailored patient management are essential to optimize patient outcomes.