Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Surg Today ; 51(2): 219-225, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676846

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients. METHODS: We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n = 188). RESULTS: An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative morbidity between the groups. The 3-year survival rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate were lower in the VE group (53.7 vs. 85.6%; P < 0.0001, 78.5 vs. 92.4%; P = 0.0116). A univariate analysis showed that PS scores ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and pN stage were independent predictors of decreased overall survival rates in the VE group. A multivariate analysis showed total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage to be independent predictors in the VE group. CONCLUSION: LG for gastric cancer is, thus, considered to be safe for patients aged 80 years or older. Total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in these patients.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Segurança , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 74: 158-163, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32846278

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is a common surgical treatment for SMA syndrome. Although there are successful cases of laparoscopic duodenojejunostomies on malignant conditions, cancer patients with opioid-induced bowel dysfunction could struggle in maintaining an oral diet despite surgical treatment of the mechanical obstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66 year-old woman with a chemotherapy history of 18 months for Stage 4 jejunal cancer near the ligament of Treiz presented with vomiting and dehydration. She had a gastrojejunostomy constructed prior to the induction of chemotherapy. CT scan and endoscopic studies confirmed the stricture of this anastomosis due to tumor invasion. Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy was performed, but tolerable food intake was not achieved, likely due to limited bowel movements caused by opioid use and tumor invasion of the celiac plexus. A side-to-side jejunojejunostomy was constructed, since accumulation of food in her jejunal loop was thought to be a significant cause of her limited food intake and vomiting. She was able to tolerate oral intake after the second intervention and was discharged home. DISCUSSION: Successful cases of laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy in malignant strictures of the duodenum have been reported. In this case, the outcome was not so well due to limited bowel movements caused by opioid use. Literature review of laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy on SMA syndrome revealed some cases to be unsuccessful in enabling oral feeding or resolving nausea, and methods to treat such cases could be discussed further. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is an option for malignant strictures of the duodenum, but a favorable outcome could not be achieved in our case. A side to side anastomosis of the jejunal loop and the efferent jejunum may help in improving the outcome.

3.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 25(7): 1285-1290, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200481

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus bevacizumab (Bmab) or cetuximab (Cmab) are now widely accepted treatment options as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Sequential chemotherapy with oral 5-FU backbone for mCRC without using central venous ports is beneficial for both patients and physicians. We designed the SOBIC trial to validate the effectiveness of the first- and second-line oral combination chemotherapy for mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2010 through March 2013, 52 patients were enrolled from 47 institutions in the Hyogo Colorectal Cancer Surgery Group. First-line chemotherapy was S-1 + oxaliplatin (SOX) plus Bmab, and second-line chemotherapy after first-line failure was irinotecan + S-1 (IRIS) + Cmab, IRIS + Bmab, or IRIS based on the KRAS status. RESULTS: The 50 finally included patients received first-line chemotherapy. Second-line therapy was administered to 20 patients (40%): 12 patients received IRIS + Cmab and 8 patients received IRIS + Bmab. The median follow-up period was 48.6 months (range 35-67 months). The median second progression-free survival was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7-35.2). The response rate after first- and second-line chemotherapy was 46.7% and 15%, respectively. The median overall survival was 35.2 months (95% CI: 27.8 to not reached). The main grade 3-4 adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%) and fatigue (10%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Sequential S-1-based combination regimens including oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Bmab, and Cmab were beneficial for patients with mCRC.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Ácido Oxônico/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Tegafur/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(45): 12970-5, 2015 Dec 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26668518

RESUMO

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is defined as a compression of the third portion of the duodenum by the abdominal aorta and the overlying SMA. SMA syndrome associated with anorexia nervosa has been recognized, mainly among young female patients. The excessive weight loss owing to the eating disorder sometimes results in a reduced aorto-mesenteric angle and causes duodenal obstruction. Conservative treatment, including psychiatric and nutritional management, is recommended as initial therapy. If conservative treatment fails, surgery is often required. Currently, traditional open bypass surgery has been replaced by laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy as a curative surgical approach. However, single incision laparoscopic approach is rarely performed. A 20-year-old female patient with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa and SMA syndrome was prepared for surgery after failed conservative management. As the patient had body image concerns, a single incision laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy was performed to achieve minimal scarring. As a result, good perioperative outcomes and cosmetic results were achieved. We show the first case of a young patient with SMA syndrome who was successfully treated by single incision laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. This minimal invasive surgery would be beneficial for other patients with SMA syndrome associated with anorexia nervosa, in terms of both surgical and cosmetic outcomes.


Assuntos
Duodenostomia/métodos , Jejunostomia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Síndrome da Artéria Mesentérica Superior/cirurgia , Anorexia Nervosa/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome da Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Artéria Mesentérica Superior/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 35(8): 1399-401, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18701858

RESUMO

A 69-year-old female patient underwent a choledochojejunostomy for unresectable duodenal papilla cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases. Both tegafur-uracil(UFT) and cyclophosphamide were given orally every day after surgery. Twenty-eight months from the initiation of the chemotherapy the tumor had remarkably reduced and the objective response was evaluated as a PR. The patient is now doing well. Lymph node metastasis is considered an important prognostic factor of papilla Vater carcinoma, and especially with para-aortic lymph node metastases the long-term prognosis is poor. Combination chemotherapy using UFT and cyclophosphamide would be a therapeutic option for elderly or high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Adenoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Duodenais/tratamento farmacológico , Tegafur/uso terapêutico , Uracila/uso terapêutico , Adenoma/patologia , Administração Oral , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Duodenais/sangue , Neoplasias Duodenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologia , Duodenoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Uracila/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA