A Path Forward for Regenerative Medicine.

Although clinical trials of cell-based approaches to cardiovascular disease have yielded some promising results, no cell-based therapy has achieved regulatory approval for a cardiovascular indication. To broadly assess the challenges to regulatory approval and identify strategies to facilitate this goal, the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium sponsored a session during the Texas Heart Institute International Symposium on Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine in September 2017. This session convened leaders in cardiovascular regenerative medicine, including participants from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, with particular focus on treatments closest to regulatory approval. A goal of the session was to identify barriers to regulatory approval and potential pathways to overcome them. Barriers identified include manufacturing and therapeutic complexity, difficulties identifying an optimal comparator group, limited industry capacity for funding pivotal clinical trials, and challenges to demonstrating efficacy on clinical end points required for regulatory decisions. Strategies to overcome these barriers include precompetitive development of a cell therapy registry network to enable dual-purposing of clinical data as part of pragmatic clinical trial design, development of standardized terminology for product activity and end points to facilitate this registry, use of innovative statistical methods and quality of life or functional end points to supplement outcomes such as death or heart failure hospitalization and reduce sample size, involvement of patients in determining the research agenda, and use of the Food and Drug Administration's new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy designation to facilitate early discussion with regulatory authorities when planning development pathways.

Long-Term and Sustained Therapeutic Results of a Specific Promonocyte Cell Formulation in Refractory Angina: ReACT(®) (Refractory Angina Cell Therapy) Clinical Update and Cost-Effective Analysis.

Mononuclear stem cells have been studied for their potential in myocardial ischemia. In our previous published article, ReACT(®) phase I/II clinical trial, our results suggest that a certain cell population, promonocytes, directly correlated with the perceived angiogenesis in refractory angina patients. This study is ReACT's clinical update, assessing long-term sustained efficacy. The ReACT phase IIA/B noncontrolled, open-label, clinical trial enrolled 14 patients with refractory angina and viable ischemic myocardium, without ventricular dysfunction, who were not suitable for myocardial revascularization. The procedure consisted of direct myocardial injection of a specific mononuclear cell formulation, with a certain percentage of promonocytes, in a single series of multiple injections (24-90; 0.2 ml each) into specific areas of the left ventricle. Primary endpoints were Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification (CCSAC) improvement at the 12-month follow-up and ischemic area reduction (scintigraphic analysis) at the 12-month follow-up, in correlation with ReACT's formulation. A recovery index (for patients with more than 1 year follow-up) was created to evaluate CCSAC over time, until April 2011. Almost all patients presented progressive improvement in CCSAC beginning 3 months (p=0.002) postprocedure, which was sustained at the 12-month follow-up (p=0.002), as well as objective myocardium ischemic area reduction at 6 months (decrease of 15%, p<0.024) and 12 months (decrease of 100%, p<0.004) The recovery index (n=10) showed that the patients were graded less than CCSAC 4 for 73.9 ± 24.2% over a median follow-up time of 46.8 months. After characterization, ReACT's promonocyte concentration suggested a positive correlation with CCSAC improvement (r=-0.575, p=0.082). Quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) improved significantly in almost all domains. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed decrease in angina-related direct costs. Refractory angina patients presented a sustained long-term improvement in CCSAC and myocardium ischemic areas after the procedure. The long-term follow-up and strong improvement in quality of life reinforce effectiveness. Promonocytes may play a key role in myocardial neoangiogenesis. ReACT dramatically decreased direct costs.

Human Umbilical Cord Blood for Transplantation Therapy in Myocardial Infarction.

Cell-based therapy is a promising therapy for myocardial infarction. Endogenous repair of the heart muscle after myocardial infarction is a challenge because adult cardiomyocytes have a limited capacity to proliferate and replace damaged cells. Pre-clinical and clinical evidence has shown that cell based therapy may promote revascularization and replacement of damaged myocytes after myocardial infarction. Adult stem cells can be harvested from different sources including bone marrow, skeletal myoblast, and human umbilical cord blood cells. The use of these cells for the repair of myocardial infarction presents various advantages over other sources of stem cells. Among these are easy harvesting, unlimited differentiation capability, and robust angiogenic potential. In this review, we discuss the milestone findings and the most recent evidence demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells as a stand-alone therapy or in combination with gene therapy, highlighting the importance of optimizing the timing, dose and delivery methods, and a better understanding of the mechanisms of action that will guide the clinical entry of this innovative treatment for ischemic disorders, specifically myocardial infarction.

Recommendations for successful training on methods of delivery of biologics for cardiac regeneration: a report of the International Society for Cardiovascular Translational Research.

The field of myocardial regeneration (angiogenesis and myogenesis) might prove to play an important role in the future management of cardiovascular disease. Stem cells are currently undergoing testing in Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. Methods of delivery will affect the outcome of such therapies, perhaps significantly. This document provides suggested guidance in 4 methods of delivery: endocardial, intracoronary, coronary sinus, and epicardial.

Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes of right ventricular failure in a large population of patients implanted with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. METHODS: Patients (n = 484) enrolled in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (Thoratec, Pleasanton, Calif) bridge-to-transplantation clinical trial were examined for the occurrence of right ventricular failure. Right ventricular failure was defined as requiring a right ventricular assist device, 14 or more days of inotropic support after implantation, and/or inotropic support starting more than 14 days after implantation. Demographics, along with clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic data, were compared between patients with and without right ventricular failure, and risk factors were identified. RESULTS: Overall, 30 (6%) patients receiving left ventricular assist devices required a right ventricular assist device, 35 (7%) required extended inotropes, and 33 (7%) required late inotropes. A significantly greater percentage of patients without right ventricular failure survived to transplantation, recovery, or ongoing device support at 180 days compared with patients with right ventricular failure (89% vs 71%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio of greater than 0.63 (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.3; P = .009), need for preoperative ventilator support (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-13.2; P < .001), and blood urea nitrogen level of greater than 39 mg/dL (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1; P = .02) were independent predictors of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of right ventricular failure in patients with a HeartMate II ventricular assist device is comparable or less than that of patients with pulsatile-flow devices. Its occurrence is associated with worse outcomes than seen in patients without right ventricular failure. Patients at risk for right ventricular failure might benefit from preoperative optimization of right heart function or planned biventricular support.

Impact of center volume on outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy: analysis of the Thoratec HeartMate Registry, 1998 to 2005.

BACKGROUND: More than 400 patients with end-stage heart failure underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation of LVAD as destination therapy (DT) after the US Food and Drug Administration approval of DT in 2002. Because most of these patients had surgeries at hospitals that were newly accredited, we sought to examine the impact of LVAD center volume on the outcomes of DT. METHODS AND RESULTS: From July 1998 through December 2005, a total of 377 patients underwent implantation of HeartMate I LVAD as DT at 68 centers in the United States. Using data from the Thoratec DT Registry, we examined the association between LVAD center volume at the time of surgery and 1-year survival with DT. Of the studied 377 DT recipients, 53% underwent device implantation at centers that performed 9th DT implant; P=0.009). However, the DT center volume was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival with DT when adjusted for the preoperative DT Risk Score, suggesting that other factors, such as improved candidate selection, may have accounted for the institutional learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The institutional experience with DT may have a significant impact on outcomes of this therapy. Better selection of candidates, systemic approach to surgical and postoperative care, as well as the long-term medical management most likely all contribute to these improvements.

The role of cerebral hyperperfusion in postoperative neurologic dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation for end-stage heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral hyperperfusion is a life-threatening syndrome that can occur in patients with chronically hypoperfused cerebral vasculature whose normal cerebral circulation was re-established after carotid endarterectomy or angioplasty. We sought to determine whether the abrupt restoration of perfusion to the brain after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation produced similar syndromes. METHODS: We studied the role of increased systemic flow after LVAD implantation on neurologic dysfunction in 69 consecutive HeartMate XVE LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, Calif) recipients from October 2001 through June 2006. Neurologic dysfunction was defined as postoperative permanent or transient central change in neurologic status, including confusion, focal neurologic deficits, visual changes, seizures, or coma for more than 24 hours within 30 days after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: We found that 19 (27.5%) patients had neurologic dysfunction, including encephalopathy (n = 11), coma (n = 3), and other complications (n = 5). The multivariate analysis showed that an increase in cardiac index from the preoperative baseline value (relative risk, 1.33 per 25% cardiac index increase; P = .01) and a previous coronary bypass operation (relative risk, 4.53; P = .02) were the only independent predictors of neurologic dysfunction. Reduction of left ventricular assist device flow in 16 of the 19 symptomatic patients led to improvement of symptoms in 14 (87%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that normal flow might overwhelm cerebral autoregulation in patients with severe heart failure, suggesting that cerebral hyperperfusion is possible in recipients of mechanical circulatory support with neurologic dysfunction.

Chronic treatment with clenbuterol modulates endothelial progenitor cells and circulating factors in a murine model of cardiomyopathy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of chronic treatment with the beta 2 adrenergic receptor agonist clenbuterol on endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in a well-characterized model of heart failure, the muscle LIM protein knockout (MLP(-/-)) mouse. MLP(-/-) mice were treated daily with clenbuterol (2 mg/kg) or saline subcutaneously for 6 weeks. Clenbuterol led to a 30% increase in CD31(+) cells in the bone marrow of MLP(-/-) heart failure mice (p < 0.004). Clenbuterol did not improve ejection fraction. Clenbuterol treatment in MLP(-/-) mice was associated with significant changes in the following circulating factors: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-type 1, leukemia inhibitory factor 1, C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein A1, fibroblast growth factor 2, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, macrophage-derived chemokine, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-3. Clenbuterol treatment in the MLP(-/-) model of heart failure did not rescue heart function, yet did increase CD31(+) cells in the bone marrow. This is the first evidence that a beta 2 agonist increases EPC proliferation in the bone marrow in a preclinical model of heart failure.

Destination therapy: current results and future promise.

The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance in the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial demonstrated that the implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as an alternative to heart transplantation, or destination therapy (DT) is superior to any known medical therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure who are not eligible for transplantation. In this article, we review results of the first United States and European clinical trials of DT, including the REMATCH, the Investigation of the Non-Transplant Eligible Patients who are Inotrope Dependent (INTREPID), and the Clinical Utility Baseline Study (CUBS) trials, as well as the outcomes of the first DT implantations in the post-REMATCH era in the United States. The article summarizes the current state of knowledge and future directions in the field of permanent mechanical circulatory support therapy as an alternative to heart transplantation.

Stem cell therapy trials: a call for standardization.

There are currently 25 new clinical cellular therapy trials in progress for cardiovascular disease in the US, and a similar number ongoing in Europe. The lack of standardization in cell isolation, preparation, storage, and time and localization of delivery, present clear hurdles to this growing field. This emphasizes the need for an organized task force to work closely with the FDA to agree upon standardized methods with the end result being improvements in patient care and enhanced knowledge in the field.

Translating clinical research to the bedside: the Minnesota model.

Minnesota is home to two of the pioneering institutions that ushered in the golden era of modern cardiac surgery. Clinicians and researchers at the Mayo Clinic and the University of Minnesota built on this momentum and began translating clinical research directly to the bedside. This legacy continues today. Minnesota has a rich history and track record of translating clinical research to the bedside and developing medical device companies that have benefited investigators, patients, and the economy. We will give a brief overview of this model and the steps to success which can be duplicated by other states and countries.

Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.

BACKGROUND: The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial first demonstrated that implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) can provide survival superior to any known medical treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. In the present study, we describe outcomes of DT in the post-REMATCH era in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study included 280 patients who underwent HeartMate XVE LVAD implantation between November 2001 and December 2005. A preoperative risk score for in-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was established in 222 patients with complete data. All patients were followed up until death or December 2006. The 1-year survival after LVAD implantation was 56%. The in-hospital mortality after LVAD surgery was 27%. The main causes of death included sepsis, right heart failure, and multiorgan failure. The most important determinants of in-hospital mortality were poor nutrition, hematological abnormalities, markers of end-organ or right ventricular dysfunction, and lack of inotropic support. Stratification of DT candidates into low (n=65), medium (n=111), high (n=28), and very high (n=18) risk on the basis of the risk score calculated from these predictors corresponded with 1-year survival rates of 81%, 62%, 28%, and 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Patients with advanced heart failure who are referred for DT before major complications of heart failure develop have the best chance of achieving an excellent 1-year survival with LVAD therapy.

Cardiac improvement during mechanical circulatory support: a prospective multicenter study of the LVAD Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support has been reported. The LVAD Working Group Recovery Study was a prospective multicenter trial to assess the incidence of myocardial recovery in patients bridged to cardiac transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: After LVAD implantation, patients were evaluated with the use of rest echocardiograms with partial LVAD support and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Dobutamine echocardiography with hemodynamic measurements was performed in those patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% during resting studies. Histological analysis was performed on myocardial samples taken at LVAD implantation and explantation. Sixty-seven LVAD patients with heart failure participated in the study. After 30 days, significant improvement occurred in left ventricular ejection fraction (17+/-7% versus 34+/-12%; P<0.001) and reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (7.1+/-1.2 versus 5.1+/-1.1 cm; P<0.001) and left ventricular mass (320+/-113 versus 194+/-79 g; P<0.001) compared with before LVAD. Thirty-four percent of patients had left ventricular ejection fraction >40% with partial device support. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased over time to pre-LVAD measurement by 120 days. Peak VO2 improved with mechanical support (13.7+/-4.2 versus 18.9+/-5.5 mL/kg per minute, 30 versus 120 days; P<0.001). Tissue analysis revealed significant reductions in myocyte size, collagen content, and cardiac tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Six subjects (9%) underwent LVAD explantation for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac function improves significantly after device implantation. Although cellular recovery and improvement in ventricular function are observed, the degree of clinical recovery is insufficient for device explantation in most patients with chronic heart failure.

A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although histological evaluation of the cardiac tissue is the current gold standard for evaluation of rejection, we hypothesized that cardiac perfusion MRI is a safe non-invasive method that correlates tissue blood flow changes with biopsy proven rejection in the cardiac transplant patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study from 1984-2001, 83 patients underwent 135 MR Gd-DTPA imaging studies. In 8 patients (9%), biopsies graded 2 or higher (by ISHLT criteria) provided evidence of rejection. Patients were age and sex matched to 11 non-rejected controls for imaging analysis. Time-signal intensity curves generated for a mid-ventricle LV short axis slice during rest and adenosine stress allowed determination of myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/gm). ROC curve analysis by SPSS allowed estimation of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: At rest, there was no difference in MBF between patients with prior rejection vs. those without (1.18 +/- 0.26 vs. 1.16 +/- 0.29). At stress there was a decrease in MBF for patients with prior rejection episodes (3.27 +/- 0.74) compared to no rejection (3.60 +/- 0.72), P = 0.067). The area under the ROC curve was 0.82, with specificity and sensitivity of 75% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that perfusion MR imaging can be used in assessing the cardiac transplant patient for rejection related microvascular changes. The high specificity and sensitivity recorded from the ROC curve illustrates the potential utility of this diagnostic test for future studies.

Improved mechanical reliability of the HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist system.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist device is a valuable treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure. During the past several years, the XVE has undergone a series of design enhancements to improve reliability. We compared the reliability of the two most recent design iterations of the XVE pump (stitch modification to the inflow valve assembly and new inflow valve housing redesign) to the earlier VE version. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of device reliability was performed for 268 devices implanted in 245 patients (VE: n = 167 devices, 147 patients, implant dates October 16, 1998, to December 19, 2003; XVE: n = 101 devices, 98 patients, implant dates August 1, 2002, to April 14, 2004). RESULTS: Median duration of device support for the VE and XVE was 159 days (range, 0 to 1,206 days) and 229 days (range, 0 to 693 days), respectively (p = 0.495). Significantly fewer major device malfunctions occurred within the XVE group as compared with the VE group (6 versus 36, respectively; p = 0.0003). The number of major device malfunctions per patient-year of support for inflow valve dysfunction, bearing wear, and other failures for the VE and XVE were 0.2 versus 0.04 (p = 0.006), 0.16 versus 0.01 (p = 0.005), and 0.06 versus 0.04 (p = 1.000), respectively. The freedom from major device malfunction at 1 year was 76% +/- 6% for the VE and 97% +/- 2% for the XVE device (p < 0.001). The freedom from death as a result of major device malfunction at 1 year was 97% +/- 2% for the VE and 98% +/- 2% for the XVE (p = 0.698). CONCLUSIONS: Design enhancements to the HeartMate XVE have significantly reduced the incidence of major device malfunctions compared with the earlier VE model because of a reduction in failure modes from bearing wear and inlet valve dysfunction. Further follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term durability of the most recent XVE pump version.

Identification of a gene expression profile that differentiates between ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling refines diagnostic and prognostic assessment in oncology but has not yet been applied to myocardial diseases. We hypothesized that gene expression differentiates ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, demonstrating that gene expression profiling by clinical parameters is feasible in cardiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Affymetrix U133A microarrays of 48 myocardial samples from Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and the University of Minnesota (UM) obtained (1) at transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement (end-stage; n=25), (2) after LVAD support (post-LVAD; n=16), and (3) from newly diagnosed patients (biopsy; n=7) were analyzed with prediction analysis of microarrays. A training set was used to develop the profile and test sets to validate the accuracy of the profile. An etiology prediction profile developed in end-stage JHH samples was tested in independent samples from both JHH and UM with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in end-stage samples and 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity in both post-LVAD and biopsy samples. The overall sensitivity was 89% (95% CI 75% to 100%), and specificity was 89% (95% CI 60% to 100%) over 210 random partitions of end-stage samples into training and test sets. Age, gender, and hemodynamic differences did not affect the profile's accuracy in stratified analyses. Select gene expression was confirmed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling accurately predicts cardiomyopathy etiology, is generalizable to samples from separate institutions, is specific to disease stage, and is unaffected by differences in clinical characteristics. This strongly supports ongoing efforts to incorporate expression profiling-based biomarkers in determining prognosis and response to therapy in heart failure.

Left ventricular assist devices: evolving devices and indications for use in ischemic heart disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The mortality with end-stage heart failure is extremely high, especially when patients become refractory to conventional medical therapy and require frequent hospitalization. Ischemic heart disease remains the primary cause of advanced heart failure. Mechanical pumps or devices have been developed called ventricular assist devices and are being used to support an increasing number of patients with refractory heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of ventricular assist devices has evolved from initially only support of patients unable to be weaned from a heart-lung machine after cardiac surgery to use now as a bridge to a heart transplant, including patients with acute myocardial infarction and shock and severe pulmonary hypertension. More recently, they have been proven as a definitive alternative for patients not eligible for heart transplantation. There are new devices being examined in clinical trials, including a change from pusher-plate to devices with axial flow technology that are much smaller and easier to implant. Outcomes with their use are improving rapidly as the devices become more reliable and more is learned about the importance of candidate selection. SUMMARY: This review describes current indications for the use of these devices, the types of pumps now available, criteria for initiating ventricular assist device support, complications of their use, and new applications such as a platform for stem cell therapy for treatment of end-stage heart failure.

Current understanding and management of allograft vasculopathy.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major obstacle to long-term survival after heart transplantation. It is a rapidly progressive, obliterative form of coronary vasculopathy distinct from classic atheromatous disease. The pathogenesis is most likely multifactorial and involves both alloantigen dependent and independent mechanisms. Since there is no definitive treatment for CAV and new immunosuppressive agents can only slow the progression of this disease, the prophylaxis and modification of numerous risk factors remains the foundation of posttransplant management in the heart transplant recipient. In this review, we discuss current understanding of the pathogenesis of CAV, novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues and explore optimal approaches to risk factors modification.