Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC) treated with first line lenvatinib monotherapy in the United States.

PURPOSE: Lenvatinib was approved for the treatment of patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC) in the United States (US) in 2015. The main objective of the current study was to assess real-world clinical effectiveness in RAI-R DTC patients treated with first line lenvatinib monotherapy in the US. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in RAI-R DTC patients who initiated lenvatinib monotherapy as first line treatment between February 2015 and September 2020. Anonymized data were abstracted by prescribing physicians from individual patient's electronic health records. Clinical outcomes included provider-reported real-world best overall response (rwBOR), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS). Time-to-event endpoints were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Our study included 308 RAI-R DTC patients treated with first line lenvatinib. At lenvatinib initiation, patients' median age was 60 years, 51.6% were female, and 26.0% of patients had an ECOG performance score of ≥2. Over the follow-up period, 32.5% of patients discontinued first line lenvatinib permanently, with others remaining on treatment. The median duration of lenvatinib therapy was 17.5 months overall. Provider-reported rwBOR (complete or partial response) to lenvatinib was 72.4%. Median rwPFS was 49.0 months. Estimated rwPFS rates at 24 and 48 months were 68.5% and 55.0%, respectively. Estimated OS rates at 24 and 72 months were 78.4% and 57.0%, respectively; median OS was not reached. CONCLUSION: The current study reinforces the clinical effectiveness of first line lenvatinib as standard of care in patients with RAI-R DTC in real-world clinical practice in the US.

Unmet Needs in Real-World Advanced Therapy-Naïve and -Experienced Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Despite availability of advanced therapies (ATs) for ulcerative colitis (UC), many patients fail to respond to treatment. This study examined real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes associated with current treatments in patients with UC. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used US data from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease from before (2017-2018) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). Physicians (gastroenterologists) seeing > 5 patients/month reported patients' disease characteristics, current symptoms and treatments, and reasons for treatment choices for their next seven consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderately to severely active UC before current treatment. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. ATs included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), integrin receptor antagonists, interleukin-12/23 antagonists, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Patients were classified as AT-naïve or AT-experienced based on current treatment received for ≥ 8 weeks and further classified as responders or non-responders based on symptoms, disease flare status, and remission. Descriptive analyses are presented. RESULTS: The 2017-2018 cohort included 92 physicians and 539 patients (208 [38.6%] AT-experienced). The 2020-2021 cohort included 73 physicians and 448 patients (349 [77.9%] AT-experienced). TNFis were the most common ATs. In 2017-2018, 195 (58.9%) AT-naïve and 113 (54.3%) AT-experienced patients were non-responders; in 2020-2021 this was 57 (57.6%) and 182 (52.1%). Efficacy and induction of remission were physicians' most common reasons for AT choice. Dislike of injections/infusions was the most common reason for eligible patients not receiving biologic therapy. Numerically, non-responders (both AT-naïve and AT-experienced) had more symptoms, overall pain and fatigue, and lower HRQoL scores than responders. CONCLUSIONS: Before (2017-2018) and during the pandemic (2020-2021), over half of patients with UC did not respond to AT. Non-responders carried a high burden of disease. Alternative therapies are urgently needed to treat UC.

Alignment of Physician-Stated vs Clinically Derived Reference Fibrosis Score in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Real-World European Survey.

Objective: Stratifying disease severity in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is essential for appropriate treatment and long-term management. Liver biopsy is the reference standard for fibrosis severity in NASH, but less invasive methods are used, eg, Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), for which reference thresholds for no/early fibrosis and advanced fibrosis are available. We compared subjective physician assessment of NASH fibrosis versus reference thresholds to understand classification in a real-world setting. Methods: Data were drawn from Adelphi Real World NASH Disease Specific ProgrammeTM conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK in 2018. Physicians (diabetologists, gastroenterologists, hepatologists) completed questionnaires for five consecutive NASH patients presenting for routine care. Physician-stated fibrosis score (PSFS) based on available information was compared with clinically defined reference fibrosis stage (CRFS) determined retrospectively using VCTE and FIB-4 data and eight reference thresholds. Results: One thousand two hundred and eleven patients had VCTE (n = 1115) and/or FIB-4 (n = 524). Depending on thresholds, physicians underestimated severity in 16-33% (FIB-4) and 27-50% of patients (VCTE). Using VCTE ≥12.2, diabetologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists underestimated disease severity in 35%, 32%, and 27% of patients, respectively, and overestimated fibrosis in 3%, 4%, and 9%, respectively (p = 0.0083 across specialties). Hepatologists and gastroenterologists had higher liver biopsy rates than diabetologists (52%, 56%, 47%, respectively). Conclusion: PSFS did not consistently align with CRFS in this NASH real-world setting. Underestimation was more common than overestimation, potentially leading to undertreatment of patients with advanced fibrosis. More guidance on interpreting test results when classifying fibrosis is needed, thereby improving management of NASH.

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Palbociclib Combination Therapy: A Multinational, Pooled Analysis From the Ibrance Real World Insights Study.

PURPOSE: Palbociclib was the first cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as initial endocrine-based therapy or with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women who previously received endocrine therapy based on data from randomized clinical trials. Real-world studies examining the effectiveness of palbociclib in large, diverse patient populations in routine clinical practice were needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) was a retrospective medical record review study of women with confirmed hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib plus an AI or with palbociclib plus fulvestrant according to approved indications. Participating physicians reviewed medical records of up to 16 sequentially presenting patients, collecting demographic and clinical data. Outcomes included objective response rates, progression-free rates, and survival rates overall and in patients stratified according to age, race and ethnicity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), disease-free interval, visceral disease, liver metastases, bone-only metastases, and previous lines of therapy. FINDINGS: Data were abstracted by 417 physicians for 2954 patients in 13 countries; 1415 patients (47.9%) were ≥65 years of age, 369 patients (12.5%) had an ECOG PS ≥2 at initiation, and 835 patients (28.3%) were races other than White. The 12-month progression-free rate was 88% for palbociclib plus an AI and 79% for palbociclib plus fulvestrant; the 12-month survival rate was 96% in both groups. The objective response rates were 80% for palbociclib plus an AI and 75% for palbociclib plus fulvestrant. Palbociclib was similarly effective in most subgroups examined. IMPLICATIONS: Data from IRIS provide in-depth, real-world evidence for the use of palbociclib in a range of breast cancer populations in multiple countries. These data support the findings of the randomized PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving palbociclib combinations for HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer in Japan: Results from the IRIS study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of breast cancer is rising in Japan, particularly in postmenopausal women. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy in clinical studies in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study (NCT03159195) collected real-world data for palbociclib-treated patients in several countries including Japan, where such data are currently scarce. METHODS: IRIS was a retrospective chart review study of patients with confirmed HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC receiving palbociclib according to approved indications in real-world clinical practice. In Japan, physicians each abstracted data from patient medical records for up to eight sequential patients treated with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (P+AI) or fulvestrant (P+F). Outcomes included progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs). RESULTS: Fifty-eight physicians abstracted data for 170 patients receiving palbociclib in the first (64.1%) or second or later line (35.9%), in combination with AI (51.2%) or fulvestrant (48.8%). Median follow-up was 10.4 months. Most patients were initiated on palbociclib 125 mg/d (P+AI, 63.2%; P+F, 78.3%). PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 76.2% and 52.6%, respectively, for P+AI and 71.6% and 65.6%, respectively for P+F. PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 85.4% and 66.5%, respectively, for first-line palbociclib combinations and 56.4% and 50.7%, respectively, for second- or later-line palbociclib combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the Japanese IRIS cohort, outcomes in terms of PFRs and SRs appear to be better with first- versus second or later-line palbociclib, regardless of the endocrine partner.

Patient-reported pain severity and health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma in real world clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The association between patient self-reported pain severity and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is poorly understood. AIMS: This real-world study of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) patients sought to determine how pain severity from a single question asked during routine clinical consultation was associated with HRQoL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Point-in-time data on HRQoL of 330 patients with MM (median age 70 years) receiving anti-myeloma therapy in Germany and Italy from November 2017 through February 2018 were analyzed. HRQoL was assessed using validated questionnaires (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -C30 and -MY20). Physical pain severity was assessed during clinical consultation by a single question, asking patients to describe their pain as "no pain," "mild," "moderate," or "severe." Associations between patient-reported pain severity and HRQoL scores were assessed by analysis of variance or χ2 tests. Ninety-six of the 330 patients (29.1%) reported moderate to severe pain. Increase in pain severity, from "no" to "severe" pain, was associated with significantly decreased overall HRQoL (mean score 70.2 to 33.3); significant decreases in levels of physical (82.7 to 35.1), social (81.1 to 44.4), emotional (78.1 to 48.3), and role functioning (79.5 to 38.9); and increased levels of WPAI usual activity impairment (35.4 to 71.4), and fatigue burden (26.0 to 68.9) (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Higher pain severity, based on a single self-report question, was associated with poorer HRQoL in patients with MM, thereby supporting the clinical relevance of directly asking patients to self-evaluate their pain severity.

Real-world treatment of patients with palbociclib for HR+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer: the Europe IRIS study.

Aim: To report the Europe Ibrance Real World Insights study findings. Methods: Physicians abstracted demographic/clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes data for women with HR+/HER2- locally advanced breast cancer (ABC) or metastatic  breast cancer (MBC) receiving palbociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) or palbociclib + fulvestrant. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs). Results: 238 physicians abstracted data for 1723 patients. For patients (>90%) initiating at 125 mg/day, dose was reduced in 18.9% of palbociclib + AI and 12.3% of palbociclib + fulvestrant patients. At 12 months, PFR for palbociclib + AI was 88.1%, and SR was 97.3%; PFR for palbociclib + fulvestrant was 79.8%, and SR was 97.5%. Conclusion: Low dose-reduction rates and favorable PFRs and SRs suggest that palbociclib + AI/fulvestrant is well tolerated and effective for HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC in real-world clinical practice.

Lay abstract We describe findings of the Europe Ibrance Real World Insights study. Patients were women with a common type of breast cancer that had worsened but not spread or that had spread. Doctors collected medical information about the women and looked at their progress while on treatment. The treatment was either palbociclib + an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib + fulvestrant. Two hundred thirty-eight doctors collected information on 1723 women. More than 90% of women started this treatment at a dose of 125 mg/day; the dose was reduced for fewer than 20% of women. At 12 months, more than 80% of women survived without their breast cancer worsening, and more than 97% of women survived. These good results suggest that this treatment is safe and effective for women with breast cancer that had worsened but not spread or that had spread.

Real-World Palbociclib Use in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in Canada: The IRIS Study.

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor used in combination with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). Palbociclib was the first CDK 4/6 inhibitor approved for HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC treatment in Canada in combination with letrozole (P+L) as an initial endocrine-based therapy (approved March 2016), or with fulvestrant (P+F) following disease progression after prior endocrine therapy (approved May 2017). The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study (NCT03159195) collected real-world outcomes data for palbociclib-treated patients in several countries, including Canada. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included women with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC receiving P+L or P+F in Canada. Physicians reviewed medical records for up to 14 patients, abstracting demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three physicians examined medical records for 247 patients (P+L, n = 214; P+F, n = 33). Median follow-up was 8.8 months for P+L and 7.0 months for P+F. Most patients were initiated on palbociclib 125 mg/d (P+L, 90.2%; P+F, 84.8%). Doses were reduced in 16.6% of P+L and 14.3% of P+F patients initiating palbociclib at 125 mg/d. The PFR for P+L was 90.3% at 12 months and 78.2% at 18 months; corresponding SRs were 95.6% and 93.0%. For P+F, 6-month PFR was 91.0%; 12-month SR was 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction rates were low and PFR and SR were high in this Canadian real-world assessment of P+L and P+F treatments, suggesting that palbociclib combinations are well tolerated and effective.

Treatment persistence and colectomy-free outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving golimumab or adalimumab: a UK experience.

OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world treatment persistence, colectomy-free survival and treatment switching patterns in UK patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) prescribed golimumab or adalimumab. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review study in adult patients diagnosed with UC using data from 16 National Health Service sites in the UK. Patient records were included in the study if they had initiated first or second-line adalimumab or golimumab between 1 March 2016 and 30 September 2017 (index date). Subjects were required for ≥6 months post treatment initiation. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment-related data and colectomy data were extracted over a follow-up period of 6-12 months. Treatment persistence rate was the primary outcome. Colectomy-free survival and treatment switching were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between treatments using χ2 tests and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The t-tests were used for continuous variables. Time-to-event variables were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The study included a total of 183 patients (96 (52.5%) prescribed adalimumab; 87 (47.5%) golimumab), and patients were mostly first line (79.8%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups. Persistence rates within 12 months were 64.6% for adalimumab and 64.4% for golimumab (p=0.681). Overall, 20.2% switched to other therapy within 1 year, with 8.2% golimumab and 12.0% adalimumab switching to another biologic. Of patients prescribed adalimumab, 14.6% had ≥1 dose change, mainly dose escalations. In the 12 months post treatment initiation, 8.2% of patients underwent colectomy, with no significant difference in colectomy-free survival by treatment, p=0.73. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of clinical outcomes and real-world persistence for adalimumab and golimumab in UC. The persistence rates of both therapies were above 64.0% at 12 months following treatment initiation. In addition, the 1-year colectomy-free survival was relatively similar between the two treatments.

Disease Characteristics and the Burden of Joint and Skin Involvement Amongst People With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disease where disease burden and quality of life (QoL) are affected by both joint and skin manifestations. METHODS: Patient and physician reported data were collected about 3200 patients in a cross-sectional survey of patients from nine countries. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included perceptions of symptom importance, EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D), Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID12), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Index. Outcomes were compared in patients with 'joint-only' and 'joint and skin' disease symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 3200 patients, 2703 had complete information for 'joint-only' or 'joint and skin' involvement and were included in the analysis. Patients had a mean age of 49.2 years, 45.2% were female, and 64.5% had 'joint and skin' involvement. Patients with 'joint and skin' involvement had higher mean tender and swollen joint counts (5.2 and 4.8) than patients who were 'joint-only' (2.0 and 1.5). Significantly more patients with active 'joint and skin' symptoms experienced a flare (currently or within the last 12 months) compared with 'joint-only' patients (34.9 vs. 23.2%, p < 0.001). When asked to prioritize the burden of symptoms, 61.6% of patients prioritized joints, 38.4% prioritized skin. Anxiety/depression was experienced by 41.4% of patients, 62.4% of whom indicated that both joint and skin symptoms were the cause. Patients with 'joint and skin' involvement reported significantly worse QoL, work productivity and activity impairment than 'joint-only' patients (EQ-5D index 0.79 vs. 0.85, p < 0.001; EQ-5D VAS 71.98 vs. 77.68, p < 0.001; PsAID12 2.91 vs. 1.66, p < 0.001; WPAI overall work impairment 25.61 vs. 16.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PsA patients who experience 'joint and skin' symptoms had significantly worse clinical outcomes, health-related QoL, and work productivity compared with patients with 'joint-only' symptoms.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Argentina: The IRIS Study.

PURPOSE: The selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib was approved in Argentina in 2015 for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on phase III study results. The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study aims to evaluate palbociclib in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC or MBC in the real-world setting in multiple countries globally. Here we report results from patients enrolled in the IRIS study in Argentina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective medical chart review study included postmenopausal women with confirmed HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC or MBC who were treated with palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line endocrine-based therapy or with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with disease progression after endocrine therapy. Participating physicians reviewed medical records of up to six patients each, collecting demographic and clinical data. Outcomes included progression-free and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Records were extracted for 162 patients in Argentina (palbociclib plus letrozole, n = 105 [65%]; palbociclib plus fulvestrant, n = 57 [35%]). The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 94% for patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole and 95% for patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant; 85% and 80% of patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole were progression free at 12 and 18 months, respectively. Six-month survival rates were 98% for palbociclib plus letrozole and 98% for palbociclib plus fulvestrant; 93% and 89% of patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole were alive at 12 and 18 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results from this first real-world evaluation of clinical outcomes in Argentina suggest that palbociclib plus letrozole or fulvestrant delivers favorable effectiveness, as measured by progression-free and overall survival rates.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant for HR+/HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer in real-world settings in the US: Results from the IRIS study.

PURPOSE: Palbociclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor approved for use in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). Palbociclib has proven benefits in phase III placebo-controlled studies; however, real-world outcome data are lacking. The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study evaluated palbociclib use in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC in the real-world setting in the US, Argentina, and Germany. Here we describe results for the US patient subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IRIS was a retrospective medical chart review study of patients with confirmed HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC who received palbociclib with either an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as initial endocrine-based therapy in postmenopausal women or fulvestrant-based therapy in women with disease progression following endocrine therapy. Physicians extracted data from patient medical records for ≤16 sequential patients each. Outcomes included progression-free and survival rates. RESULTS: Records were extracted for 652 patients: 360 (55.2%) treated with palbociclib + AI and 292 (44.8%) treated with palbociclib + fulvestrant. The 12-month progression-free rate was 84.1% for patients treated with palbociclib + AI and 79.8% for those treated with palbociclib + fulvestrant; 12-month survival rates were 95.1% for palbociclib + AI and 87.9% for palbociclib + fulvestrant. CONCLUSION: In this first real-world assessment of clinical outcomes in US patients with HR+/HER- ABC/MBC, treatment with palbociclib in combination with AI or fulvestrant demonstrated favorable effectiveness in terms of progression-free and survival rates. Ongoing studies are needed to deliver mature clinical outcome data beyond 12/24 months in the real-world setting.

Skin Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Worsens Overall Disease Activity, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Increases Healthcare Resource Utilization: An Observational, Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthropathy that exhibits heterogeneity in clinical presentation and severity of skin and joint symptoms. This heterogeneity results in an incomplete understanding of the relationship between the skin and joint components of PsA, and their relative impact on PsA disease activity and patient-reported outcomes. The objective of the study was to Investigate the clinical presentation of joint and active skin symptom involvement and the associated impact on physician- and patient-reported outcomes [patient global assessment (PtGA), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and physical function), and healthcare resource burden in patients with PsA. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the Adelphi 2015 PsA Disease Specific Programme, a real-world, cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and their consulting PsA patients from the USA and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK). The sample included data collected during the fourth quarter of 2015, on 1201 patients from 410 rheumatologists. Physician-reported joint and active skin symptom involvement were investigated for associations with clinical outcomes, patient/physician-reported outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). RESULTS: The majority of patients with PsA with documented skin involvement had both joint and active skin involvement (80.9%, njoint+skin = 515, njoint only = 122, noverall = 637). Patients with skin involvement possessed a more severe global clinical profile, and the PsA clinical symptom severity profile positively correlated with skin severity. Physician global assessment scores were not significantly different in patients with joint-only involvement vs. joint with active skin involvement. Patients with skin involvement in PsA possessed significantly worse PtGA scores and increased HCRU. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsA involving both joint and active skin symptoms exhibit a more severe overall disease state, worse patient-reported outcomes, and increased HCRU relative to patients with joint-only involvement in PsA. These results indicate that treating skin involvement should be considered along with treating joint involvement in patients with PsA. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Evaluation of a Postdischarge Call System Using the Logic Model.

This mixed-method study was conducted to evaluate a postdischarge call program for congestive heart failure patients at a major teaching hospital in the southeastern United States. The program was implemented based on the premise that it would improve patient outcomes and overall quality of life, but it had never been evaluated for effectiveness. The Logic Model was used to evaluate the input of key staff members to determine whether the outputs and results of the program matched the expectations of the organization. Interviews, online surveys, reviews of existing patient outcome data, and reviews of publicly available program marketing materials were used to ascertain current program output. After analyzing both qualitative and quantitative data from the evaluation, recommendations were made to the organization to improve the effectiveness of the program.

Intimate partner violence: how clinicians can be an asset to their patients.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) has emerged as a public health concern. It does not consist of physical violence alone, but includes psychological and emotional issues as well. IPV cuts across all cultures, age groups, and socioeconomic classes and necessitates numerous health care visits. It is often difficult to identify those who are affected by IPV when assessing during health care services. This difficulty may be overcome as health care providers become aware of the need to integrate screening as part of the initial assessment. Although it can be difficult to measure the impact of IPV, several organizations have been able to determine that the economic cost to society is significantly increased when IPV is present. Because nurses are the largest class of health care providers, their ability to perform screening activities is paramount to early detection and management of IPV.

Real-world use of Permixon® in benign prostatic hyperplasia--determining appropriate monotherapy and combination treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a major health concern for aging men. The resulting lower urinary tract symptoms may have a profound effect on a patient's quality of life and it is recognized that patient acceptability of treatment is key to decreasing the human and economic burden of the condition. Alphaadrenergic antagonists (alpha-blockers), 5-alphareductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), and phytotherapy as monotherapy or in combination, form the mainstay of medical treatment. METHODS: The Adelphi Permixon Study, a cross-sectional study of representative consulting patients with BPH in two European countries, was undertaken to examine the reasons for choice of medication. Physicians completed patient record forms, and data were analyzed for clinical outcomes and their relationship with the choice of appropriate therapy. RESULTS: Patients receiving combination therapies for BPH are likely to be older and are more likely to be retired than those on monotherapy. Combination therapy is adopted in the real-world setting as first-line therapy on a not-infrequent basis. The analyses demonstrated an association between choice of Permixon® (Pierre Fabre Medicament, Castres, France) as appropriate monotherapy or in combination with alpha-blockers, and the following: BPH severity; treatment of general urinary symptoms, including storage and voiding symptoms; improvement of urinary flow rate; lack of a risk of sexual problems; and reduction of inflammation. Permixon combination with an alpha-blocker is associated with benefits in terms of speed of onset of action, reduction of inflammation, and a positive benefit regarding sexual problems when compared with use of alpha-blocker monotherapy. CONCLUSION: In the real clinical world, Permixon is considered an appropriate treatment for BPH as both monotherapy and in combination with alpha-blockers. Prescribing Permixon in combination with alpha-blockers can be demonstrated to provide benefits beyond use of either therapy alone.