Acupuncture as a Complementary Treatment Modality in the Post-Anesthesia Care Setting: A Feasibility Study.

Introduction: Postoperative pain management and postoperative nausea and vomiting are a persistent challenge for both health care providers and patients. Acupuncture is an effective and safe modality for the management of pain and nausea, and has the potential to play a key role in postoperative pain management. This study explores the utility and feasibility of acupuncture in the immediate postoperative setting. Methods: In a retrospective case-control study, 22 patients who underwent elective surgeries and received acupuncture in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were compared with 88 case controls. Indications for acupuncture therapy included persistent pain, nausea, or anxiety. Patient satisfaction and symptom improvement after acupuncture were assessed. PACU nurses and patients were queried on their perspectives on using this therapy. Demographic data, perioperative opioid consumption, pain score in the PACU, incidence of postoperative nausea, PACU length of stay, and unintended hospital admission were assessed. The groups with/without acupuncture were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: A total of 78.9% of patients receiving acupuncture felt improvement in their symptoms. 94.7% of recovery nurses who cared for patients who received acupuncture felt that it was helpful and 78.9% did not believe it was disruptive. Patients who opted for acupuncture had a statistically significant higher overall median (interquartile range) pain score in the PACU (7.0 [5.2, 9.5] vs. 5.0 [3.0, 7.0], p = 0.009) and higher postoperative opioid consumption (22.5 [9.8, 44.8] vs. 15.0 [0.0, 30.0], p = 0. 03). There was no difference between total perioperative opioid consumption between groups (p = 0.94). Conclusions: Most patients who received acupuncture therapy in the PACU were satisfied with their therapy and would recommend it to future patients undergoing surgery. Most recovery nurses felt it was helpful, was not disruptive, and would like to see it utilized in the PACU.

Patient Attitudes Toward Acupuncture in the Perioperative Setting.

Introduction: Acupuncture is a potential treatment option for pain, nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and agitation in the perioperative period. Patient preference for participating in acupuncture in the perioperative period is not well understood. The aim of this study was to quantify patient interest in perioperative acupuncture, explore the relationship between acupuncture interest, insurance coverage and patient cost, and identify clinical factors associated with patient interest in acupuncture. Materials and Methods: Adult patients evaluated in the Preoperative Evaluation Clinic at the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, AZ, between June 2019 and July 2019, received a voluntary survey to assess their attitudes toward receiving acupuncture in the perioperative period. Patient interest in acupuncture to help treat pain, anxiety, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as their willingness to pay for such services, were assessed. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class, scheduled procedure, and insurance coverage were extracted from the medical record. Univariate analysis was performed to estimate interest in acupuncture. Results: Three hundred and seven respondents were included in this study with a response rate of 60.4%. A total of 68.4% of study participants were interested in receiving perioperative acupuncture. Of those interested in acupuncture, 86.7% were interested if acupuncture was offered at no cost (either free or fully covered by insurance). A total of 47.1% of those patients interested in acupuncture would be interested if the cost of acupuncture was between 20 and 50 U.S. dollars. A total of 8.6% would be interested in acupuncture if patients were expected to pay the full cost of treatment (estimated 175 U.S. dollars). Age, sex, ASA status, type of surgery, risk of procedure, and Medicare/Medicaid coverage were not statistically associated with interest in acupuncture. Conclusions: When there is little to no direct cost to the patient, the majority of patients are interested in acupuncture in the perioperative period.

A Comparison of Perceived Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk to Calculated Lifetime Risk Using the Gail Risk Assessment Tool.

Background: Understanding the accuracy of a woman's perceived breast cancer risk can enhance shared decision-making about breast cancer screening through provider and patient discussion. We aim to report and compare women's perceived lifetime breast cancer risk to calculated lifetime breast cancer risk. Methods: Women presenting to Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Minnesota in July 2016 completed a survey assessing their perceived breast cancer risk. Lifetime Gail risk scores were calculated from questions pertaining to health history and were then compared with perceived breast cancer risk. Results: A total of 550 predominantly white, married, and well-educated (≥college) women completed surveys. Using lifetime Gail risk scores, 5.6% were classified as high risk (>20% lifetime risk), 7.7% were classified as intermediate risk (15%-20%), and 86.6% were classified as average risk (<15%). Of the 27 women who were classified as high risk, 18 (66.7%) underestimated their risk and of the 37 women who were intermediate risk, 12 (32.4%) underestimated risk. Women more likely to underestimate their risk had a reported history of an abnormal mammogram and at least one or more relative with a history of breast cancer. Surveyed women tended to overestimate risk 4.3 (130/30) times as often as they underestimated risk. Conclusion: In a group of predominantly white, educated, and married cohort of women, there was a large portion of women in the elevated risk groups who underestimated risk. Specific aspects of medical history were associated with underestimation including a history of abnormal mammogram and family history of breast cancer. Overall, in our sample, more women overestimated than underestimated risk.

Use of a Wearable EEG Headband as a Meditation Device for Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment affect quality of life and stress and are associated with fatigue. Meditation interventions are effective strategies for patients with breast cancer but are often limited by poor access, high cost, substantial time commitment, and poor adherence. In this feasibility study, we investigated the use of a portable, wearable, electroencephalographic device for guided meditation practices by breast cancer patients during the period from breast cancer diagnosis until 3 months after surgical treatment. Methods: We enrolled women (age = 20-75 years) who had received a recent diagnosis of breast cancer and planned to undergo surgical treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to perform guided meditation with the device (intervention group) or receive CD-based stress-reduction education (control group). Surveys were used to measure stress, quality of life, and fatigue at baseline, within 4 days before surgery, up to 14 days after surgery, and at 3 months after surgery. Results: In the intervention group, 15 of 17 participants (88.2%) completed the study; in the control group, 13 of 13 participants completed the study (100%). Participants in both groups had less fatigue and stress and improved quality of life at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery compared with baseline, but there were no significant intergroup differences at any time point. Conclusion: The use of this wearable electroencephalographic device for meditation is a feasible strategy for patients with breast cancer.

Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care: patient preferences from focus groups.

PURPOSE: To understand patient preferences for integrative therapeutics and/or modalities during cancer care. METHODS: Cancer patients currently going through treatment were recruited from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Participants were asked to engage in 1 of 4 focus groups to understand preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment. Focus group data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighty-five percent of inter-coder reliability was achieved with four team investigators. RESULTS: Nineteen cancer patients participated in four focus groups with mixed cancer types (42% breast cancer), gender (53% female), and age (69% over age 60). Focus group analyses resulted in five themes with respect to preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities among cancer patients: (1) preference regarding accurate and congruent information; (2) preference regarding stress and symptom management; (3) preference regarding discussion of integrative therapies with healthcare providers (4) preference regarding support from family and friends; and (5) preference regarding personalized holistic care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients have a desire to discuss integrative therapeutic aspects of their cancer treatment with healthcare providers. Understanding patient preferences allows opportunity for oncology providers to increase awareness/education of integrative therapeutic modalities. Increased integrative therapeutic knowledge may best support recovery and increased quality of life. IMPLICATIONS: Qualitative research may facilitate understanding the scope of cancer patient preferences regarding the desire and use of integrative therapeutic modalities. A conceptual understanding of cancer patient preferences regarding integrative therapies and modalities may best inform successful direction and efficacy of treatment strategies.

Breast Cancer Screening: Women's Attitudes and Beliefs in Light of Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: In recently updated breast cancer screening guidelines, the American Cancer Society (ACS) and United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended increasing mammography screening intervals for various age groups. In addition, ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination (CBE) for routine screening among average-risk women. Our study explores women's attitudes regarding screening mammography and CBE and evaluates the impact of the updated USPSTF and ACS guidelines on these attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred fourteen patients presenting to Mayo Clinic, Arizona and Minnesota, in July 2016 completed a self-administered survey, which included a summary of the updated guidelines. RESULTS: A majority of the 555 women who fit the inclusion criteria reported that CBE and mammogram are useful in detecting breast cancer and should be performed annually, and 51% of participants were unaware of the updated guidelines. Before reviewing the guidelines, 77% believed yearly CBE and 76% believed yearly mammogram was needed for routine screening. After reviewing the guidelines, the percentage of women who planned to continue with yearly CBE and mammogram decreased significantly to 61% and 64%, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Nearly half the participants (48%) believed the most influential reason for the guideline change was to decrease healthcare spending. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer screening is well received among patients, and a majority of surveyed women were unaware of recent guideline changes. After reviewing the guidelines, there was a significant downward shift in intended screening frequency, although the majority still planned to undergo annual screening. Informing women about updated evidence-based guidelines may influence their knowledge, preferences, and opinions.