Incidence and Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Complications after Spinal Fusion Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal surgery holds a higher chance of unpredicted postoperative medical complications among orthopedic surgeries. Several studies have analyzed the risk factors for diverse postoperative medical complications, but the majority investigated incidences of each complication qualitatively. Among gastrointestinal complications, reports regarding postoperative ileus were relatively frequent. However, risk factors or incidences of hepatobiliary complications have yet to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of gastrointestinal complications after spinal surgery, quantitatively analyze the risk factors of frequent complications, and to determine cues requiring early approaches. METHODS: In total, 234 consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery performed by one senior doctor at our institute in one-year period were retrospectively enrolled for analyses. The primary outcomes were presence of paralytic ileus, elevated serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels, and elevated total bilirubin levels. Univariate logistic regression analyses of all variables were performed. In turn, significant results were reanalyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The variables used were adjusted with age and gender. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal complications were observed in 15.8% of patients. Upon the risk factors of postoperative ileus, duration of anesthesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.373; P = 0.015), number of fused segments (OR, 1.202; P = 0.047), and hepatobiliary diseases (OR, 2.976; P = 0.029) were significantly different. For elevated liver enzymes, men (OR, 2.717; P = 0.003), number of fused segments (OR, 1.234; P = 0.033), and underlying hepatobiliary (OR, 2.704; P = 0.031) and rheumatoid diseases (OR, 5.021; P = 0.012) had significantly different results. Lastly, risk factors for total bilirubin elevation were: duration of anesthesia (OR, 1.431; P = 0.008), number of fused segments (OR, 1.359; P = 0.001), underlying hepatobiliary diseases (OR, 3.426; P = 0.014), and thoracolumbar junction involving fusions (OR, 4.134; P = 0.002) compared to lumbar spine limited fusions. CONCLUSION: Patients on postoperative care after spinal surgery should receive direct attention as soon as possible after manifesting abdominal symptoms. Laboratory and radiologic results must be carefully reviewed, and early consultation to gastroenterologists or general surgeons is recommended to avoid preventable complications.

Effects of Restoration of Sagittal Alignment on Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Instrumented Lumbar Fusions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of postoperative sagittal alignment on radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is one of inherent problems with fusion surgery. Many confounding factors are related to the development of ASD. Recently, sagittal alignment has been emphasized for its significance on ASD. METHODS: Seventy-three patients who underwent four-level lumbar fusion surgery (L2-S1) were divided into two groups according to postoperative sagittal alignment (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] ≥ or <9°): 44 patients (matched group, including 10 patients who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy [PSO] at L4) and 29 patients (mismatched group). The general demographics, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Preoperative disc degeneration at L1-2 was evaluated by Pfirrmann grade and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade. Disc degeneration at L1-2 was evaluated by the K-L grade on 2-year postoperative X-rays. RESULTS: The incidence of radiographic ASD (11 [25%] vs. 16 patients [55%], P = 0.02) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (36.9 ±â€Š19.9 vs. 49.4 ±â€Š20.7, P = 0.015) at postoperative 2 years were significantly higher in the mismatched group. There were no significant differences in other demographic and radiographic parameters between the two groups. On subgroup analysis between 10 PSO patients and the mismatched group, the mismatched group showed a higher incidence of radiographic ASD (16 [55%] vs. 1 patient [10%], P = 0.041) and worse ODI scores (49.7 ±â€Š20.5 vs. 39.0 ±â€Š20.7, P = 0.040). Preoperative Pfirrmann grade at L1-2 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.191, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.754-10.013, P = 0.001) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (OR = 4.890, 95% CI: 1.550-15.427, P = 0.007) showed significant relationships with the development of radiographic ASD at postoperative 2 years. CONCLUSION: The restoration of optimal sagittal alignment, even with PSO, may provide a protective effect on the development of radiographic ASD, although the preoperative disc degeneration grade was a risk factor for radiographic ASD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Lumbar Disc Herniation Within Solid Fused Segments After Removal of Pedicle Screws: A Case Report.

CASE: A 73-year-old man with instrumented fusion of L3-4-5 underwent the removal of previous pedicle screws and posterior instrumented fusion of L1-2-3. The solid dorsal fusion mass of L3-5 was identified intraoperatively and preoperatively. At 3 years after the second surgery, he presented with abrupt radiating pain in the left leg. Plain radiographs showed a collapse of the intervertebral disc space, and magnetic resonance imaging showed disc herniation of L3-4. CONCLUSIONS: Disc herniation even in solid fused segments may occur. Removal of pedicle screws and cranial extension of interbody fusion may increase the intradiscal stress associated with physiologic cantilever motion of the disc.

Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology: A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this article was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic efficacies of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for clinical adjacent segment pathology (ASP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly applied for spinal surgery. No report has compared LLIF with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for clinical ASP. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing LLIF with posterior fusion (hybrid surgery) were compared with 40 patients undergoing conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (posterior surgery). The radiologic outcomes including indirect decompression in hybrid surgery group, and clinical outcomes such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were assessed. Postoperative major complications and reoperations were also compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Correction of coronal Cobb's angle and segmental lordosis in the hybrid surgery were significantly greater postoperatively (2.8 vs. 0.9 degrees, P=0.012; 7.4 vs. 2.5 degrees, P=0.009) and at the last follow-up (2.4 vs. 0.5 degrees, P=0.026; 4.8 vs. 0.8 degrees, P=0.016) compared with posterior surgery. As regards indirect decompression of the LLIF, significant increases in thecal sac (83.4 vs. 113.8 mm) and foraminal height (17.8 vs. 20.9 mm) were noted on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Although postoperative back VAS (4.1 vs. 5.6, P=0.011) and ODI (48.9% vs. 59.6%, P=0.007) were significantly better in hybrid surgery, clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were similar. Moreover, intraoperative endplate fractures developed in 17.7% and lower leg symptoms occurred in 30.0% of patients undergoing hybrid surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid surgery for clinical ASP has advantages of segmental coronal and sagittal correction, and indirect decompression compared with conventional posterior surgery. However, LLIF-related complications such as endplate fracture and lower leg symptoms also developed. LLIF should be performed considering advantages and approach-related complications for the clinical ASP.

Clinical and Radiographic Features of Subtypes of Acute Proximal Junctional Failures Following Correction Surgery for Degenerative Sagittal Imbalance.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical and radiographic features of subtypes of acute proximal junctional failures (PJFs) following correction surgery for degenerative sagittal imbalance. METHODS: The study included 157 patients with mean age 68.0 ± 6.3 years who underwent correction surgery for degenerative sagittal imbalance. Acute PJFs were categorized into 4 subtypes: fracture at uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV), fracture at vertebra just proximal to UIV (UIV+1), fixation failure at UIV, and junctional subluxation. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 18 patients with acute PJFs. PJF group had significantly lower T-score (-3.3 ± 1.1 vs. -1.9 ± 1.5) on bone densitometry and lower body mass index (BMI) (23.0 ± 3.9 kg/m2 vs. 25.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2) than non-PJF group. Radiographic parameters exhibited no significant differences. UIV fracture, UIV+1 fracture, UIV fixation failure, and junctional subluxation were observed in 5, 6, 4, and 3 patients. Fixation failure developed the earliest (median 1.3 months), followed by UIV fracture (1.5 months). UIV fracture occurred earlier than UIV+1 fracture (36 months). Patients with UIV or UIV+1 fracture had significantly lower T-scores than others. Although BMI and T-score were significant risk factors for all PJFs (P = 0.043 and P = 0.021, respectively), different risk factors for each subtype of PJFs were identified on separate risk factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute PJFs had lower T-score and BMI. Each subtype of PJFs had different clinical and radiographic features. Although BMI and T-score were associated with all PJFs, each subtype may have different risk factors. Identifying risk factors for each subtype of acute PJFs may help avoid it.

Clinical Significance of Preoperative Embolization for Non-Hypervascular Metastatic Spine Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of preoperative embolization for hypervascular metastatic spine disease (MSD) such as renal cell and thyroid cancers has been reported. However, the debate on the efficacy of preoperative embolization for non-hypervascular MSD still remains unsettled. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative embolization for non-hypervascular MSD decreases perioperative blood loss. METHODS: A total of 79 patients (36 cases of preoperative embolization and 43 cases of non-embolization) who underwent surgery for metastatic spine lesions were included. Representative hypervascular tumors such as renal cell and thyroid cancers were excluded. Intraoperative and perioperative estimated blood losses (EBL), total number of transfusion and calibrated EBL were recorded in the embolization and non-embolization groups. The differences in EBL were also compared along with the type of surgery. In addition, the incidence of Adamkiewicz artery and complications of embolization were assessed. RESULTS: The average age of 50 males and 29 females was 57.6±13.5 years. Lung (30), hepatocellular (14), gastrointestinal (nine) and others (26) were the primary cancers. The demographic data was not significantly different between the embolization and the non-embolization groups. There were no significant differences in intraoperative EBL, perioperative EBL, total transfusion and calibrated EBL between two groups. However, intraoperative EBL and total transfusion in patients with preoperative embolization were significantly lower than in non-embolization in the corpectomy group (1645.5 vs. 892.6 mL, p=0.017 for intraoperative EBL and 6.1 vs. 3.9, p=0.018 for number of transfusion). In addition, the presence of Adamkiewicz artery at the index level was noted in two patients. Disruption of this major feeder artery resulted in significant changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring. CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization for non-hypervascular MSD did not reduce perioperative blood loss. However, the embolization significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding and total transfusion in corpectomy group. Moreover, the procedure provided insights into the anatomy of tumor and spinal cord vasculature.

Arthroscopic-assisted plate fixation for displaced large-sized comminuted greater tuberosity fractures of proximal humerus: a novel surgical technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to describe the use of a novel hybrid surgical technique-arthroscopic-assisted plate fixation-and evaluate its clinical and anatomical outcomes in the management of large, displaced greater tuberosity (GT) fractures with comminution. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, this novel technique was performed in 11 patients [2 men and 9 women; median age, 64 years (range 41-83 years)] with large, comminuted GT fractures, with fragment displacements of >5 mm. The preoperative mean posterior and superior migration of the fractured fragment, as measured on computed tomography (CT), was 19.5 and 5.5 mm, respectively. Two patients had shoulder fracture-dislocation, and three had associated undisplaced surgical neck fracture. The mean duration between injury and surgery was 4 days. The mean follow-up duration was 26 months. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative ASES, UCLA and SST scores were 84, 29, and 8, respectively. The mean range of motion was as follows: forward flexion, 138°; abduction, 135°; external rotation at the side, 19°; and internal rotation, up to the L2 level. The mean posterior and superior displacements of fracture fragments on postoperative CT scan [0.7 ± 0.8 mm (range 0-2.1 mm) and 2.8 ± 0.5 mm (range 3.4-5.3 mm), respectively] were significantly improved (p < 0.05). On arthroscopy, a partial articular-side supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesion was identified in 10 of 11 patients (91 %), and 1 of these patients had a partial tear of the biceps and 1 had a partial subscapularis tear, respectively (9 %). Intraoperatively, 1 anchor pullout and 1 anchor protrusion through the humeral head were noted and corrected. Postoperatively, the loss of reduction in the fracture fragment was noted in 1 patient at 4 weeks, after corrective reduction and fixation surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The novel arthroscopic-assisted anatomical plate fixation technique was found to be effective in reducing large-sized, displaced, comminuted GT fractures and in allowing concurrent management of intra-articular pathologies and early functional rehabilitation. Compared with the conventional plate fixation or arthroscopic suture anchor fixation technique, arthroscopic-assisted plate fixation enabled accurate restoration of the medial footprint of the GT fracture and provided an effective buttress to the large-sized GT fracture fragments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective clinical study, Level IV.

Anterior cerebral artery aneurysm associated with multiple intracranial aneurysms and abdominal aorta aneurysm.

We found multiple aneurysms in the intracranial arteries and abdominal aorta of an 87-year-old Korean female cadaver, whose cause of death was reported as "cholangiocarcinoma." An abdominal aortic aneurysm was observed in the infrarenal aorta, where the inferior mesenteric artery arose. The intracranial aneurysms were found in the A3 segment of the anterior cerebral artery and at the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery. This case provides an example of the very rare association of peripheral intracranial aneurysms with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Clinicians as well as anatomists should recognize the potential association between these two aneurysm types.