A new bioinformatics approach identifies overexpression of GRB2 as a poor prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer.

A subset of prostate cancer displays a poor clinical outcome. Therefore, identifying this poor prognostic subset within clinically aggressive groups (defined as a Gleason score (GS) ≧8) and developing effective treatments are essential if we are to improve prostate cancer survival. Here, we performed a bioinformatics analysis of a TCGA dataset (GS ≧8) to identify pathways upregulated in a prostate cancer cohort with short survival. When conducting bioinformatics analyses, the definition of factors such as "overexpression" and "shorter survival" is vital, as poor definition may lead to mis-estimations. To eliminate this possibility, we defined an expression cutoff value using an algorithm calculated by a Cox regression model, and the hazard ratio for each gene was set so as to identify genes whose expression levels were associated with shorter survival. Next, genes associated with shorter survival were entered into pathway analysis to identify pathways that were altered in a shorter survival cohort. We identified pathways involving upregulation of GRB2. Overexpression of GRB2 was linked to shorter survival in the TCGA dataset, a finding validated by histological examination of biopsy samples taken from the patients for diagnostic purposes. Thus, GRB2 is a novel biomarker that predicts shorter survival of patients with aggressive prostate cancer (GS ≧8).

A bioinformatics-to-clinic sequential approach to analysis of prostate cancer biomarkers using TCGA datasets and clinical samples: a new method for precision oncology?

Biomarker-driven cancer therapy has met with significant clinical success. Identification of a biomarker implicated in a malignant phenotype and linked to poor clinical outcome is required if we are to develop these types of therapies. A subset of prostate adenocarcinoma (PACa) cases are treatment-resistant, making them an attractive target for such an approach. To identify target molecules implicated in shorter survival of patients with PACa, we established a bioinformatics-to-clinic sequential analysis approach, beginning with 2-step in silico analysis of a TCGA dataset for localized PACa. The effect of candidate genes identified by in silico analysis on survival was then assessed using biopsy specimens taken at the time of initial diagnosis of localized and metastatic PACa. We identified PEG10 as a candidate biomarker. Data from clinical samples suggested that increased expression of PEG10 at the time of initial diagnosis was linked to shorter survival time. Interestingly, PEG10 overexpression also correlated with expression of chromogranin A and synaptophysin, markers for neuroendocrine prostate cancer, a type of treatment-resistant prostate cancer. These results indicate that PEG10 is a novel biomarker for shorter survival of patients with PACa. Also, PEG10 expression at the time of initial diagnosis may predict focal neuroendocrine differentiation of PACa. Thus, PEG10 may be an attractive target for biomarker-driven cancer therapy. Thus, bioinformatics-to-clinic sequential analysis is a valid tool for identifying targets for precision oncology.