[Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2024 update on novel therapeutic strategies].

Many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) can now maintain response thanks to the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and STAMP inhibitors, but adverse events associated with prolonged TKI therapy have become a problem. Adequate management of adverse events is key to successful treatment, as some can significantly impact the patient's prognosis. The goal of CML treatment was once to prevent acute transformation, but now that many patients achieve deep remission and long-term survival, the goal has shifted to achieving long-term treatment free remission (TFR). It is essential to carefully consider disease risk, patient background, and adverse events of each therapeutic agent in order to make the appropriate choice. This article reviews the treatment of chronic phase CML (CML-CP) as described in the 2023 edition of the Guidelines for Hematopoietic Tumors, focusing on treatment options for first-line CML-CP, dose optimization of ponatinib, outcomes with the new CML drug asciminib, and TFR.

Achievement of deep molecular response and treatment-free remission with asciminib treatment in CML.

We evaluated the possibility of treatment-free remission (TFR) and durability of deep molecular response (DMR) with asciminib treatment by monitoring major BCR::ABL mRNA on the International Scale (BCR::ABL-IS) in 4 patients who needed to reduce or discontinue asciminib due to adverse event concerns, intolerance, or personal circumstances. IS increased in all 4 patients after discontinuation of asciminib, but 3 patients who resumed asciminib achieved DMR again. None of the patients achieved TFR with asciminib, but DMR could be achieved again by restarting asciminib after TFR failure. As this was a retrospective study in a small number of patients, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the possibility of TFR with asciminib. However, this study included patients with short treatment duration and DMR maintenance periods, so strict conditioning may be necessary. Safe dose reduction or TFR with asciminib may need to be considered in more cases.

Nilotinib vs dasatinib in achieving MR4.5 for de novo chronic myeloid leukemia: the randomized JALSG CML212 study.

ABSTRACT: Deep molecular response (DMR) is a prerequite for treatment-free remission (TFR) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). The JALSG (Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group) conducted a prospective randomized phase 3 CML212 study for de novo CML-CP to compare the cumulative achievement of molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5; international scale BCR::ABL1 ≤0.0032%) by 18 months between nilotinib and dasatinib treatment as a primary end point. A total of 454 patients were randomly assigned to the 300 mg nilotinib twice daily arm or to the 100 mg dasatinib daily arm (both n = 227). BCR::ABL1 messenger RNA levels were monitored every 3 months. Study treatment was stopped if the patients were judged as failure according to the European LekemiaNet 2009 criteria or showed intolerance. The cumulative achievement rates of MR4.5 by 18 months were 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.5-39.1) in the nilotinib arm and 30.8% (95% CI, 24.9-37.3) in the dasatinib arm with no significant difference (P = .66). The cumulative achievement rates of early molecular response, complete cytogenetic response, and major molecular response by 12, 18, 24, and 36 months were almost the same between the 2 arms. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms by log-rank tests (PFS, P = .58; OS, P = .64). These results suggest that nilotinib and dasatinib would be equally effective for patients with de novo CML-CP. This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as #UMIN000007909.

Asciminib in Patients With CML-CP Previously Treated With ≥ 2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: 96-Week Results From the Japanese Subgroup Analysis of the ASCEMBL Study.

Asciminib is a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL1 Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP). It is approved worldwide and in Japan for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with resistance or intolerance to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. In the Phase 3 ASCEMBL study, patients with CML-CP who received ≥ 2 prior ATP-competitive TKIs were randomized (2:1) to asciminib 40 mg twice-daily or bosutinib 500 mg once-daily. Here, we report the 96-week results of the subgroup analysis of Japanese patients (asciminib, n = 13; bosutinib, n = 3) in the ASCEMBL study. The MMR rate at Week 96 was 46.2% in asciminib-treated patients, increasing from Weeks 24 and 48. Patients who achieved MMR at Week 24 remained in MMR up to the Week 96 cutoff. While a high proportion of patients treated with asciminib remained on treatment at cutoff, none randomized to bosutinib were on treatment at Week 96. Despite the longer duration of exposure to asciminib, its safety and tolerability continued to be favorable with no new or worsening safety findings. Overall, the efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subgroup were comparable with the ASCEMBL global study population, which supports the use of asciminib in Japanese patients with previously treated CML-CP.

Ponatinib vs Imatinib in Frontline Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I. Objective: To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Design, Setting, and Participants: Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022. Intervention: Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival. Results: Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.

Advancements in minimal residual disease detection: a practical approach using single-cell droplet PCR for comprehensive monitoring in hematological malignancy.

The identification of chromosomal abnormalities accompanied by copy number alterations is important for understanding tumor characteristics. Testing methodologies for copy number abnormality have limited sensitivity, resulting in their use only for the sample provided at the time of diagnosis or recurrence of malignancy, but not for the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) during and after therapy. We developped the "DimShift" technology which enable to measure the copy number of target gene/chromosome in each cell, which is given by the single cell droplet PCR. Qualitative result of DimShift given by peripheral blood was perfectly concordant with that of bone marrow. These findings and performances are promising to be the new methodology for MRD detection in malignant diseases utilizing bone marrow as well as peripheral blood.

Pre-operative Serum Albumin Predicts Native Liver Survival in Biliary Atresia.

BACKGROUND: To predict native liver survival (NLS) after Kasai portoenterostomy (KP) for biliary atresia (BA) using pre-operative clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-operative data were collected from 29 patients with BA who underwent KP at our department between 1989 and 2017 and were analysed including serum albumin, bilirubin, prothrombin time-international normalised ratio, body height, body weight, age at KP, paediatric end-stage liver disease score calculated using the pre-operative data and the period of NLS. RESULTS: The 10-year NLS rate of all patients was 51%. A multivariate analysis revealed that among all factors, the pre-KP serum albumin level was the only independent predictor of NLS ( P = 0.04, hazard ratio = 0.269, 95% confidence interval = 0.077-0.934). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NLS, determined using pre-KP serum albumin was 0.760 and 3.75 mg/dl was selected as the cut-off value. There was a significant difference in NLS between patients with high (≥3.8 mg/dl) and low (≤3.7 mg/dl) pre-KP serum albumin (90.0% vs. 31.5%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased pre-KP serum albumin may reflect not only functional impairment of the liver, but also the inflammatory process, which is hypothesized to occur during its advancement. The pre-KP serum albumin level may be a good prognostic factor for NLS in post-KP BA patients.

Germline Variants and Characteristic Features of Hereditary Hematological Malignancy Syndrome.

Due to the proliferation of genetic testing, pathogenic germline variants predisposing to hereditary hematological malignancy syndrome (HHMS) have been identified in an increasing number of genes. Consequently, the field of HHMS is gaining recognition among clinicians and scientists worldwide. Patients with germline genetic abnormalities often have poor outcomes and are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, HSCT using blood from a related donor should be carefully considered because of the risk that the patient may inherit a pathogenic variant. At present, we now face the challenge of incorporating these advances into clinical practice for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and optimizing the management and surveillance of patients and asymptomatic carriers, with the limitation that evidence-based guidelines are often inadequate. The 2016 revision of the WHO classification added a new section on myeloid malignant neoplasms, including MDS and AML with germline predisposition. The main syndromes can be classified into three groups. Those without pre-existing disease or organ dysfunction; DDX41, TP53, CEBPA, those with pre-existing platelet disorders; ANKRD26, ETV6, RUNX1, and those with other organ dysfunctions; SAMD9/SAMD9L, GATA2, and inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. In this review, we will outline the role of the genes involved in HHMS in order to clarify our understanding of HHMS.

Genetic Landscape of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and a Novel Targeted Drug for Overcoming Resistance.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exemplify the success of molecular targeted therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, some patients do not respond to TKI therapy. Mutations in the kinase domain of BCR::ABL1 are the most extensively studied mechanism of TKI resistance in CML, but BCR::ABL1-independent mechanisms are involved in some cases. There are two known types of mechanisms that contribute to resistance: mutations in known cancer-related genes; and Philadelphia-associated rearrangements, a novel mechanism of genomic heterogeneity that occurs at the time of the Philadelphia chromosome formation. Most chronic-phase and accelerated-phase CML patients who were treated with the third-generation TKI for drug resistance harbored one or more cancer gene mutations. Cancer gene mutations and additional chromosomal abnormalities were found to be independently associated with progression-free survival. The novel agent asciminib specifically inhibits the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) and shows better efficacy and less toxicity than other TKIs due to its high target specificity. In the future, pooled analyses of various studies should address whether additional genetic analyses could guide risk-adapted therapy and lead to a final cure for CML.

Gilteritinib Affects the Selection of Dominant Clones in Clonal Hematopoiesis: Sequential Genetic Analysis of an FLT3-ITD Positive AML Patient with Long-Term Gilteritinib Therapy.

We performed sequential molecular analyses of a 75-year-old woman with de novo FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who had received gilteritinib therapy for 43 months. At the time of diagnosis, her karyotype was normal; however, FLT3-ITD, NPM1, DNMT3A, and IDH2 mutations were detected. She received induction therapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine and achieved hematological complete remission (HCR). After attaining HCR, she underwent consolidation therapy with azacytidine or cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. However, AML relapsed eight months after the first HCR. FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations were persistently positive, and the patient received gilteritinib therapy. Although the FLT3-ITD clone was not detected during gilteritinib treatment, a clone harboring monosomy 7 and CBL mutations emerged. Bone marrow examinations at 15, 24, and 32 months after gilteritinib treatment revealed multi-lineage blood cell dysplasia without an increase in myeloblasts. After 33 months of treatment, gilteritinib was discontinued for two months because to ileus development, and the FLT3-ITD clone was detected again. Gilteritinib treatment was restarted, and FLT3-ITD became negative. Our analysis demonstrated that: (1) hematopoiesis derived from gilteritinib-resistant clones was generated by long-term gilteritinib treatment, and (2) FLT3-ITD clones regained clonal dominance in the absence of FLT3 inhibition. These findings suggest that gilteritinib affects the selection of dominant clones during clonal hematopoiesis.

Health-related quality of life of patients with resistant/intolerant chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with asciminib or bosutinib in the phase 3 ASCEMBL trial.

In ASCEMBL, an open-label, randomized Phase 3 study, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy and better safety profile compared with bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) previously treated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) reported by patients is key to understanding the benefit and impact of treatment on patients' lives, and is becoming increasingly important as the life expectancy of CML-CP patients increases and patients require long-term treatment. In ASCEMBL, patients completed questionnaires to assess CML symptoms and interference with daily life (M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - CML [MDASI-CML]), general HRQOL (five-level EQ-5D [EQ-5D-5L], Patient Global Impression of Change - CML [PGIC-CML]), and impact of CML on working life and activity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire - CML [WPAI-CML]). Patients' CML symptoms and HRQOL remained stable during 48 weeks of treatment with asciminib, with a general trend for decreased CML symptom severity, particularly for fatigue, and improvement in HRQOL. A clinically meaningful increase in diarrhea severity was observed in patients treated with bosutinib compared to asciminib. These data provide better understanding of the patient perspective and treatment impact on HRQOL in a later-line setting, where little information has been published to date.

The Immuno-Oncology and Genomic Aspects of DNA-Hypomethylating Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have been used for decades in the treatment of hematologic neoplasms, and now, have gathered attention again in terms of their combination with potent molecular-targeted agents such as a BCL-6 inhibitor venetoclax and an IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib, as well as a novel immune-checkpoint inhibitor (anit-CD47 antibody) megrolimab. Several studies have shown that leukemic cells have a distinct immunological microenvironment, which is at least partially due to genetic alterations such as the TP53 mutation and epigenetic dysregulation. HMAs possibly improve intrinsic anti-leukemic immunity and sensitivity to immune therapies such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-CD47 agents. This review describes the immuno-oncological backgrounds of the leukemic microenvironment and the therapeutic mechanisms of HMAs, as well as current clinical trials of HMAs and/or venetoclax-based combination therapies.

Clinical utility of genomic profiling of AML using paraffin-embedded bone marrow clots: HM-SCREEN-Japan 01.

Next-generation sequencing of AML has identified specific genetic mutations in AML patients. Hematologic Malignancies (HM)-SCREEN-Japan 01 is a multicenter study to detect actionable mutations using paraffin-embedded bone marrow (BM) clot specimens rather than BM fluid in AML patients for whom standard treatment has not been established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the presence of potentially therapeutic target gene mutations in patients with newly diagnosed unfit AML and relapsed/refractory AML (R/R-AML) using BM clot specimens. In this study, 188 patients were enrolled and targeted sequencing was undertaken on DNA from 437 genes and RNA from 265 genes. High-quality DNA and RNA were obtained using BM clot specimens, with genetic alterations successfully detected in 177 patients (97.3%), and fusion transcripts in 41 patients (23.2%). The median turnaround time was 13 days. In the detection of fusion genes, not only common fusion products such as RUNX1-RUX1T1 and KMT2A rearrangements, but also NUP98 rearrangements and rare fusion genes were observed. Among 177 patients (72 with unfit AML, 105 with R/R-AML), mutations in KIT and WT1 were independent factors for overall survival (hazard ratio = 12.6 and 8.88, respectively), and patients with high variant allele frequency (≥40%) of TP53 mutations had a poor prognosis. As for the detection of actionable mutations, 38% (n = 69) of patients had useful genetic mutation (FLT3-ITD/TKD, IDH1/2, and DNMT3AR822 ) for treatment selection. Comprehensive genomic profiling using paraffin-embedded BM clot specimens successfully identified leukemic-associated genes that can be used as therapeutic targets.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of asciminib versus other treatments in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of two prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The current standard of care for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) is tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Treatment recommendations are unclear for CP-CML failing ≥ 2 lines of treatment, partly due to the paucity of head-to-head trials evaluating TKIs. Thus, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted to compare asciminib with competing TKIs in third- or later line (≥ 3L) CP-CML. METHODS: Individual patient-level data for asciminib (ASCEMBL; follow-up: ≥ 48 weeks) and published aggregate data for comparator TKIs (ponatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib) informed the analyses. Major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were assessed, where feasible. RESULTS: Asciminib was associated with statistically significant improvements in MMR by 6 (relative risk [RR]: 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02, 2.36) and 12 months (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.14) vs ponatinib. For CCyR, the results vs ponatinib were similar by 6 (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.52) and 12 months (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.28). Asciminib was associated with improvements in MMR by 6 months vs dasatinib but with a CI overlapping one (RR 1.52; 95% CI: 0.66, 3.53). Asciminib was associated with statistically significant improvements in CCyR by 6 (RR: 3.57; 95% CI: 1.42, 8.98) and 12 months (RR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.12, 3.67) vs nilotinib/dasatinib. Median TTD was unreached for asciminib in ASCEMBL. However, post-adjustment asciminib implied prolonged TTD vs nilotinib and dasatinib, but not vs ponatinib. CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate favorable outcomes with asciminib versus competing TKIs, highlighting its therapeutic potential in ≥ 3L CP-CML.

Asciminib vs bosutinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors: longer-term follow-up of ASCEMBL.

Asciminib, the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), is approved worldwide for the treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In ASCEMBL, patients with CML-CP treated with ≥2 prior TKIs were randomized (stratified by baseline major cytogenetic response [MCyR]) 2:1 to asciminib 40 mg twice daily or bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Consistent with previously published primary analysis results, after a median follow-up of 2.3 years, asciminib continued to demonstrate superior efficacy and better safety and tolerability than bosutinib. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 (key secondary endpoint) was 37.6% with asciminib vs 15.8% with bosutinib; the MMR rate difference between the arms, after adjusting for baseline MCyR, was 21.7% (95% CI, 10.53-32.95; two-sided p = 0.001). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (56.4% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (7.7% vs 26.3%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. A higher proportion of patients on asciminib than bosutinib remained on treatment and continued to derive benefit over time, supporting asciminib as a standard of care for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs.

Patients with B-cell malignancies experience reduced antibody responses with class switching defect following BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Vaccines having aided in escaping the majority of the population from immunological naïvety, our strategies are now shifting towards an increased focus on identifying and protecting the extremely vulnerable. We here describe the results of testing 12 patients, those with lymphoid malignancies having been targeted their B-cells for therapy with rituximab-containing regimens or a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies after receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine doses. The interval from last dosing of B-cell depletion therapy to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was at median 5.3 (range 3.1-6.6) months. Using the 'seroprotection' threshold of 775 [BAU/mL] for the anti-spike antibody titer, our finding points out the crucial unresponsiveness of the targeted population with 0/12 (0%) achieving 'seroprotection'. Although IgG seroconversion was observed in 4/12 (33%), supporting the overall benefit of vaccination, the figures still point out a potential need for optimization of practice. IgA was further less responsive (unsuccessful 'seroconversion' in 11/12 (92%)), implicating an underlying class switch defect. Those with depletion on B-cells are caught at a dilemma between, being too early and too late on receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. They wish to get over their immunological naïvety at the earliest, while, in order to assure quality immune memory, are also required to hold the patience for their B-cells to repopulate. Although it remains an issue whether intensified vaccine schedules and/or regimens will lead to stronger immunogenicity or more effective boosters for non-responders, we shall take advantage of every increasing evidence in order to optimize current options.

Asciminib vs bosutinib in CML patients pretreated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Results from the Japanese subgroup analysis of ASCEMBL study.

Asciminib, a first-in-class, allosteric inhibitor of BCR-ABL1 that acts by STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket), is a novel therapeutic option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the global, phase 3, open-label ASCEMBL study in patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) pretreated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (NCT03106779), asciminib (40 mg twice-daily) demonstrated significant superiority over the ATP-competitive TKI bosutinib (500 mg once daily) for the primary endpoint of major molecular response (MMR; BCR::ABL1 transcript levels on the international scale [BCR::ABL1IS ] ≤0.1%) at week 24. Here, we report results from a descriptive subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in ASCEMBL study (data cut-off: May 25, 2020). Overall, 16 Japanese patients were randomized (asciminib, n = 13; bosutinib, n = 3). At week 24, the MMR rate with asciminib was 30.8% (4/13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.09-61.43). BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% and complete cytogenic response (CCyR) at week 24 were 61.5% (8/13 patients) and 50.0% (4/8 patients), respectively. In the bosutinib group, no patient achieved MMR, CCyR, or BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%, but results were limited by the low number of patients. The safety profile of asciminib was comparable to that previously observed in the overall study population. Findings from this Japanese subgroup analysis of the ASCEMBL study support the use of asciminib for the treatment of Japanese patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03106779.

Molecular-Targeted Therapy for Tumor-Agnostic Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Comprehensive genomic profiling examinations (CGPs) have recently been developed, and a variety of tumor-agnostic mutations have been detected, leading to the development of new molecular-targetable therapies across solid tumors. In addition, the elucidation of hereditary tumors, such as breast and ovarian cancer, has pioneered a new age marked by the development of new treatments and lifetime management strategies required for patients with potential or presented hereditary cancers. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), however, few tumor-agnostic or hereditary mutations have been the focus of investigation, with associated molecular-targeted therapies remaining poorly developed. We focused on representative tumor-agnostic mutations such as the TP53, KIT, KRAS, BRCA1, ATM, JAK2, NTRK3, FGFR3 and EGFR genes, referring to a CGP study conducted in Japan, and we considered the possibility of developing molecular-targeted therapies for AML with tumor-agnostic mutations. We summarized the frequency, the prognosis, the structure and the function of these mutations as well as the current treatment strategies in solid tumors, revealed the genetical relationships between solid tumors and AML and developed tumor-agnostic molecular-targeted therapies and lifetime management strategies in AML.

BATF epigenetically and transcriptionally controls the activation program of regulatory T cells in human tumors.

Regulatory T (Treg) cells suppress effective antitumor immunity in tumor-bearing hosts, thereby becoming promising targets in cancer immunotherapy. Despite the importance of Treg cells in tumor immunity, little is known about their differentiation process and epigenetic profiles in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we showed that Treg cells in the TME of human lung cancers harbored a completely different open chromatin profile compared with CD8+ T cells, conventional CD4+ T cells in the TME, and peripheral Treg cells. The integrative sequencing analyses including ATAC, single-cell RNA, and single-cell ATAC sequencing revealed that BATF, IRF4, NF-κB, and NR4A were important transcription factors for Treg cell differentiation in the TME. In particular, BATF was identified as a key regulator, which leveraged Treg cell differentiation through epigenetically controlling activation-associated gene expression, resulting in the robustness of Treg cells in the TME. The single-cell sequencing approaches also revealed that tissue-resident and tumor-infiltrating Treg cells followed a common pathway for differentiation and activation in a BATF-dependent manner heading toward Treg cells with the most differentiated and activated phenotypes in tissues and tumors. BATF deficiency in Treg cells remarkably inhibited tumor growth, and high BATF expression was associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer, kidney cancer, and melanoma. These findings indicate one of the specific chromatin remodeling and differentiation programs of Treg cells in the TME, which can be applied in the development of Treg cell-targeted therapies.

Molecular Classification and Overcoming Therapy Resistance for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Adverse Genetic Factors.

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria define the adverse genetic factors of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML with adverse genetic factors uniformly shows resistance to standard chemotherapy and is associated with poor prognosis. Here, we focus on the biological background and real-world etiology of these adverse genetic factors and then describe a strategy to overcome the clinical disadvantages in terms of targeting pivotal molecular mechanisms. Different adverse genetic factors often rely on common pathways. KMT2A rearrangement, DEK-NUP214 fusion, and NPM1 mutation are associated with the upregulation of HOX genes. The dominant tyrosine kinase activity of the mutant FLT3 or BCR-ABL1 fusion proteins is transduced by the AKT-mTOR, MAPK-ERK, and STAT5 pathways. Concurrent mutations of ASXL1 and RUNX1 are associated with activated AKT. Both TP53 mutation and mis-expressed MECOM are related to impaired apoptosis. Clinical data suggest that adverse genetic factors can be found in at least one in eight AML patients and appear to accumulate in relapsed/refractory cases. TP53 mutation is associated with particularly poor prognosis. Molecular-targeted therapies focusing on specific genomic abnormalities, such as FLT3, KMT2A, and TP53, have been developed and have demonstrated promising results.