The Decline of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Splenectomies: A Single Center Experience.

Background: Splenectomy has been performed for various indications from haematological diseases to benign cysts and tumours, and for splenic traumatic injuries. However, there has been a steady decline in splenectomies in the last 20 years. The aim of this study is to establish the reasons behind this decline in splenectomy and to analyse them based on indication, type of splenectomy, and manner of approach (open, laparoscopic or robotic). Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of a single centre experience of all the splenectomies, both total and partial, performed in the Department of General Surgery of Fundeni Clinical Institute (Bucharest) between 2002 and 2023. Only surgeries for primary splenic diseases were selected, splenic resections as part of other major operations were not included. Results: Between 2002 and 2023, 876 splenectomies were performed in the Department of General Surgery of Fundeni Clinical Institute (Bucharest). Most splenectomies (n=245) were performed for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), followed by benign tumours and cysts (n=136), lymphoma (n=119), hypersplenism due to cirrhosis (n=107) and microspherocytosis (n=95). Other indications included myelodysplastic syndrome (n=39), trauma (n=35), thalassemia (n=22), leukaemia (n=18) and also there were 60 splenectomies that were performed for hypersplenism of unknown cause. There were 795 total splenectomies (TS) and 81 partial splenectomies (PS). There was a decline in the number of splenectomies both TS and PS for all these indications, most notably in the case of ITP, microspherocytosis and hypersplenism due to cirrhosis with no splenectomies performed for these indications since 2020. Conclusion: With the development of new lines of treatment, advances in interventional radiology and in surgery with the spleen parenchyma sparing options, the need for total splenectomy has been greatly reduced which is reflected in the decline in the number of splenectomies performed in the last 20 years in our clinic.

Pelvic Exenteration - Past, Present and Future.

Background: Bearing in mind that the open procedure is already validated by multiple studies, the article aims to prove that pelvic exenteration performed in a minimally invasive fashion might offer better survival and to potentially identify prognostic factors for the outcome of these patients. Material and Methods: Data regarding past and present classifications and surgical indications are presented. Patient data were collected retrospectively. Results: The most frequent diseases treated with pelvic exenteration, in terms of the hystological type, were gynecological malignancy and squamous cell carcinoma. Recurrent pelvic disease was found in 68.2% of patients. R0 resection was achieved in 72.7% of patients in the MI group, and in 73.7% of patients in the OP group. Peri-operative morbidity was reported to be 56.6% for open surgery, and 18.1% for minimally invasive. Average DFS was 20.15 months, ranging from 1.5 to 70.3 months, while the OS was calculated to be 38.1 months (0.33 1508) up until November 2023. Conclusion: Pelvic exenteration is a continuously improving surgical procedure, open approach being favored to minimally invasive one. On the other hand, hospitalization and morbidity are reduced when choosing the latter. R0 and lymph node status are important predictors for overall survival, as well as major early postoperative complications. All in all, pelvic exenteration is still a promising surgical procedure to extend cancer patients lives.

Robotic or laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: feasible options to open surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To acknowledge that minimally invasive pelvic exenteration is a feasible alternative to open surgery and potentially identify prediction factors for patient outcome. METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective single team analysis of 12 consecutive cases, set between January 2008 and January 2022. RESULTS: Six anterior and 6 total pelvic exenterations were performed. A 75% of cases were treated using a robotic approach. In 4 cases, an ileal conduit was used for urinary reconstruction. Mean operative time was 360±30.7 minutes. for anterior pelvic exenterations and 440±40.7 minutes. for total pelvic exenterations and mean blood loss was 350±35 mL. An R0 resection was performed in 9 cases (75%) and peri-operative morbidity was 16.6%, with no deaths recorded. Median disease-free survival was 12 months (10-14) and overall survival (OS) was 20 months (1-127). In terms of OS, 50% of patients were still alive 24 months after surgery. Taking into consideration the follow up period,16.6% of females under 50 or above 70 years old did not reach the cut off and 4 out of 6 patients that failed to reach it were diagnosed with distant metastases or local recurrence (p=0.169). CONCLUSION: Our experience is very much consistent with literature in regard to primary site of cancer, post-operative complications, R0 resection and survival rates. On the other hand, minimally invasive approach and urinary reconstruction type were in contrast with cited publications. Minimally invasive pelvic exenteration is indeed a safe and feasible procedure, providing patients selection is appropriately performed.

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Minimal Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients.

Introduction: Currently, surgeons deal with an older patient cohort, confronting new challenges brought by the raised life expectancy. This population is unrepresented in surgical trials; therefore, the optimal therapy is still a matter of debate. The efficacy of open versus minimal invasive management of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an elderly cohort is not clearly established. The current study assesses the minimal invasive approach in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Material and Methods: The General Surgery Department database was inquired between 2012 and 2015 using the following filters: age â?¥ 65 and rectal or colon adenocarcinoma. After applying the exclusion criteria, 975 cases were obtained: 842 underwent open surgery (OS) and 133 underwent minimal invasive surgery (MIS). A propensity score matching was performed to reduce patient selection bias. Results: After the propensity score matching, the MIS group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OS group (p = 0.025). From the preoperative variables, the presence of chronic lung disease was significantly higher in the OS group (p = 0.039). The presence of chronic lung disease positively associates with the Clavien-Dindo classification (p 0.001) and with the number of days from surgery to discharge (p = 0.028). Conclusion: The chronological age alone should not be a limit to MIS granting that it showed no inferiority to the OS in terms of postoperative morbidity, correlating with lower postoperative stay in the elderly. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the outcome of MIS in elderly population.

Short-term Outcome of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecological Malignancies: A Single-center Experience.

Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the preferred option for many gynecologic pathologies since complication rate and postoperative recovery time have decreased considerably. Postoperative complications remain an important aspect when using the MIS approach, if they are not timely or accurately diagnosed and treated. The main aim of the study is to first assess their incidence, followed by identifying possible risk factors. Furthermore, the secondary aim is to identify if the type of MIS approach used, robotic or laparoscopic, may render some additional benefits. Materials and Methods: The database of the General Surgery Department was queried between 2008 and 2019 for patients with gynecologic pathology: 2907 cases were identified. An additional selection was performed using the following filters: MIS and neoplasia. All emergency surgeries were excluded. One hundred and ninety-eight cases were obtained. Results: The majority of complications were urological (11.6%) with only 7.07% requiring a specific urological procedure. The second most common was lymphorrhea 4.5%. Dindo-Clavien classification correlates positively with the postoperative hospital stay (PHS) (P = 0.000), the type of surgery (P = 0.046), the primary tumor location (P = 0.011), conversion rate (P = 0.049), the expertise of the lead surgeon (P = 0.012), and the operative time (P = 0.002). The urological complications correlate positively with the type of surgery (P = 0.002), the tumor location (P = 0.001), early reintervention (P = 0.000), operative time (P = 0.006), postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.000), pelvic abscess (P = 0.000), venous thrombosis (P = 0.011), and postoperative cardiac complications (P = 0.002). Laparoscopic and robotic approaches were comparatively assessed. The PHS (P = 0.025), the type of surgery performed (P = 0.000), and primary tumor location (P = 0.011) were statistically significantly different. Conclusion: Postoperative complications reported after MIS for gynecological malignancies show similar incidence as in the current literature, also taking into consideration those for the open approach. The robotic approach seems to be able to perform more complex surgeries with no difference in the postoperative complication rates. The expertise of the lead surgeon in gynecology correlates with lower postoperative complications. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

The Impact of Screening and Surgery on Life Expectancy in Breast Cancer - A Mathematical Model Case Study in the European Union.

Background: In the last 20 years in European Union states, the life expectancy did not change much. In the period 2012-2021 the average life expectancy remained almost constant at 82 years. Breast cancer represents the main cause of death by cancer in women The purpose of this research is to identify o identify and measure the influence of some medical interventions and procedures related to breast cancer on life expectancy. In our article, the target group is the feminine population from 27 EU countries. Methodology: For the analysis several indicators provided by Eurostat were considered: life expectancy for female population as a dependent variable and breast cancer screenings, surgical operations and procedures performed in hospitals (partial and total excision) were used as independent variables. The research used a mathematical model (regression panel) for 27 EU countries, for a 10 year period, to evaluate the impact of each independent variable on the life expectancy in EU as a whole. Results: From a statistical point of view, screening has a significant effect on life expectancy. On the other hand, surgical interventions have a role in the overall medical process and positively influence life expectancy. The panel model has shown that partial interventions contribute less than screening procedures to increase life expectancy. Conclusion: The development of mathematical models in health care is useful in the process of improving health care quality. In our days, the measurement and quantification of some medical methods is particularly difficult due to so many variables and observations. In these difficult circumstances, the mathematical models could bring some clarifications and structure.

Safety and Efficacy of Simultaneous Resection of Gastric Carcinoma and Synchronous Liver Metastasis-A Western Center Experience.

Background and objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is often diagnosed in the metastatic stage. Palliative systemic therapy is still considered the gold standard, even for patients with resectable oligometastatic disease. The aim of the current study is to assess the potential benefit of up-front gastric and liver resection in patients with synchronous resectable liver-only metastases from GC (LMGC) in a Western population. Materials and Methods: All patients with GC and synchronous LMGC who underwent gastric resection with or without simultaneous resection of LMs between January 1997 and December 2016 were selected from the institutional records. Those with T4b primary tumors or with unresectable or more than three LMs were excluded from the analysis. All patients who underwent emergency surgery for hemorrhagic shock or gastric perforation were also excluded. Results: Out of 28 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 16 underwent simultaneous gastric and liver resection (SR group), while 12 underwent palliative gastric resection (GR group). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was of 18.81 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of 71.4%, 17.9% and 14.3%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in SR group (75%, 31.3% and 25%, respectively) were significantly higher than those achieved in GR group (66.7%, 0% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort revealed that the only independent prognostic factor associated with better OS was liver resection (HR = 3.954, 95% CI: 1.542-10.139; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In a Western cohort, simultaneous resection of GC and LMGC significantly improved OS compared to patients who underwent palliative gastric resection.

The seen and the unseen: Molecular classification and image based-analysis of gastrointestinal cancers.

Gastrointestinal cancers account for 22.5% of cancer related deaths worldwide and represent circa 20% of all cancers. In the last decades, we have witnessed a shift from histology-based to molecular-based classifications using genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic data. The molecular based classification revealed new prognostic markers and may aid the therapy selection. Because of the high-costs to perform a molecular classification, in recent years immunohistochemistry-based surrogate classification were developed which permit the stratification of patients, and in parallel multiple groups developed hematoxylin and eosin whole slide image analysis for sub-classifying these entities. Hence, we are witnessing a return to an image-based classification with the purpose to infer hidden information from routine histology images that would permit to detect the patients that respond to specific therapies and would be able to predict their outcome. In this review paper, we will discuss the current histological, molecular, and immunohistochemical classifications of the most common gastrointestinal cancers, gastric adenocarcinoma, and colorectal adenocarcinoma, and will present key aspects for developing a new artificial intelligence aided image-based classification of these malignancies.

Is There a Role for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Cervical Cancer Treatment: Carry on, Discard, or Modify? A Literature Review and Case Series Presentation.

Oncological surgery is constantly evolving. Recommendations and guidelines are updated periodically in light of new research. Since surgery is a key step in the treatment of cervical cancer in Romania and considering the new findings, this study aims to assess the new guideline recommendations and the surgical treatment options available. The paradigm shift that took place in 2018 left the question: does minimally invasive surgery still play a role in the treatment of cervical cancer? K ouml;hler surgical technique seems to address some of the issues raised by the minimally invasive surgery with good results. H ouml;ckel proposes total mesometrial excision to decrease the risk of recurrence. This study presents 3 cases of cervical cancer patients with stages ranging from IB1 to IIIB that had undergone total mesometrial excision and vaginal cuff closure using the laparoscopic approach to minimize the risk of local recurrence. The case series presented showed that it is feasible and safe to merge these techniques. Further prospective studies are needed in order to assess the risk and benefits of these techniques.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Urgent vs. Delayed and the Outcome of Same-Admission Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) represents a major burden for the medical system, associating important morbidity and mortality rates. This paper is focused on debatable aspects of the management of biliary AP, namely indications, timing and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on the hand and, on the other hand, same-admission cholecystectomy as a preventive measure for recurrent disease. Material and methods: This is a retrospective study including 108 patients with biliary AP in whom ERCP was performed, treated in the Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest between 2016 and 2020. According to the urgency of the ERCP, we divided the patients into two groups: urgent versus delayed ERCP. Results: Urgent ERCP was performed in 52 patients, while delayed ERCP was performed in 56 patients; the hospital stay was higher in the urgent group than in the delayed group (10 days vs 8 days, p = 0.299) with no difference in morbidity rates. The mean time between ERCP and surgery was 5 days, without significant difference between the groups. The laparoscopic approach was the preferred method, with a conversion rate of 7%. Conclusion: ERCP with stone extraction followed by same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe therapeutic option, that prevents recurrent pancreatitis. The timing of the procedures remains debatable, further prospective studies being needed to achieve statistical significance.

Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Open, Laparoscopic or Robotic Approach.

OBJECTIVES: The present study compares abdominoperineal resection (APR) performed by minimally invasive and open approach, regarding preoperative selection criteria, intraoperative and early postoperative aspects, in choosing the suitable technique performed by surgical teams with experience in both open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Methods: This is a retrospective study, conducted between 2008-2020. Two hundred thirty-three patients with APR performed for low rectal or anal cancer were included. The cohort was divided into two groups, depending on the surgical approach used: Minimally Invasive Surgery (laparoscopic and robotic procedures) and Open Surgery (OS). The perioperative characteristics were analyzed in order to identify the optimal approach and a possible selection criteria. Results: We identified a high percentage of patients with a history of abdominal surgery in the open group (p = .0002). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the open group (p= .02), with an increased number of simultaneous resections (p = .041). The early postoperative outcome was marked by significantly lower morbidity in the MIS group (p = .005), with mortality recorded only in the open group (3 cases), in patients that associated severe comorbidities. The hystopathological results identified a significant number of patients with stage T2 in the MIS group (p= .037). Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery provides a major advantage to APR, by avoiding an additional incision, the specimen being extracted through the perineal wound. The success of MIS APR seems to be assured by a good preoperative selection of the patients, alongside with experienced surgical teams in both open and minimally invasive rectal resections. The lack of conversion identified in robotic APR confirm the technical superiority over laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Although cirrhotic patients are considered to have a higher risk for surgical procedures than non-cirrhotic ones, there are certain pathologies such as gallstones cholecystitis that cannot be treated otherwise. The focus of this study is to evaluate the main characteristics of the patients with lithiasic cholecystitis and liver cirrhosis and to assess if there is a correlation between them and postoperative morbidity evaluated with Dindo-Clavien classification. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study. The database from General Surgery Department of Fundeni Clinical Institute was queried between 2014-2018 using as key words "cirrhosis" and "cholecystitis". The initial interrogation reveled 57 cases out of which 3 were excluded since other resections were associated. Results: This study identified that Dindo-Clavien classification positively correlates with the open approach (0.405, p=0.002), emergency surgery (0.599, p=0.000), acute cholecystitis (0.476, p=0.000), high MELD score (0.291, p=0.008) and Child score (0.346, p=0.007) and furthermore with high levels of total bilirubin (0.220, p=0.047), high INR (0.286, p=0.010), the presence of ascites (0.303, p=0.022) and portal hypertension (0.266, p=0.044). It also correlates negatively with the levels of hemoglobin (-0.295, p=0.044). Conclusion: Adequate estimation of perioperative mortality and morbidity is generally limited by the retrospective nature of most studies and the patient's selection criteria. Emergency surgery, acute cholecystitis and the open approach carry the highest risk for unfavorable results of cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients.

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision - A Case Report.

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), first introduced in 2010, represents a relatively new approach in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. A case of a 65-years-old patient diagnosed with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the middle rectum (cT2N0M0) is presented. Taking into consideration patient's characteristics and tumour features, the surgical team decided to use transanal total mesorectal excision technique. The surgical technique, as well as potential postoperative complications and oncological issues are discussed in the article. Patient selection and extensive experience in minimally invasive colorectal surgery are the bases for an optimal technique implementation. Although further studies are required in order to confirm its superiority over the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, TaTME seems to be a safe and feasible option in the surgical approach of rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic Hartmann s Reversal: A Single Center Experience.

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery showed multiple advantages in terms of morbidity, surgeons applied this approach to Hartmann reversal considering improving the reversal rate and postoperative outcome. The database from Fundeni Clinical Institute, General Surgery Department, was analyzed, selecting the laparoscopic Hartmann reversals. Nine cases were reported with a median age of 63 years, mean BMI 29 and three of them with prior open Hartmann surgery. The average operative time was 223 minutes, without any case necessitating ileostomy diversion. No anastomotic leakage was reported. The laparoscopic approach seems to be an attainable alternative in the reversal of Hartmann procedure, considering the experience of the surgical team and the patient's characteristics. Further studies are needed in order to confirm its superiority on larger case series.

Mind the Gap Between Scientific Literature Recommendations and Effective Implementation. Is There Still a Role for Surgery in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma?

According to evidence accumulated in the last years, many cancer centers recommend a treatment plan based solely on chemo-radiotherapy and exclude surgery from the treatment options in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). In Romania, surgery was at the forefront of therapeutic options. Nevertheless, current data shows that in fact, a large number of patients are still referred to surgery in various stages of diagnosis and treatment. It was noted that recommendations may differ, in spite of the wide dissemination of the literature data.Works published so far, discussing the role of surgery in LACC treatment shows a lack of consensus. A group of experts in oncology (SURCECAN research group - Surgery of Cervical Cancer) met for a session of the Romanian Surgical Society (Bucharest) on April 18, 2018. They found that LACC therapeutic strategy in Romania may differ somewhat from the European recommendations.On top of that, late enrolement to RT and low acces to specialized centers are the problem. Performing surgery not only allows the evaluation of the pathological response to chemo-radiotherapy, but also achieves a better local control. In conclusion, there is still a place for surgery within locally advanced cervical cancer treatment options. More trials need to be carried out in order to confirm the findings and establish high levels of confidence for each piece of information provided.