Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To investigate the psychometric performance and responsiveness of Catquest-9SF, a patient-reported questionnaire developed to evaluate visual function as related to daily tasks, in patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This is a pooled analysis on prospective data collected for previous projects. Subjects were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Peel region, Hamilton, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Catquest-9SF was administered pre-operative and post-operatively to patients with cataract. Psychometric properties, including category threshold order, infit/outfit, precision, unidimensionality, targeting, and differential item functioning were tested using Rasch analysis with Winsteps software (v.4.4.4) for Catquest-9SF. Responsiveness of questionnaire scores to cataract surgery was assessed. RESULTS: 934 patients (mean age = 71.6, 492[52.7%] female) completed the pre- and post-operative Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.01, person reliability = 0.80), and confirmed unidimensionality. The infit range was 0.75-1.29 and the outfit range was 0.74-1.51, with one item ('satisfaction with vision') misfitting (outfit value = 1.51). There was mistargeting of -1.07 in pre-operative scores and mistargeting of -2.43 in both pre- and post-operative scores, meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. There was no adverse differential item functioning. There was a mean 1.47 logit improvement in Catquest-9SF scores after cataract surgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Catquest-9SF is a psychometrically robust questionnaire for assessment of visual function in patients with cataract in Ontario, Canada. It is also responsive to clinical improvement after cataract surgery.

Validation of a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for preoperative fasting in cataract surgery: a discrimination analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative fasting is routinely performed to prevent anaesthesia-related pulmonary aspiration. To capture patients' experiences with preoperative fasting, a 13-item questionnaire was developed and validated using Rasch analysis and shortened to 6 items. This extension study aims to assess this questionnaire's ability to discriminate between participants with a short versus long duration of fasting and early versus late day surgery. DESIGN: Single-centred cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were recruited via consecutive sampling of cataract patients on surgery day at Kensington Eye Institute in Toronto from February to December 2019. METHODS: A validated preoperative fasting questionnaire was administered. Discriminative ability was assessed by comparing responses in patients scheduled for surgery in the morning (8:00 am-12:00 pm) versus afternoon (12:00 pm-3:30 pm) and fasting for short (≤8 hours) versus long (>8 hours) duration. Diagnostic ability of the 6-item questionnaire relative to the 13-item questionnaire was assessed with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (mean age 70.8 ± 10.0 years; 57% female) were included. Total scores of patients having surgery in the morning were greater (i.e., less fasting-related burden) than in the afternoon (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in scores between patients fasting for a short versus long duration (p > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed excellent diagnostic ability of the 6-item questionnaire relative to the 13-item version (area under the curve = 0.964). CONCLUSION: The 6-item questionnaire for fasting-related burden has excellent discriminative ability between early versus late surgery patients. The time fasting while awake may be a more relevant predictor of fasting-related burden relative to the total duration of fasting.

An observational study evaluating the impact on prostate patient outcomes and experiences when radiation therapists use a standard grading system tool to assess and document treatment-related toxicities and interventions.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Men undergoing radiation therapy (RT) treatment for prostate cancer (PC) often experience acute urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal toxicities. Timely screening, management, and documentation of these toxicities is an integral part of clinician practice, ensuring patients receive the care they require. Various screening tools, completed by either the patient or the clinician, are available, which allow clinicians to collect and respond to these toxicity outcomes; however there is a paucity of literature regarding the effective use and timing of these tools during RT treatment. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of conducting comprehensive toxicity screening and symptom management using a toxicity screening tool in one of the busiest RT departments in Canada. Specifically, the use of a toxicity screening tool and its effect on the quality of toxicity documentation, operational impact, and patient reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: 90 consented patients were allocated to either the structured or non-structured arm. Patients in the structured arm were assessed weekly by radiation therapists for 13 toxicities across four domains (bladder, bowel, hormonal, and sexual), using an in-house developed structured questionnaire, known as the Grid, to complete the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v3 (CTCAEv3). Patients in the non-structured arm were assessed and had free text clinical documentation charted according to current department policy. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), a PRO tool to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment, was completed by all study patients on a weekly basis. Statistical analysis compared documentation completeness, EPIC scores, patient satisfaction, and operational impact between study arms, as well as evaluated optimal timing of toxicity assessments. RESULTS: Assessment of the non-structured arm for completeness revealed an inconsistent and insufficient amount of documentation for the bladder and bowel domains. As for both the sexual and hormonal domains, documentation was largely absent. There was no difference in EPIC scores and patient satisfaction scores between the structured arm and the non-structured arm. Evaluation of the timing of PROs showed significant week to week change for the bladder and bowel toxicities, but not the sexual and hormonal toxicities. Finally, the use of the Grid revealed no significant impact on daily operations, only increasing average treatment times by seven seconds, and did not create any additional workload for the oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Grid increased documentation completeness without negatively impacting clinical flow or operations, despite the fact that PROs were not improved. Based on EPIC PRO scores, bladder and bowel toxicities should be evaluated on a weekly basis during RT treatment, while sexual and hormonal toxicities need only be evaluated monthly.

Predicting changes in cataract surgery health outcomes using a cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization instrument.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether items in a cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization questionnaire can predict change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and health related quality of life (HRQOL) following cataract surgery. METHODS: 313 patients with a cataract in Ontario, Canada were recruited to participate. BCVA was measured using the Snellen chart. HRQOL was measured using a generic instrument (EQ5D), a visual functioning instrument (Catquest-9SF), and an appropriateness and prioritization instrument (17 items). Outcomes were measured preoperatively and 3-6 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and outcomes. For each appropriateness and prioritization questionnaire item, a one-way ANOVA was used to compare group means of the change in BCVA, EQ5D, and Catquest-9SF. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 69 years and were 56% female. BCVA improved in 81%, EQ5D in 49.6%, and Catquest-9SF score in 84% of patients. Improvement in both BCVA and Catquest-9SF scores were found in 68.5% of patients. The ANOVA showed a statistically significant association between a change in BCVA and the ability to participate in social life, and a statistically significant association between a change in Catquest-9SF and glare, extent of impairment in visual function, safety and injury concerns, ability to work and care for dependents, ability to take care of local errands, ability to assist others and ability to participate in social life. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients had improved BCVA and/or visual functioning after surgery. Seven variables from the cataract appropriateness and prioritization instrument were found to be predictors of improvement in Catquest-9SF measuring visual functioning.

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient Distress from Preoperative Fasting in Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To develop and psychometrically validate a questionnaire to measure patient distress with preoperative fasting related to cataract surgery.Methods: In this single-centered cross-sectional study, consecutive sampling of cataract patients was undertaken immediately preoperatively from February to December 2019. A questionnaire evaluating patient distress with fasting was designed and administered. Questionnaire development occurred in an iterative process and was conducted with consultation from expert investigators and patients. Validation and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire were performed with Rasch analysis.Results: A preliminary version of the questionnaire was developed by 10 study investigators. Across five iterations of development, the questionnaire was administered to 186 cataract patients. Psychometric evaluation of the 13-item questionnaire demonstrated ordered thresholds, acceptable item calibration and fit, adequate internal consistency, ability to discriminate between three levels of distress from preoperative fasting and no notable differential item functioning. However, issues with mistargeting, clustering of items on the person-item map and multidimensionality remained. Given these concerns, 13 separate re-analyses were conducted via removal of certain items. A 6-item subset was determined to be well targeted, unidimensional, did not display item clustering and was able to discriminate between patients with high and low distress from preoperative fasting.Conclusion: A 6-item questionnaire is a valid, psychometrically robust and reliable measure for the assessment of patient distress with preoperative fasting in cataract surgery. Items include hunger, thirst, hoarseness, weakness, anxiety and nausea. Future studies should seek to validate this questionnaire across a variety of sociodemographic contexts, languages and specialties.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population.

BACKGROUND: Visual acuity alone has limitations in assessing a patient's appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. Several tools, including the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and the electronic cataract appropriateness and priority system (eCAPS) have been developed to evaluate patients-reported visual function as related to day-to-day tasks. The aim of this study was to validate Catquest-9SF and eCAPS in a Canadian population and propose a shorter version of each, in an attempt to extend their applicability in clinical practice. METHODS: The English translation of the Swedish Catquest-9SF and eCAPS were self-administered separately in pre-operative patients in tertiary care in Peel region, Ontario. Rasch analysis was used to validate both scales and assess their psychometric properties, such as category threshold order, item fit, unidimensionality, precision, targeting, and differential item functioning. RESULTS: A total of 313 cataract patients (mean age = 69.1, 56.5% female) completed the Catquest-9SF and eCAPS. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.09, person reliability = 0.81), unidimensionality and no misfits (infit range 0.75-1.35, outfit range 0.83-1.36). There mean for patients was equal to -1.43 (lower than the mean for items which is set automatically at zero), meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. eCAPS had 3 items that misfit the Rasch model and were excluded (infit range 0.82-1.30, outfit range 0.75-1.36). Precision was inadequate (person separation index = 0.19, person reliability = 0.04). 78.8% of subjects scored≤9 (answered that they had no issues for most questions). CONCLUSIONS: Catquest-9SF demonstrated good psychometric properties and is suitable for assessing visual function of care-seeking patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. There was some mistargeting, suggesting that the tasks were relatively easy to perform, which is consistent with previous research. On the contrary, eCAPS is not sensitive in differentiating patients who had impaired visual functioning.