Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 59, 2024 02 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are becoming more frequent throughout the world. Adherence to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, as well as lifestyles, is important for good management and control of the disease. This study aims to explore the opinions and perceptions of patients with ischemic heart disease on the difficulties associated with therapeutic adherence. METHODS: An interpretive phenomenological study was carried out using focus groups and one semi-structured interview. The MAXQDA qualitative data analysis program was used for inductive interpretation of the group discourses and interview. Data were coded, and these were grouped by categories and then consolidated under the main themes identified. RESULTS: Two in-person focus groups and one remote semi-structured interview were performed. Twelve participants (6 men and 6 women) from the Hospital de San Juan de Alicante participated, two of them being family companions . The main themes identified were aspects related to the individual, heart disease, drug treatment, and the perception of the health care system. CONCLUSIONS: Adhering to recommendations on healthy behaviors and taking prescribed medications for cardiovascular disease was important for most participants. However, they sometimes found polypharmacy difficult to manage, especially when they did not perceive the symptoms of their disease. Participants related the concept of fear to therapeutic adherence, believing that the latter increased with the former. The relationship with health professionals was described as optimal, but, nevertheless, the coordination of the health care system was seen as limited.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde
2.
J Patient Saf ; 18(4): 276-286, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503970

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Compensation claims are a useful source of information on patient safety research. The purpose of this study was to determine the main causes of surgical compensation claims and their financial impact on the health system. METHODS: A descriptive observational study with analytical components was carried out on compensation claims brought against the surgical area of the Murcia Health System between 2002 and 2018. We analyzed the frequency, causes, consequences, locations and surgical settings of these claims, the time of judicial procedure, and compensation adjusted to the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: There were 1172 compensation claims. "orthopedic surgery and traumatology" (27.4%), "gynecology and obstetrics" (25.7%), and "general surgery" (17.2%) were the main surgical settings involved. The most frequent causes were surgical error (42.4%) and treatment error (30.9%). The main sequelae were musculoskeletal (20.0%), neurological (17.7%), and obstetric (17.7%). The average time from incident to resolution of claims was 6.3 years. A total of 20.1% of these claims were successful, particularly those involving retained surgical foreign bodies (71.4% successful claims; P < 0.001). The total compensation paid was €56,338,247 (an average of €17,207 per claim). Compensation was higher in cases with respiratory sequelae (median, 131,600; P = 0.033), death (75,916; P < 0.001), and neurological (60,000; P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Compensation claims associated with surgical procedures are made on a variety of grounds. They are drawn-out proceedings, and patients are only successful in 20% of cases.


Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Imperícia , Feminino , Humanos , Erros Médicos , Segurança do Paciente , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 14(6): 685-691, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32674912

RESUMO

AIMS: This study aimed to analyse the association between adherence to treatment and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Multicentre, cross-sectional study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus recruited by primary care professionals in Castilla y León (Spain). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were reflected in self-reported questionnaire, which included the Morisky-Green Medication Adherence Scale and the 14-point Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener. Medication non-adherence and poor glycaemic control were analysed by bivariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 3536 included patients, the 33.8% reported non-adherence to pharmacological treatment, and the 33.7% had poor glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol [7.5%]); 50.6% of patients reported moderate-high adherence to the Mediterranean diet (≥9 points). The multivariable logistic regression model showed that educational level (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.87; p < 0.001) and sedentarism (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.36-1.98; p < 0.001) were associate with low adherence. Younger age, rural residence, smoking, time since diagnosis (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03-1.05; p < 0.001) and polypharmacy were associated with poor glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: Lower educational level and sedentarism were associated with low adherence. Younger age, rural residence, smoking, time since diagnosis and polypharmacy, increased risk of poor glycaemic control.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dieta Mediterrânea , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Glicemia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Controle Glicêmico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Adesão à Medicação
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32438657

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To know the frequency and causes of low value surgical practices, according to the opinion of surgeons and anesthetists, and to determine their degree of knowledge about the Spanish "Choosing wisely" initiative. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study, based on a self-administered online questionnaire through an opportunistic sample of 370 surgeons and anesthetists from three Spanish regions, contacted through Scientific Societies. The survey took part between July and December 2017. RESULTS: A patient profile requesting unnecessary practices was identified (female, 51-65 years old and unaffiliated disease). The frequency of requests was weekly or daily for 50.0% of the professionals, of whom 15.1% acknowledged succumbing to these pressures. To dissuade the patient, clinical reasons (47%) were considered the most effective. To increase control and safety in the case was the main reason to indicate them. The greatest responsibility for overuse was attributed to physicians, defensive medicine and mass media. Assessing professionals' knowledge on unnecessary practices, an average of 5 correct answers out of 7 was obtained. Some 64.1% of the respondents were unaware of the Spanish "Choosing wisely" initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Low value surgical practices are perceived as a frequent problem, which requires an approach entailing intervention with patients and the media as well as professionals. Increase awareness on unnecessary surgical practices, and how to avoid them remain essential.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Cirurgiões , Idoso , Anestesistas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29440883

RESUMO

Background: To identify practices that do not add value, cause harm, or subject patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a level of risk that outweighs possible benefits (overuse). Methods: A qualitative approach was applied. First, a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals used the Metaplan technique to draft and rank a list of overused procedures as well as self-care practices in patients with stable and exacerbated COPD. Second, in successive consensus-building rounds, description files were created for each "do not do" (DND) recommendation, consisting of a definition, description, quality of supporting evidence for the recommendation, and the indicator used to measure the degree of overuse. The consensus group comprised 6 pulmonologists, 2 general practitioners, 1 nurse, and 1 physiotherapist. Results: In total, 16 DND recommendations were made for patients with COPD: 6 for stable COPD, 6 for exacerbated COPD, and 4 concerning self-care. Conclusion: Overuse poses a risk for patients and jeopardizes care quality. These 16 DND recommendations for COPD will lower care risks and improve disease management, facilitate communication between physicians and patients, and bolster patient ability to provide self-care.


Assuntos
Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Autocuidado/efeitos adversos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Consenso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Segurança do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Autocuidado/economia , Procedimentos Desnecessários/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA