Post severe COVID-19 infection lung damages study. The experience of early three months multidisciplinary follow-up.

The correct type and time of follow-up for patients affected by COVID19 ARDS is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate at the survivors to COVID19 ARDS requiring non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) admitted to a Respiratory Intensive care unit (RICU) from March 8th till May 31th 2020 looking at all sequelae via a comprehensive follow up. All patients underwent a multi-disciplinary instrumental and clinical assessment within three months form admission to evaluate all infection related sequelae. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled Lung-Ultrasound (LUS) showed an outstanding discrimination ability (ROC AUC: 0.95) and a substantial agreement rate (Cohen's K: 0.74) compared to chest CT-scan detecting improvement of lung consolidations. Youden's test showed a cut-off pressure of 11 cmH2O ExpiratoryPAP-Continuous-PAP-max (EPAP-CPAP) applied at the airways during hospitalization to be significantly correlated (p value: 0.026) to the increased pulmonary artery common trunk diameter. A total of 8/38 patients (21.8%), 2 of whom during follow-up, were diagnosed with Pulmonary Emboli (PE) and started anticoagulant treatment. Patients with PE had a statistically significant shorter length of time of hospitalization, time to negative swab, CPAP/NIV duration, P/F ratio and D-dimers at follow-up compared to non PE. A comprehensive approach to patients with ARDS COVID19 requiring NRS is necessary. This study highlighted cardiopulmonary impairment related to the ARDS and to the high-EPAP-CPAP-max greater than 11mmHg provided during admission, the usefulness of LUS in monitoring post-infection recovery and the correct identification and  treatment of patients with PE during follow up.

CT pulmonary angiography appropriateness in a single emergency department: does the use of revised Geneva score matter?

PURPOSE: To assess the percentage of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) procedures that could have been avoided by methodical application of the Revised Geneva Score (RGS) coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs rather than only clinical judgment in Emergency Department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2019 and May 2020, 437 patients with suspected PE based on symptoms and D-dimer test were included in this study. All patients underwent to CTPA. For each patient, we retrospectively calculated the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs and the RGS in the original version. Finally, CT images were retrospectively reviewed, and the presence of PE was recorded. RESULTS: In total, 43 (9.84%) CTPA could have been avoided by use of RGS coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs. Prevalence of PE was 14.87%. From the analysis of 43 inappropriate CTPA, 24 (55.81%) of patients did not show any thoracic signs, two (4.65%) of patients had PE, and the remaining patients had alternative thoracic findings. CONCLUSION: The study showed good prevalence of PE diagnoses in our department using only physician assessment, although 9.84% CTPA could have been avoided by methodical application of RGS coupled with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs.

A diagnostic dilemma: Pedunculated mesenteric lipodystrophy mimicking Meckel's diverticulum. A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Mesenteric lipodystrophy is a rare fibroinflammatory disease of unknown origin with clinical and radiological non specific findings. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: The case of a 42-years-old man affected by a pedunculated mesenteric lipodystrophy mimicking Meckel's diverticulum is reported. Clinical, imaging and histological findings are discussed. DISCUSSION: Mesenteric lipodystrophy affects the mesenteric fat of the abdomen with a typical diffuse thickening of the mesentery, nodular thickening of the mesenteric root and presence of mass-like lesions. Ultrasound (US) and Multiphasic Computed Tomography (CT) represent the main imaging tools used for diagnosis. Clinical and imaging findings can mimick other pathological conditions affecting the mesenteric fat tissue. Contrast enhanced CT is the most accurate imaging technique for diagnosing mesenteric lipodystrophy due to the high panoramicity and accuracy with multiplanar imaging. Multiphasic technique helps to characterize the lesion and to recognize vascular anatomy. Oral administration of iodinated contrast medium may help to assess the relationship with bowel loops. All these diagnostic elements are crucial for the surgical timing and approach. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneous mesenteric involvement, the nonspecific CT findings and the high number of diseases for differential diagnosis, the detection of mesenteric lipodystrophy is challenging and requires early clinical suspicion. An histological examination is always necessary.