A multicentre observational study to investigate feasibility of a direct oral penicillin challenge in de-labelling 'low risk' patients with penicillin allergy by non-allergy healthcare professionals (SPACE study): Implications for healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVE: The huge burden of inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) is an important driver of antimicrobial resistance. This is magnified by insufficient allergy specialists and lack of 'point-of-care' tests. We investigated the feasibility of non-allergy healthcare professionals (HCPs) delivering direct oral penicillin challenges (DPCs) for penicillin allergy de-labelling. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals in England across three settings (acute medical, pre-surgical and haematology-oncology). Patients with a PAL were screened and stratified as low risk/high risk. Low risk patients (non-immune mediated symptoms, benign rash, tolerated amoxicillin since and family history) underwent a DPC. RESULTS: N = 2257 PALs were screened, 1054 were eligible; 643 were approached, 373 declined, 270 consented and 259 risk stratified (low risk = 155; high risk = 104). One hundred and twenty-six low risk patients underwent DPC, 122 (96.8%) were de-labelled with no serious allergic reactions. Conversion rate from screening-to-consent was 12% [3.3% and 17.9% in acute and elective settings respectively; odds ratios for consent were 3.42 (p < 0.001) and 5.53 (p < 0.001) in haematology-oncology and pre-surgical setting respectively. Common reasons for failure to progress in the study included difficulty in reaching patients, clinical instability/medical reasons, lacking capacity to consent and psychological factors. INTERPRETATION: DPCs can be delivered by non-allergy HCPs. A high proportion of patients with PALs did not progress in the study pathway. Strategies to deliver DPC at optimal points of the care pathway are needed to enhance uptake. Elective settings offer greater opportunities than acute settings for DPC. The safety and simplicity of DPCs lends itself to adoption by healthcare systems beyond the UK, including in resource-limited settings.

Peri-Operative Anaphylaxis-An Investigational Challenge.

Patients with suspected peri-operative anaphylaxis (POP) require thorough investigation to identify underlying trigger(s) and enable safe anesthesia for subsequent surgery. The changing epidemiology of POP has been striking. Previous estimates of the incidence of POP have ranged between 1:6,000 and1:20,000 anesthetics, but more recent data from France and the United Kingdom suggest an estimated incidence of 1:10,000. Other important changes include a change in the hierarchy of well-recognized triggers, with antibiotics (beta-lactams) supplanting neuromuscular blockers (NMB) as the leading cause of POP. The emergence of chlorhexidine, patent blue dye, and teicoplanin as important triggers have also been noteworthy findings. The mainstay of investigation revolves around critical analysis of the time-line of events leading up to anaphylaxis coupled with judicious skin testing. Skin tests have limitations with respect to unknown predictive values for most drugs/agents and therefore, knowledge of background positivity in healthy controls, test characteristics of individual drugs and the use of non-irritant concentrations is essential to avoid both false-positive and false-negative results. Specific IgE assays for individual drugs are available only for a limited number of agents and are not a substitute for skin testing. Acute serum total tryptase has a high specificity and positive predictive value in IgE-mediated POP anaphylaxis but is limited by its moderate sensitivity and negative predictive value. Planning for safe anesthesia in this group of patients is particularly challenging and consequently anesthetists need to be alert to the possibility of repeat episodes of anaphylaxis. Because of the limitations of current investigations for POP, collecting systematic data on the outcome of repeat anesthesia is valuable in validating current investigatory approaches. This paper reviews the changing epidemiology of POP with reference to the main triggers, and the investigation and outcome of subsequent anesthesia.

Treatment stratification of respiratory syncytial virus infection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Due to paucity of evidence to guide management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections national and international guidelines make disparate recommendations. METHODS: The outcomes of allo-HSCT recipients with RSV infection between 2015 and 2017 were assessed using the following treatment stratification; upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) being actively monitored and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) treated with short courses of oral ribavirin combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG, 2 g/kg). RESULTS: During the study period 49 RSV episodes were diagnosed (47% URTI and 53% LRTI). All patients with URTI recovered without pharmacological intervention. Progression from URTI to LRTI occurred in 15%. Treatment with oral ribavirin given until significant symptomatic improvement (median 7 days [3-12]) and IVIG for LRTI was generally well tolerated. RSV-attributable mortality was low (2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, we demonstrate that active monitoring of allo-HSCT patients with RSV in the absence of LRTI was only associated with progression to LRTI in 15% of our patients and therefore appears to be a safe approach. Short course oral ribavirin in combination with IVIG was effective and well-tolerated for LRTI making it a practical alternative to aerosolised ribavirin. This approach was beneficial in reducing hospitalisation, saving nursing times and by using oral as opposed to nebulised ribavirin.

Secondary antibody deficiencies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antibody deficiency can occur in the context of primary immune deficiency due to inherited genetic defects or secondary to a variety of causes. This review aims to summarize current data concerning the causes of secondary antibody deficiency and where possible evidence regarding the use of prophylactic replacement immunoglobulin. (Figure is included in full-text article.) RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in immune-mediated therapies ranging from monoclonal antibodies to novel B-cell-targeted therapeutics are responsible for an expansion in the possible iatrogenic causes of antibody deficiency. SUMMARY: Causes of secondary antibody deficiency include B-cell lymphoproliferative disease, notably chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma, protein losing states, disorders of lymphatic circulation, increased immunoglobulin catabolism and a growing number of therapeutic agents. At-risk patients should be closely monitored for the development of hypogammaglobulinaemia, B-cell function should be defined where appropriate with specific antibody responses to immunization antigens and where there is a significant burden of infections patients should be treated with prophylactic antibiotics and/or replacement immunoglobulin.

Is rheumatoid factor useful in primary care? A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is frequently tested in general practice where its utility as a diagnostic test for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not known. We undertook a retrospective cross-sectioal study to determine the utility and cost of RF in a primary care population. We compared RF with recorded clinical features based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as a diagnostic test for RA in 235 patients in general practice using receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the cost of testing per case of RA. We analysed 36,191 RF requests made to one laboratory from 2003-2009 at a mean annual cost of £58,164 and the variation and annual cost of RF testing between 77 practices. The sensitivity and specificity of RF at the optimal cut-off value of 20 U/ml were 0.6 and 0.96 and that of two documented clinical ACR criteria were 0.9 and 0.92, respectively. No ACR criteria were documented in 150 (63.8%) patients who had RF tested. The overall cost of RF testing per case of seropositive RA was £708.75. Of all RF requests, 66.6% was made by GPs, 7.0% by rheumatologists and 26.4% by other hospital departments. The proportion of positive tests was 5.8% in primary care and 17.7% in rheumatology. The mean number of tests performed annually in primary care was 4.65 (SD 2.7) per 1,000 patients. RF is less sensitive for RA than clinical features in primary care and is frequently requested in cases without clinical evidence of the disease, adding to the overall cost.

The diagnostic significance of serum IgG4 levels in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis: a UK study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is recognised as an end organ manifestation of the systemic condition known as IgG4-sclerosing disease. One major characteristic of this disease, regardless of its location in the body, is the presence of high levels of circulating serum IgG, in particular IgG4 antibody. In the case of AIP, differential diagnosis from other conditions of the pancreas and biliary system, particularly cancers, can be difficult, but could result in avoiding invasive procedures and surgery. Earlier studies have evaluated the use of checking IgG4 levels in AIP diagnosis; these have produced variable results. OBJECTIVE: To further assess the diagnostic significance of serum IgG4 levels in AIP and investigate its value in differentiating from cancer of the gastroenterological system. METHODS: A retrospective study of 196 IgG4-requested samples from a 24-month period was examined. Samples were sorted into confirmed AIP, cancer or other pancreatic conditions including primary sclerosing cholangitis. RESULTS: Patients with AIP possessed a mean serum IgG level that was significantly higher compared with all other groups (mean serum IgG level=19.0 g/l+/-2.5, P<0.001). The mean serum IgG4 level of AIP patients was also significantly higher compared with all other conditions including cancer patients (mean IgG4 level=3.7 g/l+/-0.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This data lends support to circulating IgG4 levels only being used as an accompanying diagnostic marker to imaging, histology and clinical presentation. In particular, this may help in differentiating between AIP and pancreatic carcinoma.