[Effective therapeutic regimens for patients with triple-negative (ER/PgR/HER2-negative) metastatic breast cancer].

The so-called triple-negative (TN) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), that is, MBC expressing no hormone receptors or HER2 protein, has attracted attention because of its low response rate to drug therapy and poor prognosis after recurrence. Of 423 MBC patients in our hospital in and after 2001, 54 had TN tumors. The median survival time (MST) of TN patients (25 months) was shorter than the MSTs of HR (+)/HER2 (-), HR (+)/HER2 (+), and HR (-)/HER2 (+) patients (69, 58, and 39 months, respectively). A retrospective analysis of responses to 162 regimens in 54 TN-MBC patients showed that anthracycline regimens produced a response rate of 18. 8% (a PR or higher response in 3 of 16 patients), whereas a taxane regimen yielded a very low response rate of 8. 1% (3/37). A similar low response was observed in monotherapy with MTX, CPT-11, VNR, gemcitabine, or S-1. Of particular note were the high response rate (46. 2%, 12/26) of DMpC therapy (oral 5'-DFUR, MPA, and CPA) and that (28%, 7/25) of MFL-P therapy (MTX, 5-FU, leucovorin, and CDDP), although these were not standard therapies. In addition, the molecular-targeted drug bevacizumab or cetuximab was concomitantly used with chemotherapeutic agents in 3 patients, and 1 each treated with either therapy achieved a PR. Thus, in the future, we can expect further advances in molecular-targeted therapy while using DMpC and MFL-P for the treatment of TN-MBC as an early-line therapy.

[Stratification with respect to hormone receptor and HER 2/neu in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer; sensitivity to taxane].

Of 231 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer treated in Hiei Hospital between January 2001 and March 2005, for whom data on hormone receptor (HR) and HER 2/neu were available, we retrospectively analyzed the association of the response rate with HR and HER 2 in 172 patients treated with taxane in whom the treatment response could be evaluated. Among the patients treated with taxane alone,the response rates were 37.5% (n=67) in the HR (+) patients and 14.6% (n=41) in the HR (-) patients (p=0.0131). In particular, taxane resistance was suggested in the HR (-)/HER 2 (-) patients (response rate: 4.2%, n=24). Concerning combination therapy with trastuzumab and taxane, the response rate were 52.8% in the HR (+)/HER 2 (+) patients and 60.4% in the HR (-)/HER 2 (+) patients. In 27 of these patients, single therapy with taxane was switched to combination therapy with taxane and trastuzumab after they became resistant to taxane, and 8.3% of the HR (+)/HER 2 (+) patients and 53.3% of the HR (-)/HER 2 (+) patients responded to this combination therapy (p=0.0192), suggesting the synergistic effects of the two agents in HR (-)/HER 2 (+) patients. Therefore, HR and HER 2 were associated with the sensitivity to a chemotherapeutic agent, taxane. Stratification with respect to HR and HER 2 is important in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In particular, therapeutic strategies for HR (-)/HER 2 (-) patients with a poor prognosis must be established in the future.

A case of metachronous bilateral breast cancer with bilateral radiation pneumonitis after breast-conserving therapy.

We report a patient with metachronous bilateral breast cancer who has twice developed radiation pneumonitis after breast-conserving therapy for each breast. The patient was a 48-year-old woman, who presented with Stage I right breast cancer. After wide excision of the right breast tumor and dissection of level I axillary lymph nodes, systemic therapy with oral 5-FU and tamoxifen was started. Subsequently, tangential irradiation with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions was given. Seven months after irradiation, she developed respiratory symptoms and radiation pneumonitis was diagnosed. The symptoms resolved with oral prednisolone. Thirty months after the right breast cancer treatment, Stage I left breast cancer was diagnosed. After wide excision of the left breast tumor and partial removal of the level I axillary lymph nodes, the same oral systemic chemo-hormonal therapy was initiated. Thereafter, tangential irradiation with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions was given. Four months after irradiation, she developed respiratory symptoms. A chest X-ray showed an area of increased density in the left lung consistent with radiation pneumonitis. The symptoms were mild and they improved spontaneously without medication. Although there is insufficient evidence to justify or withhold whole breast radiation therapy from patients with a history of contralateral breast cancer and radiation pneumonitis, it is essential to discuss the adequacy of whole breast irradiation and the possibility of alternative approaches, such as breast-conserving surgery without irradiation or partial breast irradiation for this rare condition.

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases.

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast conserving therapy (BCT) for early stage breast cancer were analyzed from long-term follow-up of BCT in Japan. The purpose of this study was to clarify risk factors of IBTR and the impact of IBTR on development of distant metastases in this ethnic group. METHODS: Patients (N = 1901)with unilateral breast cancer < or = 3 cm in diameter who underwent BCT at 18 Japanese major breast cancer treatment institutes from 1986 to 1993 were registered in this study. Survival rates, the incidences of IBTR and distant metastases, and annual rates of IBTR and distant metastases after primary operation were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risks of IBTR and distant metastases. A Cox model was also used to estimate the risks of distant metastases after IBTR in the group of IBTR. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 107 months, the 10-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 83.9% and 77.8%, respectively. The 10-year cumulative rates of IBTR were 8.5% in the patients with postoperative irradiation and 17.2% in the patients without irradiation. The 10-year cumulative distant metastasis rate was 10.9%. On multivariate analysis, young age, positive surgical margin, and omission of radiation therapy were significant predictors of IBTR. In addition, IBTR significantly correlated with subsequent distant metastases (hazard ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.676-5.771; P < 0.0001). Among patients who developed IBTR, initial lymph node metastases and short interval to IBTR were significant risk factors for subsequent distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Young age, positive surgical margin, and omission of radiation therapy seemed to be important factors in relation to local control. The authors' results also indicated that IBTR is significantly associated with subsequent distant metastasis. Patients with positive nodal status at primary operation or with short interval from primary operation to IBTR are at especially high risk of distant metastasis. It remains unclear, however, whether IBTR is an indicator or a cause of subsequent distant metastases.

[Bi-weekly chemotherapy with medium-dose docetaxel for advanced and recurrent breast cancers (The 15th study of Keiji Breast Cancer Study Group)].

The efficacy and safety of bi-weekly administration of medium-dose docetaxel (TXT) were evaluated in patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancers. The additional effect of 5'-DFUR for non-responders was also evaluated. Forty patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancers were treated and 38 cases of 40 were evaluated (34 with recurrent cases and 4 with advanced cases). All cases were female, and their mean age was 56.0 (38-74). TXT of 60 mg/body, which was equivalent to 30-50 mg/m2 for standard-sized Japanese women, was administered every two weeks. 5'-DFUR of 800 mg/body was added for non-responders after 5 weeks. The response rate was calculated from the data of 32 cases with measurable lesions, and side effects were evaluated in about 34 cases with exact records. Two hundred seventy-one courses were performed for 38 patients (4-24 courses per person, average 7.13 courses). The mean dosage per course of TXT was 58.4 mg/body (38.3 mg/ m2). Three complete and 7 partial responses were observed (overall response rate: 31.3%). Ten non-responders were evaluated for the additional effect of 5' DFUR, and one case reached PR. Grade 3/4 bone marrow suppression occurred in 9 patients, and Grade 3/4 general malaise was observed in two patient. According to the results, bi-weekly administration of medium dose TXT is an active and safe regimen in patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancers. The additional effect of 5'-DFUR was observed in one of 10 non-responders of bi-weekly chemotherapy with medium-dose TXT.

Analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast-conserving treatment based on the classification of true recurrences and new primary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment include two different entities: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be de novo cancer independently arising in the preserved breast. The patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) are potentially at high risk for subsequent distant metastasis, but many studies do not distinguish between these types of recurrence. The aim of this study is to clarify the biological difference between TR and NP, and to show the clinical significance of classifying IBTR into these two types of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 172 patients with IBTR after breast-conserving therapy from the cohort of a long-term large scale study (Research of cancer treatment from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (no.13-9)) were analyzed. We classified IBTRs as TR or NP based on tumor location and pathological findings. The characteristics of the primary tumors of TR and NP were compared. Survival rates and risk factors of each type of IBTR were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The results of salvage surgery were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients, 135 patients were classified as TR and 26 as NP. Eleven cases could not be categorized. The primary tumor of TR was characterized by a high rate of lymph node metastasis (37.8%) and short disease-free interval (mean DFI; 46.6 months) while that of NP showed a rather low lymph node positivity (8.7%) and longer DFI (62.1 months). The risk factors for TR were young age, positive surgical margin, omission of irradiation and positive lymph node metastasis. Those for NP were young age, omission of irradiation and contralateral breast cancer after the primary operation. The 5-year survival rates after IBTR were 71.0% in TR and 94.7% in NP (p=0.022). Salvage operation was performed in 136 IBTRs. Eighty-one patients underwent salvage mastectomy and 55 patients underwent repeat lumpectomy. Five-year survival rates after salvage operation were 75.7% for mastectomy and 84.2% for lumpectomy (N.S.). Twenty percent of patients who underwent repeat lumpectomy developed secondary local relapse within 5 years after salvage treatment. The risk factors for secondary local relapse were analyzed. Limited to cases of IBTR which received radiation therapy after the primary operation, NP was the only factor influencing secondary local relapse by univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TR and NP show clinically quite different features; time to occurrence, characteristics of the original tumor, prognosis and risk factor profile for IBTR were all different. Classifying IBTR as TR or NP can provide clinically significant data for the management of IBTR.

Bilateral breast-conserving therapy for bilateral breast cancer: results and consideration of radiation technique.

BACKGROUND: Although breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive irradiation is an established treatment for patients with early breast cancer, the role of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for patients with bilateral breast cancer has not been well studied and the radiation therapy technique is still under investigation. We examined the feasibility of breast-conserving therapy for bilateral breast cancer and present here our radiation therapy technique with CT simulator. METHODS: Between July 1990 and December 1998, we treated 17 patients with bilateral breast cancer who underwent bilateral breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive irradiation. Seven patients had synchronous bilateral breast cancer and ten had metachronous bilateral breast cancer. Radiation therapy consisted of 50 Gy to the bilateral whole breast in all patients but one. A CT simulator was used to plan a tangential radiation field to the breast in all patients. Boost irradiation of 10 Gy was administered to 8 tumors with close or positive margins. RESULTS: With a median follow-up periods of 95 months from each operation, no patients showed loco-regional recurrence on either side, and none suffered distant metastasis. Furthermore no serious late adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that BCT is feasible for bilateral breast cancer and the CT simulator is useful for determining the radiation field, especially when lesions are metachronous.

Feasibility of breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple ipsilateral breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Macroscopically multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MMIBC) is generally considered a contraindication for breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The result of BCT for MMIBC is reported and the feasibility discussed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1993 and February 1999, 34 patients with MMIBC underwent BCT at our clinic. The local control, disease-free survival, and cosmetic results in these patients were compared with those of patients with single disease. RESULTS: After wide excision, 21 (62%) of 34 patients with MMIBC had a close surgical margin and the rate was significantly greater than that of patients with a single lesion. However, the size of the boost irradiation field was not significantly increased. At a median follow-up of 98 months, no statistically significant difference was noted in local control, disease-free survival, or cosmetic result compared with patients with a single lesion. CONCLUSION: Although patients with MMIBC frequently had close surgical margins after BCT, it can be a treatment option for these patients as long as the close surgical margin is accurately detected and treated with an appropriate radiation technique.