Traumatic Aortic Disruption Index (TADI) is associated with mortality and urgency of stent grafting in blunt thoracic aortic (Grade 3) injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed stent grafting for blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI) is current standard of care. However, given the heterogeneity of pseudoaneurysm presentations, it is currently unclear which severe BTAIs require more urgent intervention. We hypothesize that a Traumatic Aortic Disruption Index (TADI) calculation based on sagittal computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging measurements would correlate with urgency of stent grafting. METHODS: All patients at a level-1 trauma center with BTAIs over a 12-year period were identified. A TADI score was then calculated using the length of pseudoaneurysm (L), maximum width of pseudoaneurysm (W), and normal adjacent aortic diameter (NA) (Figure1). Patient presentation, injury characteristics, timing of stent grafting, and outcomes were then evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were diagnosed with BTAIs. Mean age was 37.6 years, with a median injury severity score (ISS) of 29. Overall mortality was 11.9%. TADI scores ranged from 3.6 to 158.6. Compared to patients with a TADI<28, patients with TADI>28 had similar median ISS scores (34 vs 29, p=0.16), and rates of both traumatic brain injury (33.3% vs 42.0%, p=0.53) and non-aortic hemorrhage control procedures (44.4% vs 33.3%, p=0.3). TADI>28 patients had a lower initial mean systolic BP (98.5 vs 121.9, p=.003), more severe hypotension (lowest systolic 77.0 vs 91.2, p=.034), lower initial GCS (6 vs 13, p=.039), higher mean admission lactate (4.6 vs 3.3, p=.036), and higher overall mortality (23.8% vs 0%, p=.048). Patients with TADI>28 received stent grafting at significantly shorter median time intervals from injury identification (median 4 hrs vs 14 hrs, p=.001). Overall causes of mortality were aortic hemorrhage related (n=3, 60%) and traumatic brain injury (n=2, 40%). CONCLUSION: This simple-to-calculate index is independently correlated with mortality and urgency of stent grafting in blunt trauma patients with similar ISS. Patients with TADI scores >28 were more likely to undergo urgent stent grafting, thereby suggesting a trend in practice patterns with higher scores representing injuries that should be considered for expedited operative management. The TADI score should be validated in a larger sample of blunt trauma patients as an injury prioritization tool in the multi-system injured patient.

Iliac transposition technique for reconstruction of aortic bifurcation in pediatric blunt abdominal aortic injury.

Blunt abdominal aortic injuries, especially in pediatric patients, represents a rare and critical challenge. We report a unique case of a 10-year-old boy who presented after a high-speed motor vehicle collision resulting in injury to the aortic bifurcation, alongside other intra-abdominal trauma. A novel surgical approach for aortoiliac reconstruction in a contaminated field was used. This technique consisted of the mobilization of the distal aorta and common iliac arteries, ligation of right internal iliac artery, and creation of aortoiliac and common to internal iliac artery anastomoses. This method demonstrates a potentially lifesaving technique in select patients.

An assessment of nationwide trends in emergency department (ED) resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) use - A trauma quality improvement program registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemorrhage control in severe non-compressible torso trauma remains controversial, with limited data on patient selection and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the nationwide trends of its use in the emergency department (EDs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) from 2017 to 2022 was performed, focusing on REBOA placements in EDs. RESULTS: The analysis included 3398 REBOA procedures. Majority patients were male (76 â€‹%) with a median age of 40 years (27-58) and injury severity score of 20 (20-41). The most common mechanism was collision (64 â€‹%), with emergency surgeries most frequently performed for pelvic trauma (14 â€‹%). Level 1 trauma centers performed 82 â€‹% of these procedures, with consistent low annual utilization (<200 facilities). Survival rates were 85 â€‹% at 1-h post-placement, decreasing significantly to 42 â€‹% by discharge. CONCLUSIONS: REBOA usage in remains limited but steady, primarily occurring at level 1 trauma center EDs. While short-term survival rates are favorable, they drop significantly by the time of discharge.

Analyzing computed tomography Modalities for screening pediatric patients for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury.

BACKGROUND: Optimal screening for BCVI in pediatric trauma patients remains debated. We hypothesized screening with CTAN would decrease the number of duplicate CT scans per patient and increase BCVI detection rate. METHODS: Local BCVI screening institutional protocol changed May 2022 to include Computed Tomography angiography neck (CTAN). We performed a retrospective review of pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023. Patients before and after implementation of universal screening were compared for demographic, clinical, radiographic, and outcome data. RESULTS: Six-hundred-eight patients were included with 368 before and 240 after the protocol change. Screening with CTAN decreased the number of duplicate neck scans (5.7%vs.2.1 â€‹%,p â€‹= â€‹0.03) and increased BCVI detection rate (0.27%v.2.5 â€‹%,p â€‹= â€‹0.01). Of the seven patients diagnosed with BCVI 2019-2023, no patients suffered any stroke-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: Universal screening for BCVI in pediatric patients with CTAN resulted in fewer scans and an increased BCVI detection rate.

Vascular Surgery Role in Vascular Trauma: 11-Year Analysis of Peripheral Vascular Trauma Management at a Level-1 Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Vascular surgeons are increasingly relied upon in the management of complex peripheral vascular trauma. The degree however that vascular surgery (VS) is involved in vascular trauma care is not well established. We hypothesize that VS consultation is required in a high portion of complex lower extremity vascular trauma. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who sustained traumatic arterial injury of the lower extremity requiring open operative repair at a level-1 trauma center (from February 2009 to May 2020) was performed. Patients who underwent surgical repair were stratified by the service that performed the operation (VS versus trauma surgery [TS]). Secondary outcomes assessed included location of arterial injury, type of repair, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients underwent operative repair of lower extremity arterial injury (mean age 34.5 ± 15.5 years, 89% male). The most common vessels requiring intervention were the superficial femoral artery (n = 42, 38%), popliteal artery (n = 35, 31.5%), and tibial vessels (n = 19, 17.1%). The most common intervention required in patients was an autologous bypass (n = 85, 76.5%), followed by ligation (n = 9, 8.1%) and primary repair (n = 6, 5.4%). Most interventions overall required VS involvement (n = 95, 86%). VS performed a higher proportion of autologous graft procedures compared to TS (n = 79, 92.9% vs. n = 6, 7.1%). VS case load overall was likewise predominantly autologous grafts (n = 79/95, 83.2%). TS operated on a higher proportion of injuries to the tibial vessels (44% vs. 13%, P = 0.01), whereas VS intervened more frequently on popliteal injuries (36% vs. 6%, P = 0.02). With regard to the method of arterial repair, TS was more likely to perform ligation (38% vs. 3 %, P < 0.001) or primary repair (13% vs. 3%, P = 0.04) compared to VS. However, VS was more likely to perform repair with autologous graft (83% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of mortality, limb loss, transfusions requirement, fasciotomy, deep venous thrombosis, hematoma formation, or length of stay between groups. Although, surgical site infections were more common in the TS group (38% vs. 15%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons play a large role in managing complex lower extremity vascular trauma. In particular, VS remains integral for the management of more difficult injuries (e.g., popliteal injuries) and is more likely to provide more complex repairs (e.g., autologous grafts).

Preoperative frailty measured by risk analysis index predicts complications and poor discharge outcomes after Brain Tumor Resection in a large multi-center analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the independent effect of frailty, as measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Administrative (RAI-A) for postoperative complications and discharge outcomes following brain tumor resection (BTR) in a large multi-center analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing BTR were queried from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSIQP) for the years 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the independent associations between frailty tools (age, 5-factor modified frailty score [mFI-5], and RAI-A) on postoperative complications and discharge outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 30,951 patients who underwent craniotomy for BTR; the median age of our study sample was 59 (IQR 47-68) years old and 47.8% of patients were male. Overall, increasing RAI-A score, in an overall stepwise fashion, was associated with increasing risk of adverse outcomes including in-hospital mortality, non-routine discharge, major complications, Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complication, and extended length of stay. Multivariable regression analysis (adjusting for age, sex, BMI, non-elective surgery status, race, and ethnicity) demonstrated that RAI-A was an independent predictor for worse BTR outcomes. The RAI-A tiers 41-45 (1.2% cohort) and > 45 (0.3% cohort) were ~ 4 (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% CI: 2.1-8.9) and ~ 9 (OR: 9.5, 95% CI: 3.9-22.9) times more likely to have in-hospital mortality compared to RAI-A 0-20 (34% cohort). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing preoperative frailty as measured by the RAI-A score is independently associated with increased risk of complications and adverse discharge outcomes after BTR. The RAI-A may help providers present better preoperative risk assessment for patients and families weighing the risks and benefits of potential BTR.

Surgical Infection Society: Chest Wall Injury Society Recommendations for Antibiotic Use during Surgical Stabilization of Traumatic Rib or Sternal Fractures to Reduce Risk of Implant Infection.

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is recommended in patients with flail chest or multiple displaced rib fractures with physiologic compromise. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) and surgical stabilization of sternal fractures (SSSF) involve open reduction and internal fixation of fractures with a plate construct to restore anatomic alignment. Most plate constructs are composed of titanium and presence of this foreign, non-absorbable material presents opportunity for implant infection. Although implant infection rates after SSRF and SSSF are low, they present a challenging clinical entity often requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, debridement, and potentially implant removal. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and Chest Wall Injury Society's Publication Committee convened to develop recommendations for antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib and sternal fractures. Clinical scenarios included patients with concomitant infectious processes (sepsis, pneumonia, empyema, cellulitis) or sources of contamination (open chest, gross contamination) incurred as a result of their trauma and present at the time of their surgical stabilization. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent studies. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the absence of pre-existing infectious process, there is insufficient evidence to suggest existing peri-operative guidelines or recommendations are inadequate. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the presence of sepsis, pneumonia, or an empyema, there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations on duration and choice of antibiotic. This decision may be informed by existing guidelines for the concomitant infection. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF with an open or contaminated chest there is insufficient evidence to provide specific antibiotic recommendations. Conclusions: This guideline document summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society and Chest Wall Injury Society recommendations regarding antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib or sternal fractures. Limited evidence exists in the chest wall surgical stabilization literature and further studies should be performed to delineate risk of implant infection among patients undergoing SSSRF or SSSF with concomitant infectious processes.

General surgeon management of complex hepatopancreatobiliary trauma at a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The impact of general surgeons (GS) taking trauma call on patient outcomes has been debated. Complex hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) injuries present a particular challenge and often require specialized care. We predicted no difference in the initial management or outcomes of complex HPB trauma between GS and trauma/critical care (TCC) specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent operative intervention for complex HPB trauma from 2008 to 2015 at an ACS-verified level I trauma center was performed. Chart review was used to obtain variables pertaining to demographics, clinical presentation, operative management, and outcomes. Patients were grouped according to whether their index operation was performed by a GS or TCC provider and compared. RESULTS: 180 patients met inclusion criteria. The GS (n = 43) and TCC (n = 137) cohorts had comparable patient demographics and clinical presentations. Most injuries were hepatic (73.3% GS versus 72.6% TCC) and TCC treated more pancreas injuries (15.3% versus GS 13.3%; P = 0.914). No significant differences were found in HPB-directed interventions at the initial operation (41.9% GS versus 56.2% TCC; P = 0.100), damage control laparotomy with temporary abdominal closure (69.8% versus 69.3%; P = 0.861), LOS, septic complications or 30-day mortality (13.9% versus 10.2%; P = 0.497). TCC were more likely to place an intraabdominal drain than GS (52.6% versus 34.9%; P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences between GS and TCC specialists in initial operative management or clinical outcomes of complex HPB trauma. The frequent and proper use of damage control laparotomy likely contribute to these findings.

Interhospital transfer of liver trauma in New Mexico: a state of austere resources.

BACKGROUND: There is debate in the trauma literature regarding the effect of prolonged prehospital transport on morbidity and mortality. This study analyzes the management of hepatic trauma patients requiring surgery and compares the outcomes of the group that was transferred to the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) from outside institutions, to the directly admitted group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The UNMH Trauma Database was queried from 2005-2012. Of 674 patients who sustained liver injuries, 163 required surgery: 46 patients (28.2%) underwent interhospital transfer, and 117 (71.8%) were directly admitted. Variables examined included transfer status, trauma mechanism, transport type, injury severity score (ISS), liver injury grade, and associated injuries. Outcome variables included length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality. Outcomes of the transfer group (TG) and direct admit group (DAG) were compared. RESULTS: Both TG and DAG had the same median age (31 y, P = 0.33). The blunt-to-penetrating ratio was the same for each group (48% blunt: 52% penetrating, P = 1.0). Median ISS was 25 for the TG and 26 for the DAG. Grade III or higher injury occurred in 29 (63%) of the TG and in 68 (58%) of the DAG (P = 0.56). Median hospital LOS was 14 d for TG and 9 d for DAG (P = 0.15). Median intensive care unit LOS was 4 d for both groups (P = 0.71). Thirty-day mortality was 20% in each group (P = 0.27). Using a multiple logistic regression model for the outcome of mortality, only age, ISS, and liver injury grade, not transfer status or transport type, had a significant effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in liver injury grade, ISS, LOS, and mortality between TG and DAG. In the patient population of our study, transfer status did not affect outcome.