Comparative efficacy of surgical approaches to disease modification in Parkinson disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) may optimally be treated with a disease-modifying therapy to slow progression. We compare data underlying surgical approaches proposed to impart disease modification in PD: (1) cell transplantation therapy with stem cell-derived dopaminergic neurons to replace damaged cells; (2) clinical trials of growth factors to promote survival of existing dopaminergic neurons; (3) subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation early in the course of PD; and (4) abdominal vagotomy to lower risk of potential disease spread from gut to brain. Though targeted to engage potential mechanisms of PD these surgical approaches remain experimental, indicating the difficulty in translating therapeutic concepts into clinical practice. The choice of outcome measures to assess disease modification separate from the symptomatic benefit will be critical to evaluate the effect of the disease-modifying intervention on long-term disease burden, including imaging studies and clinical rating scales, i.e., Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale. Therapeutic interventions will require long follow-up times (i.e., 5-10 years) to analyze disease modification compared to symptomatic treatments. The promise of invasive, surgical treatments to achieve disease modification through mechanistic approaches has been constrained by the reality of translating these concepts into effective clinical trials.

Surgical Treatment of Parkinson Disease.

Surgery in Parkinson disease is effective for a select group of patients when optimal medical management is not sufficient. Functional neurosurgery can be used as either a salvage therapy in patients with disabling symptoms or to maintain quality of life and independence before progression to severe disability in high-functioning patients. With recent technological advancements in imaging and targeting as well as novel neuromodulation paradigms, there are numerous options for targeted brain lesions and deep brain stimulation. Surgical decision making and postoperative management in Parkinson disease therefore often requires a multidisciplinary team effort with neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychology, and psychiatry.

Benefits and risks of unilateral and bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial essential tremor symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Many experts assume bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) is necessary to improve axial tremor in essential tremor (ET). In the largest clinical trial of DBS for ET to date evaluating a non-directional, constant current device, we studied the effects of unilateral and staged bilateral DBS on axial tremor. METHODS: We included all participants from the original trial with unilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS and 90-day follow up at minimum. Primary outcomes were changes in pooled axial subscores in the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) at 90 and 180 days after activation of unilateral VIM DBS compared to pre-operative baseline (n=119). Additionally, we performed within-subject analyses for unilateral versus bilateral DBS at 180 days in the cohort who underwent staged surgery to bilateral DBS (n=39). RESULTS: Unilateral VIM DBS improved midline tremor by 58% at 90 days (median[IQR]) (3[3] to 1[2], p<0.001) and 65% at 180 days (3[3] to 1[2], p<0.001) versus pre-op baseline. In the staged to bilateral DBS cohort, midline tremor scores further improved after bilateral DBS at 180 days by 63% versus unilateral DBS (3[3] to 1[3], p=0.007). There were, however, 35 additional DBS and surgery-related adverse events, 14 related to incoordination, gait impairment, or speech impairment, versus 6 after unilateral DBS. CONCLUSION: Unilateral VIM DBS for ET significantly improved associated axial tremor. Staged bilateral DBS was associated with additional axial tremor improvement but also additional adverse events. Unilateral VIM DBS may be sufficient to achieve a goal of contralateral limb and axial tremor attenuation.