Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of abaloparatide and teriparatide in postmenopausal women new to anabolic therapy: A US administrative claims database study.

Real-world evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of abaloparatide versus teriparatide in women with osteoporosis may help inform treatment decisions. Following 18 months of treatment, abaloparatide was comparable to teriparatide for prevention of nonvertebral fractures, resulted in a 22% risk reduction for hip fractures, and demonstrated similar cardiovascular safety. Osteoporotic fracture risk can be reduced with anabolic or antiresorptive medications. In addition to efficacy and safety data from controlled clinical trials, real-world evidence on comparative effectiveness and safety may help inform treatment decisions. INTRODUCTION: The real-world effectiveness of abaloparatide versus teriparatide on nonvertebral fracture (NVF) incidence and cardiovascular safety during the 19-month period after treatment initiation were evaluated (NCT04974723). METHODS: Anonymized US patient claims data from Symphony Health, Integrated Dataverse (IDV)®, May 1, 2017 to July 31, 2019, included women aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 prescription of abaloparatide or teriparatide and no prior anabolic therapy. Most were enrolled in commercial and Medicare health plans. Index was the date of the initial prescription dispensed during the identification period. In 1:1 propensity score matched cohorts, time to first NVF following index date, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and MACE + heart failure (HF) were compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 11,616 patients per cohort. Overall median age (interquartile range) was 67 (61, 75) years, and 25.6% had a fracture history. Over 19 months, 335 patients on abaloparatide and 375 on teriparatide had a NVF (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.89 [0.77, 1.03]), and 121 and 154 patients, respectively, had a hip fracture [HR (95% CI): 0.78 (0.62, 1.00)]. The MACE and MACE + HF rates were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Following 18 months of treatment, abaloparatide was comparable to teriparatide for prevention of NVF and similar cardiovascular safety was demonstrated between cohorts.

Bone turnover markers to explain changes in lumbar spine BMD with abaloparatide and teriparatide: results from ACTIVE.

Early PINP changes correlate with 18-month lumbar spine BMD changes and the correlation was greater with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. The uncoupling index was similar between the two agents. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the relationship between early PINP changes and subsequent changes in spine BMD following abaloparatide and teriparatide treatments. We also explored the use of an "uncoupling index" (UI), the balance between bone formation and bone resorption, which we hypothesised would be similar in response to these treatment groups. METHODS: Blood samples were taken for measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs) s-PINP and s-CTX at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months from 189 abaloparatide patients and 227 teriparatide patients randomly selected from all participants who completed the study. BMD was measured by DXA at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Correlations were calculated between log ratio of BTMs from baseline to 3 months and percent change from baseline in BMD at 18 months. A UI was calculated using log transformation and subtraction of the standard deviate for s-CTX from the standard deviate for s-PINP for each patient. RESULTS: Early BTM changes were associated with subsequent BMD changes for both treatments. Pearson correlations for the log ratio of PINP over baseline at 3 months and BMD percent change from baseline at 18 months were larger (P < 0.0001) with abaloparatide (r = 0.561) than teriparatide (r = 0.198). The mean UI at 1 month was greater for abaloparatide versus teriparatide (1.743 and 1.493, respectively; P = 0.03) but was similar at 3 months or later time points. CONCLUSIONS: Early s-PINP changes correlate with percentage change in lumbar spine BMD 18 months after treatment with both abaloparatide and teriparatide, though the correlation with abaloparatide was greater. The UI was similar between abaloparatide and teriparatide suggesting that the balance between formation and resorption markers was similar.

Implications for fracture healing of current and new osteoporosis treatments: an ESCEO consensus paper.

Osteoporotic fracture healing is critical to clinical outcome in terms of functional recovery, morbidity, and quality of life. Osteoporosis treatments may affect bone repair, so insights into their impact on fracture healing are important. We reviewed the current evidence for an impact of osteoporosis treatments on bone repair. Treatment with bisphosphonate in experimental models is associated with increased callus size and mineralization, reduced callus remodeling, and improved mechanical strength. Local and systemic bisphosphonate treatment may improve implant fixation. No negative impact on fracture healing has been observed, even after major surgery or when administered immediately after fracture. Experimental data for denosumab and raloxifene suggest no negative implications for bone repair. The extensive experimental results for teriparatide indicate increased callus formation, improved biomechanical strength, and greater external callus volume and total bone mineral content and density. Case reports and a randomized trial have produced mixed results but are consistent with a positive impact of teriparatide on clinical fracture healing. Studies with strontium ranelate in models of fracture healing indicate that it is associated with improved bone microstructure, callus volume, and biomechanical properties. Finally, there is experimental evidence for a beneficial effect of some of the agents currently being developed for osteoporosis, notably sclerostin antibody and DKK1 antibody. There is currently no evidence that osteoporosis treatments are detrimental for bone repair and some promising experimental evidence for positive effects on healing, notably for agents with a bone-forming mode of action, which may translate into therapeutic applications.

The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

UNLABELLED: The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate. METHODS: In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 µg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety. RESULTS: At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

Fracture risk reduction during treatment with teriparatide is independent of pretreatment bone turnover.

INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide is a bone formation agent that increases bone turnover and mass, resulting in an increase in bone strength and a decrease in fracture risk. METHODS: The primary purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the association between pretreatment bone turnover marker (BTM) concentrations and the absolute and relative fracture risks after adjusting for baseline femoral neck BMD, number of prevalent vertebral fractures, and age. Because femoral neck BMD is commonly attained in the assessment of patients at risk for osteoporosis, we examined the ability of a multivariate assessment including pretreatment BTM concentration and femoral neck BMD to predict future fracture risk after adjusting for the number of prevalent vertebral fractures. We examined data from the Fracture Prevention Trial, a study designed to determine the effect of teriparatide 20 mcg/day and teriparatide 40 mcg/day on vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BTM were analyzed in two subsets of women within the Fracture Prevention Trial, and included serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), serum carboxy-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type I (PICP), serum amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type I (PINP), urinary free deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTX). RESULTS: Teriparatide significantly reduced the risk of fracture [four BTM subset (n = 520), placebo = 14.3%, teriparatide = 5.8%, P < 0.05; PINP subset (n = 771), placebo = 17.7%, teriparatide = 5.5%, P < 0.05]. Subjects with the highest pretreatment BTM concentrations had the greatest fracture risk. Teriparatide-mediated absolute risk reduction was greatest for women with high pretreatment bone turnover; however, the relative fracture risk reduction was independent of pretreatment bone turnover. After adjusting for pretreatment BTM and number of prevalent vertebral fractures, baseline femoral neck BMD was not a significant predictor of fracture risk. CONCLUSION: Teriparatide-mediated relative fracture risk reduction was independent of pretreatment bone turnover, demonstrating that this therapy offers clinical benefit to patients across a range of disease severity.

Long-term effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and serum lipid levels in early postmenopausal women: three-year data from 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, raloxifene hydrochloride has favorable effects on bone and lipid metabolism and does not stimulate reproductive tissues. The studies reported herein evaluated the long-term (3-year) effects of raloxifene treatment on bone mineral density (BMD), serum lipid levels, and drug tolerability in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 1145 healthy European and North American postmenopausal women aged 45 through 60 years were enrolled in 2 parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of identical design and randomly assigned to receive raloxifene hydrochloride, 30, 60, or 150 mg, or placebo daily; all groups received 400 to 600 mg of elemental calcium. Assessments included measurements for BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, markers of bone turnover, and serum lipid levels. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changed from baseline to 36 months as follows: placebo (mean percentage change + SE), -1. 32% +0.22%; raloxifene, 30 mg, 0.71% +0.23%; raloxifene, 60 mg, 1. 28% +0.23%; and raloxifene, 150 mg, 1.20% +0.24%. Comparable BMD changes were observed in the hip and total body. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were suppressed by raloxifene to normal premenopausal ranges through 3 years. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced 7% to 12% below baseline through 3 years. Study withdrawals due to any reason (37%) and withdrawals due to adverse events (14%) were not different among groups. The only significant adverse effect of therapy was hot flashes (25% in the 60-mg raloxifene group vs 18% in the placebo group); hot flashes were typically reported as mild and were not associated with study withdrawal (1.7% for 60-mg raloxifene vs 2.4% for placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene preserves BMD at important skeletal sites, lowers serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and has a tolerability profile comparable to placebo. These results indicate a favorable benefit-risk profile of raloxifene for long-term use in healthy postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3444-3450.

Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

CONTEXT: Raloxifene hydrochloride, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women, but whether it reduces fracture risk in these women is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of raloxifene therapy on risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. DESIGN: The Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study, a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7705 women aged 31 to 80 years in 25 countries who had been postmenopausal for at least 2 years and who met World Health Organization criteria for having osteoporosis. The study began in 1994 and had up to 36 months of follow-up for primary efficacy measurements and nonserious adverse events and up to 40 months of follow-up for serious adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to 60 mg/d or 120 mg/d of raloxifene or to identically appearing placebo pills; in addition, all women received supplemental calcium and cholecalciferol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident vertebral fracture was determined radiographically at baseline and at scheduled 24- and 36-month visits. Nonvertebral fracture was ascertained by interview at 6-month-interim visits. Bone mineral density was determined annually by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: At 36 months of the evaluable radiographs in 6828 women, 503 (7.4%) had at least 1 new vertebral fracture, including 10.1% of women receiving placebo, 6.6% of those receiving 60 mg/d of raloxifene, and 5.4% of those receiving 120 mg/d of raloxifene. Risk of vertebral fracture was reduced in both study groups receiving raloxifene (for 60-mg/d group: relative risk [RR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.8; for 120-mg/d group: RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). Frequency of vertebral fracture was reduced both in women who did and did not have prevalent fracture. Risk of nonvertebral fracture for raloxifene vs placebo did not differ significantly (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.1 for both raloxifene groups combined). Compared with placebo, raloxifene increased bone mineral density in the femoral neck by 2.1 % (60 mg) and 2.4% (120 mg) and in the spine by 2.6% (60 mg) and 2.7% (120 mg) P<0.001 for all comparisons). Women receiving raloxifene had increased risk of venous thromboembolus vs placebo (RR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2). Raloxifene did not cause vaginal bleeding or breast pain and was associated with a lower incidence of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, raloxifene increases bone mineral density in the spine and femoral neck and reduces risk of vertebral fracture.

Endometrial response to raloxifene compared with placebo, cyclical hormone replacement therapy, and unopposed estrogen in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the endometrial effects of raloxifene 60 mg/day in postmenopausal women as assessed by vaginal bleeding and endometrial thickness. DESIGN: Data from 1157 postmenopausal women were analyzed from a database consisting of four independent, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (range = 6-30 months duration), a 24-month open-label randomized, cyclical hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-controlled trial, and a 6-month double-blind, randomized, unopposed estrogen-controlled trial. Vaginal bleeding rate was derived from self-reported adverse events collected at least every 6 months. Endometrial thickness was measured by ultrasonography at regular intervals. RESULTS: Raloxifene 60 mg/day was not significantly different from placebo with regard to the incidence of vaginal bleeding, the baseline-to-endpoint change in endometrial thickness, or the proportion of women experiencing an increase in endometrial thickness above baseline after either 12 or 24 months of therapy. Unexpected bleeding was reported significantly more frequently in the unopposed estrogen groups compared with the raloxifene group (raloxifene 60 mg/day, 0% versus estrogen, 50%; p = 0.002). A significantly greater baseline-to-endpoint increase in endometrial thickness was observed in both the HRT and estrogen groups compared with their respective raloxifene comparison group (raloxifene 60 mg/day, 0.01 +/- 2.0 mm versus HRT, 1.8 +/- 3.2; p < 0.001; raloxifene 60 mg/day, 1.1 +/- 1.7 mm versus estrogen, 7.8 +/- 3.8; p < 0.001). No cases of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer were diagnosed in the placebo or raloxifene 60 mg/day groups. Endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed in one case in the HRT group and in two cases in the estrogen group. CONCLUSION: Raloxifene 60 mg/day for up to 30 months is not associated with vaginal bleeding or increased endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators: a look ahead.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally diverse compounds that bind to estrogen receptors (ER) and elicit agonist or antagonist responses depending on the target tissue and hormonal milieu. They are being evaluated primarily for conditions associated with aging, including hormone-responsive cancer, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Several SERMs are marketed or are in clinical development, including triphenylethylenes (tamoxifen and its derivatives: toremifene, droloxifene and idoxifene), chromans (levormeloxifene), benzothiophenes (raloxifene, LY353381) and naphthalenes (CP336,156). Tamoxifen and toremifene, both used to treat advanced breast cancer, also have beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Tamoxifen was recently shown to decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer in women at high risk. Unfortunately, both drugs also have stimulatory effects on the endometrium. Raloxifene, used for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures, also has favourable effects on bone mineral density, serum lipids and the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women but does not stimulate the endometrium. Like replacement estrogens, SERMs increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. SERMs offer post-menopausal women many of the advantages of estrogen replacement while mitigating some of the disadvantages, particularly the concern over breast cancer. Newer SERMs, exemplified by raloxifene, also eliminate the concerns over endometrial stimulation that were not addressed by first generation SERMs. The clinical success of SERMs has set the stage for a variety of drug therapies based on selective modulation of nuclear receptor activity.

Geographic differences in bone turnover: data from a multinational study in healthy postmenopausal women.

Biochemical markers of bone metabolism (bone markers) are used increasingly to monitor response to therapy and may be predictors of bone loss and fractures. The relationship between fracture rates, which differ between countries, and the rate of bone turnover has not been examined. Therefore, we explored the geographic variability of bone turnover in a selected, healthy study population of 619 postmenopausal women, ages 40-61, participating in a clinical trial of raloxifene hydrochloride for osteoporosis prevention. The subjects were distributed among 38 investigative sites in 10 countries (9-211 subjects/country) on four continents (North America, n = 277, Europe, n = 168, Australia, n = 125, and Africa, n = 49). Specimens for serum osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and urine type I collagen fragment/urinary creatinine ratio (CTX) were handled in a uniform fashion and assayed in a central laboratory. Mean levels of OC (P < 0.001), BSAP (P = 0. 006), and CTX (P < 0.001) varied significantly by country (ANOVA), with the lowest values typically in German and Spanish subjects and the highest in American and Canadian subjects. The consistent pattern and wide ranges of mean bone marker values (OC 1.6-fold, BSAP 1.7-fold, CTX 3.1-fold) between countries suggest clinically significant differences in bone turnover. Geographic differences in bone markers were not explained by the determined potential confounders of age, years posthysterectomy, total serum cholesterol, and serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). We conclude that bone marker values vary substantially by country in this selected study population, suggesting systematic geographic differences in bone metabolism that potentially relate to osteoporotic fracture rates.

Clinically favorable effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density and serum lipids: population assessment via bivariate analysis.

Introduction: Raloxifene is a nonsteroidal benzothiophene derivative that is classified as a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). It has clinical promise because of its actions as an estrogen-agonist on bone and serum lipids and an estrogen-antagonist on the breast and uterus.Objectives: To determine the percentage of women who respond to raloxifene therapy with regard to bone mineral density (BMD) and serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration in a large population of healthy postmenopausal women.Methods: Pooled 24-month interim data from two multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III studies were used in this analysis. The study population included 1145 healthy women, 45-60 years of age and 2-8 years postmenopausal, randomized to receive either placebo, raloxifene (RLX) 30 mg/day, RLX 60 mg/day, or RLX 150 mg/day. Changes in BMD, measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, and serum LDL-C concentration, measured by enzymatic assay, were analyzed simultaneously by plotting the median percentage change (baseline to endpoint) in BMD of the lumbar spine and total hip on the y-axis against the corresponding median percentage change in serum LDL-C on the x-axis for each subject in the placebo group and each of the raloxifene groups. The data localized to one of four quadrants on the plot, the upper-left quadrant representing clinically favorable shifts (increased BMD and decreased LDL-C) and the lower-right quadrant representing clinically unfavorable shifts (decreased BMD and increased LDL-C). The bivariate mean, 50th and 95th percentile ellipses, and the percentage of patients improving in one, both, or neither of the measured parameters are displayed.Results: At the end of 24 months, the bivariate mean and the 50th and 95th percentile ellipses of the placebo group for lumbar spine BMD and LDL-C were shifted to the clinically unfavorable quadrant of the plot, reflecting a decrease in BMD and an increase in LDL-C. In contrast, the bivariate mean for all raloxifene groups had shifted to the clinically favorable quadrant of the plot, reflecting an increase in BMD and a decrease in LDL-C. There was a statistically significant difference (Hotelling-Lawley test, P <.001) in the bivariate mean for all doses of raloxifene compared to placebo. Only 19.1% of subjects in the placebo group exhibited improvement in both lumbar spine BMD and LDL-C, whereas 43.5%, 47.4%, and 49.8% of subjects in the RLX 30, RLX 60, and RLX 150 group, respectively, exhibited improvement in both of these variables. Furthermore, 35.9% of subjects in the placebo group exhibited no improvement in either lumbar spine BMD or LDL-C, whereas only 13.7%, 10.1%, and 11.6% of subjects in the RLX 30, RLX 60, and RLX 150 groups, respectively, exhibited no improvement in either of these variables. Similar results were obtained comparing total hip BMD and LDL-C.Conclusions: Compared with placebo, raloxifene has beneficial effects on BMD and LDL-C in a large sample of healthy postmenopausal women. Thus, insofar as these intermediate endpoints predict disease outcomes, long-term therapy with raloxifene may be beneficial in the prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases.

Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Long-term estrogen therapy can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. At present, however, these beneficial effects are not separable from undesirable stimulation of breast and endometrial tissues. METHODS: We studied the effect of raloxifene, a nonsteroidal benzothiophene, on bone mineral density, serum lipid concentrations, and endometrial thickness in 601 postmenopausal women. The women were randomly assigned to receive 30, 60, or 150 mg of raloxifene or placebo daily for 24 months. RESULTS: The women receiving each dose of raloxifene had significant increases from base-line values in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, whereas those receiving placebo had decreases in bone mineral density. For example, at 24 months, the mean (+/-SE) difference in the change in bone mineral density between the women receiving 60 mg of raloxifene per day and those receiving placebo was 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the lumbar spine, 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the total hip, and 2.0+/-0.4 percent for the total body (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Serum concentrations of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in all the raloxifene groups, whereas serum concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides did not change. Endometrial thickness was similar in the raloxifene and placebo groups at all times during the study. The proportion of women receiving raloxifene who reported hot flashes or vaginal bleeding was not different from that of the women receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Daily therapy with raloxifene increases bone mineral density, lowers serum concentrations of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and does not stimulate the endometrium.

In search of optimal long-term female hormone replacement: the potential of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) comprise a group of structurally diverse compounds which are distinguished from estrogens by their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor but to act as either an estrogen agonist or antagonist depending on the target tissue and hormonal milieu. The mechanisms by which SERMs elicit tissue-specific responses are being intensively investigated, and recently a novel pathway for estrogen receptor-mediated gene activation by the SERM raloxifene has been demonstrated. The tissue-specific activity of SERMs suggests that they may be clinically useful as, for example, potential substitutes for long-term female hormone replacement therapy. Large-scale clinical testing currently in progress for raloxifene, and soon to begin for other SERMs, will evaluate this important potential.

Sequential effects of chronic human PTH (1-84) treatment of estrogen-deficiency osteopenia in the rat.

Although daily injections of parathyroid hormone (PTH) can rapidly reverse estrogen-deficiency bone loss in rats, PTH treatment of osteoporotic humans has to date produced more modest increases in bone mass. To explore the reasons for this important difference, we evaluated the dose- and time-dependence of human PTH 1-84 treatment effects on bone mass and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in rats with estrogen-deficiency bone loss. The highest doses of PTH increased spinal, femoral, and total skeletal mass to supra-normal levels and stimulated cortical endosteal bone formation. Spine and whole skeleton mass and density increased rapidly at first, but then increased more slowly; the rate of change decreased significantly (p < 0.01) during continued treatment with the highest doses of PTH. The effects of PTH treatment on biochemical markers also were both dose-dependent and time-dependent. Serum osteocalcin, a marker of osteoblast function, increased with the highest doses of PTH (p < 0.001), but reached an early plateau and later returned toward baseline. Urinary excretion of pyridinolines, a marker of osteoclast function, increased in a time-dependent fashion throughout treatment (p < 0.001). Serum 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D levels increased in a dose-related fashion, but then decreased toward control levels despite continued treatment. We demonstrate that both osteoblast and osteoclast function are increased during daily PTH therapy in the rat. The pattern of response depends on both the dose of PTH and the duration of therapy. These dose- and time-related effects should be taken into account when designing experimental PTH treatments for osteoporosis, and they deserve intensive study.

The effect of systemically administered PDGF-BB on the rodent skeleton.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), an osteoblast mitogen, has been demonstrated to accelerate fracture healing and periodontal bone repair when applied locally in vivo. To explore whether PDGF could stimulate bone formation in intact bone, we administered it systemically to rats rendered acutely estrogen-deficient. Because PDGF may stimulate bone resorption in vitro, PDGF was administered with and without an antiresorptive agent (alendronate). All treatments were given by intravenous injection 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Spinal bone mineral density (BMD) decreased by 5% in the vehicle-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats by the end of the study as determined by DXA. Treatment with PDGF prevented this bone loss and significantly (p < 0.05) increased the bone density in the spine (9%) and whole skeleton (5.8%). Combined treatment with PDGF and alendronate resulted in a greater increase at the spine (18%) and whole skeleton (12.8%) than either agent alone. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that treatment with PDGF increased the osteoblast number and osteoblast perimeter without consistent changes in osteoclast estimates. Biomechanical testing demonstrated that PDGF administration increased the vertebral body compressive strength and femoral shaft torsional stiffness and resulted in a trend for enhanced femoral head shearing strength. Coadministration of alendronate further increased these indices of bone strength. PDGF administration also caused premature closure of the growth plate, decreased body fat, and resulted in extraskeletal collagen deposition. We therefore demonstrate, for the first time, that systemic administration of PDGF can increase bone density and strength throughout the skeleton.

Parathyroid hormone-related peptide mediates hypercalcemia in an islet cell tumor of the pancreas.

Hypercalcemia occurring in a patient with an islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas suggests the diagnosis of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type I and associated hyperparathyroidism. We describe a patient with an islet cell carcinoma and hypercalcemia in whom low concentrations of PTH, the absence of skeletal metastases, hypophosphatemia, and elevated nephrogenous cAMP alternatively suggested the syndrome of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy. The peptide PTHrP was measured in the patient's serum during the course of therapy by an immunoradiometric assay directed toward the midportion of the molecule. Hypercalcemia was treated with an investigational aminobisphosphonate. The concentration of PTHrP[56-86] increased over time and fell after the patient received chemotherapy directed toward the islet cell tumor.