Delayed-type Hypersensitivity to Metals in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

The causes of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy are classified as genetic or nongenetic, but environmental factors such as metal pollutants may interact with genetic susceptibility. The presence of metal particles has been detected in the myocardium, including in those patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. It is also known that hypersensitivity reactions can induce inflammation in tissue. The present study aimed to verify if metal-induced delayed-type hypersensitivity is present in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient group consisted of 30 patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy; the control group comprised 41 healthy subjects. All patients and control subjects provided blood samples for lymphocyte transformation testing (MELISA®) to assess possible hypersensitivity to seven common metals. Specific exposure to metals was based on interview data. Results showed that exposure to cadmium and lead (p = 0.0002), aluminum (p = 0.0006), nickel (p = 0.0012), and chromium (p = 0.0065) was more often reported by patients than controls. The patients also had significantly more frequent hypersensitivity reactions to mercury (26.7% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.014624), nickel (40% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.02341), and silver (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.025468) than the control group. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy had greater exposure to certain metals compared with healthy controls. Hypersensitivity to metals was more frequent in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, suggesting a possible association that warrants further investigation.

Viral genome changes and the impact of viral genome persistence in myocardium of patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Viral infections are considered the most frequent cause of myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated the changes in viral presence and the impact of viral genome persistence in the myocardium on echocardiographic parameters, functional status and some laboratory parameters in a 6-month follow-up. Fifty-four patients with recent onset DCM, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and biopsy-proven myocarditis (> 14 mononuclear leukocytes/mm2 and/or > 7 T-lymphocytes/mm2) were enrolled. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect pathogens in the myocardium. Patients were divided according to the administered therapy: standard heart failure medication (46 patients) and immunosuppressive therapy (8 patients). RESULTS: In the standard heart failure medication group viral clearance was observed in 13 patients and viral persistence in 24 patients in the follow-up period. Comparing both groups, there was no statistically significant difference - LVEF improvement of 12.0 ±11.4% vs. 18.3 ±12.6%, decrease in NYHA class of 0.7 ±0.7 vs. 1.0 ±0.7, decline in NT-proBNP of 1335 ±1933 ng/l vs. 1942 ±3242 ng/l and decrease in infiltrating leukocytes of 11.1 ±15.8 vs. 6.7 ±23.0 cells/mm2 and T-lymphocytes of 5.8 ±15.1 vs. 1.8 ±10.9 cells/mm2 (all p = NS). A decrease in PCR positive patients from 37 to 29 was observed. The number of PVB19 positive PCR findings decreased from 5 to 4 in patients with immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in the number of positive PCR findings in control endomyocardial biopsy was observed. Viral genome persistence was not associated with worse outcome in short-term follow-up.

[Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy]. / Myokarditidy a zánetlivé kardiomyopatie.

Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle. The most common cause of myocarditis is viral infection in industrialized countries. Myocarditis with left ventricular dysfunction is called inflammatory cardiomyopathy and is the major cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. The clinical picture is very diverse, most often the patient present with signs of heart failure, arrhythmic symptoms and chest pains. Despite significant advances in non-invasive diagnostics, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard of myocarditis diagnosis. Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy therapy is primarily based on the restriction of physical activity and the pharmacotherapy of heart failure. Specific treatment - immunosuppressive or antimicrobial - may be considered in some cases according to endomyocardial biopsy results. Implantation of mechanical cardiac support or heart transplantation is indicated only in the most serious cases.Key words: clinical course - diagnostics - inflammatory cardiomyopathy - myocarditis - treatment.

Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: A Current View on the Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is defined as inflammation of the heart muscle associated with impaired function of the myocardium. In our region, its etiology is most often viral. Viral infection is a possible trigger of immune and autoimmune mechanisms which contributed to the damage of myocardial function. Myocarditis is considered the most common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Typical manifestation of this disease is heart failure, chest pain, or arrhythmias. The most important noninvasive diagnostic method is magnetic resonance imaging, but the gold standard of diagnostics is invasive examination, endomyocardial biopsy. In a significant proportion of cases with impaired left ventricular systolic function, recovery occurs spontaneously in several weeks and therefore it is appropriate to postpone critical therapeutic decisions about 3-6 months after start of the treatment. Therapy is based on standard heart failure treatment; immunosuppressive or antimicrobial treatment may be considered in some cases depending on the results of endomyocardial biopsy. If severe dysfunction of the left ventricle persists, device therapy may be needed.

Improvement of left ventricular systolic function in inflammatory cardiomyopathy: What plays a role?

AIMS: To compare the differences between patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy (ICM) with and without improvement in left ventricular (LV) systolic function and to identify the relevant predictors of LV improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 63 patients with biopsy-proven ICM and heart failure symptoms of at least NYHA II, symptom duration ≤ 6 months, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% assessed by echocardiography and presence of >14 mononuclear leukocytes (LCA+ cells)/mm2 in biopsy samples. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: In the group with LVEF improvement of ≥ 10% (I+ group, n = 41), LVEF increased from 24 ± 7% to 47 ± 8% (P < 0.001). In 22 patients (group I-), there was no or minimal LVEF increase (< 10%). In the I+ group, there were more LCA+ cells/mm2 at baseline (25.1 ± 16.5 vs. 18.5 ± 4.4 cells/mm2; P = 0.032) and a more significant decrease in LCA+ cells in the follow-up (reduction of 13.6 ± 14.3 cells/mm2 vs. 5.0 ± 7.7 cells/mm2 in the I- group; P = 0.009). The univariate logistic regression showed a possible association of number of LCA+ cells, LV end-diastolic diameter and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) value with LVEF improvement. In the multivariate analysis, only NTproBNP at diagnosis was confirmed as an independent predictor of LVEF improvement (OR=1.2; 1.003 to 1.394; P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The LV systolic function improvement was observed in 65% of the patients. In these patients, the number of inflammatory cells at baseline was higher and decreased more but the higher baseline NTproBNP value was the only independent predictor of LVEF improvement.