Extracorporeal Photopheresis With Low-Dose Immunosuppression in High-Risk Heart Transplant Patients-A Pilot Study.

In severely ill patients undergoing urgent heart transplant (HTX), immunosuppression carries high risks of infection, malignancy, and death. Low-dose immunosuppressive protocols have higher rejection rates. We combined extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an established therapy for acute rejection, with reduced-intensity immunosuppression. Twenty-eight high-risk patients (13 with high risk of infection due to infection at the time of transplant, 7 bridging to transplant via extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 8 with high risk of malignancy) were treated, without induction therapy. Prophylactic ECP for 6 months (24 procedures) was initiated immediately postoperatively. Immunosuppression consisted of low-dose tacrolimus (8-10 ng/ml, months 1-6; 5-8 ng/ml, >6 months) with delayed start; mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); and low maintenance steroid with delayed start (POD 7) and tapering in the first year. One-year survival was 88.5%. Three patients died from infection (POD 12, 51, 351), and one from recurrence of cancer (POD 400). Incidence of severe infection was 17.9% (n = 5, respiratory tract). Within the first year, antibody-mediated rejection was detected in one patient (3.6%) and acute cellular rejection in four (14.3%). ECP with reduced-intensity immunosuppression is safe and effective in avoiding allograft rejection in HTX recipients with risk of severe infection or cancer recurrence.

Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Safe and Reduces Intraoperative Blood Product Use: A Propensity Score Analysis VAD Implantation Techniques and Blood Product Use.

Despite increasing popularity and multiple postulated benefits, less invasive (LIS) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been sufficiently compared with standard full sternotomy (FS). We report the outcomes of a propensity score analysis designed to compare LIS and FS LVAD implantation, with perioperative blood product use, adverse event rates, and mortality as primary objective. From September 2010 to August 2016, 159 consecutive patients received a Medtronic HVAD or Abbott HeartMate 3 LVAD via a FS or LIS approach. Outcomes were analyzed using proportional hazard Cox regression, with risk adjustment based on a LIS approach propensity score model computed from demographics, risk factors, and operative covariates. Seventy-five patients were matched and compared (HVAD 83% [n = 62]; LIS approach 43% [n = 32]; mean age 60 ± 12 years; 89% [n = 67] male; 48% [n = 36] ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICMP]; 37% [n = 28]). Patient groups were comparable with regard to preoperative patient characteristics. Less invasive LVAD implantation was successful in all patients with no intraoperative conversions. In-hospital mortality was 16% in both groups, despite 37% Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Level I patients. Overall, 28% of the LIS patients did not receive any blood products intraoperatively, whereas, in the FS group, only two patients (5%) did not require the administration of blood products (p = 0.000). This was also a significant finding in the overall perioperative phase in which seven LIS patients (22%) who not receive any blood products versus two FS patients (5%; p = 0.033). Otherwise, outcomes were comparable. Less invasive LVAD implantation is a feasible, safe, and reduces blood product use.

Thrombolysis as first-line therapy for Medtronic/HeartWare HVAD left ventricular assist device thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed our institutional experience with intravenous thrombolysis (TL) as first-line therapy in patients with Medtronic/HeartWare HVAD left ventricular assist device pump thrombosis (PT). METHODS: From March 2006 to November 2018, 30 Medtronic/HeartWare HVAD left ventricular assist device patients had 48 PT events. We analysed outcomes with intravenous Alteplase as a first-line therapy for PT. Pump exchange or urgent heart transplantation was only considered after the failure of TL or existing contraindications to TL. RESULTS: TL was used as the first-line therapy in 44 PT events in 28 patients without a contraindication to TL. TL was successful in 61.4% of PT events. More than 1 cycle of TL was necessary in 55.6% of events. The combined success of TL and heart transplantation or device exchange was 81.8%. In 15.9% of events, PT was fatal. Causes of death were severe complications (9.1%) related to TL or discontinuation of therapy for multi-organ failure (6.8%). Intracranial bleeding and arterial thromboembolism were observed in 4.5% and 11.5% of the PT events after TL. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous TL as a first-line therapy for PT in Medtronic/HeartWare HVAD patients can be a reasonable treatment option and does not preclude subsequent heart transplantation or device exchange. However, thromboembolic and bleeding complications are common. The decision to perform TL or device exchange should, therefore, be made on an individual basis after balancing the risks and benefits of different treatment approaches.

Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVES: Fixed pulmonary hypertension (fPH) is a contraindication for heart transplantation (HTX). Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to candidacy can reverse fPH in patients with terminal heart failure by chronic left ventricular unloading. We report our institutional experience with terminal heart failure patients and fPH that were successfully bridged to candidacy and underwent subsequent HTX. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 79 patients with terminal heart failure and fPH who were successfully bridged to candidacy for HTX with 6 different LVAD devices at our centre from October 1998 to September 2016 (Novacor n = 4, MicroMed DeBakey n = 29, DuraHeart n = 2, HeartMate II n = 14, HVAD n = 29 and MVAD n = 1). Median duration of LVAD support was 288 days (range 45-2279 days). Within the same timeframe, a control group of 48 patients underwent HTX after bridge-to-transplant LVAD therapy for reasons other than PH. Study end points were (i) development of fPH after LVAD implantation, (ii) post-transplant outcomes and (iii) incidence of severe adverse events. RESULTS: Pulmonary vascular resistance, assessed by vasodynamic catheterization, was 4.3 ± 1.8 WU before LVAD implantation. After a median support period of 89 days (interquartile range 4-156 days), pulmonary vascular resistance decreased to 2.0 ± 0.9 WU (P ≤ 0.001), and patients were listed for HTX. Median duration of LVAD support in the study group was 288 days (45-2279 days). We observed 2 patients (2.5%) with acute right heart failure who required extracorporeal mechanical support after HTX in the study group. Long-term post-transplant survival between the study group (3 years: 83.5%, 5 years: 81.0%) and the control group (3 years: 87.5%, 5 years: 85.4%) was comparable (log-rank: P = 0.585). CONCLUSIONS: LVAD implantation as a bridge to candidacy reverses fPH in patients with terminal heart failure. Post-HTX survival is excellent and comparable to results obtained in patients without fPH at the time of HTX listing.