Surgicel plug technique versus endoclose technique for port-site closure post minimally invasive (robotic and laparoscopic) surgeries: Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compares the endoclose technique (ET) techniques and surgicel plug technique (SPT) in terms of port-site related complications. Minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) are widely performed nowadays, nonetheless, port-site closure technique plays a role in the prevention of port-site related complications. METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out at general surgery and urology departments of King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia. Variables that were collected include age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, co-morbidities, type and date of surgery, intraoperative visceral injury or bleeding, technique cost, and port-site post-operative complications (hernia, infection, bleeding, dehiscence, and hypertrophic scarring). Data was collected from electronic medical records. Patients included are whom underwent any minimally invasive procedure from the beginning of 2014 until the end of September 2020. Follow up period was at least for 2 years. RESULTS: We analyzed 397 patients. Surgicel plug technique was more of having hernia (2.3%) than of ET (0%). While ET was more on infection (0.9%) than in SPT, but no significant difference being observed (p=0.064). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between the ET and the novel SPT in terms of port-site related complications.

Single-Docking Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy in Morbidly Obese Patient Post-Radical Cystectomy With Ileal Conduit: A Case Report.

Bladder cancer is considered the most prevalent malignancy affecting the urinary tract system. Urothelial carcinoma, also known as transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), can arise from the entire urinary tract, with the bladder considered the primary site of origin and representing 95% of all cases. The management of TCC of the upper urinary tract is mainly by nephroureterectomy (NU). To our knowledge, there are no data regarding single-docking robotic-assisted NU following cystectomy with an ileal conduit. Therefore, in this study, we are reporting a case of single-docking robotic-assisted NU in a patient who previously underwent open cystectomy with an ileal conduit. A case of a 57-year-old female diagnosed with bladder cancer 10 years ago and underwent several transurethral resections of bladder tumor (TURBT) sessions presented for the first time in 2019, complaining of hematuria and dropping in the hemoglobin, which was not improving with multiple TURBT. For that, the patient underwent an open radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit. During the follow-up in 2021, computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis and abdomen with intravenous (IV) contrast showed a 7 mm enhancing lesion in the right proximal ureter, which was suspicious of proximal ureter mass. In 2022, the patient was again seen in the outpatient clinic; a CT of the pelvis and abdomen with IV contrast was done and demonstrated a significant progression of the mass size to 2 x 1.5 cm, with no other intraabdominal or intrathoracic lesions. For that, she underwent a single-docking robotic-assisted NU. To conclude, performing a single-docking robotic-assisted NU in a patient who previously underwent open radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit is challenging due to multiple adhesion and altered anatomy. More studies need to be published regarding the long-term outcomes of such procedures.

Saudi Urological Association consensus guidelines on the use of robotic surgery in urology.

Over the past three decades, minimally invasive robotic technology has evolved substantially in urological practice, replacing many open procedures and becoming part of routine clinical practice. The Health Sector Transformation Program for the Kingdom's Vision 2030 aims to restructure the health sector and optimize its status and prospects as an effective and integrated ecosystem centered on the patient's health. Therefore, this consensus seeks to endorse the clinical practice guidelines for robotic surgery (RS) in the KSA, highlighting its effectiveness, safety, and favorable outcomes compared to open and laparoscopic surgeries in certain procedures when used by trained surgeons in well-structured RS programs.