Bariatric surgery mitigated electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with morbid obesity.

Obesity can lead to cardiovascular dysfunctions and cause electrocardiographic disruptions. Bariatric surgery plays a significant role in weight loss. To assess its benefits, this study investigated electrocardiographic changes before and after bariatric surgery. The present article describes a retrospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up period. Electrocardiograms were interpreted and compared before and six months after surgery. The relationships between weight loss, type of surgery, and electrocardiographic alterations were analyzed. A total of 200 patients participated in the study, with 34 (17%) men and 166 (83%) women. The mean age of the participants was 44.6 ± 8.6, and their mean body mass index was 43.8 ± 5.5 kg/m2. The mean of QTc decreased after the surgery, while the Sokolow-Lyon scores increased. The statistical analysis showed that QTc dispersion (> 40) (P < 0.001), right ventricular hypertrophy (P < 0.001), abnormal R wave progression (P < 0.001), QTc (P < 0.001) and Sokolow-Lyon criteria (P < 0.001) significantly changed postoperatively. In conclusion, bariatric surgery can reduce QTc, correct poor R wave progression, and resolve right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in patients with morbid obesity.

The evaluation of bariatric surgery effect on cardiac structure and function using transthoracic echocardiography: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a pathology and a leading cause of death worldwide. Obesity can harm multiple organs, including the heart. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of bariatric surgery and following weight loss on cardiac structure and functions using echocardiography parameters in patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: In this cohort study, 30 patients older than 18 with BMI > 40 or BMI > 35 and comorbidity between March 2020 to March 2021 were studied. The patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography before and after six months of the bariatric surgery. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients (28 women, 93.3%) with a mean age of 38.70 ± 9.19 were studied. Nine (30%) were diabetic, and 9 (30%) had hypertension. After six months of bariatric surgery, all physical measurements, including weight, Body mass index, and Body surface area, decreased significantly (p < 0.001). After bariatric surgery, all parameters regarding left ventricular morphology, including left ventricular mass, interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular posterior wall thickness, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, improved significantly (p < 0.001). Also, LVEF rose post-bariatric surgery (p < 0.001). TAPSE parameter indicating right ventricular function also improved (p < 0.001). Right ventricular diameter, left atrium volume, and mitral inflow E/e' decreased significantly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Systolic and diastolic parameters refine significantly after bariatric surgery in patients with obesity. Bariatric surgery lead to significant cardiac structure and function improvement.

Massive pulmonary embolism post sleeve gastrectomy treated with systemic thrombolytic: A case report.

Prompt diagnosis and management of massive pulmonary embolism after bariatric surgery is crucial, but thrombolytic therapy may increase the risk of complications such as anastomotic leakage and bleeding. Individualized management is needed.

Braun Anastomosis: A Technique for Bile Reflux Improvement After Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass; a Pilot Study.

Background. Single anastomotic surgeries can increase the risk of reflux, marginal ulceration, and gastrointestinal complications. Braun anastomosis prevents bile reflux after gastric resection and gastrojejunal anastomosis surgeries. The present pilot study evaluated Braun's efficacy in a single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass surgery.Methods. 28 patients with a history of SASI bypass surgery from October 2017 to September 2021 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on having Braun anastomosis to this surgical procedure; group A: underwent SASI bypass without Braun anastomosis; group B: underwent SASI bypass with Braun anastomosis. The surgical complications in terms of bile reflux, marginal ulcer, reflux esophagitis, and gastritis were evaluated and compared between the groups. Results. Bile reflux and reflux esophagitis were seen more in group A than in group B (37.5% vs 8.3% and 18.8% vs 8.3%, respectively). In contrast, 2 patients (16.7%) in group B had marginal ulcers compared to 1 (6.3%) in group A. Also, gastritis was seen in 1 patient in each group (6.3% in group A vs 8.3% in group B). However, the differences were not statistically different. Conclusions. Braun anastomosis is probably an effective procedure to reduce bile reflux, a concern of SASI bypass. Besides, further studies with a larger study population are needed.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Success of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Severe Obesity.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) pandemic may influence the weight outcomes of bariatric surgeries (BS). Here, we intended to compare the weight outcome of patients who underwent BS before and during the pandemic time. METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center study, the information of two groups of patients; first COVID-19 group (n = 51) consisted of those that underwent BS during the pandemic and completed a year of follow-up, second non-COVID-19 group included 50 patients who underwent BS and were followed up before the pandemic. All the patients' anthropometric and obesity-related disease data were compared between groups. RESULTS: Weight loss and the decrease of body mass index 1 year after the surgery, as well as excess weight loss and total weight loss, were significantly higher in the non-COVID-19 group compared to the COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). Although the rate of remission for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was higher in the non-COVID-19 group, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We showed a significantly poorer weight outcome at the 1-year follow-up of the BS during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic. These results need further investigations to determine the preventive measures and management by evaluating the associated factors.

The impact of gastric pouch size, based on the number of staplers, on the short-term weight outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Introduction: No standard of anatomical variables, including stoma size, limb length, pouch size, and volume, has been determined for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass yet. Herein, we evaluated the effect of two different techniques for creating the gastric pouch on short-term postoperative weight loss. Methods: This retrospective cohort was conducted on patients with a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history from January 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: in one group, patients' gastric pouch was made using two 60 mm linear staplers, while in the other group, the gastric pouch was made using three 60 mm linear staplers. Anthropometric data, including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), were measured preoperatively and six months following surgery. Weight outcomes, such as weight loss, a decrease in BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), and total weight loss (%TWL), were calculated as short-term weight outcomes. Results: Two groups, each containing 50 patients, were included. Patients with smaller pouches (two staplers) had 32.4 ± 9.2 kg weight loss, and those with larger pouches (three staplers) had a 31.42 ± 10.3 kg weight loss. Also, %EWL was 69.7 ± 14.9 and 63.0 ± 20.9, and %TWL was 28.2 ± 6.0 and 26.14 ± 7.5 in patients with two stapler pouches and three stapler pouches, respectively. None of the weight outcome parameters were significantly different between the groups (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: Various studies have been conducted, resulting in different conclusions regarding the effect of the size of the gastric pouch on weight loss. One of the major differences contributing to varying literature studies results is the measurement method used for gastric pouch size. We conclude that using two staplers is not a way to achieve a better result. As the best measurement method has not been defined, studies comparing different methods are suggested; here, the aim was to use a more simple and clinical method regarding this issue.

The Effect of Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass on Patients with Severe Obesity in Three Consecutive Years.

BACKGROUND: Sparse data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass surgery, where most available studies utilized short-term follow-ups. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the safety and outcomes of this procedure in three consecutive years after the surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out with 116 patients who underwent SASI from October 2016 to September 2021. Anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical data were recorded before, 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: The 1, 2, and 3-year percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were 87.37%, 90.7%, and 80.6%, respectively. Remission or improvement was recorded for diabetes mellitus in 90.9%, hypertension in 80.0%, hyperlipidemia in 100%, sleep apnea in 100%, and irregular menstruation in 58.06 at 3 years after surgery. No mortality and 5.1% early major postoperative complications were recorded. Eight patients (6.8%) had reversal surgery due to EWL > 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The SASI bypass is an effective bariatric surgery that achieved sequential weight loss and improvement in medical comorbidities three years after the surgery; however, standardization of SASI procedure technique is needed to ameliorate nutritional deficiencies.

Preservation of fat-free mass in the first year after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 122 studies and 10,758 participants.

The main goal of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with morbid obesity is reducing body mass and fat mass (FM). However, body mass loss is systematically accompanied by a decline in fat-free mass (FFM). We aimed to examine the time-course effect of BS on FFM and body FFM percentage (FFM%) in individuals with morbid obesity by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled adult human trials. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science, and Cochrane databases within the period from October 2002 to May 2021, with no restriction in the English language, to find studies assessing the effect of BS on FFM and FFM% in patients with morbid obesity. A meta-analysis of 122 studies carried out on data of 10,758 patients with morbid obesity after BS showed that BS was associated with a substantial decrease in FFM at 1 (-3.47 kg [95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.88, -3.07]), 3 (-5.59 kg [95% CI: -6.01, -5.17], 6 (-6.61 kg [95% CI: -7.25, -5.98]), and 12 (-8.34 kg [95% CI: -9.04, -7.63]) months after the surgery; however, the FFM% increased at 3 (6.51% [95% CI: 5.00, 8.02]), 6 (8.56% [95% CI: 6.81, 10.31], and 12 (11.29% [95% CI: 8.94, 13.64]) months after the surgery. BS was associated with sustained declines in FFM and increases in FFM% from 1-12 months with no indication of plateau phase postoperatively. These findings emphasize that postbariatric care should focus more on FFM loss during the first year after surgery.

Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: At 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.

Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19: What We Have Learned from the Pandemic in Iran: a Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients with morbid obesity following bariatric surgery (BS) in Iran. Thus, we sought to investigate the symptoms and effect of COVID-19 in patients with morbid obesity following, or candidates for, BS in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 236 morbid obese patients following (surgical group) or candidates (nonsurgical group) for bariatric surgery. Demographics, probable COVID-19 incidence, acute and persistent COVID-19 symptoms, and clinical outcome parameters of bariatric patients and candidates for BS were compared. The incidence of probable COVID-19 was assessed including the clinical definition of probable case, according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of probable COVID-19 among surgical and nonsurgical groups was significantly different (20.6% vs 26.08%, respectively, p = 0.046). The probable case of surgical patients had a shorter length of symptoms and hospitalization duration, and a lower proportion of admission in ICUs and hospitals with respect to nonsurgical patients (p < 0.001). Surgical patients had a greater prevalence of persistent symptoms including anorexia, food intolerance, and anosmia-hyposmia than nonsurgical patients. Moreover, surgical patients with probable COVID-19 had a significantly higher proportion of diabetic patients than surgical patients without probable COVID-19 (20% vs 9.3%). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need to evaluate the persistent symptoms of COVID-19 and the importance of nutritional support for at least several weeks after COVID-19 symptom onset. Moreover, it seems that COVID-19 incidence in post-bariatric surgery patients could reduce the effectiveness of bariatric surgery in the resolution of diabetes.

Esophageal perforation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Complication of bougie insertion.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Esophageal perforation (EF) is an uncommon complication of bariatric procedures, mostly related to the intraoperative use of bougie that is used for gastric calibration. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present a 33-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopy sleeve surgery (LSG). Due to perforation in the cervical site of the esophagus caused by bougie insertion, she developed subcutaneous emphysema on the first post-operative day. She immediately underwent reconstructive esophageal surgery under the probable diagnosis of having a cervical esophagus perforation. The patient's condition was stable in the postoperative period and discharged after 10 days. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patients who present symptoms including subcutaneous emphysema, cervical pain, dysphagia, dysphonia, and fever post-surgery have to be considered for probably EF. The early optimal diagnosis works up and therapeutic approach should be performed as soon as possible to prevent mortality. CONCLUSION: EP caused by a bougie insertion is an uncommon complication that is associated with high mortality rates if the diagnosis and treatment were delayed. The risk of using a bougie during surgery should not be underestimated and have to be inserted with extreme caution and careful guide of surgeon.

Empyema Caused by Gastropleural Fistula Post Complicated Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Gastropleural fistula (GPF) can occur as a rare complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Here, we present the clinical presentation, radiological findings, and outcome of a 19-year-old female who underwent LGS in Mother and Child Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, but due to leakage in the proximal of the stapler line, the operation converted to a single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass to decrease intraluminal pressure and accelerate healing of leakage site. Three months later, the patient admitted with the impression of empyema and diagnosed finally with a GPF. Although the conversion of LSG to SASI bypass for post leakage may be efficient in controlling the intraabdominal leakage, it will not prevent GPF formation, so applying another surgery method such as classic bypass in this situation may be more effective in the management of stapler line leakage.

Long-term effect of bariatric surgery on body composition in patients with morbid obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We performed a meta-analysis to provide quantitative estimates of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) changes in patients following bariatric surgery over 1 year. A systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases was conducted; the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Thirty-four studies including Roux en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and gastric banding (GB) were analyzed. RYGB decreased in body FM (-28.99 kg [31.21, -26.77]) or FM% (-12.73% [-15.14, -10.32]) or FFM (-9.97 kg [-10.93, -9.03]), which were greater than SG and GB. Moreover, the FFM% in RYGB group (11.72% [7.33, 16.11]) was more than SG (5.7% [4.44, 6.95]) and GB (8.1% [6.15, 10.05]) groups. Bariatric surgeries, especially RYGB, might be effective for a decrease in FM and maintenance of FFM in patients with morbid obesity in over 1 year.

A Pregnant Lady Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

The patient was a 34-year-old morbidly obese woman, a proper candidate for bariatric surgery, with a BMI of 49.5 (135 kg weight, and 165 cm height). All the routine blood tests, done prior to the surgery, were within the normal range, and her blood ß-hCG was particularly negative before the surgery.Sleeve gastrectomy was performed successfully and she was discharged three days later under acceptable medical conditions. Due to the lack of menstruation three months after the operation, Blood ß-hCG level was checked and turned out to be positive. Ultrasound examination confirmed a pregnancy at 14 weeks of gestational age, implying that the patient had been pregnant during the bariatric surgery.