Coagulation assays and direct oral anticoagulant levels among patients having an elective surgery or procedure.

BACKGROUND: The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation study prospectively evaluated a prespecified periprocedural interruption strategy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation. Coagulation testing is widely available and frequently requested prior to invasive procedures. Coagulation assays display poor sensitivity to clinically relevant DOAC concentrations. OBJECTIVES: Determine the utility of routinely available coagulation testing at predicting a DOAC concentration of <30 ng/ml among patients in the preprocedural setting. METHODS: We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) of a normal coagulation assay result for identifying patients with a preprocedural DOAC level < 30 ng/ml. RESULTS: We identified weak or very weak correlations between coagulation assay results and DOAC levels in the preprocedural setting, except for a moderate correlation between the thrombin time (TT) and dabigatran concentrations (ρ = 0.68; p < .001). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) demonstrated modest sensitivity (78.9% to 88.2%) and PPVs (76.4% to 93.1%) but poor specificity (13.2% to 53.3%) and NPVs (16.3% to 30.2%) across all three DOACs. A normal TT was associated with 100% specificity and PPV values for a dabigatran level < 30 ng/ml. A normal APTT among patients on dabigatran was associated with an LR+ of 1.671 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.297, 2.154) and an LR- of 0.395 (95% CI 0.207, 0.751) for levels <30 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The PT and APTT perform poorly at safely identifying patients with negligible DOAC levels in the preprocedural setting.

Circulating heparin-like anticoagulants: Case report and review of literature.

We report a case of a 56-year-old woman with a history of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) following splenectomy on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), who developed moderate bleeding after stopping MMF. Her laboratory testing suggested the presence of an abnormal circulating heparin-like anticoagulant with demonstrable anti-Xa activity. She was initially treated with antifibrinolytic therapy and was subsequently started on MMF alongside intravenous immunoglobulin, which significantly improved her bleeding symptoms. The presence of abnormal circulating heparin-like anticoagulants is a rare cause of coagulopathy. Few cases exist in the literature, with nearly all occurring in the setting of hematologic or solid-organ malignancy. The mechanism by which these endogenous anticoagulants develop is unclear. Clinical manifestations range from mild bleeding and bruising to life-threatening hemorrhage refractory to conventional therapy. Diagnosis of a heparin-like anticoagulant is based on coagulation testing as well as exclusion of other exogenous anticoagulants, acquired inhibitors, and/or factor deficiencies.

Perioperative Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who use a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and request elective surgery or procedure present a common clinical situation yet perioperative management is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of a standardized perioperative DOAC management strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) cohort study conducted at 23 clinical centers in Canada, the United States, and Europe enrolled and screened patients from August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2018. Participants (n = 3007) had AF; were 18 years of age or older; were long-term users of apixaban, dabigatran etexilate, or rivaroxaban; were scheduled for an elective surgery or procedure; and could adhere to the DOAC therapy interruption protocol. INTERVENTIONS: A simple standardized perioperative DOAC therapy interruption and resumption strategy based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk, and creatinine clearance levels. The DOAC regimens were omitted for 1 day before a low-bleeding-risk procedure and 2 days before a high-bleeding-risk procedure. The DOAC regimens were resumed 1 day after a low-bleeding-risk procedure and 2 to 3 days after a high-bleeding-risk procedure. Follow-up of patients occurred for 30 days after the operation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack) and the proportion of patients with an undetectable or minimal residual anticoagulant level (<50 ng/mL) at the time of the procedure. RESULTS: The 3007 patients with AF (mean [SD] age of 72.5 [9.39] years; 1988 men [66.1%]) comprised 1257 (41.8%) in the apixaban cohort, 668 (22.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 1082 (36.0%) in the rivaroxaban cohort; 1007 patients (33.5%) had a high-bleeding-risk procedure. The 30-day postoperative rate of major bleeding was 1.35% (95% CI, 0%-2.00%) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (95% CI, 0%-1.73%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 1.85% (95% CI, 0%-2.65%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. The rate of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (95% CI, 0%-0.48%) in the apixaban cohort, 0.60% (95% CI, 0%-1.33%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 0.37% (95% CI, 0%-0.82%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. In patients with a high-bleeding-risk procedure, the rates of major bleeding were 2.96% (95% CI, 0%-4.68%) in the apixaban cohort and 2.95% (95% CI, 0%-4.76%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, patients with AF who had DOAC therapy interruption for elective surgery or procedure, a perioperative management strategy without heparin bridging or coagulation function testing was associated with low rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism.

Update on diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders: What is practical and useful?

INTRODUCTION: Platelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis. METHODS: This review summarizes the authors' experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD. RESULTS: Blood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high-quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD. CONCLUSION: PFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.

Basic coagulation tests as surrogates of dabigatran levels in a pre-operative setting: Analysis of five activated partial thromboplastin time reagents and thrombin time.

BACKGROUND: In patients who are receiving dabigatran, a direct oral anticoagulant, measuring the anticoagulant effect before surgery may be needed in certain circumstances. Although the dilute thrombin time (dTT) can reliably measure dabigatran levels, it is not consistently available. More commonly used coagulation tests, including the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and thrombin time (TT) might have clinical utility but their accuracy is uncertain. METHODS: 103 patients stopped dabigatran 1-4 days before an elective surgery/procedure as part of a standardized dabigatran interruption protocol. With a blood sample taken just before surgery, we assessed the accuracy of five aPTT assays (Actin FS, Stago PTT, C.K. PREST, HemosIL aPTT-SP, SynthASil) and TT to measure the residual anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. We determined the sensitivity, specificity and other accuracy indices of these assays to predict a dabigatran level > 30 ng/mL as determined by a reference standard test, the dTT (Hemoclot). RESULTS: Of five aPTT reagents, four assays had excellent (100%) and one assay had good (93%) sensitivity to detect a level of dabigatran > 30 ng/mL, but all had insufficient specificity (50-74%). A TT > 90 s had good sensitivity (93%) and excellent specificity (100%). CONCLUSION: Five aPTT assays had good sensitivity but poor specificity to detect low levels of dabigatran (≤30 ng/mL) after standardized dabigatran interruption before an elective surgery/procedure, thereby limiting the use of aPTT as an alternative to the dTT in preoperative settings.

A prospective cohort study of light transmission platelet aggregometry for bleeding disorders: is testing native platelet-rich plasma non-inferior to testing platelet count adjusted samples?

Light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA) is important to diagnose bleeding disorders. Experts recommend testing LTA with native (N) rather than platelet count adjusted (A) platelet-rich plasma (PRP), although it is unclear if this provides non-inferior, or superior, detection of bleeding disorders. Our goal was to determine if LTA with NPRP is non-inferior to LTA with APRP for bleeding disorder assessments. A prospective cohort of patients, referred for bleeding disorder testing, and healthy controls, were evaluated by LTA using common agonists, NPRP and APRP (adjusted to 250 x 109 platelets/l). Recruitment continued until 40 controls and 40 patients with definite bleeding disorders were tested. Maximal aggregation (MA) data were assessed for the detection of abnormalities from bleeding disorders (all causes combined to limit bias), using sample-type specific reference intervals. Areas under receiver-operator curves (AUROC) were evaluated using pre-defined criteria (area differences: < 0.15 for non-inferiority, > 0 for superiority). Forty-four controls and 209 patients were evaluated. Chart reviews for 169 patients indicated 67 had bleeding disorders, 28 from inherited platelet secretion defects. Mean MA differences between NPRP and APRP were small for most agonists (ranges, controls: -3.3 to 5.8; patients: -3.0 to 13.7). With both samples, reduced MA with two or more agonists was associated with a bleeding disorder. AUROC differences between NPRP and APRP were small and indicated that NPRP were non-inferior to APRP for detecting bleeding disorders by LTA, whereas APRP met superiority criteria. Our study validates using either NPRP or APRP for LTA assessments of bleeding disorders.

Diagnostic usefulness of a lumi-aggregometer adenosine triphosphate release assay for the assessment of platelet function disorders.

Platelet dense granule release assays are recommended for diagnosing platelet function disorders and are commonly performed by Lumi-Aggregometer (Chrono-Log, Havertown, PA) assays of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release. We conducted a prospective cohort study of people tested for ATP release defects to assess bleeding symptoms. Reduced release, with 1 or more agonists, was more common among patients with bleeding disorders than among healthy control subjects (P < .001). The respective likelihood (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) of a bleeding disorder or an inherited platelet function disorder were high when release was reduced with 1 or more agonists (17 [6-46]; 128 [30-545]), even if aggregation was normal (12 [4-34]; 105 [20-565]). ATP release had high specificity and moderate sensitivity for inherited platelet function disorders, with most abnormalities detected by the combination of 6 µmol/L epinephrine, 5.0 µg/mL collagen, and 1 µmol/L U46619. Platelet ATP release assays are useful for evaluating common bleeding disorders, regardless of aggregation findings.

An evaluation of methods for determining reference intervals for light transmission platelet aggregation tests on samples with normal or reduced platelet counts.

Light transmission platelet aggregation tests are important for diagnosing platelet function defects. However, uncertainties exist about the best procedures to determine aggregation reference intervals. We investigated methods for determining reference intervals for light transmission aggregation tests, using the % maximal aggregation values for prospectively collected data on healthy control samples. Reference intervals for samples tested at 250 x 10(9) platelets/l were determined by mean +/- 2 standard deviations and non-parametric analyses. To establish reference intervals for tests on thrombocytopenic subjects, regression analyses were used to estimate 95% confidence limits for % maximal aggregation, according to sample platelet counts, using data for control samples diluted to match the platelet count of undiluted thrombocytopenic patient platelet-rich plasma samples. For samples tested at 250 x 10(9) platelets/l, non-parametric analyses described 95% of data for healthy control samples better than mean +/- 2 standard deviations. For samples tested at lower counts, to match thrombocytopenic samples, the % maximal aggregation was influenced by platelet count and derived limits were wider at very low platelet counts for almost all agonists. With ristocetin, it proved feasible to test samples with very low platelet counts to exclude Bernard-Soulier syndrome and type 2B von Willebrand disease. Non-parametric analyses should be the preferred method to establish light transmission aggregation reference intervals for samples tested at normal platelet counts. The derived limits for thrombocytopenic samples provide guidance for evaluating thrombocytopenic platelet function disorders, including which agonists to test, based on the sample platelet count.