Low-Level Groundwater Atrazine in High Atrazine Usage Nebraska Counties: Likely Effects of Excessive Groundwater Abstraction.

Recent studies observed a correlation between estrogen-related cancers and groundwater atrazine in eastern Nebraska counties. However, the mechanisms of human exposure to atrazine are unclear because low groundwater atrazine concentration was observed in counties with high cancer incidence despite having the highest atrazine usage. We studied groundwater atrazine fate in high atrazine usage Nebraska counties. Data were collected from Quality Assessed Agrichemical Contaminant Nebraska Groundwater, Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), and water use databases. Descriptive statistics and cluster analysis were performed. Domestic wells (59%) were the predominant well type. Groundwater atrazine was affected by well depth. Clusters consisting of wells with low atrazine were characterized by excessive groundwater abstraction, reduced precipitation, high population, discharge areas, and metropolitan counties. Hence, low groundwater atrazine may be due to excessive groundwater abstraction accompanied by atrazine. Human exposure to atrazine in abstracted groundwater may be higher than the estimated amount in groundwater.

Neighborhood context and non-small cell lung cancer outcomes in Florida non-elderly patients by race/ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between neighborhood environment and lung cancer outcomes among Florida residents younger than 65 years of age. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Florida from January 2005 to December 2014 (n = 22,750). Multi-level, mixed-effect logistic regression models were used for two outcomes: receipt of treatment and receipt of surgery. Survival analyses, using proportional subdistribution hazard models, were conducted to examine the impact of neighborhood characteristics on risk of death due to lung cancer with adjustment for individual-level variables. Neighborhood exposures of interest were census tract level black and Hispanic segregation combined with economic deprivation. RESULTS: White patients who lived in low black segregation/high deprivation areas had 15 % lower odds of receiving surgery (95 % CI: 0.76-0.93). However, the likelihood of receiving surgery for black patients who lived in high black segregation/low deprivation and high black segregation/high deprivation was lower than for black patients who lived in low black segregation/low deprivation neighborhoods (level 3 AOR = 0.56 [0.38-0.85]; level 4 AOR = 0.69 [0.54-0.88]). Living in suburban and rural areas increased the risk of lung cancer death for white patients by 14 % (95 % CI: 1.05-1.24) and 26 % (95 % CI: 1.08-1.46), respectively. Living in rural areas increased the risk of death for black patients by 54 % r (SHR = 1.54 [1.19-2.0]). Black patients who live in high Hispanic segregation/high deprivation had 36 % increased risk of death compared to black patients who lived in low Hispanic segregation/low deprivation areas. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that when investigating cancer disparities, merely adjusting for race/ethnicity does not provide sufficient explanation to understand survival and treatment variations. Lung cancer outcomes are impacted by neighborhood environments that are formed based on the distribution of race, ethnicity and class.