Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal strategy for surgical revascularization in patients with impaired renal function is inconclusive. We compared early and late outcomes between bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) and single ITA (SITA) grafting in patients with renal dysfunction. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all the patients with multivessel disease and impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in our center during 1996-2011, utilizing either BITA or SITA revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 5301 patients with multivessel disease who underwent surgical revascularization during the study period, 391 were with impaired renal function: 212 (54.2%) underwent BITA, 179 (45.8%) underwent SITA. Patients who underwent BITA were less likely to have comorbidities. Statistically significant differences were not observed between the BITA and SITA groups in 30-day mortality (5.6% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.2) and in rates of early stroke, myocardial infarction, and sternal infection (4.5% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.467; 1.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.517; and 2.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.088, respectively). Long-term survival of the BITA group was better: median 8.36 vs. 4.14 years, p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.556-0.89, p = 0.003). In analysis of a matched cohort (134 pairs), early outcomes did not differ between the groups; however, in multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.35 (95%CI 0.18-0.68), p = 0.002) . CONCLUSIONS: BITA revascularization did not impact early outcome in patients with CRF, but demonstrated a significant protective effect on long-term survival in the unmatched and matched cohorts.

Saphenous Vein vs Arterial Graft to the Right System in Left-Sided Arterial Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: To investigate clinical outcomes of various arterial grafts (AGs) vs saphenous vein grafts (VGs) to the right coronary system in patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization. METHODS: We compared short- and long-term outcomes of all the patients operated in our center during 1996-2011, who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery (left anterior descending and left circumflex) grafting and either a VG or an AG to the right coronary system. RESULTS: Of 1691 patients, 983 received a VG and 708 received an AG to the right coronary system: 387 gastroepiploic arteries and 321 internal thoracic artery grafts. The median follow-up was 15.7 ± 0.32 years. For the VG and AG groups, early mortality (1.6% for VG and 1.3% for AG, P = .55) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ. Long-term (up to 20 years) survival was similar (34.1% ± 3.4% for VG vs 36.0% ±2% for AG, P = .86). In multivariable analysis, VG to the right coronary artery was not found to be a predictor of inferior survival (hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.836-1.194, P = .99). Comparing 2 propensity-matched groups of 349 pairs with a VG or an AG, and accounting for the severity of the right coronary lesion, did not demonstrate differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early outcomes and long-term survival were comparable among patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization, between various graft types to the right coronary system.

Late Outcomes of In Situ Versus Composite Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: We compared 2 configurations for revascularization of the internal thoracic arteries to the anterior and lateral walls. In the "in situ" configuration, an in situ right internal thoracic artery supplies the left anterior descending territory, and an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left circumflex territory. In the "composite" configuration, an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left anterior descending artery and a free right internal thoracic artery is attached end-to-side to the left internal thoracic artery and supplies the lateral wall. METHODS: We compared outcomes of all the patients treated in our center by the described strategies during 1996 through 2011. RESULTS: Of 2951 patients, 1220 underwent composite grafting and 1731 underwent in situ grafting; the median follow-up was 15.1 years (interquartile range, 11.2-18.6 years). Early mortality (2.2% vs 2.0%, P = .787) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Long-term (15-year) survival was marginally significant in favor of the in situ group (53.5% vs 49.5%, P = .05); this difference disappeared after 20 years. Configuration strategy was not a predictor for better 15-year survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.09; P = .568). An additional analysis compared matched groups of 995 patients each who underwent the 2 configuration strategies and found no differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of 2 strategies for bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization to the left side, with comparable early outcomes and long-term survival.

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with low ejection fraction.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard of care for the treatment of complex coronary artery disease. However, the optimal surgical treatment for patients with reduced left ventricular function with low ejection fraction (EF) is inconclusive. In our center, left-sided coronary grafting with bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) is generally the preferred method for surgical revascularization, also for patients with low EF. We compared early and long-term outcomes between BITA grafting and single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in patients with low EF.We evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of all patients who underwent surgical revascularization in our center during 1996 to 2011, according to EF ≥30% and <30%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In addition, patients who underwent BITA and SITA grafting were matched using propensity score matching.In total, 5337 patients with multivessel disease underwent surgical revascularization during the study period. Of them, 394 had low EF. Among these, 188 underwent SITA revascularization and 206 BITA grafting. Those who underwent SITA were more likely to have comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, and a critical preoperative condition including preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion.Statistically significant differences were not observed between the SITA and BITA groups in 30-day mortality (8.5% vs 6.8%, P = .55), sternal wound infection (2.7% vs 1.0%, P = .27), stroke (3.7% vs 6.3%, P = .24), and perioperative myocardial infarction (5.9% vs 2.9%, P = .15). Long-term survival (median follow up of 14 years, interquartile range, 11.2-18.9) was also similar between the groups. Propensity score matching (129 matched pairs) yielded similar early and long-term outcomes for the groups.This study did not demonstrate any clinical benefit for BITA compared with SITA revascularization in individuals with low EF.

Myocardial preservation methods in isolated minimal invasive mitral valve surgery: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Minimal invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a commonly used approach for mitral valve surgery. Several techniques of myocardial preservation were described in patients undergoing MIMVS. We aim to evaluate preservation technique and short term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent isolated MIMVS and were included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. RESULTS: The final cohort included 4976 patients. Mean age was 63.1 years (SD, 12.5) and 42.6% were females. Antegrade delivery method (71.3% of the patients) was the most common, follow by antergrade/retrograde (19.9%). Blood, crystalloid solution, and combination of blood-crystalloid were used in 62.4%, 13.2%, and 13.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, cardioplegia technique was associated with mortality (P = .011), pleural effusion (P = .045), and length of ICU stay (P < .001). Antegrade-crystalloid (OR, 3.37; 95%CI, 1.70-6.68) and antegrade/retrograde-blood/crystalloid (OR, 3.28; 95%CI, 1.15-9.38) were associated with increased risk for mortality compared with antegrade-blood cardioplegia. Data on postoperative ejection fraction (EF), CPK-MB, and Troponin was available only in 30%, 9%, and 5% of the patients, respectively, and were not included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ante-grade-blood was the most common preservation technique in MIMVS. Ante-grade-crystalloid and ante-grade/retrograde-blood/crystalloid are associated with increased risk for mortality. The results suggest that using crystalloid solutions for cardioplegia should be carefully considered. The STS database as a source for MIMVS outcome analysis is lacking, both in detailed specification of different surgical technique aspects, and in actual data collection of already existing categories.

A simple-to-use nomogram to predict long term survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting technique.

BACKGROUND: Several risk scores have been created to predict long term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Several studies demonstrated a reduction in long-term mortality following bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) compared to single internal thoracic artery. However, these prediction models usually referred to long term survival as survival of up to 5 years. Moreover, none of these models were built specifically for operation incorporating BITA grafting. METHODS: A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent isolated BITA grafting between 1996 and 2011 at Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center, a tertiary referral university affiliated medical center with a 24-bed cardio-thoracic surgery department. Study population (N = 2,935) was randomly divided into 2 groups: learning group which was used to build the prediction model and validation group. Cox regression was used to predict death using pre-procedural risk factors (demographic data, patient comorbidities, cardiac characteristics and patient's status). The accuracy (discrimination and calibration) of the prediction model was evaluated. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The learning (1,468 patients) and validation (1,467 patients) groups had similar preoperative characteristics and similar survival. Older age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, old MI, ejection fraction ≤30%, pre-operative use of intra-aortic balloon, and peripheral vascular disease, were significant predictors of mortality and were used to build the prediction model. The area under the ROC curves for 5, 10, and 15-year survival ranged between 0.742 and 0.762 for the learning group and between 0.766 and 0.770 for the validation group. The prediction model showed good calibration performance in both groups. A nomogram was built in order to introduce a simple-to-use tool for prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: A simple-to-use validated model can be used for a prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year mortality after CABG using the BITA grafting technique.

Left anterior descending artery revascularization with the right internal thoracic artery T-graft: the 'reverse composite' configuration.

OBJECTIVES: The use of bilateral internal thoracic artery graft for myocardial revascularization has improved the long-term survival and decreased the rate of repeat interventions in patients. A key technical factor for complete arterial revascularization is sufficient length of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft. The purpose of this study was to compare early and long-term outcomes of 'standard composite' grafting and 'reverse composite' grafting. In the former, the left ITA (LITA) is connected to the left anterior descending artery, and the right ITA is connected end-to-side to the LITA for revascularization of the left circumflex artery. In 'reverse composite' grafting, the LITA is connected to the left circumflex artery, and the right ITA is connected end-to-side to the LITA, for revascularization of the left anterior descending artery. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 1365 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, using bilateral ITA as standard composite versus 'reverse composite' grafts, between January 1996 and December 2011. A propensity score matching analysis compared 132 pairs of patients who underwent bilateral ITA by the 2 modes. RESULTS: Twelve hundred and thirty patients underwent standard 'composite' grafts and 135 underwent 'reverse composite' grafts. Early mortality and early adverse effects did not differ significantly between the groups. After matching, the difference in late mortality between the groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that revascularization of the left anterior descending with the right ITA, arising from an in situ LITA, is safe and provides early outcomes and long-term survival that are not significantly different from those of the standard composite grafting technique. However, there was evidence of better survival in the standard composite group.

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one? An analysis of 5301 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Although bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is associated with improved survival, many surgeons are reluctant to use this technique due to its greater complexity and the potentially increased risk of sternal infection. This observational study examined if BITA grafting provides improved outcomes compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in patients with multivessel coronary disease. METHODS: Patients in our institution who underwent BITA grafting during 1996-2011 were compared to those who underwent SITA grafting during the same period. To adjust for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, patients were matched by propensity score. The Cox model was used to identify predictors of decreased survival and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, both for the entire cohort and for the matched cohort. RESULTS: SITA patients were older than BITA patients, included more females, and were more likely to have chronic obstructive lung disease, an ejection fraction <30%, diabetes, renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease and emergency and repeat operations. Three-vessel and left main diseases were more common among BITA patients, and operative mortality was reduced (2.1% vs 3.6% for SITA, P = 0.002). Sternal infection and stroke rates were similar for the groups. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival of BITA patients was better (71.2% vs 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). BITA grafting was found to be a predictor of better survival in the analysis of the matched cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the routine use of BITA grafting in patients who undergo myocardial revascularization.

The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods.

During the last decades, the increased number of percutaneous interventions procedures causes a significant change in the profile of patients referred to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to study changes in patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients referred to CABG in a community hospital during the first 15 years of the millennium.A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent CABG in Cape Cod Hospital was performed. The period was divided into 2 sub-periods, 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014. Patients' characteristics and procedure outcomes were compared. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, Society of Thoracic Surgery risk scores and surgical adverse outcomes (stroke, coma, and 30-days mortality) were collected.During the study period, 1108 patients underwent CABG; 612 were operated before 2009 and 496 after. Age and sex were similar in the 2 periods. The patients in the later period presented lower risk for mortality and stroke (P <.001). Diabetes (DM) was more common in the later period (P <.001) while peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (P <.001) and left main disease (LM) (P = .017) were more common in the earlier period. Mortality rates were similar between the 2 periods. Post-operative stroke (1.8%) and coma (0.8%) were presented only in the later period. In conclusion, a significant change in CABG patients' characteristics was observed.In conclusion, patients in the later period had lower risk score and were more likely to present with DM and less with PVD and LM. Despite the lower risk, the mortality rate was similar.

Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results.

The Core-Knot device is an automatic fastener used mainly in minimally invasive heart valve surgery procedures, to facilitate knot tying. The purpose of this report is to compare ischemic time and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) utilizing the Core-Knot device compared with manually tied knots.Between January, 2014 and December, 2016, 119 patients underwent SAVR in Cape Cod Hospital. We compared patient's characteristics, cross-clamp time, and outcomes of 75 patients who underwent SAVR using Core-Knot to those of 44 operated using manually tied knots.Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the Core-Knot group had higher preoperative aortic valve area and higher ejection fraction. The use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced aortic cross-clamp time (median 70 vs 84 minutes; P < .001). Patients undergoing SAVR using Core-Knot were less likely to have postoperative aortic regurgitation (P < .001). Early mortality, and also the rates of early adverse events (including all cardiac, neurologic, and renal complications), and the immediate postprocedure echo findings were similar in the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced postoperative mean gradient across the aortic valve and reduced occurrence of postoperative aortic regurgitation. Older age and larger valve size were other predictors of reduced postoperative mean gradients.The use of an automatic fastener (Core-Knot) in surgical aortic valve replacement cases reduce aortic cross-clamp time and help eliminate postoperative paravalvular aortic regurgitation.

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease? Analysis of 387 cases between 1996-2011.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting is associated with improved survival. However, potential survival benefit of using two ITA`s in patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) is questionable due to their increased risk of sternal wound infection (SWI) compared to operations incorporating single ITA (SITA). The purpose of this study is to compare early and long-term outcome of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting to that of grafting with single internal thoracic grafts and vein grafts or radial artery (SITA) in CLD patients with multi-vessels coronary disease. METHODS: One hundred and forty eight CLD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 239 who underwent SITA at the same period. RESULTS: SITA patients were more often female, more likely to have insulin treated diabetes (DM), DM with end organ damage, neurologic dysfunction and unstable angina. Despite of the difference in preoperative characteristics, early mortality (5.4% vs. 5.4%, in the SITA and BITA respectively, p = 0 < .999) and occurrences of SWI (6.3% vs 9.5%, p = 0.320) and strokes (3.8% vs 5.4%,p = 0.611) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have better Kaplan-Meier 10 year survival (52.8% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.088) and after matching, BITA and SITA had similar adjusted survival (HR 0.983[95%CI 0.755-1.280] p = 0.901) (cox model). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that in patients with CLD, the choice of BITA grafting technique did not provide survival benefit compared to SITA with other conduits.

Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery-More Than a Decade of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Nonfatal strokes, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and reversible ischemic neurological deficits (RIND) after elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are devastating clinical problems. The anesthesiologist, surgical and intensive care teams in a community hospital adopted a strategy developed in an effort to minimize these adverse outcome events.The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of and predictors for perioperative adverse neurologic events. METHODS: A historical cohort study of 1,108 consecutive CABG patients operated between 2002 and 2014. Outcomes were defined as (1) a new neurologic damage (a new stroke, TIA, or RIND) and (2) a new neurologic damage or 30 days mortality. RESULTS: Adverse cerebral outcomes occurred in 16 patients (1.4 percent). Nine patients had postoperative stroke, six suffered TIAs, and one had postoperative RIND.In multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14), congestive heart failure (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.22-10.49) and prior stroke (OR 6.27, 95% CI 1.78-22.03) were significantly associated with increased risk of new neurologic damage. These parameters were also significantly associated with increased risk of the combined outcome (new neurologic damage/mortality). CONCLUSIONS: A low incidence rate of adverse cerebral outcomes after CABG in community hospital can be achieved with the use of the suggested surgical intensive care, and anesthetic strategy. Advanced age, congestive heart failure, and prior stroke are associated with adverse outcomes.

Comparison of radial and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with peripheral vascular disease†.

OBJECTIVES: The composite T-graft with radial artery (RA) attached end-to-side to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) provides arterial myocardial revascularization without the increased risk of deep sternal wound infection associated with harvesting 2 ITAs. However, many surgeons are reluctant to use RA in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) due to concerns regarding the quality of the conduit in this subset of patients. The purpose of this study is to compare early- and long-term outcomes of arterial grafting with bilateral ITAs (BITA) to that of single ITA and RA in patients with PVD. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2010, 619 consecutive patients with PVD (500 BITAs and 119 single ITA and RA) underwent myocardial revascularization in our institution. RESULTS: Occurrence of following risk factors as female sex, age 70+, diabetes, unstable angina, emergency operation, cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was higher in the RA-ITA group. The RA-ITA group also had a higher logistic EuroSCORE (22.1 vs 13.3). Operative mortality and occurrence of deep sternal wound infection of the two groups was similar (4.2% vs 5.0% and 2.5% vs 4.0% for the radial and bilateral ITA, respectively). Median follow-up was 9.75 years. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival of the two groups was similar (44.1% vs 49.6%, P = 0.7). After propensity score matching (100 pairs), assignment to BITA was not associated with better adjusted survival (hazard ratio 0.593, 95% confidence interval 0.265-1.327, P = 0.20, Cox model). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PVD, complete arterial revascularization with left ITA and RA can be justified with regards to survival.

One or Two Internal Thoracic Grafts? Long-Term Follow-Up of 957 Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: The potential survival benefit of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) is controversial owing to the technical complexity of these operations. Our objective was to compare the outcome of patients undergoing OPCABG with BITA to the outcome of patients undergoing OPCABG with a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) and saphenous vein grafts or radial artery. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent OPCABG BITA at our institute between 2000 and 2008 were compared with 422 patients who underwent OPCABG with SITA. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences between groups in preoperative characteristics. RESULTS: Being female (20.9% versus 36.0%, p < 0.001), having diabetes mellitus (36.6% versus 55.7%, p > 0.001), recent myocardial infarction (23.6% versus 33.2%, p > 0.001), aged 70 years or more (41.1% versus 49.8%, p = 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (26.1% versus 46.7%, p > 0.001), and chronic renal failure (7.9% versus 15.9%, p > 0.001) were less frequent in the BITA group than in the SITA group, respectively. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was significantly higher for the SITA group (7.62, versus 5.46 for BITA group, p = 0.001), whereas operative mortality (1.7% BITA versus 2.6% SITA) and sternal wound infections (1.7% BITA versus 2.1% SITA) were similar. The mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 3.5 years. The BITA patients' 10-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) was better (72.2% versus 55.1% for SITA, p > 0.001). However, after propensity matching, survival for BITA and SITA were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study suggests that long-term outcomes for patients undergoing OPCABG are not better with BITA grafting.

Should Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Be Used in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus?

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus is controversial because of a higher risk for sternal infection. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of BITA grafting to that of single ITA (SITA) grafting in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, 964 diabetic patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery with BITA were compared with 564 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with SITA and saphenous vein grafts. RESULTS: The SITA patients were older, more often female, more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ejection fraction 30% or less, insulin-dependent diabetes, recent myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, and emergency operation. The BITA patients more often underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with three or more grafts. The two groups had similar operative mortality, 2.6% BITA versus 3.0% SITA, and sternal infection, 3.1% versus 3.9%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 12.2 ± 4.3 years. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival of the BITA group was better than that of the SITA group (65.3% ± 3.1% versus 55.5% ± 4.5%, respectively; p = 0.004), After propensity score matching (490 well-matched pairs), Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival was not significantly different between the matched groups; however, the Cox-adjusted survival of the BITA patients was better (hazard ratio 0.729, 95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.964, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this large cohort study suggest that the long-term outcome of patients with diabetes and multivessel disease who undergo BITA grafting is better than that of diabetic patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery with SITA and saphenous vein grafts.

Long-term outcome of revascularization with composite T-grafts: Is bilateral mammary grafting better than single mammary and radial artery grafting?

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting is associated with improved survival. However, many surgeons are reluctant to use this technique, owing to the potentially increased risk of sternal infection. The composite T-graft with radial artery (RA) attached end-to-side to the left internal mammary artery (IMA) provides complete arterial revascularization without increased risk of sternal infection. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of these 2 strategies. METHODS: Patients who underwent BIMA grafting using the composite T-graft technique, between 1996 and 2010 (n = 1329), were compared with 389 patients who underwent composite grafting with a single IMA + RA during the same time period. RESULTS: Patients undergoing single IMA grafting were older, more often women, and more likely to have diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and COPD, and to need an emergency operation. Congestive heart failure, left main disease, and recent myocardial infarction were more prevalent with bilateral grafting. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences between groups in preoperative patient characteristics. The 268 matched pairs had similar characteristics. The median follow-up time was 14.19 (95% confidence interval 13.43-14.95) years. Operative mortality and Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival of the 2 matched groups were similar (3.4% vs 3.7%, and 61.6% vs 64%, for the groups treated with BIMA and single IMA, respectively). Cox-adjusted survival was similar (P = .514). Age, chronic renal failure, and performance of <3 bypass grafts were independent predictors of decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that long-term outcomes of arterial revascularization with a composite T-graft constructed using left IMA and RA are not inferior to outcomes after BIMA grafting.

Arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in elderly patients is controversial. We compared the outcome of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting with that of single internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein and radial artery conduits in these patients. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years or more who underwent bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting between 1996 and 2008 (n = 1045) were compared with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with a single internal thoracic artery + saphenous vein graft (n = 582) or a single internal thoracic artery + radial artery (n = 249). RESULTS: Prevalence of female gender, diabetes, emergency operation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was lower in the bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting group compared with the internal thoracic artery + radial artery and internal thoracic artery + saphenous vein graft groups, whereas congestive heart failure and recent myocardial infarction were more prevalent in the bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting group. Operative mortality and sternal wound infections were not significantly different between groups. The mean follow-up was 8.17 ± 4.45 years. Ten-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) in the internal thoracic artery + saphenous vein graft group was significantly lower than in the bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting and internal thoracic artery + radial artery groups (P < .001). Assignment to the saphenous vein graft group was also associated with decreased adjusted survival (P < .001) compared with the bilateral internal thoracic artery and internal thoracic artery + radial artery groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of arterial grafts in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization for multivessel disease in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Early Intervention Triage Strategy trial.

BACKGROUND: The preferred revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel coronary artery disease is uncertain. We evaluated the outcomes of diabetic patients with moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 13 819 moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients enrolled in the Acute Catheterization and Early Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial, 1772 diabetic patients had multivessel disease with left anterior descending artery involvement and were managed by PCI (n=1349) or CABG (n=423). Propensity scoring was applied to adjust for differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, yielding a total of 326 matched patients (163 managed by PCI and 163 managed by CABG). At 30 days, treatment with PCI compared with CABG was associated with lower rates of major bleeding (15.3% versus 55.6%; P<0.0001), blood transfusions (9.2% versus 43.2%; P<0.0001), and acute kidney injury (13.4% versus 33.6%; P<0.0001), but more unplanned revascularization procedures (6.9% versus 1.9%; P=0.03). At 1 year PCI was associated with higher rates of repeat revascularization procedures (19.5% versus 5.2%; P=0.0001), with nonsignificantly different rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death at either 30 days or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In the large-scale ACUITY trial, diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease treated with PCI rather than CABG had less bleeding and acute kidney injury, greater need for repeat revascularization procedures, and comparable rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death through 1-year follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00093158.

Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting patients supported preoperatively with an intra-aortic balloon pump.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies describing the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting patients supported preoperatively with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) have reported early results. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the early and long-term results. METHODS: Of 2658 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed from 1996 to 2001, 215 were supported preoperatively with an IABP. The indications for IABP insertion were cardiogenic shock in 18 (8.4%), acute evolving myocardial infarction in 38 (17.7%), clinical instability in 84 (39.1%), and critical coronary lesions in 75 (34.9%). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 12.6%. The mortality of the cardiogenic shock patients was greater (22.2%; P=.174). Logistic regression analysis showed patient age (odds ratio, 1.057; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-1.108) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (odds ratio, 1.020; 95% confidence interval, 1.008-1.031) were associated with increased operative mortality. An increased number of bypass grafts had a protective effect (odds ratio, 0.241; 95% confidence interval, 0.113-0.515). The actual early mortality was lower than the logistic EuroSCORE calculated mortality (12.6% vs 32.8%, P<.0001). The mean follow-up was 8±4 years. The Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival was 49%. The Cox adjusted overall (early and late) survival and major adverse cardiac events-free survival of the different IABP subgroups was similar. Cox analyses showed peripheral vascular disease, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, age, CPB time, female gender, and fewer bypass grafts were associated with decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients supported preoperatively with an IABP, better early and long-term results were strongly related to younger age, a shorter CPB time, and a greater number of bypass grafts. Avoiding the use of CPB (off pump) in these emergency cases is not recommended.

Should bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting be used in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND: Although bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with improved survival, the use of this technique in the elderly is controversial because of their increased surgical risk and shorter life expectancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on outcome of patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2001, 1714 consecutive patients underwent skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, of whom 748 were ≤65 years of age, 688 were between 65 and 75 years of age, and 278 were ≥75 years of age. Operative mortality of the 3 age groups (1.2%, 4.1%, and 5.8%, respectively) was lower than the logistic EuroSCORE predicted mortality (3.9%, 6.5%, and 9.3%, respectively; P<0.001). There were no significant differences among the groups in occurrence of sternal infection (1.3%, 2.6%, and 1.4%, respectively; P=0.171). Mean follow-up was 11.5 years. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival for patients ≤65, 65 to 75, and >75 years of age was 85%, 65%, and 40%, respectively (P<0.001). These rates were better than the corresponding predicted Charlson Comorbidity Index survival rates (68%, 37%, and 20%, respectively; P<0.001 for all age groups), approaching survival of the sex- and age-matched general population (90%, 70%, and 41%, respectively). Age ≤65 years (hazard ratio, 0.232; 95% confidence interval, 0.188-0.288) and age 65 to 75 years (hazard ratio, 0.499; 95% confidence interval, 0.414-0.602) were independent predictors of improved survival (Cox model). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting should be considered in patients >65 years of age because of the significant survival benefit obtained with this surgical technique with no additional risk of sternal wound infection related to age.