Patient-reported outcome measures for hip preservation surgery-a systematic review of the literature.

Hip preservation surgery is rapidly advancing and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are becoming an integral part of measuring treatment effectiveness. Traditionally the modified Harris hip score has been used as the main outcome measure. More recently, new PRO tools in the field have been developed. We performed a systematic review of the English literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and SPORTDiscus databases to identify the PRO tools used in hip preservation surgery. Our aim was to critically appraise the quality of the questionnaire properties in order to recommend the most appropriate PRO tool for future use. Measurement properties of each PRO questionnaire were rated from excellent to poor, based on Terwee criteria and the results from the included studies. Six PRO tools were identified with description or comparison of their measurement properties in 10 articles. While, most recently developed PRO tools, the hip outcome score (HOS), the Copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS) and the international hip outcome tool (iHOT-33) scored better than the others in their measurement properties, iHOT-33 scored the best of all the PRO tools and is recommended for future use in hip preservation surgery.

Pulmonary embolism after hip arthroscopy.

A case of pulmonary embolus after elective hip arthroscopy is reported. The incidence of thromboembolic events after such procedures is currently unknown, and the decision regarding whether to provide prophylaxis rests on anecdotal evidence.

The effect of exercise on anterior-posterior translation of the normal knee and knees with deficient or reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments.

Exercise may result in increased laxity in the knee. Anterior translation in 40 normal knees, 33 consecutive anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees, and 30 randomly chosen anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees was measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer before and after the participants ran for 15 minutes on a neutral-incline treadmill. A single observer blinded to the status of each knee tested all participants. There was a significant increase in anterior translation in the normal (mean, 0.75 mm), anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (mean, 0.62 mm), and anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees (mean, 0.25 mm) after exercise. In addition, the amount of anterior translation after exercise was significantly different when these groups were compared with each other. Post hoc analysis using Tukey's procedure indicated that anterior translation in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee was significantly less than in the normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Therefore, repetitive loading exercise contributes to an increase in anterior translation in normal, anterior cruciate ligament-deficient, and anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees, and the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee does not respond to repetitive loading in the same manner as a normal knee.

Two 6-year follow-up studies of large and massive rotator cuff tears: comparison of outcome measures.

The purposes of this report are (1) to describe the development of a quality-of-life outcome measure for rotator cuff disease (RC-QOL) and a new simple test of rotator cuff function, the Functional Shoulder Elevation Test (FSET), and (2) to compare these with the SF-36 and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Assessment (ASESA) in a cohort of 86 patients with surgically treated large and massive rotator cuff tears. The RC-QOL is a 34-item self-administered questionnaire that has demonstrated excellent reliability, face validity, and ability to discriminate between large and massive cuff tears; it has also confirmed the construct of higher correlations with the other shoulder outcome measures than with the SF-36. The FSET is a simple test of rotator cuff function that uses 5% body weight and measurement of pain and discomfort on a 100-point visual analog scale. It was highly correlated with the RC-QOL and ASESA and discriminated between large and massive cuff tears. The study achieved an 82% follow-up at an average of 3.5 years. Large cuff tears had statistically significantly improved outcome scores in comparison with massive cuff tears on these 3 outcome measures. The SF-36, however, was not able to discriminate between tear sizes. The RC-QOL and the FSET are recommended outcome measures for rotator cuff disease.

Evaluation of outcomes in patients following surgical treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome in the leg.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes in patients who had a fasciotomy performed on their leg(s) for chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS). DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care sport medicine referral practice. PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 62 patients surgically treated for CECS from January 1991 to December 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A questionnaire was designed and developed to assess pain (using a 100 mm visual analogue scale), level of improvement, level of maximum activity, satisfaction level, and the occurrence of reoperations. RESULTS: Fifty patients had anterior/lateral compartment involvement, 8 patients had deep posterior compartment involvement, and 4 patients had anterior/lateral/deep posterior compartment involvement. The demographics of the 39 respondents and 23 nonrespondents were similar. The mean percent pain relief of respondents was 68% (95% CI [confidence interval] = 54% to 82%). There was no relationship between percent pain relief and the documented immediate post exercise compartment pressures. A clinically significant improvement was reported by 26 of 32 (81%) anterior/lateral compartment patients and 3 of 6 (50%) patients with deep posterior compartment involvement. Patient level of activity after fasciotomy was classified as equal to or higher than before the operation with a lesser degree of pain by 28 of 36 (78%) patients, while 8 of 36 (22%) patients reported lower activity levels than before the operation. Of the patients reporting lower activity, seven were due to exercise related pain in the post operative leg(s) and one was due to lifestyle changes. Thirty of 38 patients (79%) were satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Four of 62 patients (6%) failed the initial surgical procedure and required revision surgery for exercise-induced pain. In addition, one of these individuals also had a sympathectomy and another had a neurolysis performed at the time of revision surgery. Three of the 62 (5%) patients had subsequent operations for exercise-induced pain on different compartments than the initial surgical procedure. One individual had an unsuccessful operative repair of a posttraumatic neuroma. Postoperative complications were reported by 5 of 39 (13%) patients in the additional comments section of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients surgically treated for CECS experience a high level of pain relief and are satisfied with the results of their operation. The level of pain relief experienced by patients is not related to the magnitude of the immediate post exercise compartment pressures. Despite the possibility that some patients have less favorable outcomes, experience complications, or need subsequent operations, fasciotomy is recommended for patients with CECS as there is no other treatment for this condition.

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder.

Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of traditional treatment with immediate arthroscopic stabilization in young patients who have sustained a first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Forty skeletally mature patients younger than 30 years of age were randomly allocated to immobilization for 3 weeks followed by rehabilitation (group T) or arthroscopic stabilization (within 4 weeks of injury) followed by an identical immobilization and rehabilitation protocol (group S). A blinded research assistant performed all follow-up evaluations. The dominant arm was involved in 35% of subjects. The injury occurred in a sporting event in 70% of subjects. At 24 months, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of redislocation (T = 47%, S = 15.9%, P = .03). An intention-to-treat analysis comparing disease-specific quality of life using the validated Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index showed statistically significantly better results in the surgically treated group at the 33 months (T = 633.93 v S = 287.1, P = .03) and no significant difference in range of motion. At an average 32 months follow-up, a significant reduction in redislocation and improvement in disease-specific quality of life is afforded by early arthroscopic stabilization in patients less than 30 year of age with a first, traumatic, anterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

A patient-based, subjective outcome measure for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency was developed, pretested, and validated. The development of the outcome measure was completed in four stages: 1) item generation (167 items), 2) item reduction (by surveying 79 patients), 3) questionnaire formation and pretesting (20 patients), and 4) reliability, responsiveness, and validity assessment (100 patients). This disease-specific quality of life measure is a 32-item questionnaire using a 100-mm visual analog scale response format. Face validity was derived from extensive direct patient input. Content validity was determined by consensus among 20 knee surgeons. There was no significant difference on test-retest reliability, with an overall average error of 6%. The outcome measure demonstrated responsiveness to clinical change correctly in 21 of 25 patients (84%). Construct validity was shown by the ability of the questionnaire to measure the full spectrum of disease; scores ranged from 8 to 99 out of a maximum score of 100. The questionnaire was able to distinguish patients who went on to have surgery (average score, 31) from those who would be treated nonoperatively (average score, 79). The quality of life outcome measure for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is the first subjective knee scale of its kind to be validated to measure quality of life in patients with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Functional outcome measures after displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

We have devised a new scoring system using visual analogue scales (VAS) to determine the functional outcome in 15 patients with 20 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, confirmed by CT. The average follow-up was 19 months. A VAS was completed separately by the patient, the surgeon and an independent assessor. It showed satisfactory agreement between observers and strong correlations with a General Health Survey (SF36), a pain scale (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and a disease-specific, historical scale for calcaneal fractures (the Rowe score).

Injuries to the nervous system and spine in downhill skiing.

The authors describe injuries to the nervous system and spine from downhill skiing accidents through a review of the charts of downhill skiers admitted over 5 years to the three teaching hospitals of the University of Calgary. The office of the chief medical examiner provided details about accidental deaths from downhill skiing in which nervous system trauma occurred. During the study period, 145 downhill skiers suffered injury to the nervous system or spine. There were five deaths from nervous system trauma. The mean age of the injured skiers was 23.8 years, and these injuries were three times more common in men than in women. Eighty-eight skiers sustained a head injury, 25 had spinal fractures alone, 20 had spinal cord or nerve root injury and 12 had peripheral nerve injury. A simple fall on the hill was the commonest method of injury, followed in frequency by collision with a tree, which caused the most severe injuries. Reckless skiing, design of ski runs and man-made snow were contributing factors. The serious nature and number of these injuries must be recognized, and further study is needed on causal factors and preventive measures.

Controversy in anterior shoulder instability.

The main areas of controversy in anterior shoulder instability are acute dislocation, recurrent instability, pain and instability in the "throwing athlete", and the role of arthroscopy. Treatment of the acute dislocation involves rest initially, followed by aggressive rehabilitation with protection of the shoulder until strength and motion have returned and pain and apprehension have resolved. Patients with recurrent instability may be seen with a variety of clinical scenarios. The surgical indications, pathology, and two methods of soft-tissue reconstruction are described along with an approach to postoperative rehabilitation. Return to sporting activity may be feasible by three months. The current thinking on the painful shoulder in the "throwing athlete" is outlined. Management must be based on an accurate diagnosis. Strengthening of the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers is recommended with surgery to correct the pathology in those who fail this program. Arthroscopy is a valid tool in the diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability. The clinical significance of some intraarticular findings has not yet been clarified. Therapeutic use should be undertaken only in experienced hands, appreciating that failure of arthroscopic repair is higher than comparable open surgical techniques. The open approach to anterior stabilization is preferred.

Limitation of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A case-control study.

Limitation of motion following ACL reconstruction is a well-recognized and disturbing complication. The purposes of this study were to identify and characterize those patients who developed this complication from a series of 527 ACL reconstructions, determine etiologic factors, and make recommendations regarding prevention and management. The case group included 37 patients who required a manipulation under anesthesia because of failure to gain a satisfactory range of motion after an ACL reconstruction. Unsatisfactory motion was defined as a flexion deformity of 10 degrees or more and/or limitation of flexion to less than 120 degrees by 3 months following ACL reconstruction. The control group of patients were selected randomly from the overall series and all had a satisfactory range of motion. The cases and controls were then compared by analyzing these variables: age, sex, knee, time from injury to reconstruction, type of tissue used, meniscal abnormalities or surgery, repair of the medical collateral ligament, and postoperative immobilization and rehabilitation. The cases were followed up to assess the range of motion compared to the opposite knee at an average of 26 months postmanipulation. Thirty-seven patients (7%) underwent a manipulation under anesthesia, 9 of these (24.3%) also had an arthroscopic arthrolysis. Reconstructions done less than 2 weeks postinjury showed a statistically significant higher rate of knee stiffness. The same trend was also present for those reconstructed 2 to 6 weeks postinjury. All other variables failed to show a significant statistical difference. At followup, the average loss of extension was 4 degrees and loss of flexion 5 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)