RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients diagnosed with high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) using a national cohort of NMIBC patients. METHODS: A cohort of patients diagnosed with NMIBC cancer with urothelial carcinoma from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2019 was utilized. The cohort consists of patients who have not received BCG and underwent upfront radical cystectomy or pelvic exenteration. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes. Cox regression was also utilized to identify independent predictors of OS. RESULTS: The cohort of 9399 patients was stratified by clinical T stage and then subdivided by pathological outcome. For patients with cTa, a majority received a lymph node dissection 97.74% (941/1019), amongst the entire cohort, a minority had node positive disease 3.3% (34/1019). For cTis, most patients received a lymph node dissection 94.08% (482/507), and a minority had node positive disease 5.1% (26/507). For cT1, most patients had a lymph node dissection 95.62% (6,060/6,337), and a 13.1% (832/6337) of patients had a positive lymph node. Amongst patients with cT1 disease who underwent PLND, KMA demonstrated better OS compared to patients who did not undergo PLND (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The data suggests an OS benefit in patients with later stage (cT1) NMIBC. Thus, our findings support the existing clinical guidelines of pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.
RESUMO
Importance: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is an invaluable and widely used resource for cancer research, but the current state of representation of different racial and ethnic groups compared with the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) database is unknown. Objective: To examine whether Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals have lower representation in the NCDB compared with the USCS database. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study assessed individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, and January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, in the NCDB and USCS databases. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to October 2023. Exposure: Time. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the absolute percentage change (APC) in capture rate across the study period. Results: The cohort included 5â¯175â¯007 individuals (0.50% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.10% Asian or Pacific Islander, 12.01% Black, 6.58% Hispanic, and 77.81% White) who were diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Capture rates were the lowest for individuals who were Hispanic (40.83% in 2004-2006 and 54.75% in 2017-2019; P < .001) or American Indian or Alaska Native (20.72% in 2004-2006 and 41.41% in 2017-2019; P < .001). The APCs were positive for both racial categories across all 4 cancers. However, overall APCs for Hispanic individuals (13.92%) remained lower than the overall APCs of White individuals (22.23%; P < .001). The APCs were greater for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals than for White individuals for prostate (14.68% vs 11.57%) and breast (21.61% vs 17.90%) cancer (P < .001), but the APCs for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals were lower than for White individuals for lung cancer (24.54% vs 33.03%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals diagnosed with cancer in the NCDB, Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer were undercaptured in the NCDB, but their representation improved over time. Increased study is needed to determine where these populations predominantly seek cancer care.