Perioperative management of oral anticoagulated patients undergoing an oral, implant, or periodontal procedure: a survey of practices of members of two dental scientific societies, the PRADICO study.

OBJECTIVES: Studies on the perioperative management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) receiving oral invasive procedures are sparse. Moreover, the recommendations of the scientific societies on DOACs are discordant, and the practices are highly variable. We conducted a survey of general and specialized dentists in France to compare their practices concerning the management of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and DOACs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of two dental surgical societies were invited to participate in the survey. One hundred forty-one practitioners answered an online questionnaire focusing on the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulated patients (participation rate, 17.8%). RESULTS: Practitioners at hospitals or mixed practices and specialists treated significantly more anticoagulated patients and more frequently performed procedures with high hemorrhagic risk than practitioners with private practice and general dentists. Greater than 90% of practitioners did not modify the treatment for patients on VKAs and controlled the International Normalized Ratio (INR) preoperatively. Regarding DOACs, 62.9% of practitioners did not change the treatment, 70.8% did not prescribe any biological tests, and 13.9% prescribed an INR. Practitioners at hospitals and mixed practices and specialists had better training and knowledge about DOACs. CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that anticoagulated patients were managed mostly by specialists in private or hospital care, notably when requiring oral procedures at high hemorrhagic risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A growing proportion of anticoagulated patients are being treated by dentists in primary care. Consequently, they need training, especially concerning DOACs. Additionally, consensus recommendations are necessary for better coordination of stakeholders and patient safety. Trial registration on ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03150303.

[Perfecting smile esthetics: keep it pink!] / Comment parfaire l'esthétique du sourire : toujours en rose !

INTRODUCTION: Smile aesthetics is based on numerical, physical, physiological and psychological data regarding beauty, while taking into account the desires of the patient. It is determined by the shape, colour and position of the lips, teeth and gingival tissues. Periodontal examination in both the facial and labial settings supports analysis of the gingival display during natural and forced smiling, the health of the periodontium, the gingival contours, the aesthetic gingival line, and the presence of the papillae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All these data will help establish a gingival aesthetic score to determine the causes of disharmony and possible treatment. DISCUSSION: During implementation of the global orthodontic treatment plan, periodontal plastic surgery can change the gingival appearance and morphology in order to restore the harmony of the smile. Subtractive periodontal plastic surgery treats biological space defects and excess tissue during incomplete passive eruption by gingivectomy or apically positioned flap, combined, or not, with osteoplasty or osteoectomy. Finally, injections of hyaluronic acid in the papillae can plump them up and minimize the size of any black holes.

[Reason for failure in the treatment of impacted and retained teeth]. / Échec de la mise en place de dents retenues et incluses.

The positioning of an impacted or retained tooth in either children or adults presents a real challenge for the two practitioners involved, the orthodontist and the surgeon in charge of the surgical exposure. The maxillary canine is the tooth most often impacted in the anterior segment, with a prevalence of 2% in the general population. One can understand, therefore, the functional and esthetic challenge for the surgical-orthodontic team whose aim will be to reposition the impacted or retained tooth in the arch. A large number of mistakes must be avoided in order to achieve a satisfactory result for both the patient and the practitioner. Modern imaging techniques should be used to obtain a precise diagnosis of the location of the tooth and to perform surgery which will spare the tooth in question as well as the surrounding anatomic structures. The directions and forces of the traction used will need to be carefully thought out in order to move the tooth into its final position on the arch in optimal conditions. The periodontal setting will be optimized and checked at every step of the treatment. The aim, in fact, is to anticipate the onset of periodontal problems on the grounds that prevention is easier than cure.

Qualitative cosmetic evaluation after root-coverage procedures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the esthetic outcome using four categories of root-coverage procedures (pedicle soft tissue grafts, non-submerged grafts, submerged grafts, and envelope techniques) and to identify factors associated with esthetic assessment. METHODS: A professional panel of three observers (two periodontists and one control) used a before-after panel scoring system to evaluate the esthetics of 162 root-coverage surgeries. A five-point ordinal scale was used to evaluate the overall esthetic improvement and seven variables that may be considered in the assessment. RESULTS: The intraobserver agreement of the two trained periodontists for the overall cosmetic assessment was almost perfect (kappa = 0.83), and substantial agreement was found between them (kappa = 0.68). Good to excellent overall esthetic results were found by the professionals and control in >70% of the surgical procedures. Analysis of variance indicated a statistical difference between the non-submerged grafts category and the three other surgical categories (P <10(-3)). Multivariate analysis showed that the degree of root coverage was not a significant predictive factor, whereas soft tissue appearance variables and the follow-up were significantly associated with cosmetic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that non-submerged grafts are not recommended in cases of esthetic demand. Future root-coverage trials, basing their justification on esthetics, should include overall qualitative evaluation as the primary variable. The follow-up period should not be <12 months. The before-after panel scoring system is a tool that can be used to evaluate cosmetic outcomes.

A retrospective study of root coverage procedures using an image analysis system.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of root coverage procedures and factors that may affect the clinical outcomes in non-experimental patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-seven root coverage surgical procedures in 215 adult patients were evaluated retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the patient profile. Comparisons between surgeries were assessed, and the impact of different parameters on the probability of mean/complete root coverage and gingival augmentation was explored. RESULTS: The mean percentage of root coverage was 72.29 (+/- 28)%. Complete root coverage was observed in 35.56% of the defects. The difference between the surgical procedures was not significant. The mean percentage of gingival augmentation was 106.18 (+/- 260)%. The difference between non-submerged grafts and the other techniques was significant (p<10(-3)). A significant negative impact of smoking, and maxillary teeth for both mean and complete root coverage were found. A significant positive impact of the tuberosity donor site was found for complete root coverage. Maxillary teeth and Miller's Class II and III were positive predictive factors for gingival augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Under non-experimental conditions, root coverage procedures are effective. Smoking, maxillary teeth, donor site, and Miller's Classes are prognostic factors that may affect the results.

Root coverage assessment: validity and reproducibility of an image analysis system.

AIM: The aim of this methodological study was to validate a new method for root coverage evaluation following periodontal plastic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty recessions were treated in 21 consecutive patients, using a subepithelial connective tissue graft technique. Clinical measurements and photographs were taken at baseline and 12+/-6 months after treatment. The mean percentage of root coverage for linear and surface area measurements was calculated using conventional clinical evaluation, and compared with ImageJ, a public domain Java image processing program. Bland-Altman plots were used for assessing repeatability and agreement between clinical and ImageJ measurements. The strength of the relationship was calculated using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The repeatability of ImageJ was excellent for both linear and surface area measurements. The agreement between clinical and ImageJ measurements was good for the linear evaluation, showing lower and upper limits of -13.14% and 17.42%, respectively. Significant correlations (p<0.001) were found between clinical and ImageJ measurements, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 for linear evaluation, and from 0.89 to 0.90 for surface evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study show that the ImageJ analysis is a reliable, reproducible method to evaluate the percentage of root coverage after periodontal plastic surgery, when a midfacial linear measurement is used.