Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making.

BACKGROUND: Whereas the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria restrict germline-genetic testing (GGT) to a subset of breast cancer (BC) patients, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends universal GGT. Although the yield of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in unselected BC patients has been studied, the practicality and utility of incorporating universal GGT into routine cancer care in community and rural settings is understudied. This study reports real-world implementation of universal GGT for patients with breast cancer and genetics-informed, treatment decision-making in a rural, community practice with limited resources. METHODS: From 2019 to 2022, all patients with breast cancer at a small, rural hospital were offered GGT, using a genetics-extender model. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, t-tests, and calculation of odds ratios. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 210 patients with breast cancer who were offered GGT, 192 (91.4%) underwent testing with 104 (54.2%) in-criteria (IC) and 88 (45.8%) out-of-criteria (OOC) with NCCN guidelines. Pathogenic germline variants were identified in 25 patients (13.0%), with PGV frequencies of 15 of 104 (14.4%) in IC and ten of 88 (11.4%) in OOC patients (p = 0.495). GGT informed treatment for 129 of 185 (69.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Universal GGT was successfully implemented in a rural, community practice with > 90% uptake. Treatment was enhanced or de-escalated in those with and without clinically actionable PGVs, respectively. Universal GGT for patients with breast cancer is feasible within rural populations, enabling optimization of clinical care to patients' genetic profile, and may reduce unnecessary healthcare, resource utilization.

The genetic profile of Leber congenital amaurosis in an Australian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is a severe visual impairment responsible for infantile blindness, representing ~5% of all inherited retinal dystrophies. LCA encompasses a group of heterogeneous disorders, with 24 genes currently implicated in pathogenesis. Such clinical and genetic heterogeneity poses great challenges for treatment, with personalized therapies anticipated to be the best treatment candidates. Unraveling the individual genetic etiology of disease is a prerequisite for personalized therapies, and could identify potential treatment candidates, inform patient management, and discriminate syndromic forms of disease. METHODS: We have genetically analyzed 45 affected and 82 unaffected individuals from 34 unrelated LCA pedigrees using predominantly next-generation sequencing and Array CGH technology. RESULTS: We present the molecular findings for an Australian LCA cohort, sourced from the Australian Inherited Retinal Disease Registry & DNA Bank. CEP290 and GUCY2D mutations, each represent 19% of unrelated LCA cases, followed by NMNAT1 (12%). Genetic subtypes were consistent with other reports, and were resolved in 90% of this cohort. CONCLUSION: The high resolution rate achieved, equivalent to recent findings using whole exome/genome sequencing, reflects the progression from hypothesis (LCA Panel) to non-hypothesis (RD Panel) testing and, coupled with Array CGH analysis, is a highly effective first-tier test for LCA.