Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgery ; 145(5): 486-94, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19375606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our objective was evaluate the outcome of primary clinical T4M0 extraperitoneal rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Prognosis of clinical T4 rectal cancer is poor. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy may be beneficial. The results obtained are unclear due to lack of objective and strictly applied staging methods. METHODS: Patients with primary, clinical, T4MO, extraperitoneal rectal cancer, defined by transrectal ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were considered. Intraoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were employed in some patients after curative resection (R0). Variables influencing the possibility to perform an R0 resection and a sphincter-saving procedure were investigated as predictors of outcome. RESULTS: 100 patients were included. R0 resection was performed in 78 patients. R0 resection rate was greater in females (93% vs 67%) and in responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (94% vs 60%). The ability to perform a sphincter-saving procedure was 57%, greater in middle rectal location (85% vs 51%) and in responders to the chemoradiation (70% vs 47%). Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 4-136). Local recurrences were found in 7 patients (10%). Five-year local control in R0 patients was 90% and better in the IORT group (100%). Distant relapse occurred in 24 patients (30%). Five-year overall survival was 59%, and was better after an R0 versus an R1 or R2 resection (68% vs 22%). Overall and disease free survival in R0 patients improved after overall downstaging. Adjuvant chemotherapy given in addition to the neoadjuvant therapy did not appear to offer benefit in improving survival. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach enabled us to obtain a 5-year overall survival of about 60%. IORT increased local control. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy needs to be further investigated.


Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Proctoscopia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rays ; 30(2): 197-203, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16294914

RESUMO

Radiotherapy-induced fatigue is a common early and chronic side-effect of irradiation, reported in up to 80% and 30% of patients respectively during radiation therapy and at follow-up visits. The factors that cause fatigue and the exact mechanisms responsible for its production, sustenance, or amelioration are not well understood. Multiple correlates and mechanisms have been proposed in the literature and integrated within models of cancer-related fatigue. A multidimensional approach in clinical practice is proposed based on the evaluation of cancer-related fatigue, and on the development of an adequate management. The monitoring system of fatigue used by the authors is presented.


Assuntos
Fadiga/etiologia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA