Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Vet Res ; 80(6): 601-606, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31140850

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant and loperamide for the prevention and reduction of adverse gastrointestinal effects associated with administration of paclitaxel to dogs with cancer. ANIMALS: 168 dogs with cancer. PROCEDURES: The study comprised 2 phases. For phase 1, dogs in the intervention group were administered maropitant and loperamide followed by paclitaxel. Outcomes were compared with those for a control group that received only maropitant and paclitaxel. For phase 2, all dogs of phase 1 that did not receive maropitant and loperamide and that had adverse gastrointestinal effects were enrolled; they received maropitant and loperamide and another dose of paclitaxel. RESULTS: In phase 1, significantly fewer dogs in the intervention group had adverse effects. For dogs that had adverse effects, the intervention group had a lower severity of lack of appetite and lethargy. Also, adverse effects for dogs in the intervention group were of significantly shorter duration than for the control group. In phase 2, significant reductions in adverse effects were observed after administration of maropitant and loperamide. In those dogs that still had adverse effects after administration of maropitant and loperamide, there was a significant reduction in severity of signs of nausea and lethargy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A combination of maropitant and loperamide was found to be safe for use and effective for reducing or preventing signs of paclitaxel-induced gastrointestinal effects in dogs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Loperamida/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/veterinária , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Quinuclidinas/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antidiarreicos/uso terapêutico , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Diarreia/veterinária , Cães , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Distribuição Aleatória , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Vômito/veterinária
2.
J Feline Med Surg ; 19(6): 693-696, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26783021

RESUMO

Objectives The aim of this study was to characterise the response of acute phase proteins (APPs) in cats seropositive for Dirofilaria immitis and to its endosymbiont bacterium Wolbachia. Methods The APPs serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin (Hp) and ceruloplasmin (Cp) were measured in 25 seropositive cats and in 16 healthy seronegative cats. Results SAA and Cp concentrations were significantly higher in animals with D immitis seropositivity that exhibited clinical signs related to the disease, and Hp was elevated in all D immitis-seropositive animals. There was no significant correlation between APPs and D immitis or Wolbachia species antibody titres. Conclusions and relevance An association between feline seropositivity to D immitis and APP response was demonstrated. Increases in serum SAA and Cp concentrations were related to D immitis-associated clinical signs, whereas Hp increased in all seropositive animals.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Fase Aguda/análise , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Dirofilaria immitis/imunologia , Dirofilariose/diagnóstico , Wolbachia/imunologia , Animais , Doenças do Gato/sangue , Gatos , Dirofilariose/sangue , Feminino , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Testes Sorológicos/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA