Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(5): 1841-1847, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35984517

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Surgical trauma may confer additional infectious risk after operative fixation for high energy tibial plateau fractures. This study aims to determine the impact of plate number and location on infection rates after these injuries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study completed at two level one trauma centers included patients who underwent staged fixation for a tibial plateau fracture between 2015 and 2019. Plate number and location (lateral, medial, posteromedial, and anterior quadrants) used in the definitive fixation construct were collected from post-operative radiographs. Deep infection rate was primary the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall infection rate was 13.9% (34/244). Infection rates increased with each additional quadrant utilized (8.0% one quadrant, 13.0% two quadrants, 27.3% three quadrants, 100% four quadrants; p < 0.001), independent of plate number, fracture severity, operative time, number of incisions, external fixator pin and plate construct overlap, and days in the external fixator on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Infection risk increases with each quadrant utilized in the fixation of high energy tibial plateau fractures. Providers should attempt to limit the dissection of soft tissue for hardware placement in the fixation of these injuries to limit infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective therapeutic study.


Assuntos
Ferida Cirúrgica , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas do Planalto Tibial , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura , Fixadores Externos/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Placas Ósseas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Spine Surg ; 17(2): 179-184, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36414379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a known neurotoxin that has been shown to negatively impact neurological function and recovery in multiple animal studies. Patients who smoke have been shown to have decreased rates of motor improvement, fusion, and overall successful outcomes after elective spinal surgery, but the effect of smoking on outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) has not been demonstrated in prior literature. This study aims to investigate how smoking effects motor recovery after TSCI. METHODS: Using the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database, patients who underwent surgical management of American Spinal Injury Association grade D cervical TSCI between 2009 and 2016 were included. Patients were grouped by smoking or nonsmoking status. Overall total motor score and change in motor scores at rehabilitation admission, rehabilitation discharge, and 1-year follow-up visits were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was completed, including any possible confounding demographic or injury variables. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (121 smokers and 31 nonsmokers) completed their 1-year follow-up interview and physical examination and were included in the study. There were no differences in motor score between groups at rehabilitation admission or discharge. Smokers had worse improvement in motor score at 1 year (7.99 nonsmokers vs 4.61 smokers; P = 0.019 on multivariate analysis) and worse overall total motor score at 1 year (94.0 nonsmokers vs 90.0 smokers; P = 0.018 on multivariate analysis) after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate diminished motor recovery in patients who continue to smoke after TSCI. These patients should be targeted for aggressive smoking cessation and require intervention from providers and peers in order to maximize recovery after injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that smoking cessation may be beneficial for patients with cervical ASIA grade D spinal cord injury and may be a focus for providers of these patients.

3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(10): 530-534, 2022 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35470324

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare infection rates after second-stage definitive surgery for high-energy tibial plateau fractures between groups of patients who had the external fixator prepped into the surgical field and those who did not. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-four patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria between the 2 institutions. INTERVENTION: Prepping of the external fixator into the surgical field during second-stage definitive open reduction and internal fixation. 162 patients were in the prepped group, and 82 patients were in the nonprepped group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the rate of deep infection after definitive fixation. Secondary outcome was operative time. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in infection rates between prepped (11.7%) and nonprepped (18.3%) groups ( P = 0.162). Patients in the prepped groups had significantly decreased operative time (168.2 minutes vs. 221.9 minutes, P < 0.001) even after controlling for confounders in regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no increased risk of infection associated with prepping and maintenance of the external fixator during definitive internal fixation for high-energy tibial plateau fractures. These data suggest that this practice may lead to shorter operative times as well. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas da Tíbia , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esterilização , Fraturas da Tíbia/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/etiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA