The Prevalence of Hip Dysplasia on Radiographs for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: During radiographic assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), upright images frequently capture the hip. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of radiographic hip dysplasia on postero-anterior (PA) scoliosis radiographs, as defined as a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) ≤25 degrees. METHODS: All patients with upright PA scoliosis radiographs over a one-year study period at a single tertiary academic medical center (2020 to 2021) were included in the study. Radiographs containing the hip joints were annotated by 3 reviewers for left and right LCEA, and triradiate cartilage (TRC) status. Inter-rater reliability was determined among the 3 reviewers. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients {500 hips, 75.6% female, median age 14 [interquartile range (IQR)=3]} had PA scoliosis radiographs that captured the hip, which qualified for analysis. Seventy-four hips (14.8%) demonstrated evidence of dysplasia (LCEA ≤25 deg) in 55/250 patients (22%). The median LCEA was significantly lower in the dysplastic hip cohort (23.9 deg, IQR=4.8 deg), compared with those without dysplasia (33 deg IQR=7.3 deg; P=0.001). A higher percentage of dysplastic hip patients were female than male (72.7% vs. 27.3%). Patients with bilateral dysplasia had a similar LCEA ( 22.9 deg) [to those with unilateral dysplasia (22.9 deg left, 23.9 deg right, P=0.689)]. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of 250 AIS patients, 22% demonstrated evidence of hip dysplasia, as defined as an LCEA ≤2 degrees. The dysplastic patients were more likely to be female. Screening for hip symptomatology in AIS patients may be of benefit, considering the frequency of radiographic hip dysplasia in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Type of Evidence: diagnostic.

Migratory schwannoma of the cauda equina with a change in radicular pattern: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Intradural spinal tumors are an uncommon entity with a variety of pathologies and symptom patterns. Few cases reports in the literature have described tumor migration within the spinal canal. OBSERVATIONS: A 38-year-old male presented with bilateral upper lumbar radicular symptoms of anterior thigh pain, with an enhancing tumor of the cauda equina initially located at L1-2. He declined surgery initially, and at a follow-up 3 years later, his symptoms were unchanged but the tumor was now located at T12-L1. He again declined surgery, but 3 months later, he had a significant change in his pain distribution, which was now along his posterolateral right leg to his foot with associated dorsiflexion and extensor hallicus longus weakness. At this time, the tumor had migrated to L2-3. He underwent laminectomy and tumor resection with resolution of his radicular symptoms and improvement in his strength back to baseline by the 1-month follow-up. Pathology was consistent with a World Health Organization grade I schwannoma. LESSONS: Migratory schwannoma is a rare entity but should be considered when radicular symptoms acutely change in the setting of a known intradural tumor. Repeat imaging should be performed to avoid wrong-level surgery. Intraoperative imaging can also be used for tumor localization.

Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Lumbar Discectomy With Modified Technique: Symptomatic Relief and Intersegmental Stability Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a modified minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique for far lateral lumbar discectomy (FLDH) that minimizes the degree of bony drilling required for nerve root decompression, increasing postoperative pain reduction rate with reduced risk of iatrogenic spinal instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: FLDH accounts for approximately 10% of all lumbar disc herniations and is increasingly recognized in the era of advanced imaging techniques. These disc herniations typically result in extra-foraminal nerve root compression. Minimally invasive spine techniques are increasingly performed with various degrees of foraminal and facet removal to decompress the affected nerve root. METHODS: The study design involves a single institutional, retrospective cohort technical review. The review was completed of all patients undergoing MIS far lateral lumbar discectomy between 2010 and 2020. Cross-sectional, summary statistics were calculated for all variables. Counts and percentages were recorded for categorical variables and mean and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent MIS far lateral lumbar discectomies (FLLD) from 2010 to 2020. The mean age was 63 ± 11.5 years (60.4% males), the mean BMI was 28.5 ± 5.5, and 20.8% smokers. The most common presenting complaint was both low back and radicular pain (79.2%) with 8.3% of patients suffering from motor weakness preoperatively. The mean follow-up time was 4.3 ± 2.7. The mean length of stay was 1.3 ± 1.4 days with 77.1% of patients discharged postoperative day one. Forty-three patients (93.5%) had improvement in their symptoms. Twenty-seven (58.7%) had complete resolution in 2.6 months on average. Six patients (13%) had immediate symptom resolution postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified technique for FLLD allows MIS access to the extra-foraminal site of nerve root compression without the need for bony drilling. This minimizes postoperative pain and reduces the risk of iatrogenic spinal instability without sacrificing symptom resolution.

Optimizing Surgical Efficiency in Complex Spine Surgery Using Virtual Reality as a Communication Technology to Promote a Shared Mental Model: A Case Series and Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology that can be used to promote a shared mental model among a surgical team. We present a case series demonstrating the use of 3-dimensional (3D) VR models to visually communicate procedural steps to a surgical team to promote a common operating objective. We also review the literature on existing uses of VR for preoperative communication and planning in spine surgery. METHODS: Narrations of 3 to 4-minute walkthroughs were created in a VR visualization platform, converted, and distributed to team members through text and email the night before surgical intervention. A VR huddle was held immediately before the intervention to refine surgical goals. After the intervention, the participating team members' perceptions on the value of the tool were assessed using a survey that used a 5-point Likert scale. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Dimensions AI databases were queried from July 2010 to October 2022 to examine existing literature on preoperative VR use to plan spine surgery. RESULTS: Three illustrative cases are presented with accompanying video. Postoperative survey results demonstrate a positive experience among surgical team members after reviewing preoperative plans created with patient-specific 3D VR models. Respondents felt that preoperative VR video review was "moderately useful" or more useful in improving their understanding of the operational sequence (71%, 5/7), in enhancing their ability to understand their role (86%, 6/7), and in improving the safety or efficiency of the case (86%, 6/7). CONCLUSION: We present a proof of concept of a novel preoperative communication tool used to create a shared mental model of a common operating objective for surgical team members using narrated 3D VR models. Initial survey results demonstrate positive feedback among respondents. There is a paucity of literature investigating VR technology as a means for preoperative surgical communication in spine surgery. ETHICS: Institutional review board approval (IRB-300009785) was obtained before this study.

Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for postsurgical and systemic complications after lumbar spinal surgery. Smaller studies have also demonstrated diminished improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), with increased reoperation and readmission rates after lumbar surgery in patients with DM. The authors aimed to examine longer-term PROs in patients with DM undergoing lumbar decompression and/or arthrodesis for degenerative pathology. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression and/or arthrodesis for degenerative pathology. Patients were grouped into DM and non-DM groups and optimally matched in a 1:1 ratio on 31 baseline variables, including the number of operated levels. Outcomes of interest were readmissions and reoperations at 30 and 90 days after surgery in addition to improvements in Oswestry Disability Index, back pain, and leg pain scores and quality-adjusted life-years at 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: The matched decompression cohort comprised 7836 patients (3236 [41.3] females) with a mean age of 63.5 ± 12.6 years, and the matched arthrodesis cohort comprised 7336 patients (3907 [53.3%] females) with a mean age of 64.8 ± 10.3 years. In patients undergoing lumbar decompression, no significant differences in nonroutine discharge, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, reoperations, and PROs were observed. In patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis, nonroutine discharge (15.7% vs 13.4%, p < 0.01), LOS (3.2 ± 2.0 vs 3.0 ± 3.5 days, p < 0.01), 30-day (6.5% vs 4.4%, p < 0.01) and 90-day (9.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.01) readmission rates, and the 90-day reoperation rate (4.3% vs 3.2%, p = 0.01) were all significantly higher in the DM group. For DM patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis, subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly higher risk of poor surgical outcomes with the open approach. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with and without DM undergoing lumbar spinal decompression alone have comparable readmission and reoperation rates, while those undergoing arthrodesis procedures have a higher risk of poor surgical outcomes up to 90 days after surgery. Surgeons should target optimal DM control preoperatively, particularly for patients undergoing elective lumbar arthrodesis.

Racial differences in the care of pediatric sagittal craniosynostosis: a single-institution cohort study affecting state Medicaid policy.

OBJECTIVE: Although research has shown the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open repair of sagittal synostosis, few studies have shown how race, insurance status, and area deprivation impact care for these patients. The authors analyzed data from children evaluated for sagittal synostosis at a single institution to assess how socioeconomic factors, race, and insurance status affect the surgical treatment of this population. They hypothesized that race and indicators of disadvantage negatively impact workup and surgical timing for craniosynostosis surgery. METHODS: Medical records of patients treated for sagittal synostosis between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Area deprivation index (ADI) and rural-urban commuting area codes, as well as median income by zip code, were used to measure neighborhood disadvantage. Black and White patients were compared as well as patients using Medicaid versus private insurance. RESULTS: Fifty patients were prospectively included in the study. Thirty-one underwent open repair; 19 had endoscopic repair. All 8 (100%) Black patients had open repair, compared to 54.8% of White patients (p = 0.018). Black patients were more likely to use Medicaid compared to White patients (75.0% vs 28.6%, p = 0.019). White patients were younger at surgery (5.5 vs 10.0 months, p = 0.001), and Black patients had longer surgeries (147.5 minutes vs 110.0 minutes, p = 0.021). The median household income by zip code was similar for the two groups. Black patients were generally from areas of greater disadvantage compared to White patients, based on both state and national ADI scores (state: 7.5 vs 4.0, p = 0.013; national: 83.5 vs 60.0, p = 0.013). All (94.7%) but 1 patient undergoing endoscopic repair used private insurance compared to 14 (45.2%) patients in the open repair group (p = 0.001). Patients using Medicaid were from areas of greater disadvantage compared to those using private insurance by both state and national ADI scores (state: 6.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.001; national: 75.0 vs 52.0, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Because Medicaid in the geographic region of this study did not cover helmeting after endoscopic repair of sagittal synostosis, these patients usually had open repair, resulting in significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment of sagittal synostosis. This research has led to a change in Alabama Medicaid policy to now cover the cost of postoperative helmeting.

Epidural Versus Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGNS: Systematic Review. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of anesthesia type on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A significant advantage of PELD involves the option to use alternative sedation to general anesthesia (GA). Two options include local anesthesia (LA) and epidural anesthesia (EA). While EA is more involved, it may yield improved pain control and surgical results compared with LA. However, few studies have directly examined outcomes for PELD after LA versus EA, and it remains unknown which technique results in superior outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases examining PELD performed with LA or EA from inception to August 16, 2021 were conducted. All studies reported greater than 6 months of follow-up in addition to PRO data. PROs, including visual analog scale (VAS)-leg/back, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Complications, recurrent disk herniation, durotomy, and reoperation rates, as well as surgical data, were recorded. All outcomes were compared between pooled studies examining LA or EA. RESULTS: Fifty-six studies consisting of 4465 patients (366 EA, 4099 LA) were included. Overall complication rate, durotomy rate, length of stay, recurrent disk herniation, and reoperation rates were similar between groups. VAS back/leg and ODI scores were all significantly improved at the first and last follow-up appointments in the LA group. VAS leg and ODI scores were significantly improved at the first and last follow-up appointments in the EA group, but VAS back was not. CONCLUSIONS: EA can be a safe and feasible alternative to LA, potentially minimizing patient discomfort during PELD. Conclusions are limited by a high level of study bias and heterogeneity. Further investigation is necessary to determine if PELD under EA may have greater short-term PRO benefits compared with LA.

Morbid Obesity Increases Length of Surgery in Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures but Not Readmission or Reoperation Rates: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: As the obesity epidemic grows, the number of morbidly obese patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) continues to increase. Despite the association of obesity with perioperative complications in anterior cervical surgery, the impact of morbid obesity on ACDF complications remains controversial, and studies examining morbidly obese cohorts are limited. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ACDF from September 2010 to February 2022 was performed. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected via review of the electronic medical record. Patients were categorized as nonobese (body mass index [BMI] <30), obese (BMI 30-39.9), or morbidly obese (BMI ≥40). Associations of BMI class with discharge disposition, length of surgery, and length of stay were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, multivariable linear regression, and negative binomial regression, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 670 patients undergoing single-level or multilevel ACDF: 413 (61.6%) nonobese, 226 (33.7%) obese, and 31 (4.6%) morbidly obese patients. BMI class was associated with prior history of deep venous thrombosis (P < 0.01), pulmonary thromboembolism (P < 0.05), and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001). In bivariate analysis, there was no significant association between BMI class and reoperation or readmission rates at 30, 60, or 365 days postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, greater BMI class was associated with increased length of surgery (P = 0.03), but not length of stay or discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing ACDF, greater BMI class was associated with increased length of surgery, but not reoperation rate, readmission rate, length of stay, or discharge disposition.

Trends in the Utilization of Implants in Index Procedures for Early Onset Scoliosis From the Pediatric Spine Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: Because of the relative rarity of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) cases, patient registries were developed to combine clinical information from multiple institutions to maximize patient care and outcomes. This study examines the history and trends regarding the use of growth-friendly devices for index surgical procedures in EOS patients within the Pediatric Spine Study Group database. METHODS: All index growth-friendly implants were queried from registry inception until October 2020. EOS etiology, device/implant type, and geographic area/institution for each procedure were recorded. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2020, 2786 patients underwent index surgery at a mean age of 6.2±2.9 years. There were 908 traditional growing rods (TGR) (32.3%), 922 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib devices (VEPTR) (33.1%), 5 hybrid VEPTR/TGR (0.18%), and 951 magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) (34.2%) index implants. Fifty-six different institutions reported an index implant, and 5 accounted for 823 (30%) of the cases during the study period. Institutions in the Northeast accounted for more index implants than other regions of the United States. There was a 40% increase in index implant insertions annually when comparing 1994 (3 implants/1 center) to 2018 (234 implants/56 centers), ( P <0.001). Beginning in 2009, there was a 90.9% decrease in the number of TGR/VEPTR procedures (2009: 156 implants/32 centers; 2019: 22 implants/49 centers P =0.001), and a 479% increase in MCGR (2009: 1 implant/1 center; 2018: 197 implants/34 centers ( P =0.005). The overall number of growth-friendly index procedures performed in 2019 (150/49 centers) decreased 34.5% when compared to 2018 (234/48 centers). CONCLUSION: The number of growth-friendly implants reported in the Pediatric Spine Study Group registry as the initial surgical management of EOS increased markedly over the past 20 years. MCGR is currently the predominant type of device utilized for index surgical procedures by group members, surpassing the use of VEPTR and TGR in 2014. There was a significant decrease in index growth-friendly procedures in 2019 compared to 2018. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for ruptured versus unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Background: There are a limited data examining the effects of prior hemorrhage on outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) rupture and compare outcomes, including post-SRS hemorrhage, between patients presenting with ruptured and unruptured AVMs. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing SRS for intracranial AVMs between 2009 and 2019 at our institution was conducted. Chi-square and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify patient and AVM factors associated with AVM rupture at presentation and outcomes after SRS including the development of recurrent hemorrhage in both ruptured and unruptured groups. Results: Of 210 consecutive patients with intracranial AVMs treated with SRS, 73 patients (34.8%) presented with AVM rupture. Factors associated with AVM rupture included smaller AVM diameter, deep venous drainage, cerebellar location, and the presence of intranidal aneurysms (P < 0.05). In 188 patients with adequate follow-up time (mean 42.7 months), the overall post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 8.5% and was not significantly different between ruptured and unruptured groups (10.3 vs. 7.5%, P = 0.51). There were no significant differences in obliteration rate, time to obliteration, or adverse effects requiring surgery or steroids between unruptured and ruptured groups. Conclusion: Smaller AVM size, deep venous drainage, and associated intranidal aneurysms were associated with rupture at presentation. AVM rupture at presentation was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent hemorrhage or other complication after SRS when compared to unruptured AVM presentation. Obliteration rates were similar between ruptured and unruptured groups.

Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Spine surgery represents an ideal target for healthcare cost reduction efforts, with outpatient surgery resulting in significant cost savings. With an increased focus on value-based healthcare delivery, lumbar decompression surgery has been increasingly performed in the outpatient setting when appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes following outpatient and inpatient lumbar decompression surgery. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective one- or two-level lumbar decompression (laminectomy or laminotomy with or without discectomy) for degenerative spine disease. Patients were grouped as outpatient if they had a length of stay (LOS) < 24 hours and as inpatient if they stayed in the hospital ≥ 24 hours. Patients with ≥ 72-hour stay were excluded from the comparative analysis to increase baseline comparability between the two groups. To create two highly homogeneous groups, optimal matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between the two groups on 38 baseline variables, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, indications, and operative details. Outcomes of interest were readmissions and reoperations at 30 days and 3 months after surgery, overall satisfaction, and decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain, and leg pain at 3 months after surgery. Satisfaction was defined as a score of 1 or 2 in the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index. Noninferiority of outpatient compared with inpatient surgery was defined as risk difference of < 1.5% at a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 18,689 eligible one- and two-level decompression surgeries were identified. The matched study cohorts consisted of 5016 patients in each group. Nonroutine discharge was slightly less common in the outpatient group (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01). The 30-day readmission rates were 4.4% and 4.3% for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively, while the 30-day reoperation rates were 1.4% and 1.5%. The 3-month readmission rates were 6.3% for both groups, and the 3-month reoperation rates were 3.1% for the outpatient cases and 2.9% for the inpatient cases. Overall satisfaction at 3 months was 88.8% for the outpatient group and 88.4% for the inpatient group. Noninferiority of outpatient surgery was documented for readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported satisfaction from surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient lumbar decompression surgery demonstrated slightly lower nonroutine discharge rates in comparison with inpatient surgery. Noninferiority in clinical outcomes at 30 days and 3 months after surgery was documented for outpatient compared with inpatient decompression surgery. Additionally, outpatient decompression surgery performed noninferiorly to inpatient surgery in achieving patient satisfaction from surgery.

Predictive Factors for Arteriovenous Malformation Obliteration After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is particularly useful for treatment of deep arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in eloquent territory with a high associated surgical risk. Prior studies have demonstrated high rates of AVM obliteration with SRS (60%-80%) in a latency period of 2-4 years for complete obliteration. Studies have identified several factors associated with successful obliteration of the AVM nidus; however, these present inconsistent and conflicting data. The aim of this single-center study was to examine factors associated with successful obliteration of AVMs treated with SRS. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 210 consecutive patients undergoing SRS for brain AVMs between 2010 and 2019. The χ2 test and logistic regression analysis were used to identify patient and AVM factors associated with successful obliteration. RESULTS: Younger age (P = 0.034) and prior embolization (P = 0.012) were associated with complete obliteration. The presence of coronary artery disease was associated with incomplete obliteration (P = 0.04). No AVM characteristics were statistically associated with complete obliteration, although superficial venous drainage (P = 0.08) and frontal location (P = 0.06) trended toward significance. CONCLUSIONS: Successful obliteration of the AVM nidus was significantly associated with younger age and prior embolization. The presence of coronary artery disease negatively affected obliteration rates. These results add to the mixed results seen in the literature and emphasize the need for continued studies to delineate more specific patient and AVM factors that contribute to successful obliteration.

Seizure Rates After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cerebral AVMs: A Single Center Study.

OBJECTIVES: Seizure control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is an area of growing interest, with previous studies reporting up to 70% seizure freedom after treatment. The goals of this study were to identify specific patient and AVM characteristics associated with seizure presentation and seizure outcomes after SRS treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing SRS for brain AVMs between 2009 and 2019 at our institution was conducted. Chi-squared and logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify patient and AVM factors associated with preoperative seizure presentation and development of new onset seizures after SRS. RESULTS: Two hundred ten consecutive patients presenting with AVMs treated with SRS were reviewed. Factors associated with seizure presentation included larger AVM size (P = 0.02), superficial venous drainage (P < 0.05), and parietal location (P = 0.04). Of 188 patients with follow-up (90%), 30 patients presented with seizures and 14 (47%) were seizure-free post-SRS. Of 158 patients presenting without seizure, 29 (18%) developed de novo seizures during follow-up. De novo post-SRS seizures were associated with prior craniotomy for resection of AVM (P = 0.04), post-treatment hemorrhage (P = 0.02), parietal location (P = 0.05), adverse effect requiring steroids (P < 0.01), and adverse effect requiring surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Seizures are a common presentation of brain AVMs and can be treated effectively with SRS. However, seizures can also be a complication of SRS and are associated with post-treatment hemorrhage, edema, and need for future open surgery.

Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: With the expanding indications for and increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar spinal fusion, large-scale outcomes analysis to compare MIS approaches with open procedures is warranted. METHODS: The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. They performed optimal matching, at a 1:2 ratio between patients who underwent MIS and those who underwent open lumbar fusion, to create two highly homogeneous groups in terms of 33 baseline variables (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, indications, and operative details). The outcomes of interest were overall satisfaction, decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain, as well as hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, reoperations, and incidental durotomy rate. Satisfaction was defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the North American Spine Society scale. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline. Outcomes were assessed at the 3- and 12-month follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: After the groups were matched, the MIS and open groups consisted of 1483 and 2966 patients, respectively. Patients who underwent MIS fusion had higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.004); no difference was demonstrated at 12 months (OR 1.04, p = 0.67). Lumbar stenosis, single-level fusion, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System grade, and absence of spondylolisthesis were most prominently associated with higher odds of satisfaction with MIS compared with open surgery. Patients in the MIS group had slightly lower ODI scores at 3 months (mean difference 1.61, p = 0.006; MCID OR 1.14, p = 0.0495) and 12 months (mean difference 2.35, p < 0.001; MCID OR 1.29, p < 0.001). MIS was also associated with a greater decrease in leg and back pain at both follow-up time points. The two groups did not differ in operative time and incidental durotomy rate; however, LOS was shorter for the MIS group. Revision surgery at 12 months was less likely for patients who underwent MIS (4.1% vs 5.6%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal disease, MIS was associated with higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively. No difference was demonstrated at the 12-month follow-up. MIS maintained a small, yet consistent, superiority in decreasing ODI and back and leg pain, and MIS was associated with a lower reoperation rate.

Comparison of aesthetic outcomes between open and endoscopically treated sagittal craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: In the last several decades, there has been much debate regarding the ideal treatment for sagittal synostosis. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative, anthropometric, and subjective assessments of cosmetic outcomes between open and endoscopic management of isolated sagittal synostosis. METHODS: At their routine postoperative follow-up, pediatric patients with sagittal craniosynostosis were recruited to undergo digital cranial measurement and standardized photography for objective and subjective assessments of perioperative outcomes. Age-normalized z-scores for cephalic index, head circumference, euryon-euryon diameter (Eu-Eu), and glabella-opisthocranion diameter (G-Op) were calculated for each patient. Faculty surgeons, surgical trainees, nurses, and laypersons were asked to rate the normalcy of craniofacial appearances using a 5-point Likert scale. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with endoscopic correction and those treated with open repair. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Thirty-one had undergone open surgical correction, and 19 had undergone endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic repair involved significantly lower operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and hospital length of stay than those with open repair (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of z-scores for head circumference (p = 0.22), cephalic index (p = 0.25), or Eu-Eu (p = 0.38). Endoscopic treatment was associated with a significantly lower G-Op (p = 0.009). Additionally, the average subjective rating of head shape was higher for endoscopic treatment when corrected for age, gender, and ethnicity (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that patients who are treated endoscopically may have an overall more normal appearance in skull morphology and cosmesis, although these results are limited by poor reliability.

Analysis of Author Gender in the Pediatric Orthopaedic Literature from 2011 to 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery remains a male-dominated specialty. To date there has not been a focused analysis of gender in authorship within the pediatric orthopaedic literature. METHODS: The electronic table of contents from 2011 to 2020 of 3 major pediatric orthopaedic journals [Journal of Children's Orthopaedics (JCO), Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (JPO), and Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B (JPO-B)] were reviewed. Publications were reviewed for the number of articles with at least 1 female author and the number of articles with women listed as first authors. These were compared over the 10-year study period, and by individual year of publication. Statistical analysis included a general linear model with factorial one-way anslysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc testing. RESULTS: A total of 4097 articles were reviewed. In 2020, there was a significantly higher percentage of articles with a female author when compared with 2011 (64% to 42%, P=0.010). A female was listed as first author in significantly more publications in 2020 as compared with 2011 (23% to 10%, P=0.031). During the 10-year study period, the highest mean proportion of articles with at least 1 female author was seen in JPO (60%), with similar findings in JCO (55%). Significantly fewer articles in JPO-B contained a female author (37%, P=0.001). The highest percentage of publications with a female first author across 10 years was in JCO (22%), followed by JPO (20%). Significantly fewer articles with a female first author were found in JPO-B (9%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: There is an increasing proportion of publications in the pediatric orthopaedic literature with female authors and female first authors from 2011 to 2020. In addition, there was a statistical difference in female authorship when comparing specific publications, which should be investigated further. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Preoperative Decision-Making in Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Survey of Practicing Neurosurgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Microvascular decompression (MVD) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) results in durable pain freedom in a large percentage of appropriately selected patients. The decision to perform MVD is based on a combination of clinical symptomatic presentation and imaging findings demonstrating neurovascular compression (NVC) with surgeons weighting these variables differently. This study sought to determine the relative importance of clinical symptomatic presentation and imaging findings of NVC in decision-making to pursue MVD for TN among North American board-certified neurosurgeons. METHODS: An online survey detailing the decision-making process involved in the workup and treatment of TN with MVD was distributed to all American Association of Neurological Surgeons registered board-certified neurosurgeons in North America. RESULTS: From 3010 functional email addresses, there were 309 responses to the survey (10% response rate). The majority of respondents (76%) reported only operating on patients with classic type 1 TN (T1TN) while only 32% chose to operate on patients with imaging findings of vascular compression in the absence of T1TN symptoms. In contrast to low-volume surgeons, high-volume surgeons weighed imaging evidence of vascular compression more heavily into the decision-making process to operate. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of responding neurosurgeons weigh symptomatic presentation more heavily than imaging evidence of NVC when deciding on whom to perform MVD. High-volume surgeons tend to be more attentive to NVC in their decision-making to perform MVD when compared with low-volume surgeons.

The Validity of the Koos Classification System With Respect to Facial Nerve Function.

BACKGROUND: The Koos classification of vestibular schwannomas is designed to stratify tumors based on extrameatal extension and compression of the brainstem. Our prior study demonstrated excellent reliability. No study has yet assessed its validity. OBJECTIVE: To present a retrospective study designed to assess the validity of the Koos grading system with respect to facial nerve function following treatment of 81 acoustic schwannomas. METHODS: We collected data retrospectively from 81 patients with acoustic schwannomas of various Koos grades who were treated with microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. House-Brackmann (HB) scores were used to assess facial nerve function and obtained at various time points following treatment. We generated Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau correlation coefficients along with a logistic regression curve. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the presence or absence of facial dysfunction by Koos classification when looking at all patients. There was a positive but fairly weak correlation between HB score and Koos classification, which was only significant at the first postoperative clinic appointment. There was a statistically significant difference in the presence or absence of facial dysfunction between patients treated with surgery vs radiation, which we expected. We found no statistically significant difference when comparing surgical approaches. Logistic regression modeling demonstrated a poor ability of the Koos grading system to predict facial nerve dysfunction following treatment. CONCLUSION: The Koos grading system did not predict the presence of absence of facial nerve dysfunction in our study population. There were trends within subgroups that require further exploration.

Objective Craniometric Versus Subjective Outcome Ratings in Endoscopic and Open Sagittal Synostosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in surgical treatments and assessments of objective outcomes in surgery for sagittal synostosis, there is no agreement regarding the optimal assessment of postoperative outcomes. Additionally, few studies have evaluated subjective assessments of cranial morphology after surgical correction. This study sought to evaluate the utility of subjective aesthetic outcome assessment and compare these assessments to established craniometric outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for isolated sagittal synostosis. METHODS: Nineteen raters (5 parents, 4 surgeons, 5 trainees and 5 nurses) evaluated fifty patients who underwent surgical correction of isolated sagittal synostosis using standardized postoperative patient photos and a five-point Likert scale. Previously established anthropomorphic measurements were recorded postoperatively in these same patients and comparisons were made between the objective anthropomorphic and subjective outcome evaluations. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant correlations between age-controlled cephalic index, head circumference, or euryon-euryon diameter and subjective aesthetic scores. Lay persons assigned a significantly lower proportion of scores (37.9%) as middle values (2, 3, or 4) compared with faculty (64.8%). There was a statistically significant association between high scores given by surgical faculty and laypersons (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective measurement of cosmetic outcome is a useful metric in surgical correction of craniosynostosis. Although no correlations were found between objective measurements and subjective aesthetic scores, cosmetic assessments by surgeons demonstrated strong correlation with lay perception, indicating that these ratings may be a good gauge of overall cosmetic outcome. When used in combination, objective and subjective measurements provide unique value to assess outcomes after surgery for craniosynostosis.

Rare Ameloblastic Carcinoma Metastasis to the Cervical Spine: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is a malignant neoplasm of epithelial origin that typically arises from the mandible or maxilla. It represents approximately 2% of all odontogenic tumors. Gross total resection is the surgical goal given AC's aggressiveness and propensity for recurrence. We present the first reported AC metastasis to the cervical spine. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 61-yr-old African American female with a history of AC of bilateral mandibles and lung metastases presented with neck pain and right arm weakness progressive over several months. Cervical spine imaging demonstrated a cervical 3 pathological fracture with severe anterior vertebral body compression and resultant cervical 2-3 kyphotic deformity and bony retropulsion causing severe cord compression. The patient underwent a cervical 3 corpectomy and cervical 2-4 anterior fixation followed by a cervical 3 laminectomy and cervical 2-5 dorsal internal fixation and fusion. Postoperatively, the patient's neurological exam remained stable and imaging showed improved spinal alignment and appropriate anterior and posterior instrumentation. Unfortunately, the patient thereafter suffered a decline in performance status and progression of lung metastatic disease. Her oncology team is considering chemotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, but her prognosis remains grim. CONCLUSION: AC is a rare and aggressive pathology with a poor prognosis despite multimodal therapy. We present the first case of AC metastatic spread to the spine. We aim to bring this pathology to the attention of our worldwide neurosurgical colleagues and share our surgical approach and multidisciplinary management to assist those who may encounter this pathology in the future.