Effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia: a single-centre pilot randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a common cause of morbidity. Postoperative atelectasis is thought to be a significant risk factor in their development. Recent imaging studies suggest that patients' extubation may result in similar postoperative atelectasis regardless of the intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy used. In this pilot trial, we hypothesized that a study investigating the effects of an open lung extubation strategy compared with a conventional one on PPCs would be feasible. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, single-centre, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at moderate to high risk of PPCs and scheduled for elective surgery were eligible. Patients were randomized to an open lung extubation strategy (semirecumbent position, fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 50%, pressure support ventilation, unchanged positive end-expiratory pressure) or to a conventional extubation strategy (dorsal decubitus position, FIO2 100%, manual bag ventilation). The primary feasibility outcome was global protocol adherence while the primary exploratory efficacy outcome was PPCs. RESULTS: We randomized 35 patients to the conventional extubation group and 34 to the open lung extubation group. We observed a global protocol adherence of 96% (95% confidence interval, 88 to 99), which was not different between groups. Eight PPCs occurred (two in the conventional extubation group vs six in the open lung extubation group). Less postoperative supplemental oxygen and better lung aeration were observed in the open lung extubation group. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre pilot trial, we observed excellent feasibility. A multicentre pilot trial comparing the effect of an open lung extubation strategy with that of a conventional extubation strategy on the occurrence of PPCs is feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); registered 6 August 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les complications pulmonaires postopératoires (CPP) sont une cause fréquente de morbidité. L'atélectasie postopératoire est considérée comme un facteur de risque important de CPP. Des études d'imagerie récentes suggèrent que l'extubation des patient·es peut entraîner une atélectasie postopératoire semblable, quelle que soit la stratégie de ventilation mécanique peropératoire utilisée. Dans cet essai pilote, nous avons émis l'hypothèse qu'une étude examinant les effets sur les CPP d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert par rapport à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle serait réalisable. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude randomisée contrôlée pilote, monocentrique et à double insu. Les patient·es adultes présentant un risque modéré à élevé de CPP et devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie non urgente étaient éligibles. Les patient·es ont été randomisé·es à une prise en charge par une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert (position semi-couchée, fraction d'oxygène inspiré [FIO2] 50 %, ventilation par aide inspiratoire, pression positive télé-expiratoire inchangée) ou à une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle (décubitus dorsal, FIO2 100 %, ventilation manuelle par masque). Le principal critère de faisabilité était l'adhésion au protocole global, tandis que les CPP constituaient le principal critère d'efficacité exploratoire. RéSULTATS: Nous avons randomisé 35 patient·es dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle et 34 dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert. Nous avons observé une adhésion globale au protocole de 96 % (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 88 à 99), qui n'était pas différente entre les groupes. Huit CPP sont survenues (deux dans le groupe d'extubation conventionnelle vs six dans le groupe d'extubation à poumon ouvert). Nous avons observé des besoins moins importants en oxygène supplémentaire postopératoire et une meilleure aération pulmonaire dans le groupe extubé à poumon ouvert. CONCLUSION: Dans cet essai pilote monocentrique, nous avons observé une excellente faisabilité. Une étude pilote multicentrique comparant l'effet d'une stratégie d'extubation à poumon ouvert à celui d'une stratégie d'extubation conventionnelle sur la survenue de CPP est réalisable. DATE D'ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04993001); enregistrée le 6 août 2021.

Efficacy of a propofol bolus against placebo to prevent cough at emergence from general anesthesia with desflurane: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Emergence from anesthesia is a critical period and cough can result in adverse effects. Propofol inhibits airway reflexes and when infused it reduces cough more than inhalation anesthesia does. We evaluated the effect of a propofol bolus given at emergence on the incidence of coughing following a desflurane-based anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients scheduled for elective surgery were prospectively randomized to propofol (0.5 mg·kg-1) or normal saline (NS) administered at the end of the surgery at 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane. A "no touch" emergence technique was used until extubation. The primary outcome was the incidence of cough at the discontinuation of desflurane (T0) and reaching a MAC adjusted for age (MACage) of 0.15. Secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of cough until five minutes postextubation (T0-T5), time to extubation, nausea and vomiting, sedation, hemodynamic variations, postoperative hypoventilation, hypoxemia, and sore throat. RESULTS: We could not draw inferences on the incidence of cough between T0 and MACage of 0.15 because only 27/68 (40%) patients in the NS group and 13/73 (18%) patients in the propofol group regained consciousness before reaching a MACage of 0.15. There were no significant differences between the groups in coughing incidence and severity between T0 and T5 (NS group, 57/68 [84%] vs propofol group, 70/73 [96%] ). The mean time to extubation in the propofol group was prolonged by 3 min 27 sec (95% confidence interval, 1 min 7 sec to 4 min 47 sec; P < 0.001) and more vasopressors were used at emergence (P = 0.02). The incidence of respiratory complications, nausea and vomiting, agitation, and sedation were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: In the present trial, a propofol bolus administered at emergence did not reduce the incidence of cough occurring between T0 and T5 following a desflurane-based general anesthesia compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02932397); registered 13 October 2016.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'émergence de l'anesthésie est une période critique et la toux peut entraîner des effets indésirables. Le propofol inhibe les réflexes des voies aériennes et, lorsqu'il est perfusé, il est plus efficace pour réduire la toux que l'anesthésie inhalée. Nous avons évalué l'effet d'un bolus de propofol administré à l'émergence sur l'incidence de toux après une anesthésie à base de desflurane. MéTHODE: Cent cinquante-quatre patients devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie non urgente ont été randomisés prospectivement à recevoir du propofol (0,5 mg·kg−1) ou une solution physiologique de sérum salé (NS) administrée à la fin de la chirurgie lorsque la concentration alvéolaire minimale (MAC) de desflurane était de 1. Une technique d'émergence « sans contact ¼ a été utilisée jusqu'à l'extubation. Le critère d'évaluation principal était l'incidence de toux à l'arrêt du desflurane (T0) et à l'atteinte d'une MAC ajustée en fonction de l'âge (MACâge) de 0,15. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient l'incidence et la gravité de la toux jusqu'à cinq minutes après l'extubation (T0-T5), le délai d'extubation, les nausées et vomissements, la sédation, les variations hémodynamiques, l'hypoventilation postopératoire, l'hypoxémie et les maux de gorge. RéSULTATS: Nous n'avons pas pu tirer de conclusions sur l'incidence de toux entre T0 et à une MACâge de 0,15 parce que seulement 27/68 (40 %) patients du groupe NS et 13/73 (18 %) patients du groupe propofol ont repris conscience avant d'atteindre une MACâge de 0,15. Il n'y avait aucune différence significative entre les groupes dans l'incidence et la gravité de la toux entre T0 et T5 (groupe NS, 57/68 [84 %] vs groupe propofol, 70/73 [96 %]). Le temps moyen d'extubation dans le groupe propofol a été prolongé de 3 min 27 sec (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 1 min 7 sec à 4 min 47 sec; P < 0,001) et une plus grande quantité de vasopresseurs a été utilisée à l'émergence (P = 0,02). L'incidence de complications respiratoires, de nausées et vomissements, d'agitation, et de sédation n'était pas différente entre les groupes. CONCLUSION: Dans la présente étude, un bolus de propofol administré à l'émergence n'a pas réduit l'incidence de toux survenant entre T0 et T5 après une anesthésie générale à base de desflurane par rapport au placebo. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02932397); enregistrée le 13 octobre 2016.

Peak plasma concentration of total and free bupivacaine after erector spinae plane and pectointercostal fascial plane blocks.

PURPOSE: Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) and pectointercostal fascial (PIFB) plane blocks are novel interfascial blocks for which local anesthetic (LA) doses and concentrations necessary to achieve safe and effective analgesia are unknown. The goal of this prospective observational study was to provide the timing (Tmax) and concentration (Cmax) of maximum total and free plasma bupivacaine after ESPB in breast surgery and after PIFB in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: Erector spinae plane blocks or PIFBs (18 patients per block; total, 36 patients) were performed with 2 mg⋅kg-1 of bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µg⋅mL-1. Our principal outcomes were the mean or median Cmax of total and free plasma bupivacaine measured 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 180, and 240 min after LA injection using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: For ESPB, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) total bupivacaine Cmax was 0.37 (0.12) µg⋅mL-1 (range, 0.19 to 0.64), and the median [interquartile range (IQR)] Tmax was 30 [50] min (range, 10-180). For ESPB, the mean (SD) free bupivacaine Cmax was 0.015 (0.017) µg⋅mL-1 (range, 0.003-0.067), and the median [IQR] Tmax was 30 [20] min (range, 10-120). After PIFB, mean plasma concentrations plateaued at 60-240 min. For PIFB, the mean (SD) total bupivacaine Cmax was 0.32 (0.21) µg⋅mL-1 (range, 0.14-0.95), with a median [IQR] Tmax of 120 [150] min (range, 30-240). For PIFB, the mean (SD) free bupivacaine Cmax was 0.019 (0.010) µg⋅mL-1 (range, 0.005-0.048), and the median [IQR] Tmax was 180 [120] min (range, 30-240). For both ESPB and PIFB, we observed no correlations between pharmacokinetic and demographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Total and free bupivacaine Cmax observed after ESPB and PIFB with 2 mg⋅kg-1 of bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µg⋅mL-1 were five to twenty times lower than levels considered toxic in the literature.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les blocs des muscles érecteurs du rachis (ESP) et les blocs des plans fasciaux pecto-intercostaux (PIFB) sont de nouveaux blocs interfasciaux pour lesquels les doses et les concentrations d'anesthésique local (AL) nécessaires à obtenir une analgésie sécuritaire et efficace sont inconnues. L'objectif de cette étude observationnelle prospective était de déterminer le moment d'administration (Tmax) et la concentration (Cmax) de bupivacaïne plasmatique totale et plasmatique libre maximale après un bloc ESP pour chirurgie mammaire et après un PIFB chez les patients en chirurgie cardiaque. MéTHODE: Des blocs ESP ou PIFB (18 patients par bloc; total, 36 patients) ont été réalisés avec 2 mg⋅kg-1 de bupivacaïne et 5 µg⋅mL-1 d'épinéphrine. Nos principaux critères d'évaluation étaient la Cmax moyenne ou médiane de bupivacaïne plasmatique totale et libre mesurée 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 180 et 240 min après l'injection d'AL par chromatographie liquide avec spectrométrie de masse en tandem. RéSULTATS: Pour le bloc ESP, la Cmax de bupivacaïne totale moyenne (écart type [ET]) était de 0,37 (0,12) µg⋅mL-1 (plage, 0,19 à 0,64), et le Tmax médian [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)] était de 30 [50] min (intervalle, 10­180). Pour le bloc ESP, la Cmax de bupivacaïne libre moyenne (ET) était de 0,015 (0,017) µg⋅mL-1 (plage, 0,003­0,067), et le Tmax médian [ÉIQ] était de 30 [20] min (intervalle, 10­120). Après un PIFB, les concentrations plasmatiques moyennes ont plafonné à 60­240 min. Pour le bloc PIFB, la Cmax de bupivacaïne totale moyenne (ET) était de 0,32 (0,21) µg⋅mL-1 (plage, 0,14­0,95), et le Tmax médian [ÉIQ] était de 120 [150] min (intervalle, 30­240). Pour le bloc PIFB, la Cmax de bupivacaïne libre moyenne (ET) était de 0,019 (0,010) µg⋅mL-1 (plage, 0,005­0,048), et le Tmax médian [ÉIQ] était de 180 [120] min (intervalle, 30­240). Pour le bloc ESP et le PIFB, nous n'avons observé aucune corrélation entre les paramètres pharmacocinétiques et démographiques. CONCLUSION:  : Les Cmax de bupivacaïne totale et libre observées après un bloc ESP et PIFB avec 2 mg⋅kg-1 de bupivacaïne avec 5 µg⋅mL-1 d'épinéphrine étaient cinq à vingt fois plus faibles que les niveaux considérés comme toxiques dans la littérature.

Elements not Graded in the Cardiac Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines Might Improve Postoperative Outcome: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) are protocols involving the whole patient surgical journey. These protocols are based on multimodal, multidisciplinary, evidence-based, and patient-centered approaches aimed at improving patient recovery after a surgical intervention. Such programs have shown striking positive results in different surgical specialties. However, only a few research groups have incorporated preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative evidence-based interventions in bundles used to standardize care and build cardiac surgery ERPs. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recently published evidence-based recommendations for perioperative care in cardiac surgery. Their recommendations included 22 perioperative interventions that may be part of any cardiac ERP. However, various components integrated in already-published cardiac ERPs were neither graded nor reported in these recommendations. The goals of the current review are to present published cardiac ERPs and their effects on patient outcomes and reported components incorporated into these ERPs and to discuss the objectives and scope of cardiac ERPs.

Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a common reason for people to consult in primary care, and contribute to antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Alternative approaches to supporting patients with RTIs may help, but it is important to understand public perceptions about these approaches before they are widely implemented. AIM: To describe public perceptions regarding finger-prick testing, back-up antibiotic prescriptions (BUPs), and alternatives to traditional consultations for RTIs, and identify factors associated with favouring these approaches. DESIGN & SETTING: Online national survey (HealthWise Wales) with linked primary care health record data. METHOD: Survey item response distributions were described. Associations between responses about consultation alternatives, BUP, and finger-prick point-of-care testing (POCT), and potential explanatory variables, were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8752 participants completed the survey between 2016 and 2018. The survey found 76.7% (n = 3807/4,966) and 71.2% (n = 3529/4,953) of responders with valid responses were in favour of being able to consult with a pharmacist or nurse in their GP surgery, or with a community pharmacist, respectively. It also showed 92.8% (n = 8034/8659) of responders indicated they would be happy to have a finger-prick test to guide antibiotic prescribing, and 31.8% (n = 2746/8646) indicated they would like to be given a BUP if their clinician thought immediate antibiotics were not required. In addition, 47.4% (n = 2342/4944) and 42.3% (n = 2095/4949) were in favour of having video and email consultations, respectively. Characteristics associated with different response options were identified. CONCLUSION: Consulting with pharmacists, using electronic communication tools, and finger-prick testing are widely acceptable approaches. BUP was described as acceptable less often, and is likely to require greater information and support when used.

Multi-state outcome analysis of treatment interventions after failure of non-surgical root canal treatment: a 13-year retrospective study

Abstract Objective To examine the factors affecting the transitions through treatment interventions after failure of non-surgical root canal treatment (NS-RCT). Methodology Insurance enrollment and claim information for enrollees of Delta Dental of Wisconsin (DDWI), USA were analyzed for 438,487 initial NS-RCT procedures to determine the effect of initial provider type and other covariates on additional treatments (no additional treatment, nonsurgical retreatment, surgical retreatment and extraction). A multi-state model was created using the "mstate" R package. Transitions between the four states identified by Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature were analyzed. Cox proportional Hazards regression stratified by transition type was used to estimate the effect of provider type on the risk of each transition, adjusting for covariates. Results The overall survival rates for all teeth that were treated by NS-RCT was 82.8% [95% CI 82.57%, 83.11%] at 10 years. Approximately, 7% of cases changed from the first state of initial NS-RCT during the 13-year study period with ultimately 0.9%, 0.4% and 5% of cases receiving non-surgical retreatment, surgical retreatment or extraction, respectively. Teeth are more likely to be retreated non-surgically than surgically, and to be extracted than retreated. In general, the probability of a tooth having non-surgical retreatment was higher if the initial provider was not an endodontist (Hazard Ratio (HR)=3.2). Molars were more likely to be non-surgically retreated (HR=2.0) or extracted (HR=2.8) when compared to anterior teeth. The probability of non-surgical retreatment (HR=0.93) or extraction (HR=0.50) was lower when a crown was placed within 90 days after NS-RCT. Conclusion Most teeth remained in the same state after treatment with no additional treatment transitions. When a transition occurred, it was more likely to be an extraction. Type of provider, age, location of the tooth, gender, and time to placement of final restoration significantly influence treatment transitions.

Vitreoretinal interface abnormalities in patients treatedwith ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema.

PURPOSE: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are effective in the treatment of central involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (VRIA) are common in patients with DMO, and the effect of these on the response to anti-VEGF treatment is unclear. Furthermore the effect of anti-VEGF agents on the VRIA itself is uncertain. METHOD: Prospective study of consecutive patients treated with ranibizumab (RZB) for DMO as part of routine clinical care in one eye unit over a 1-year period. Visual acuity (Va), central retinal thickness (CRT) and injection frequency data was recorded on an electronic database. Treatment was initiated with four monthly RZB injections and then a monthly PRN regime. All patients underwent high-density spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) at baseline and 12 months. The SDOCTs were graded by two observers masked to the outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and four eyes (77 patients) were included in the analysis. The mean age was 62 years, and 62% were male. The mean presenting vision was 62 letters and CRT 472 µm. Eighty eyes retained stable Va, and 17 had an improvement in Va. At baseline, 39 eyes had associated focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) and by 12 months this reduced to 30 (p = 0.04), with 12 releasing VMA and three developing it. Patients with VMA had significantly better final Va than those without VMA. Improvement in CRT was greatest in those where VMA released during the study. Forty-five eyes had some degree of foveal involving epiretinal membrane (ERM) at baseline, and 28 were considered to have clinically significant ERM. There was no clinically relevant change in ERM during the study. Patients with significant ERM at baseline had a lower final vision. Multivariate analysis showed that ERM and more severe retinopathy at baseline were predictive of less visual improvement (p < 0.01). Shorter intraretinal cyst length, ERM and the absence of VMA at baseline were predictive of a worsened anatomical response (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VRIA are related to outcome in patients treated with RZB. ERM was associated with a worsened visual and anatomic response, and VMA with an improved anatomical response particularly when spontaneous VMA release occurred during treatment. The presence and severity of ERM was not affected by RZB treatment.

I-gel Versus LMA-Fastrach Supraglottic Airway for Flexible Bronchoscope-Guided Tracheal Intubation Using a Parker (GlideRite) Endotracheal Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The I-gel (IG) supraglottic airway device is a reliable way to establish an airway. Its large ventilation lumen allows for easy passage of an endotracheal tube. With the use of a flexible bronchoscope, the IG offers a good visualization of the laryngeal inlet. This prospective randomized study aims to compare the success rate of flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation using either the IG or the LMA-Fastrach (FT) laryngeal masks. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients requiring general anesthesia were randomized to 1 of the 2 study groups: IG or FT. After anesthesia induction, the assigned laryngeal mask was inserted to obtain adequate ventilation. We then proceeded to a flexible bronchoscope-guided intubation through the supraglottic device. Tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask insertion success rates were noted, as well as the time required for these manipulations. The view of the laryngeal inlet was graded for each intubation attempt. RESULTS: Sixty patients were assigned to each study group. The intubation success rates were similar between the IG and the FT groups (100 % vs 95.0 % at first attempt; P = 0.12). The times required for tracheal intubation were significantly lower in the IG group (30 ± 11 seconds vs 50 ± 21 seconds; P < 0.0001). Glottic visualization was better in the IG group, with a significantly higher percentage of grade 1 visualization (63.3% vs 3.3%; P < 0.0001) and a lower percentage of grade 3 visualization (1.7% vs 60.0%; P < 0.0001), than that in the FT group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the IG supraglottic airway device as a conduit for flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation results in a success rate equivalent to the use of the LMA-FT. However, the IG allows for shorter intubation times and a better visualization of the glottic opening compared with the LMA-FT.

Another form to fill in! Clients' reflections on the hospice use of questionnaires.

GOALS OF WORK: The use of validated tools is increasingly accepted as an unqualified good that is viewed as best practice in supportive care. This article begins to explore the impact of standardized questionnaire use in supportive care by presenting findings from recent qualitative research on clients' perceptions of the use of standardized assessment tools during their hospice experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were two arms to this phenomenological descriptive study: A. Interviews with hospice patients and their carers; B. Interviews with hospice staff. The results from arm A are reported in this article. This involved interviews with ten families (available patient and carer) who had hospice experience with questionnaires and ten families who were cared for without questionnaires. The interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. MAIN RESULTS: The research presented in this article is seminal work in the area which affirms significant concerns about the use of questionnaires in hospice practice. The evidence indicates the majority of clients dislike the use of questionnaires and points to questionnaire use being a practice built around staff, rather than client, needs. The findings also provide insight into the process of collusion by which hospice workers who are enthusiastic about the use of questionnaires can be led to believe, because of client gratitude, that the process is positive. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires should not be seen as an unqualified good, and thus should not be automatically accepted as best practice within hospice or palliative care service provision.