(En)trust me: Validating an assessment rubric for documenting clinical encounters during a surgery clerkship clinical skills exam.

BACKGROUND: The AAMC developed 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for graduating medical students. EPA 5 is: Document a clinical encounter in the patient record. Our goal was to develop an assessment rubric and gather evidence to support its validity in measuring progress towards entrustability. METHODS: A rubric was developed for EPA 5. During the 2017 surgery clerkship, 57 students wrote a note for each of two standardized patient (SP) encounters. These notes were prospectively collected and assessed by two physician raters. Messick's validity framework was used to gather validity data. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability with two raters was excellent, ICC = 0.86 (ICC 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.90) for overall note score. Correlation between note items and SP checklists ranged 0.39-0.46 (p < 0.05) and between note items and clinical evaluations 0.28-0.39 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is initial reliability evidence supporting the use of our rubric for assessing progress towards entrustability of EPA 5.

Impact of Policy Interventions on Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.

OBJECTIVE: To assess postoperative opioid prescribing in response to state and organizational policy changes. METHODS: We used an observational study design at an academic medical center in the Northeast United States over a time during which there were two important influences: 1) implementation of state rules regarding opioid prescribing and 2) changes in organization policies reflecting evolving standards of care. Results were summarized at the surgical specialty and procedure level and compared between baseline (July-December 2016) and postrule (July-December 2017) periods. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 17,937 procedures from July 2016 to December 2017, two-thirds of which were outpatient. Schedule II opioids were prescribed in 61% of cases and no opioids at all in 28%. The median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) prescribed at discharge decreased 40%, from 113 MME in the baseline period to 68 MME in the postrule period. Decreases were seen across all the surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative opioid prescribing at the time of hospital discharge decreased between 2016 and 2017 in the setting of targeted and replicable state and health care organizational policies. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Policies governing the use of opioids are an effective and adoptable approach to reducing opioid prescribing following surgery.

Preemptive Analgesia Decreases Pain Following Anorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a frequent cause for delayed discharge following outpatient procedures, including anorectal surgery. Both central and peripheral pain receptor sensitization are thought to contribute to postoperative pain. Blocking these receptors and preempting sensitization prevents hyperalgesia leading to lower pain medication requirements. Studies in the orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic literature support this practice, but the use of preemptive analgesia in anorectal surgery is understudied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in decreasing postoperative pain. DESIGN: This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: This study was conducted at the University of Vermont Medical Center, a tertiary care referral center in Burlington, Vermont. PATIENTS: Patients who were over 18 years of age, ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, or III, and undergoing surgery for anal fissure, fistula or condyloma or hemorrhoids were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin followed by intravenous ketamine and dexamethasone were given before incision compared with oral placebos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were postoperative pain scores, percentage of patients utilizing breakthrough narcotics, and rates of side effects. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled. Because of patient withdrawal, screen failures, and loss to follow-up, 61 patients were analyzed (30 in the preemptive analgesia group and 31 in the control group). Patients in the active group had significantly less pain in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Significantly fewer participants in the active group used narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Average pain scores were excellent for both groups. There was no difference in the number of medication-related side effects between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small sample size and excellent pain control in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive analgesia is safe and results in decreased pain in the early postoperative period following anorectal surgery. It should be implemented by surgeons performing these procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A588.

Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing and Use after Common Surgical Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The number of deaths from prescription opioids in the US continues to increase and remains a major public health concern. Opioid-related deaths parallel prescribing trends, and postoperative opioids are a significant source of opioids in the community. Our objective was to identify opioid prescribing and use patterns after surgery to inform evidence-based practices. STUDY DESIGN: Data from a 340-bed academic medical institution and its affiliated outpatient surgical facility included retrospective medical record data and prospective telephone questionnaire and medical record data. Retrospective data included patients discharged after 1 of 19 procedure types, from July 2015 to June 2016 (n = 10,112). Prospective data included a consecutive sample of general and orthopaedic surgery and urology patients undergoing 1 of 13 procedures, from July 2016 to February 2017 (n = 539). Primary outcomes were the quantity of opioid prescribed and used in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the proportion of patients receiving instructions on disposal and nonopioid strategies. RESULTS: In the retrospective dataset, 76% of patients received an opioid after surgery, and 87% of prescriptions were prescribed by residents or advanced practice providers. Median prescription size ranged from 0 to 503 MME, with wide interquartile ranges (IQR) for most procedures. In the prospective dataset, there were 359 participants (67% participation rate). Of these, 92% of patients received an opioid and the median proportion used was 27%, or 24 MME (IQR 0 to 96). Only 18% of patients received disposal instructions, while 84% of all patients received instructions on nonopioid strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Median opioid use after surgery was 27% of the total prescribed, and only 18% of patients reported receiving disposal instructions. Significant variability in opioid prescribing and use after surgery warrants investigation into contributing factors.

Colorectal Cancer Screening.

This article highlights the importance of colorectal cancer screening in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. Early detection of colorectal cancer is associated with reduced mortality. There are a variety of screening procedures for colorectal cancer, which are variable in technique and effectiveness. Engaging patients to participate in a screening regimen with which they will comply is critical to the ultimate success of colorectal cancer screening. Familiarity with risk stratification and screening guidelines is imperative for counseling and appropriate testing.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: There is debate regarding the appropriate use of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed our single-center experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer. DESIGN: Medical charts of patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery were reviewed to determine lesion characteristics, as well as operative and treatment characteristics. Complications and recurrences were recorded. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients with early stage cancer (T1 or T2, N0, and M0) of the rectum were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local and overall recurrence and disease-specific survival were measured. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 4.6 years. Negative margins were obtained in 98.9%. Length of stay was 1 day for 95.4% of patients. The complication rate was 10.9% (n = 10), including urinary retention at 4.3% (n = 4) and postoperative bleeding at 4.3% (n = 4). Preoperative staging included 54 at T1 (58.7%) and 38 at T2 (41.3%). Adjuvant therapy was recommended for all of the T2 and select T1 lesions with adverse features on histology. The final pathologic stages of tumors were ypT0 at 8.7% (n = 8), pT1 at 58.7% (n = 54), pT2 at 23.9% (n = 22), and ypT2 at 8.7% (n = 8). The 3-year local recurrence risk was 2.4% (SE = 1.7), and overall recurrence was 6.7% (SE = 2.9). There were no recurrences among patients with complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. Mean time to recurrence was 2.5 years (SD = 1.43). A total of 89.2% of patients with very low tumors underwent curative resection without a permanent stoma (33/37). The 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 98.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-99.8%), and overall survival rate was 89.4% (95% CI, 79.9%-94.6%). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its single-center retrospective experience. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery provides comparable oncologic outcomes to radical resection in properly selected patients with early rectal cancer. Sphincter preservation rates approach 90% even in patients with very distal rectal cancer.

A pattern-matched Twitter analysis of US cancer-patient sentiments.

BACKGROUND: Twitter has been recognized as an important source of organic sentiment and opinion. This study aimed to (1) characterize the content of tweets authored by the United States cancer patients; and (2) use patient tweets to compute the average happiness of cancer patients for each cancer diagnosis. METHODS: A large sample of English tweets from March 2014 through December 2014 was obtained from Twitter. Using regular expression software pattern matching, the tweets were filtered by cancer diagnosis. For each cancer-specific tweetset, individual patients were extracted, and the content of the tweet was categorized. The patients' Twitter identification numbers were used to gather all tweets for each patient, and happiness values for patient tweets were calculated using a quantitative hedonometric analysis. RESULTS: The most frequently tweeted cancers were breast (n = 15,421, 11% of total cancer tweets), lung (n = 2928, 2.0%), prostate (n = 1036, 0.7%), and colorectal (n = 773, 0.5%). Patient tweets pertained to the treatment course (n = 73, 26%), diagnosis (n = 65, 23%), and then surgery and/or biopsy (n = 42, 15%). Computed happiness values for each cancer diagnosis revealed higher average happiness values for thyroid (h_avg = 6.1625), breast (h_avg = 6.1485), and lymphoma (h_avg = 6.0977) cancers and lower average happiness values for pancreatic (h_avg = 5.8766), lung (h_avg = 5.8733), and kidney (h_avg = 5.8464) cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that patients are expressing themselves openly on social media about their illness and that unique cancer diagnoses are correlated with varying degrees of happiness. Twitter can be employed as a tool to identify patient needs and as a means to gauge the cancer patient experience.

Surgery clerkship orientation: evaluating temporal changes in student orientation needs.

BACKGROUND: Surgery clerkship students at our institution receive a standardized orientation covering objectives, requirements, grading, and expectations. Limited data exist regarding the student perceptions of this approach. METHODS: Surveys were provided to students to rate the importance of orientation topics and their satisfaction with topic conclusion. Scores between student groupings over the clerkship year were analyzed with Student t tests and analysis of variance with Scheffe adjustments. RESULTS: Significant differences in the mean importance rating between topics exists (P < .0001) as well as among satisfaction scores for topics (P < .0005). Early clerkship students value course expectations higher than later students (P = .03). Early clerkship students want more time devoted to hospital tours and expectations compared with later students (31% vs 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Orientation needs for students change over the clerkship year. Beginning students prefer basic direction for time spent on the ward. Later students prefer information regarding shelf preparation. Surgery course directors can adapt the orientation based on the experience of clerkship students.

Laparoscopic Colectomy and the General Surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has a shorter length of stay and less analgesic requirements than its open counterpart. Studies have suggested a learning curve of 30 cases. It is uncertain whether surgeons in rural settings have the case volume to acquire and maintain the necessary skill set. The aim of this study was to analyze the volume of colon resections performed by surgeons in rural practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the laparoscopic and open partial colectomy case volumes of rural general surgeons seeking American Board of Surgery recertification in 2012. Results were stratified by large and small rural area. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven surgeons were classified as practicing in a rural setting (large rural-150, small rural-47). The median open partial colectomy frequency for large rural surgeons was 7 cases and 4 for small rural surgeons. Median annual partial laparoscopic colectomy volume was 1.0 for large rural surgeons and 0.0 for small rural surgeons. Approximately half of surgeons in both groups did not perform a laparoscopic partial colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Industry and financial pressures to promote laparoscopic colectomy may not promote optimal patient outcomes in rural settings, as safety concerns may outweigh the modest benefits of the procedure. Although referral to remote high-volume centers could be advocated, the need for rural general surgeons to perform urgent colectomy for acute indications and the desire of many patients to have care close to home must also be considered.

A resident preceptor model improves the clerkship experience on general surgery.

BACKGROUND: The frenetic pace of inpatient care on surgical services can create barriers to resident teaching of students. Students are often concerned that busy surgical residents will not be able to adequately evaluate their performance at the end of a clerkship. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of a resident preceptor would increase the satisfaction of students rotating through the general surgery portion of the required third-year surgery clerkship. STUDY DESIGN: Before implementing a resident preceptor model, third-year students rotating on general surgery were administered a 24-item web-based survey regarding their experience on the general surgery portion of the surgery clerkship. General surgery residents were similarly surveyed. A resident preceptor model was then introduced. Subsequent students and residents were surveyed. Presurveys and postsurveys were compared and mean responses analyzed. RESULTS: The addition of a resident preceptor made students more comfortable with asking residents questions (p = 0.02), increased the time students felt was available for developing relationships with residents (p = 0.03), and improved the feeling that residents would be able to accurately evaluate the student's effectiveness as a team member (p = 0.05). The students felt resident teaching on afternoon rounds was increased with the resident preceptor model (p = 0.05). Residents reported spending more time teaching students on morning rounds (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a resident preceptor model resulted in significant improvement in medical students' perceptions of resident teaching effectiveness and ability to accurately evaluate a student's performance.

Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival.

BACKGROUND: Survival in colon cancer is greater in those patients who have more lymph nodes identified at resection and may be due to stage migration, confounding by treatment, social, or clinical characteristics. Identifying factor(s) responsible for the effect may represent an opportunity to improve quality of care for patients with colon cancer by increasing node counts in specimens. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards models were created to analyze survival of 11,399 patients with stage I-III colon cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. The primary predictor variable was the number of lymph nodes identified. The models allowed adjustment for patient factors, use of chemotherapy, surgical specialty, and the average number of nodes identified by surgeon and hospital pathologist. RESULTS: The number of nodes identified was related to survival. Compared to those with less than 7 nodes, patients with 7 to 11 nodes had a 13% lesser risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.99; P = .037). Patients with more than 12 nodes had a 17% lesser risk (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; P = .005). Adjusting for selected patient demographic characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy, surgical specialty, and the average number of nodes identified per specimen by the surgeon or hospital did not significantly alter the relationship between number of nodes and survival. CONCLUSION: These findings argue against understaging or confounding as the explanation for the inferior survival observed in patients with fewer nodes identified. National initiatives to increase the number of nodes identified in colon cancer specimens may not improve substantially the cancer-specific outcomes.

The high yield of 1-year colonoscopy after resection: is it the handoff?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy 1 year after colorectal cancer (CRC) resection based on whether the index colonoscopy was performed by the operating surgeon. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer by two colon and rectal surgeons at a university hospital from 1991 to 2005 were identified from the tumor registry. Those patients with a complete preoperative colonoscopy by any physician and a 1-year follow-up examination by the operating surgeon were selected for the study population. Family history of colorectal cancer, tumor location, endoscopist, presence of synchronous neoplasms, and findings of 1-year colonoscopy were recorded. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the probability of finding any adenoma, advanced adenoma, or invasive cancer based on the index endoscopist. RESULTS: Of the 719 patients who underwent resection during the study period, 432 met the inclusion criteria. The index colonoscopy for 117 of these patients (27.1%) was performed by one of the two surgeons. Overall, 10 patients (2.3%) had a "new" cancer diagnosed at 1 year, and 1 patient (0.2%) had a local recurrence. Patients whose index colonoscopy was performed by their operating surgeon appeared less likely to have an advanced lesion found at 1 year (5.1% vs 11.4%; p = 0.06). The index colonoscopy for 9 of the 10 of cancers found at 1 year was not performed by the operating surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy 1 year after CRC resection is clearly justified. An index colonoscopy by the operating surgeon eliminates a "handoff" and may diminish the incidence of high-risk lesions at 1 year.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses.

PURPOSE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, developed by Buess in the 1980s, has become increasingly popular in recent years. No large studies have compared the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery with traditional transanal excision. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2005, 171 patients underwent traditional transanal excision (n = 89) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 82) for rectal neoplasms. Medical records were reviewed to determine type of surgery, resection margins, specimen fragmentation, complications, recurrence, lesion type, stage, and size. RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to age, sex, lesion type, stage, and size. Mean follow-up was 37 months. There was no difference in the complication rate between the groups (transanal endoscopic microsurgery 15 percent vs. traditional transanal excision 17 percent, P = 0.69). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was more likely to yield clear margins (90 vs. 71 percent, P = 0.001) and a nonfragmented specimen (94 vs. 65 percent, P < 0.001) compared with transanal excision. Recurrence was less frequent after transanal endoscopic microsurgery than after traditional transanal excision (5 vs. 27 percent, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is the technique of choice for local excision of rectal neoplasms.