(En)trust me: Validating an assessment rubric for documenting clinical encounters during a surgery clerkship clinical skills exam.

BACKGROUND: The AAMC developed 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for graduating medical students. EPA 5 is: Document a clinical encounter in the patient record. Our goal was to develop an assessment rubric and gather evidence to support its validity in measuring progress towards entrustability. METHODS: A rubric was developed for EPA 5. During the 2017 surgery clerkship, 57 students wrote a note for each of two standardized patient (SP) encounters. These notes were prospectively collected and assessed by two physician raters. Messick's validity framework was used to gather validity data. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability with two raters was excellent, ICC = 0.86 (ICC 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.90) for overall note score. Correlation between note items and SP checklists ranged 0.39-0.46 (p < 0.05) and between note items and clinical evaluations 0.28-0.39 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is initial reliability evidence supporting the use of our rubric for assessing progress towards entrustability of EPA 5.

Preemptive Analgesia Decreases Pain Following Anorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a frequent cause for delayed discharge following outpatient procedures, including anorectal surgery. Both central and peripheral pain receptor sensitization are thought to contribute to postoperative pain. Blocking these receptors and preempting sensitization prevents hyperalgesia leading to lower pain medication requirements. Studies in the orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic literature support this practice, but the use of preemptive analgesia in anorectal surgery is understudied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in decreasing postoperative pain. DESIGN: This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: This study was conducted at the University of Vermont Medical Center, a tertiary care referral center in Burlington, Vermont. PATIENTS: Patients who were over 18 years of age, ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, or III, and undergoing surgery for anal fissure, fistula or condyloma or hemorrhoids were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin followed by intravenous ketamine and dexamethasone were given before incision compared with oral placebos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were postoperative pain scores, percentage of patients utilizing breakthrough narcotics, and rates of side effects. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled. Because of patient withdrawal, screen failures, and loss to follow-up, 61 patients were analyzed (30 in the preemptive analgesia group and 31 in the control group). Patients in the active group had significantly less pain in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Significantly fewer participants in the active group used narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Average pain scores were excellent for both groups. There was no difference in the number of medication-related side effects between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small sample size and excellent pain control in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive analgesia is safe and results in decreased pain in the early postoperative period following anorectal surgery. It should be implemented by surgeons performing these procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A588.

Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing and Use after Common Surgical Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The number of deaths from prescription opioids in the US continues to increase and remains a major public health concern. Opioid-related deaths parallel prescribing trends, and postoperative opioids are a significant source of opioids in the community. Our objective was to identify opioid prescribing and use patterns after surgery to inform evidence-based practices. STUDY DESIGN: Data from a 340-bed academic medical institution and its affiliated outpatient surgical facility included retrospective medical record data and prospective telephone questionnaire and medical record data. Retrospective data included patients discharged after 1 of 19 procedure types, from July 2015 to June 2016 (n = 10,112). Prospective data included a consecutive sample of general and orthopaedic surgery and urology patients undergoing 1 of 13 procedures, from July 2016 to February 2017 (n = 539). Primary outcomes were the quantity of opioid prescribed and used in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the proportion of patients receiving instructions on disposal and nonopioid strategies. RESULTS: In the retrospective dataset, 76% of patients received an opioid after surgery, and 87% of prescriptions were prescribed by residents or advanced practice providers. Median prescription size ranged from 0 to 503 MME, with wide interquartile ranges (IQR) for most procedures. In the prospective dataset, there were 359 participants (67% participation rate). Of these, 92% of patients received an opioid and the median proportion used was 27%, or 24 MME (IQR 0 to 96). Only 18% of patients received disposal instructions, while 84% of all patients received instructions on nonopioid strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Median opioid use after surgery was 27% of the total prescribed, and only 18% of patients reported receiving disposal instructions. Significant variability in opioid prescribing and use after surgery warrants investigation into contributing factors.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: There is debate regarding the appropriate use of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed our single-center experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer. DESIGN: Medical charts of patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery were reviewed to determine lesion characteristics, as well as operative and treatment characteristics. Complications and recurrences were recorded. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients with early stage cancer (T1 or T2, N0, and M0) of the rectum were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local and overall recurrence and disease-specific survival were measured. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 4.6 years. Negative margins were obtained in 98.9%. Length of stay was 1 day for 95.4% of patients. The complication rate was 10.9% (n = 10), including urinary retention at 4.3% (n = 4) and postoperative bleeding at 4.3% (n = 4). Preoperative staging included 54 at T1 (58.7%) and 38 at T2 (41.3%). Adjuvant therapy was recommended for all of the T2 and select T1 lesions with adverse features on histology. The final pathologic stages of tumors were ypT0 at 8.7% (n = 8), pT1 at 58.7% (n = 54), pT2 at 23.9% (n = 22), and ypT2 at 8.7% (n = 8). The 3-year local recurrence risk was 2.4% (SE = 1.7), and overall recurrence was 6.7% (SE = 2.9). There were no recurrences among patients with complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. Mean time to recurrence was 2.5 years (SD = 1.43). A total of 89.2% of patients with very low tumors underwent curative resection without a permanent stoma (33/37). The 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 98.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-99.8%), and overall survival rate was 89.4% (95% CI, 79.9%-94.6%). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its single-center retrospective experience. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery provides comparable oncologic outcomes to radical resection in properly selected patients with early rectal cancer. Sphincter preservation rates approach 90% even in patients with very distal rectal cancer.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses.

PURPOSE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, developed by Buess in the 1980s, has become increasingly popular in recent years. No large studies have compared the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery with traditional transanal excision. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2005, 171 patients underwent traditional transanal excision (n = 89) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 82) for rectal neoplasms. Medical records were reviewed to determine type of surgery, resection margins, specimen fragmentation, complications, recurrence, lesion type, stage, and size. RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to age, sex, lesion type, stage, and size. Mean follow-up was 37 months. There was no difference in the complication rate between the groups (transanal endoscopic microsurgery 15 percent vs. traditional transanal excision 17 percent, P = 0.69). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was more likely to yield clear margins (90 vs. 71 percent, P = 0.001) and a nonfragmented specimen (94 vs. 65 percent, P < 0.001) compared with transanal excision. Recurrence was less frequent after transanal endoscopic microsurgery than after traditional transanal excision (5 vs. 27 percent, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is the technique of choice for local excision of rectal neoplasms.