Long-Term Follow-Up of Anti-Infliximab Antibodies in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Marker of Drug Survival and Tapering.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anti-infliximab (IFX) antibodies on three different points of care: response/tolerance to IFX, tapering strategy, and in a subsequent treatment with a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHODS: A prospective cohort of 60 patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis who received IFX were evaluated retrospectively regarding clinical/laboratorial data, IFX levels, and anti-IFX antibodies at baseline, after 6, 12 to 14, 22 to 24, 48 to 54, 96 to 102 weeks, and before tapering or switching. RESULTS: Anti-IFX antibodies were detected in 27 patients (45%), of whom 23 (85.1%) became positive in the first year of IFX treatment. In comparison to the group that was negative for anti-IFX antibodies, patients who were positive for anti-IFX antibodies demonstrated the following: less use of methotrexate as a concomitant treatment to IFX (5 [18.5%] vs 14 [42.4%]; P = 0.048), more infusion reactions at 22 to 24 weeks (P = 0.020) and 48 to 54 weeks (P = 0.034), more treatment failures (P = 0.028) at 48 to 54 weeks, reduced overall IFX survival (P < 0.001), and lower sustained responses (P = 0.044). Of note, patients who were positive for anti-IFX antibodies exhibited a shorter tapering survival (9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-15.8] vs 63.4 months [95% CI 27.9-98.8]; P = 0.004) in comparison with patients who were negative for anti-IFX antibodies. Conversely, for patients who failed IFX, patients who were positive for anti-IFX antibodies had better clinical response to the second TNFi at three months (15 [83.3%] vs 3 [27.3%]; P = 0.005) and six months (15 [83.3%] vs 4 [36.4%]; P = 0.017) than the patients who were negative for anti-IFX antibodies after switching. CONCLUSION: This study provided novel data that anti-IFX antibodies is a parameter for reduced tapering survival, reinforcing its detection to guide clinical decision. Additionally, we confirmed in a long-term cohort the anti-IFX antibody association with worse IFX performance and as predictor of the second TNFi good clinical response.

Periodontitis Response to Anti-TNF Therapy in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been demonstrated that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher risk of periodontitis; however, the effect of anti-TNF therapy in periodontal status of patients with AS and particularly in dental attachment is not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinally the local periodontal effect of TNF-antagonist in AS and compare to patients with RA. METHODS: Fifteen patients with AS and 15 RA control patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and after 6 months (6 M) of anti-TNF therapy. Periodontal assessment included: probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival bleeding index, and plaque index. Rheumatologic clinical and laboratory evaluations were the following: Bath AS Disease Activity Index, Bath AS Metrology Index, Bath AS Functional Index, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for AS and Disease Activity Score 28 joints, and C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate for patients with RA. RESULTS: At baseline, periodontal parameters were alike in AS and RA (P > 0.05). After 6 M of anti-TNF therapy, clinical and laboratory parameters of rheumatic diseases decreased significantly in the patients with AS and RA (P < 0.05). A significant improvement in periodontal attachment measurements were observed in the patients with AS (PPD, 2.18 vs 1.94 mm; P = 0.02; CAL, 2.29 vs.2.02 mm; P = 0.03), but not in RA (PPD, 1.92 vs 2.06 mm; P = 0.06; CAL, 2.14 vs 2.28 mm; P = 0.27). Oral hygiene and gingival inflammation remained unchanged from baseline to 6-M evaluation in AS and RA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with AS under anti-TNF improved periodontal attachment. The mechanism for this effect needs further studies.