Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart ; 107(21): 1717-1724, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34290038

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sex-dependent differences of infective endocarditis (IE) have been reported. Women suffer from IE less frequently than men and tend to present more severe manifestations. Our objective was to analyse the sex-based differences of IE in the clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed the sex differences in the clinical presentation, modality of treatment and prognosis of IE in a national-level multicentric cohort between 2008 and 2018. All data were prospectively recorded by the GAMES cohort (Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis). RESULTS: A total of 3451 patients were included, of whom 1105 were women (32.0%). Women were older than men (mean age, 68.4 vs 64.5). The most frequently affected valves were the aortic valve in men (50.6%) and mitral valve in women (48.7%). Staphylococcus aureus aetiology was more frequent in women (30.1% vs 23.1%; p<0.001).Surgery was performed in 38.3% of women and 50% of men. After propensity score (PS) matching for age and estimated surgical risk (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II)), the analysis of the matched cohorts revealed that women were less likely to undergo surgery (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.91; p=0.05).The observed overall in-hospital mortality was 32.8% in women and 25.7% in men (OR for the mortality of female sex 1.41; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.65; p<0.001). This statistical difference was not modified after adjusting for all possible confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex was an independent factor related to mortality after adjusting for confounders. In addition, women were less frequently referred for surgical treatment.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Morbidade/tendências , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
2.
Eur J Intern Med ; 87: 59-65, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33685806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplantation (SOT) implies immunosuppression and frequent health care contact. Our aim was to compare the characteristics of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and SOT against those without SOT. METHODS: We used data from the Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis during the period 2008-2018. RESULTS: We identified 4794 cases of IE, 85 (1.8%) in SOT (56 kidney, 18 liver, 8 heart, 3 lung). Thirteen patients with other transplantation types (bone marrow, hematopoietic precursors, and cornea) were excluded from the analysis. Compared with patients without SOT, patients with SOT had lower median age (61 vs. 69 years, p<0.001), more comorbidities (mean age-adjusted Charlson index 5.7±2.9 vs. 4.9±2.9, p=0.004), a lower prevalence of native valvular heart disease (29.4 vs. 45.4%, p=0.003), more in-hospital and healthcare-related IE (70.5% vs. 36.3%, p<0.001) and staphylococcal etiology (57.7% vs. 39.7%, p=0.001). Patients with SOT had more frequent kidney function worsening (47.1% vs. 34.6%, p=0.02), septic shock (25.9% vs. 12.1 %, p<0.001), sepsis (27.1% vs. 17.2%, p=0.02), and less surgery indication (54.1% vs 66.3%, p=0.02) and surgery (32.9% vs. 46.3%, p=0.01) than patients without SOT. There were no significant differences in mortality: inhospital (30.6% SOT vs. 25.6% without SOT, p=0.31), 1-year (38.8% SOT vs. 31.9% without SOT, p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Most IE in SOT recipients are nosocomial and over 70% are health care-related. Half have previously normal heart valves and almost 60% are due to Staphylococcus spp. infections. Mortality seems to be similar to non-SOT counterparts.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Transplante de Órgãos , Sepse , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Humanos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia
4.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 32(6): 386-95, 2014.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950613

RESUMO

Bacterial infections are the most common infections in solid organ transplant recipients. These infections occur mainly in the first month after transplantation and are hospital-acquired. Nosocomial infections cause significant morbidity and are the most common cause of mortality in this early period of transplantation. These infections are caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms, mainly Gram-negative enterobacteria, non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, and staphylococci. The patients at risk of developing nosocomial bacterial infections are those previously colonized with MDR bacteria while on the transplant waiting list. Intravascular catheters, the urinary tract, the lungs, and surgical wounds are the most frequent sources of infection. Preventive measures are the same as those applied in non-immunocompromised, hospitalized patients except in patients at high risk for developing fungal infection. These patients need antifungal therapy during their hospitalization, and for preventing some bacterial infections in the early transplant period, patients need vaccinations on the waiting list according to the current recommendations. Although morbidity and mortality related to infectious diseases have decreased during the last few years in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, they are still one of the most important complications in this population. Furthermore, as occurs in the general population, the incidence of nosocomial infections has increased during the different phases of transplantation. It is difficult to establish general preventive measures in these patients, as there are many risk factors conditioning these infections. Firstly, they undergo multiple antibiotic treatments and interventions; secondly, there is a wide variability in the degree of neutropenia and immunosuppression among patients, and finally they combine hospital and home stay during the transplant process. However, some simple measures could be implemented to improve the current situation.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Órgãos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle
5.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 25(3): 91-101, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21530219

RESUMO

The substantial immigration into Spain from endemic areas of Chagas disease such as Latin America has increased the number of potential donors of organs and tissues. In addition, an increasing number of patients with advanced Chagas heart disease may eventually be eligible to receive a heart transplant, a universally accepted therapeutic strategy for the advanced stages of this disease. Therefore, it is necessary to establish protocols for disease management. This document is intended to establish the guidelines to be followed when a potential donor or a tissue or organ recipient is potentially affected by Chagas disease and summarizes the action criteria against the possibility of Chagas disease transmission through the donation of organs, tissues, or hematopoietic stem cells and aims to help professionals working in this field. A single registry of transplants in Trypanosoma cruzi infected donors and/or recipients will provide and disseminate experience in this area, which has shown a low recorded incidence to date.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas/cirurgia , Doença de Chagas/transmissão , Transplante de Coração , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doadores de Tecidos , Doença de Chagas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Sistema de Registros
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA